Chapter XVII.

But it will be said that the objection which has been brought against us has not yet been solved, and that what unbelievers have urged has been rather strengthened by all we have said. For if, as our argument has shown, there is such power in Him that both the destruction of death and the introduction of life resides in Him, why does He not effect His purpose by the mere exercise of His will, instead of working out our salvation in such a roundabout way, by being born and nurtured as a man, and even, while he was saving man, tasting death; when it was possible for Him to have saved man without subjecting Himself to such conditions? Now to this, with all candid persons, it were sufficient to reply, that the sick do not dictate to their physicians the measures for their recovery, nor cavil with those who do them good as to the method of their healing; why, for instance, the medical man felt the diseased part and devised this or that particular remedy for the removal of the complaint, when they expected another; but the patient looks to the end and aim of the good work, and receives the benefit with gratitude. Seeing, however, as says the Prophet51    the Prophet, i.e. David; Ps. xxxi. 19: ὡς πολὺ τὸ πλῆθος τῆς χρηστότητός σου, κ.τ.λ. Hervetus translates Gregory here “divitiæ benignitatis,” as if he had found πλοῦτος in the text, which does not appear. Jerome twice translates the χρηστότης of LXX. by “bonitas”; Aquila and Symmachus have τί πολὺ τὸ ἀγαθόν σου. This is the later sense of χρηστότης, which originally meant “serviceableness” and then “uprightness” (Psalm xiii. 2, 4; xxxvi. 3; cxix. 66), rather than “kindness.”, that God’s abounding goodness keeps its utility concealed, and is not seen in complete clearness in this present life—otherwise, if the eyes could behold all that is hoped for, every objection of unbelievers would be removed,—but, as it is, abides the ages that are coming, when what is at present seen only by the eye of faith must be revealed, it is needful accordingly that, as far as we may, we should by the aid of arguments, the best within our reach, attempt to discover for these difficulties also a solution in harmony with what has gone before.

[17] Ἀλλ' οὔπω φήσει τις λελύσθαι τὴν ὑπενεχθεῖσαν ἡμῖν ἀντίθεσιν, ἰσχυροποιεῖσθαι δὲ μᾶλλον ἐκ τῶν εἰρημένων τὸ παρὰ τῶν ἀπίστων ἡμῖν προφερόμενον. εἰ γὰρ τοσαύτη δύναμίς ἐστιν ἐν αὐτῷ, ὅσην ὁ λόγος ἐπέδειξεν, ὡς θανάτου τε καθαίρεσιν καὶ ζωῆς εἴσοδον ἐπ' αὐτῷ εἶναι, τί οὐχὶ θελήματι μόνῳ τὸ κατὰ γνώμην ποιεῖ, ἀλλ' ἐκ περιόδου τὴν σωτηρίαν ἡμῶν κατεργάζεται, τικτόμενός τε καὶ τρεφόμενος, καὶ τῇ τοῦ θανάτου πείρᾳ σώζων τὸν ἄνθρωπον, ἐξὸν μήτε ἐν τούτοις γενέσθαι καὶ ἡμᾶς περισώσασθαι; πρὸς δὲ τὸν τοιοῦτον λόγον ἱκανὸν μὲν ἦν πρὸς τοὺς εὐγνώμονας τοσοῦτον εἰπεῖν, ὅτι καὶ τοῖς ἰατροῖς οὐ νομοθετοῦσι τὸν τρόπον τῆς ἐπιμελείας οἱ κάμνοντες, οὐδὲ περὶ τοῦ τῆς θεραπείας εἴδους πρὸς τοὺς εὐεργέτας ἀμφισβητοῦσι, διὰ τί προσήψατο τοῦ πονοῦντος μέρους ὁ θεραπεύων καὶ τόδε τι πρὸς τὴν τοῦ κακοῦ λύσιν ἐπενόησεν, ἕτερον δέον, ἀλλὰ πρὸς τὸ πέρας ὁρῶντες τῆς εὐεργεσίας ἐν εὐχαριστίᾳ τὴν εὐποιίαν ἐδέξαντο. ἀλλ' ἐπειδή, καθώς φησιν ἡ προφητεία, τὸ πλῆθος τῆς χρηστότητος τοῦ θεοῦ κεκρυμμένην ἔχει τὴν ὠφέλειαν καὶ οὔπω διὰ τοῦ παρόντος βίου τηλαυγῶς καθορᾶται: ἦ γὰρ ἂν περιῄρητο πᾶσα τῶν ἀπίστων ἀντίρρησις, εἰ τὸ προσδοκώμενον ἐν ὀφθαλμοῖς ἦν: νυνὶ δὲ ἀναμένει τοὺς ἐπερχομένους αἰῶνας, ὥστε ἐν αὐτοῖς ἀποκαλυφθῆναι τὰ νῦν διὰ τῆς πίστεως μόνης ὁρώμενα: ἀναγκαῖον ἂν εἴη λογισμοῖς τισὶ κατὰ τὸ ἐγχωροῦν καὶ τῶν ἐπιζητουμένων ἐξευρεῖν τὴν λύσιν τοῖς προλαβοῦσι συμβαίνουσαν.