Whether the will is the subject of virtue.
1. Objections: It would seem that it is:
a. There are virtues in other powers, so
a fortiori, in the will obj. 1, 3, 4, 11.
b. Friendship and charity are virtues in
the will obj. 5 and 6.
c. Happiness, which is the supreme good for
the will, is attained by virtue obj. 2, 7, 8.
d. Sin is in the will, hence its contrary,
virtue, is there also obj. 9 and 10.
2. On the contrary
a. It would seem that there is no virtue in
the will, because the will is rational
neither essentially nor by participation 1.
b. There is no need for virtue in the will
to rectify the lower powers, since these
powers have their own virtue 2.
3. Body
a. The will needs no virtue to order it to the good which is proportionate to it, because the object of the will, by its very nature as a power, is the good.
b. However, the will does need virtue to tend to a good which exceeds
(1) the good of the human species: this good is supernatural, to which the will is elevated by the virtues of faith, hope, charity, etc.
(2) the good of an individual: i.e., another's good, which man seeks by the virtues of liberality, justice, etc.
c. That certain virtues, e.g., justice and charity, although in the appetitive part, are not in the lower appetites, is clear from the fact that they act without passion.