Opuscula psychologica, theologica, daemonologica

 After the judgment of the thoughts, an exact discernment of how the thoughts happen to be, whether they are good or otherwise but imagination is the

 to divide for us, by the established terms, the sesquitertian ratios into both the sesquioctave ratios and the leimmata, we would have stopped at thes

 having split it, he bent each one into a circle, bringing them together middle to middle with each other like a chi, having joined 7 them both to them

 left, or rather the one is an image of mind, the other of soul. And in the soul itself, the right is that which is turned toward the intelligible thin

 regarding the explanation of the Platonic psychogony, this we now discharge for you as a kind of debt. For Plato's statement that the division of thes

 and of exegesis. And there is a letter of mine placed among my books that has traced out and carefully examined the meaning in the sayings. But it is

 a ruler drives a team of two then of the 14 horses, one of them is noble and good and of such stock, but the other is from opposite stock and is oppo

 a body from one of the seeing things, such that it is able to be extended as far as the stars. But it was better, he says, than to say that the extern

 through which it is not swept into material disorder, but is joined to the divine light, holds it in its own place and makes it unmixed with matter, l

 of knowledge. For there is something intelligible, which you must understand with the flower of the intellect. And he says that the one in us is twofo

 agrees, but among them the salty is more than the drinkable. They say, for example, that every soul is either divine or changing from intellect to min

 to be deemed worthy of pardon in repenting. If the soul is a body according to some of the ancients, what is it that contains it? every body is three-

 distinction. Two kinds of air according to Aristotle, the vaporous from the exhalation of water and the smoky from the extinguishing of fire. The latt

 Plato. Pleasure is not a coming-to-be for coming-to-be is of things that are not, while pleasure is of things that are. And coming-to-be is swift and

 is natural, while habit is acquired and taught. Providence is the care for existing things that comes from God. Epicurus says: the blessed and incorr

 but such powers are simply and imperceptibly desired. What then? Do we have three souls? Solution: just as the soul, when united to the body, seems to

 When this is dimmed they also are dimmed the soul flourishes when this 34 withers. Further, everything desires to preserve its own substrate. If the

 actuality, as physicians, others in relation to something, others a double or one-and-a-half ratio. Potentiality is found in substance, as a man in th

 concerning form, matter and cause, for example the matter of the celestial bodies is not the four elements, but a certain fifth, spherical one, as be

 as knowledge (for knowledge is a transition from defined things to defined things for this reason it is also knowledge, as leading the mind to a stat

 this, for indeed the flesh also moves downwards and is none of the elements. Aporia: but matter, that is the element, is not soul, but the form that c

 definitions have as their beginning the most general things, as their end the most specific things. If, then, these are finite, so are the definitions

 and it acts according to one part and another. It seems to act in these ways as being one. For if it is divided, it is necessary for the parts to be e

 the rest, but this is about hot and soft, heavy and light, rare and dense, and many opposites. In humans, the cause of local motion is intellect, in i

 is nourished {which} is twofold: either as Matter or as an instrument. And the instrument is twofold: either moving and being moved, like the innate h

 is equal in distance to the zodiac signs. Light is not a body. for if it were a body, how would it be possible for it to have instantaneous movement,

 we see the introduction of the forms of things seen entering the sight, but how do we see the interval of the air in between? Solution: It is not that

 with a violent collision. In soft things no sound is produced, because the air is broken up in their pores and dispersed as in sponges. In things that

 a buzzing which is conveyed back to the sense of hearing. Others say that the sound occurring in the ears after the blockage is of the external air th

 For instance, fish, not having this, are cooled through their gills. Those that have a windpipe also have a lung. Fish have neither these nor a heart.

 the sense organs of touch, it is clear for every sense organ is both separated and known. Aristotle speaks of the senses both as one each and as many

 Aristotle in On the Soul : if sensation ceased, the sense-organ would also cease. But if the second is not, neither is the first. Sensation and sense-

 Some add also a sixth, the attentive [faculty], as when a man says, I perceived, I thought, I opined. To this part they also add the activities of t

 We can say ten, but not indeed opine it, so that opinion is not up to us. But neither do we imagine what we wish for we see at night what we do not w

 in the case of children, the one according to state, and the one in act, as the one governing all things or the one entering from without. Plato says

 theoretical versus the practical. The theoretical corresponds to a vision discerning of forms, while the practical corresponds to a vision not only kn

 organs. Moreover, at night the nutritive faculty is more active, but the locomotive faculty is not at all. A difficulty: the vegetative faculty produc

 simpler, or rather the things inherent in the matter, into which the matter is also divided, which are also prop[erly] called its elements. I say then

 he hints that it is not completed from both of the things mixed, but is produced in the union of the soul and the body, not by the soul itself giving

 closing the senses, so as to know unknowingly the transcendent substance of that which is. For according to their own opinions, the philosopher who ha

 he himself will also pardon his own student for the apparent 78 opposition to him and others will come here again to bear witness for us, the philoso

 it grows and is naturally constituted to decay, must in every way grow along with and decay along with the other in a connate manner for that by whic

 a demonstration, so also the soul in an infant's body and a more imperfect one, if it were in another, perfect body, would immediately have shown its

 I shall use the argument. In what do you say virtue is inherent? or again, is it superimposed on the formless and incorporeal and uncompounded nature,

 Porphyry has philosophized in harmony with this. For in discussing the soul, he says: “Just as insomniacs, by the very act of wanting to sleep and wat

 have they cast off? Perhaps those who hold the contrary opinion will vex us with these things. But their objection is like a spider's web, which will

 to have received watchwords from the first father, nor that they possess the fullness of many bosoms, nor would I accept that they stand before the bo

 both the Sibylline and the Orphic ones, and those according to which the Berytian Bulls came to be and Amous the Egyptian, and Socrates and Plato (for

 of the bonds by which they were bound, and after this, turning their minds upward, they will approach God. And if the account told about the Sibyl wer

 has the front part? What then do you think? a mind scattered in so great a size is from this cause for him both slack and weak, and the soul is simply

 would remember any of the things here. But as many of the souls as were allotted to more humble portions and their whole mind has not been snatched aw

 Let us not altogether reject the analogy of the eye in the case of the soul, let it be and be called a more precise substance of the soul but if some

 The manner of the entry of souls, and likewise of their release or separation from hence, both are most difficult or hard to explain for of the first

 but by such powers the soul is led like some kind of thing moved by another, being drawn towards whatever the leaders happen to lead it, but then rath

 For that which is according to reason, knowledge is readily at hand, but that which is contrary to reason, is so because it has received such a nature

 of beasts, but perhaps the matter which reason has shown not to exist. Therefore our bodies will be resurrected, and there will be nothing to prevent

 fitting and gluing it to that by means of a suitable analogy, not placing the rational and intellectual substance into any of the animals for this is

 are generated from these powers alone, for this reason, having abandoned the others, they divided the substance of the soul into these alone. But if y

 it is in fourths, when one might contemplate these both in the third order of the intellectual virtues and in the fourth of the paradigmatic virtues,

 and so interpreting the Platonic opinion, but they do not seem to me to have grasped the precise meaning of his doctrine. But if I shall clarify for y

 and with nothing separating them, it is necessary for the one to be ordered, and the other to order and the one which is ordered has its form divided

 what is hard and resistant in them has been smoothed out by me. But what follows from this must be attributed to them alone for, proposing to speak a

 proceeds from it and returns to it.” Then indeed he works out the point by division. For if it only remained, it would in no way differ from its cause

 in our sacred writings, neither a whole soul nor any whole nature, apart from the partial ones, has been dogmatically established1. I for my part reje

 by the energy, then also the substance is perfected according to it, and these things stand in each other according to one energy. For he who does not

 having a life activated according to intellect and reason the psychic is defined according to reason 124 and takes care of divisible souls the physi

 tormenting them. But there are, they say, both on earth divine daimons and in the air, guardians of the animals there, and <in> the water, extending t

 make it superior to the confusion of life, but, if possible, may you not even leave behind in the terrestrial world the very body which you have put o

 cast under your mind: for there is no plant of truth on earth» that is: do not busy your mind with the great measures of the earth, as the geographer

 Gregory by reason and contemplation leads the soul up to the more divine things by reason that is according to us, the more intellectual and better,

 such a lion-bearing fount of heaven and the stars, but the ruling part of its own existence conceals the vision of them. Chaldaean Oracle. From all si

 often appearing, they feign the semblance of some goodness towards the one being initiated. Chaldean Oracle. The soul of mortals will draw God into it

 they can. Whence everything they say and show is false and insubstantial for they know existing things through forms but that which knows future thi

 and fear is the holding back of his goodness towards us for the sake of the economy. Chaldean Oracle. The Father snatched himself away, not even enclo

 they are possessed by passions. Therefore, it is necessary for these also to receive their part of the whole judgment and, having been filled up with

 for it is higher than being venerated, than being uttered, and than being conceived. A Chaldean Oracle. The Iynges, being conceived by the Father, the

 an unknown password, spoken and unspoken. And they often bring the soul down 148 into the world for many reasons, either through the shedding of its w

 of truth and of love. After which are the demiurgic fountains, such as that of the ideas, according to which the cosmos and the things in it have shap

 enclosing the triad towards itself and they call these also intelligible. After these, another order of the intelligible and at the same time intelle

 to the setting [sun], and the pit to the one just at mid-heaven. And thus, gently separating the membrane of the liver, [which is placed] upon the org

 parts of philosophy is necessary. For according to moral philosophy it is necessary to assume that not all things are and come to be by necessity, but

 knowledge and sees not only the essences themselves, but also their powers and their activities, both those according to nature and those contrary to

 he acquired. For even before the birth of both, God knew that the one would be good, and the other would turn out bad and this knowledge is an unchan

 from the one who knows, and it revolves around the thing known and is made like the one who knows. I mean something like this: the knowledge of the so

 they fabricate. For I too had a certain little man, ignoble in soul, but by no means the least of storytellers to him, at any rate, such phantoms pre

concerning form, matter and cause, for example "the matter of the celestial bodies is not the four elements, but a certain fifth, spherical one, as being most capacious or on account of the fittingness of such a shape, which has neither beginning nor end; it is moved in a circle in imitation of the intellects above it which incline toward themselves; for intellect, seeing the forms, sees itself and vice versa; and that intellect is everywhere." And these things the natural philosopher [says]; on account of these things, therefore, he will render the definition from matter and form. The particular art, that is, medicine or carpentry, from which natural philosophy differs in that it also assigns causes from more remote principles. For instance, a physician might assign as cause the four humors or the four elements, but the natural philosopher [assigns] both the matter and the form. Dialectic, which will render definitions from the cause, is occupied with these things, just as it also defines anger as a desire for retaliation. Mathematics, which renders the definitions of the forms in themselves by abstraction. First philosophy will discourse on the forms that are 38 entirely separate from matter. How then do the first philosopher and the mathematician differ? The principles of the forms in matter are both in our soul and in the demiurgic intellect. And of those in the soul, some are extended, those in the imagination, while others are without parts and unextended, as those in the rational faculty. The geometer, therefore, will discourse on the extended forms in the imagination; for he uses the imagination as an abacus, operating divisibly and measuring and cutting distances. But the first philosopher will discourse on the forms in the rational faculty and those in the demiurgic [intellect]. Now, those in the rational faculty are images of the first ones, while those in the demiurgic intellect are archetypal and productive. Concerning the former, one has spoken as a purifier of passions and ignorance, but concerning the latter, as a theoretician. The definition from matter and form is that of the natural philosopher, that from form is of the dialectician, that from matter belongs to no one; for no art is concerned with matter alone. Anger is threefold: that which is separate from every earthly, airy body, that in the spirit which is separate only from the earthly, and that which is inseparable from the body, that is, the boiling of the blood around the heart. Some say that a clod of earth does not move downwards according to nature; for the earth occupies the middle region and not the lower, nor fire upwards, because the whole [universe] has a circular motion. Solution: Such motions are not according to nature, but paths to what is according to nature, just as we call healing according to nature, but becoming sick, as it were, contrary to nature, because the one leads to what is according to nature, and the other to what is contrary to nature. The divine, standing unmoved, moves all things, but other things, while moving [others], are themselves moved. Beauty and an image move [things] without being moved. Rhythm, according to the Abderites, is the shape, turning is the disposition, contact is the arrangement. Plato calls the soul self-moving, not on account of locomotion, but on account of motion according to will and thought. There are five genera according to Plato: being, sameness, otherness, motion, rest, not subordinate as in the other philosophers, but as pervading everywhere. For in all things there is being on account of their existence, sameness on account of the one principle, otherness because we are a multitude, motion (not the imperfect kind, but the 39 activity of certain things, of the hot to heat, of the cold to cool), and rest, that which is in beings and in eternal things. For even in the ever-moving, rest is observed, not because the whole comes to a halt, but because this very state of being ever-moving is a kind of rest for it. We know all things either by sameness, as white by the juxtaposition of white (for we know it as similar), or by unlikeness, as white through black (for we know it as other). Aristotle wrote a book *On the Good*, in which he sets down the unwritten doctrines of Plato. The Pythagoreans honored the monad, dyad, triad, and tetrad; the tetrad, because there are four kinds of living things: celestial, aerial, terrestrial, and aquatic; and because in sensible things there are point, line, plane, solid; and because all things are from the four [elements], and because it is generative of the tenth [number]; the monad as being without parts, on account of the intelligible things that are without parts in respect to being and to activity, which is in rest and motionlessness; the dyad

περὶ τοῦ εἴδους, τῆς ὕλης καὶ τῆς αἰτίας, οἷον «τῶν οὐρανίων ὕλη οὐ τὰ τέτταρα στοιχεῖα, ἀλλὰ καὶ πέμπτον τι σφαιρικόν, ὡς πολυχωρητότατον ἢ διὰ τὸ πρεπῶδες τοῦ τοιούτου σχήματος, ὃ μήτε ἀρχὴν ἢ τέλος ἔχει· κύκλῳ κινεῖται κατὰ μίμησιν τῶν ὑπὲρ αὐτὸν νόων οἳ εἰς ἑαυτοὺς συννεύουσι· νοῦς γὰρ τὰ εἴδη ὁρῶν ἑαυτὸν ὁρᾷ καὶ ἀνάπαλιν· καὶ ὅτι ὁ νοῦς πανταχοῦ ἐστί». καὶ ταῦτα ὁ φυσικός· ἀποδώσει οὖν διὰ ταῦτα τὸν ὅρον ἐξ ὕλης καὶ εἴδους. ἡ μερικὴ τέχνη, ἤγουν ἰατρικὴ ἢ τεκτονική, ἧς διαφέρει φυσικὴ ὅτι αὐτὴ καὶ ἐκ τῶν πορρωτέρω αἰτίας ἀποδίδωσι. τυχὸν ἰατρὸς μὲν αἰτιᾶται τοὺς τέτταρας χυμοὺς ἢ τὰ τέτταρα στοιχεῖα, ὁ δὲ φυσικὸς καὶ τὴν ὕλην καὶ τὸ εἶδος. ἡ διαλεκτική, ἣ ἀποδώσει τοὺς ὁρισμοὺς ἐκ τῆς αἰτίας, περὶ ταῦτα καταγίνεται, καθὼς ὁρίζεται καὶ τὸν θυμὸν ὄρεξιν ἀντιλυπήσεως. ἡ μαθηματική, ἥτις ἀποδίδωσι τῶν καθ' αὑτὰ εἰδῶν ἐξ ἀφαιρέσεως τοὺς ὁρισμούς. ἡ πρώτη φιλοσοφία περὶ τῶν πάντῃ 38 χωριστῶν τῆς ὕλης εἰδῶν διαλέξεται. τί οὖν διαφέρει πρῶτος φιλόσοφος καὶ μαθηματικός; οἱ λόγοι τῶν εἰδῶν τῶν ἐν ὕλῃ εἰσὶ καὶ ἐν τῇ ἡμετέρᾳ ψυχῇ καὶ ἐν τῷ νῷ τῷ δημιουργικῷ. καὶ τῶν ἐν τῇ ψυχῇ οἱ μὲν διαστατοί, οἱ ἐν τῇ φαντασίᾳ, οἱ δὲ ἀμερεῖς καὶ ἀδιάστατοι, ὡς οἱ ἐν τῷ λογιστικῷ. ὁ μὲν οὖν γεωμέτρης περὶ τῶν ἐν φαντασίᾳ διαστατῶν εἰδῶν διαλέξεται· ὡς γὰρ ἀβακίῳ κέχρηται τῇ φαντασίᾳ μεριστῶς ἐνεργῶν καὶ διαστήματα ἀναμετρῶν καὶ τέμνων. ὁ δὲ πρῶτος φιλόσοφος περὶ τῶν εἰδῶν τῶν ἐν τῷ λογικῷ καὶ τῶν ἐν τῷ δημιουργικῷ διαλέξεται. οἱ μὲν οὖν ἐν τῷ λογικῷ εἰκόνες τῶν πρώτων, οἱ δὲ ἐν τῷ δημιουργικῷ νῷ ἀρχέτυποι καὶ ποιητικοί. περὶ ἐκείνων δὲ εἶπέν τις ὡς καθαρτικὸς παθῶν καὶ ἀγνοίας, περὶ δὲ τούτων ὡς θεωρητικός. ὁ ἐξ ὕλης καὶ εἴδους ὁρισμὸς τοῦ φυσικοῦ, ὁ ἐξ εἴδους τοῦ διαλεκτικοῦ, ὁ ἐξ ὕλης οὐδεμιᾶς· οὐδεμία γὰρ τέχνη περὶ ὕλην μόνην καταγίνεται. Τριττὸς ὁ θυμός· ὁ χωριστὸς παντὸς σώματος γεώδους ἀερίου, ὁ ἐν τῷ πνεύματι ὁ χωριστὸς μόνον τοῦ γεώδους, καὶ ὁ ἀχώριστος τοῦ σώματος, ἤγουν ἡ ζέσις τοῦ περὶ τὴν καρδίαν αἵματος. Λέγουσί τινες ὅτι οὔτε ἡ βῶλος κάτω κινεῖται κατὰ φύσιν· ἡ γὰρ γῆ τὸ μέσον χώραν ἔχει καὶ οὐ τὴν κάτω, οὔτε τὸ πῦρ τὴν ἄνω, ὅτι τὸ ὅλον τὴν κυκλικήν. λύσις· αἱ τοιαῦται κινήσεις οὐ κατὰ φύσιν, ἀλλ' ὁδοὶ ἐπὶ τὸ κατὰ φύσιν, ὡς λέγομεν τὴν ὑγίανσιν κατὰ φύσιν, παρὰ φύσιν δὲ τὴν οἷον νόσανσιν, ὅτι ἡ μὲν ἐπὶ τὸ κατὰ φύσιν ἄγει, ἡ δὲ ἐπὶ τὸ παρὰ φύσιν. Τὸ θεῖον ἑστὸς ἀκίνητον τὰ πάντα κινεῖ, τὰ δ' ἄλλα κινοῦντα κινοῦνται. τὸ κάλλος καὶ ἡ εἰκὼν κινοῦσι μὴ κινούμενα. Ῥυσμὸς κατὰ Ἀβδηρίτους τὸ σχῆμα, τροπὴ ἡ διάθεσις, διαθιγὴ ἡ τάξις. Αὐτοκίνητον λέγει τὴν ψυχὴν ὁ Πλάτων, οὐ διὰ τὴν κατὰ τόπον κίνησιν, ἀλλὰ τὴν κατὰ βούλησιν καὶ διάνοιαν. Πέντε τὰ γένη κατὰ Πλάτωνα, οὐσία, ταυτότης, ἑτερότης, κίνησις, στάσις, οὐχ ὡς τὰ παρὰ τοῖς φιλοσόφοις ὑπάλληλα, ἀλλ' ὡς πανταχοῦ διήκοντα. ἐν πᾶσι γὰρ οὐσία διὰ τὴν ὕπαρξιν, ταυτότης διὰ τὴν μίαν ἀρχήν, ἑτερότης ὅτι πλῆθός ἐσμεν, κίνησις (ἀλλ' οὐχ ἡ ἀτελής, ἀλλ' ἡ 39 ἐνέργεια τῶνδέ τινων, τοῦ θερμοῦ τὸ θερμαίνειν, ψυχροῦ τὸ ψύχειν), καὶ ἡ στάσις ἡ ἐν τοῖς οὖσι καὶ τοῖς ἀιδίοις. καὶ γὰρ καὶ ἐν τοῖς ἀεικινήτοις θεωρεῖται στάσις, οὐ διὰ τὸ ἵστασθαι τὸ ὅλον, ἀλλὰ καὶ τὸ ἀεικίνητον οἷον στάσιν ἔχει αὐτὸ τοῦτο. γνωρίζομεν πάντα ἢ ταυτότητι ὡς τὸ λευκὸν παραθέσει λευκοῦ (γνωρίζομεν γὰρ ὡς ὅμοιον), ἢ ἀνομοιότητι ὡς τὸ λευκὸν διὰ τοῦ μέλανος (γνωρίζομεν γὰρ ὡς ἕτερον). Ἔγραφε βιβλίον Ἀριστοτέλης περὶ τοῦ ἀγαθοῦ, εἰς ὃ τὰς ἀγράφους τοῦ Πλάτωνος δόξας κατατάττει. ἐτίμων οἱ Πυθαγορικοὶ μονάδα, δυάδα, τριάδα καὶ τετράδα· τὴν μὲν τετράδα ὅτι τέτταρα εἴδη ζῴων, οὐρανίων, ἀερίων, χθονίων, ἐνύδρων, καὶ ὅτι ἐν τοῖς αἰσθητοῖς σημεῖον, γραμμή, ἐπίπεδον, στερεόν, καὶ ὅτι πάντα ἐκ τῶν τεττάρων, καὶ ὅτι γεννητική ἐστι τοῦ δεκάτου· τὴν μονάδα ὡς ἀμερῆ διὰ τὰ νοητὰ τὰ ἀμερῆ κατ' οὐσίαν καὶ ἐνέργειαν τὴν ἐν στάσει καὶ ἀκινησίᾳ· τὴν δυάδα