Epimerismi in Psalmos

 it comes from the lessons being imprinted like wax, or from it being mixed from cold and hot, or from receiving the blow at the right time, or from *k

 in the case of theotokos theētokos, elaphobolos elaphēbolos. MAKARIOS, of what type of those falling under the category of noun? Adjective. Define.An

 to a master in skill, as a student to a teacher in choice, as a friend to a friend. But if it signifies one having the age of a man, of which kind o

 numbers, cases. Of what gender is ο῾`ς (hos)? Masculine. Of what number? Singular. Of what case? Nominative and upright of the singulars. What is it

 with nouns, and they begin with them, then verbs are derived from nouns, for example horse, I ride a horse, chariot, I drive a chariot apart from tho

 How are the prepositions divided? Into two into monosyllables and into disyllables. What is the reciprocal relationship between the monosyllables and

 it means two things: the preposition, as in not somehow now from an oak nor from a rock, and in place of from afar, as in for the washing-places

 zaea for those from the verb α᾿´ω are oxytone, for example α᾿κραής and 18 all those in ΗΣ that have ΖΑ ζαμενὴς, ζαχρειής. It has been noted that αυ

 We are accustomed to use when in doubt and they are these: ara, kâta, môn. Syllogistic are those which are well-suited for the inferences and summari

 the future has the Η or the Ε. And it ought to have the Ε and not the Η but whenever the present of the first conjugation of the perispomena verbs, e

 STE E, why? Of those in -MI, the first and the second conjugation end in E, the 3rd in O, and the 4th in a lengthened doubtful vowel. And why do the f

 are found, I do not understand, I free, I give Therefore, the verbs in -MI are not Aeolic from the breathing, because the Aeolians are psilotic but

 double. Is it a primary word or a derivative? and from where is it derived? From the preposition *kata* and the verb *hizō*. And are compound words fi

 is oxytone, except for *etoi* but following, it is barytone. The disjunctive conjunction *e*, being unaspirated and superfluous. How many things does

 What? The written law, which God gave to Moses and the coin .... indeed among the Egyptians the land and the law of grace, which is the gospel it

 the passive perfect is ispsyllabic with the active, with the rule stating that every passive or middle having an M is declined, having one syllable mo

 yours from οὗ, ὁ ὅς, ἡ ἥ, τὸ ὅν in the dual, νῶι, σφῶι, σφῶε. From νῶι comes ὁ νωΐτερος, ἡ νωιτέρα, τὸ νωΐτερον from σφῶι, ὁ σφωΐτερος, ἡ σφωιτέρα,

 I thresh and two of them have the future with H, I will shout and I will bewail and the other two with A, I will hear and I will be foolish, (for it

 having a monosyllable in the genitive, sometimes the consonant of the perfect, sometimes that of the future. And what is the consonant of the perfect?

 Phaeacians, that they might be the most skilled of all men (like) the little ear, which alone is unaspirated (made smooth) of all the others being as

 the shortened analogical, the lengthened poetic. How is water declined? Of water. The rule: neuters in -OR are declined through -ROS, and keep the OME

 being in the middle of a word, the one beginning the middle syllable is aspirated, but the one ending the same [syllable] is unaspirated, for example

 And why is it marked? Because there is a rule that says that monosyllabic words ending in ΕΣ, declined imparisyllabically, have this order (declension

 lesser than the ending of the neuter, which is absurd, the penult was found to be long by position, but the A before two consonants never wishes to be

 I was making prosper but verbs beginning from the particle EU and DYS do not augment the beginning of the imperfect 54 externally, but have the infle

 ending in the penult, able to receive contraction in the second and third person, the Y is added in the future, I flow you flow you flow (I will flow)

 I see, straight, hollow, form, and the like. And otherwise: verbs beginning with O are written with a small O, except for ὠθῶ, ὠφελῶ, ὠχριῶ, ὠρύω, ὠδύ

 is

 a combination of two consonants, of which the second is a liquid, for example μέμβλω, ο᾿´φλω, ε᾿´γρω, δάκνω, and the pure verbs in -Ω ending in the di

 has the doubtful vowel shortened, for example megas mega, brachys brachy, tis ti. Tis of what kind of those falling under the noun?Of the interrogativ

 a

 megá[l]os for the genitive megálou is heteroclitic, as if from the nominative megálos. And why did the nominative megálos fall out of use? Beca

 How many genitives does basileus admit? Six: basileus, genitive basileos with epsilon and omicron, commonly basileus, genitive basileos, wi

 should have been *Zeos*. Therefore, with the two rules conflicting, the Doric dialect entered, and it became *Zeus, Dios* for the Dorians turn Δ into

 having a single origin before the T, the ST is oxytone, for example, istos, pistos, christos, and anything similar. LET US BREAK, of the subjunctive m

 A word participating in the property of verbs and of nouns. What does it participate in of the noun and of the verb? Of the noun, genders and cases o

 it may be formed in the feminine gender, for example, stephanos, geranos the word ouranos, Sikanos, is noted, which is a place in Iberia. HE WILL LAU

 THYMOS from `thyo` meaning to rush, the future `thyso`, the perfect `tethyca`, the passive `tethumai`, and from it `thymos` for things from the passi

 falsehood, form, wall, and the like, are properispomenon but the paroxytones and the proparoxytones and the properispomena, are in effect (barytone.)

 consonants, of which the second is unchangeable. The passive perfect is πεπρόσταγμαι and from it, πρόσταγμα. Why is it proparoxytone? Neuter nouns end

 are declined without hindrance both into the participles and into the other moods but etheka, edoka, heka, ought to have been with a Sigma, but were

 on the same day a derivative, which is a participle. I HAVE BEGOTTEN YOU, a verb, indicative, simple, derivative, of the second conjugation of the per

 is written with an I, except for verbs in -ΕΥΩ, as in λαγνεύω λαγνεία, and those from words in -ΥΣ, as in ταχὺς, ταχεῖα and those from words with a c

 Otherwise: verbs ending in ΑΊΝΩ are written with the diphthong ΑΙ, for example βαμβαίνω, ξηραίνω, μιαίνω noted are σθένω, μένω, πένω, στένω. 94 ῬΆΒ

 from *agallō*, this from *aglaon*, this from *aiglē*, this from *aissō* which means *hormō*. Why is *LI* with an iota? Words with a circumflex on -IŌ

 I tread, I pour, I moisten. The THLI is long, why? Disyllabic verbs ending in BŌ, whose penultimate syllable has an I, are lengthened. EPANISTANTAI, a

 first, third person of the singulars, of the compound form. And from where was it compounded? From the preposition *epi* and the verb *akouō*. And *ak

 second, you struck. THOSE WHO HATE, where does it come from? From I hate, this from enemy, this from hatred, the hatred, this from I hold, I control.

 by a change of A to H, I seek the plural, we seek, we seek, the second person, you seek, you seek. PSEUDOS, whence does it come? From I flee, flight

 107 {1FIFTH PSALM.} 1 Where does it come from? From pempō for it sends us to the tenth number.

 second aorist from ἐντέλλω, the future ἐντελῶ, the first aorist ἔτειλα, the middle ἐτειλάμην, the second ἐτείλω. BEHOLD, a deictic adverb, why is it o

 From `opizo`, which means to pursue behind this from `opis`, not regarding the vengeance of the gods, this from `hepo` meaning to follow. Why PI I?

 of actives only is written with the EI diphthong but in the case of passives and the rest with I. It means six things: `eidô` to make like, from whic

 a monosyllable is circumflexed, and it becomes to set on fire every syllable ending in N ... IS TAKEN, from lēbō, [meaning] to take, and with the pre

 r ai g i a n

 1ELEVENTH PSALM.} another one and with the number ten, eleventh.

 a ,

 1PSALM 17.} from *stereō* this from *histēmi*, *stēsō*, second aorist

 a

 1PSALM 18.} omega, why? Because every simple Greek word with an acute accent on the last syllable

 You have favored, Lord, your land. REDEEMER, from I redeem, this from ransom, this from I loose.

 Nothing is said in a universal sense, as when we say, nothing new in the world the form with Theta is taken from οὐδέν, and by changing Delta t

 1 I AM WELL-PLEASING from *aretô*, and with the addition of S *arestô* and *euarestô* this from *aretê* (virtue) but that which is from *erô*, 'I de

 {1[Psalm 29.]} 1 EVENING (HESPERA), from to bring inward (eso pherein), being a sort of in-bringer (esophera), and by syncope, hespera,

 second. The first person plural eipaiēmen the third eipaiēsan, and by syncope eipaisan.

 I have been shaken, and from it palm, by which the hand is moved, and from this comes I wrestle the passive perfect is I have been wrestled, the thir

 .The rule: Proper nouns in NES, not compounded from the neuter, have the genitive in OU, Meriones, Merionou, Iordanes, Iordanou. HERMONIEIM: Names end

 

 I was calling, I was judging, those things, when falling out, have the E the word *ekpoma* comes from *EK*. {1[PSALM 54.]}1 I WAS HARBORING ANGER is

 playing.Of a fox the rule: simple words ending in Ξ of more than one syllable, except for those in Ξ, are all declined through Κ. {1[PSALM 63.]}1 I C

 i

 π δ μ Ι ὸ ί

 , 10

 ,

 t

 T

 e {

 of a strap for just as the I turns into E, it is necessary for the E also to turn into I, a strap, of a strap, and from it, garment. YOU WILL ROLL UP

 1[PSALM 110]}1 o in kratō, with the addition of S. For when the E adds two

 e ma

 130.]}1 THEY WERE LIFTED UP, from *meteōrizō*. Why were they not humble-minded like the weaned child now its mother, but I raised my voice

 equal,

 PSALM 140.]} (INCENSE) this from `thuma` (sacrifice), for through the burning of sacrifices

 ̀Σ ΡΝʹ.]} IN POWERS, the nominative, power, from to rule, this from

 o

 SYNIŌN (coming together), from iō, to go forward, iōn (going) and syniōn (coming together). ARRŌSTIA (sickness), from rhō, rhōsō, rhōstos . 144 APOTHA

 ON from *pleon*, and by a pleonasm of I, but it is written with a diphthong, since they write it with an H, and otherwise the disyllabic comparatives

 t

 ACEDIA, from *akedio* (I am despondent), this from *aedio* (I am displeased), and this from *hedys* (sweet) and after *edes* (sweet), and with the ad

 84

 I will support, I have supported, I have been supported, I was supported and this from 'I stand', 'I will cause to stand'. SHELTERER, from 'I shelter

 n n

 . P

 L

 P

 K

 ISIN, the nominative is mercy, it comes from helō, which means to take, elos e

 29 T

 1[PSALM 110.]} I have *kratô* [I hold], with the addition of S. For when the E is added

 ,

 1 THEY WERE LIFTED UP, from `meteorizo`. Why were they not humble-minded as the

 t ,

 EIAS, the nominative, dominion, from I rule, this from ruler, this from I am able. ENECHOI, en is a preposition, ēchōi is a noun, and ēchos from movin

 has 3 solutions, Moses of Moses, Moses of Moses, and Moses of Moses. LET HIM BE EXPECTED, I expect from the second conjugation of the perispomenon. TH

 from casting the ω᾿῀πας. OATH, from fence, and being a little wall for the one swearing, against transgressing the agreements. TO SERVE, from I serve,

being in the middle of a word, the one beginning the middle syllable is aspirated, but the one ending the same [syllable] is unaspirated, for example *syrroia*, *epirroia*, and the like. And why when two Rhos are found, is the first unaspirated, but the 48 second aspirated? Because never does a word nor a syllable end in an aspirate, whence of *amphis* and *Atthis* and *Bakchos* the first [letters] are written with a smooth breathing, and not with a rough one, and for this reason the first is unaspirated, so that a syllable may not end in an aspirate, but the second is aspirated, since a Rho beginning any word is aspirated. And why, when the other consonants are neither unaspirated nor aspirated, is Rho alone both unaspirated and aspirated? Because Rho with unaspirated letters is unaspirated, and with aspirated letters, aspirated. From where is it shown that Rho is a vowel and not a consonant? From its need both to be aspirated and to be unaspirated, and that feminine nouns ending in A, having a pure A or one with Rho, keep it also in the genitive; but if they have a consonant before the A, they change it to Eta, *dipsa*, *dipses*; *doxa*, *doxes*. For this reason some say that Rho is a vowel, and not a consonant. And again from where is it clear, that Rho is a consonant and not a vowel? Because every vowel by itself completes a sound, but Rho without the Omega cannot by itself complete a sound, and because three vowels are never found in one syllable. If therefore we said Rho is a vowel, three vowels would be found in *rheuma* and *rhous* in one syllable, which is absurd. Therefore Rho is not a vowel, but a consonant. *Rhyo*, *rhyso*, the first aorist *errysa*, the second *erryon*, the passive *erryen*, *erryes*, *errye*, and the first future *rhyēsomai*, the second person *rhyēsē*, the third, *rhyēsetai*, and with the preposition *apo*, *aporryēsetai*. Why is the other Rho added? Because prepositions ending in a vowel, if they are compounded with another word beginning with Rho, an extra Rho is added, for example, *syrroia*, *katarroia*. And otherwise: Whichever of the parts of speech mean something by themselves, these when compounded with words beginning with Rho do not double and add another Rho, for example *chrysorrēmōn*, *chrysoreithron*, *theorrēmōn*, *theorēton*; but whichever do not have meaning [by themselves], but having been given meaning (have co-meaning), these when compounded with words beginning with Rho, double and add another Rho, for example *syrroia*, *epirroia*. How does the preposition *para* differ from *apo*? It differs, in that *para* is used for animate beings, but 49 *apo* for inanimate things, for example, from Athens. But many also use a preposition in place of a preposition. What is the property of a preposition? To be placed before and not after a noun and a verb, either in composition or in construction. In composition, for example *enoikos*, *eisodos*, *probainō*, *propheugō*; for these have the preposition in composition, and they receive one accent; but in construction, for example with me, along the road. *Aporryēsomai*, the O is short, why? Every verb ending in MAI, indicative, not passive for those in Ō, wants to have a short O before the M. PANTA, a noun of three genders, for example *ho pas*, *hē hapasa*, *to pan*. The rule: it must be observed that every neuter masculine (from a masculine) derivative has the declension of the masculine. The masculine *pas*, from where does it come? It is a primitive, and it does not have a derivation. What is a primitive? Being that which is first established, and not having a prior origin of its own generation, for example *pas*, *ho pas*. Of what kind? Of those falling under the collective noun. Define it. A collective is that which in the singular number is plural [in meaning], for example people, chorus, crowd. Concerning *pas* having a circumflex; the rule: Why do nouns of one gender in AS, declined with NT, take an acute accent, for example *Zas*, *Zantos*; *Pras*, *Prantos*; but if it were declined isosyllabically, they take a circumflex, for example *Thomas*, *Thoma*; *Loukas*, *Louka*; however, *pas* takes a circumflex, as differing in gender and being of three genders; *ho pas*, *tou pantos*. The rule: nouns of three genders in AS are declined with NT, whether they be nouns or participles; the genitive of the oblique cases, of all. The accent. Disyllabic plural nominatives in ES circumflex the genitives, of months, of geese, of old women. 9 have been noted: of whom, of all. ...

ο᾿´ντος ε᾿ν μέσῃ λέξει, τὸ μὲν α᾿´ρχον τῆς μέσης συλλαβῆς δασύνεται, τὸ δὲ ληκτικὸν τῆς αυ᾿τη῀ς ψιλοῦται, οι῾῀ον σύρροια, ε᾿πι´ρροια, καὶ τὰ ο῾´μοια. Καὶ διατί ἡνίκα εὑρεθῇ δύο ΡΡ, τὸ μὲν πρῶτον ψιλοῦται, τὸ δὲ 48 δεύτερον δασύνεται; ∆ιότι ου᾿δε´ποτε ου᾿´τε λέξις ου᾿´τε συλ λαβὴ ει᾿ς δασὺ λήγει, ο῾´θεν τοῦ ἀπφὶς καὶἈτθὶς καὶ Βάκχος τὰ πρῶτα διὰ ψιλοῦ γραφόμενα, καὶ ου᾿ διὰ δασέως, καὶ διὰ τοῦτο τὸ μὲν πρῶτον ψιλοῦται, ι῾´να μὴ συλλαβὴ ει᾿ς δασὺ λήγῃ, τὸ δὲ δεύτερον δασύνεται, ε᾿πεὶ τὸ Ρ πάσης λέξεως α᾿´ρχον δασύνεται. Καὶ διατί τῶν α᾿´λλων συμφώνων μήτε ψιλουμένων μήτε δασυνομένων τὸ Ρ μόνον καὶ ψιλοῦται καὶ δασύνεται; ∆ιότι τὸ Ρ μετὰ ψιλῶν ψιλόν ε᾿στι, καὶ μετὰ τῶν δασέων δασύ. Πόθεν δείκνυται τὸ Ρ φωνῆεν ει᾿῀ναι καὶ ου᾿ σύμφωνον;Ἐκ τοῦ δεῖν αυ᾿το` καὶ δασύνεσθαι καὶ ψιλοῦσθαι, καὶ ο῾´τι τὰ ει᾿ς Α λήγοντα θηλυκὰ καθαρὰ(ὸν) ε᾿´χοντα τὸ Α η᾿` μετὰ τοῦ Ρ φυλάττει αυ᾿το` καὶ ἐπὶ γενικῆς· ει᾿ δὲ σύμφωνον ε᾿´χουσι πρὸ τοῦ Α, τρέπουσιν αυ᾿το` ει᾿ς Η, δίψα δίψης, δόξα δόξης. ∆ιὰ τοῦτο λέγουσι τινὲς τὸ Ρ ει᾿῀ναι φωνῆεν, καὶ ου᾿ σύμφωνον. Καὶ πάλιν πόθεν δῆλον, ο῾´τι σύμφωνόν ε᾿στι τὸ Ρ καὶ ου᾿ φωνῆεν; ∆ιότι πᾶν φωνῆεν καθ' ἑαυτὸ φωνὴν α᾿πο τελεῖ, τὸ δὲ Ρ χωρὶς τοῦ Ω ου᾿ δύναται καθ' ἑαυτὸ φωνὴν α᾿ποτελεῖν, καὶ ο῾´τι ου᾿δε´ποτε ε᾿ν μιᾷ συλλαβῇ φωνήεντα τρία εὑρίσκεται. Ει᾿ ου᾿῀ν ει᾿´πομεν τὸ Ρ φωνῆεν, εὑρίσκονται ε᾿ν τῷ ῥεῦμα καὶ ῥοῦς τρία φωνήεντα ε᾿ν μιᾷ συλλαβῇ, ο῾´περ α᾿´τοπον. Ου᾿κ α᾿´ρα τὸ Ρ φωνῆεν ε᾿στὶν, α᾿λλὰ σύμφωνον. Ῥύω, ῥύσω, ὁ πρῶτος ε᾿´ρρυσα, ὁ δεύτερος ε᾿´ρρυον, ὁ παθη τικὸς ε᾿ρρύην, ε᾿ρρύης, ε᾿ρρύη, καὶ ὁ μέλλων πρῶτος ῥυήσομαι, τὸ δεύτερον ῥυήσῃ, τὸ τρίτον, ῥυήσεται, καὶ μετὰ τῆς α᾿πο` προθέσεως α᾿πορρυήσεται. ∆ιατί πλεονάζει καὶ τὸ ε῾´τερον Ρ; ∆ιότι αἱ ει᾿ς φωνῆεν λήγουσαι προθέσεις, ἐὰν συντεθῶσι μεθ' ἑτέρας λέξεως τῆς α᾿πο` τοῦ Ρ α᾿ρχομένης, πλεονάζει καὶ ε῾´τερον Ρ, οι῾῀ον, σύρροια, κατάρροια. Καὶ α᾿´λλως·Ὅσα τῶν μερῶν τοῦ λόγου καθ' ἑαυτὰ σημαίνει τι, ταῦτα συντιθέμενα ταῖς α᾿πο` τοῦ Ρ α᾿ρχομέναις λέξεσιν ου᾿ διπλασιάζει καὶ ε῾´τερον Ρ, οι῾῀ον χρυσο ρήμων, χρυσόρειθρον, θεορήμων, θεόρητον· ο῾´σα δὲ ου᾿ σημαίνει, α᾿λλὰ σεσημαινομένα (συσσημαίνει,) ταῦτα συντιθέμενα ταῖς α᾿πο` τοῦ Ρ α᾿ρχομέναις λέξεσι, διπλασιάζει καὶ ε῾´τερον Ρ, οι῾῀ον σύρροια, ε᾿πι´ρροια. Τί διαφέρει ἡ παρὰ πρόθεσις τῆς α᾿πο´; ∆ιαφέρει, ο῾´τι ἡ μὲν παρὰ ἐπὶ ἐμψύχων λαμβάνεται, ἡ δὲ 49 α᾿πο` ἐπὶ ἀψύχων, οι῾῀ον, α᾿π'Ἀθηνῶν. Πολλοὶ δὲ καὶ προ θέσει κέχρηνται α᾿ντὶ προθέσεως. Τί ἐστιν ι᾿´διον τῆς προ θέσεως; Τὸ προτίθεσθαι καὶ μὴ ὑποτίθεσθαι ο᾿νο´ματι καὶ ῥήματι, η᾿` κατὰ σύνθεσιν η᾿` κατὰ σύνταξιν. Κατὰ σύνθεσιν μὲν, οι῾῀ον ε᾿´νοικος, ει᾿´σοδος, προβαίνω, προφεύγω· ταῦτα γὰρ ε᾿ν συνθέσει τὴν πρόθεσιν ε᾿´χει, καὶ ε῾´να τόνον δέχονται· ε᾿ν συντάξει δὲ, οι῾῀ον σὺν ε᾿μοὶ, καθ' ὁδόν.Ἀπορρυήσομαι, τὸ ΣΟ μικρὸν, διατί; Πᾶν ῥῆμα ει᾿ς ΜΑΙ λῆγον, ὁριστικὸν, α᾿παθὲς ε᾿πι` τῶν ει᾿ς Ω, πρὸ τοῦ Μ τὸ Ο μικρὸν θέλει ε᾿´χειν. ΠΆΝΤΑ, ο᾿´νομα τριγενὲς, οι῾῀ον ὁ πᾶς, ἡ α῾´πασα, τὸ πᾶν.Ὁ κανών· παρατηρητέον, ο῾´τι πᾶν ου᾿δε´τερον α᾿ρσενικὸν (α᾿πο` ἀρσε νικοῦ) παρεσχηματισμένον τοῦ ἀρσενικοῦ ε᾿´χει τὴν κλίσινὉ πᾶς α᾿ρσενικὸν πόθεν γίνεται; Πρωτότυπόν ε᾿στι, καὶ παραγω γὴν ου᾿κ ε᾿´χει. Τί ἐστι πρωτότυπον; Τὸ πρωτόθετον ὑπάρχον, καὶ μὴ ε᾿´χον προκάταρξιν τῆς ἑαυτοῦ γεννήσεως, οι῾῀ον πᾶς, ὁ πᾶς. Ποίου ει᾿´δους; Τῶν ὑποπεπτωκότων τῷ ὀνόματι περιληπτικοῦ. ∆ιόρισον. Περιληπτικὸν δέ ἐστι τὸ τῷ ἑνικῷ α᾿ριθμῷ πληθυντικὸν, οι῾῀ον δῆμος, χορὸς, ο᾿´χλος. Ει᾿ς τὸν πᾶς περιεσπωμένον· ὁ κανών· ∆ιατί τὰ ει᾿ς ΑΣ μονογενῆ διὰ τοῦ Ν Τ κλινόμενα, ο᾿ξυ´νονται, οι῾῀ο Ζὰς Ζαντὸς, Πρὰς Πραντός· ει᾿ δὲ ἰσοσυλλάβως κλίνοιτο, περισπῶνται, οι῾῀ον Θωμᾶς Θωμᾶ, Λουκᾶς Λουκᾶ· τὸ μέντοι πᾶς περισπᾶται, ὡς διαλλάξαν κατὰ τὸ γένος καὶ ο᾿`ν τριγενές· ὁ πᾶς, τοῦ παντός.Ὁ κανών· τὰ ει᾿ς ΑΣ τριγενῆ διὰ τοῦ Ν Τ κλίνονται, ει᾿´τε ο᾿νο´ματα ει᾿´η, ει᾿´τε μετοχαί· ἡ γενικὴ τῶν πλαγιῶν, τῶν πάντων.Ὁ τόνος. Αἱ μὲν ει᾿ς ΕΣ δισύλλαβοι ευ᾿θεῖαι πληθυν τικαὶ περισπῶσι τὰς γενικὰς, μηνῶν, χηνῶν, γραῶν. Σεση μείωται θʹ· τίνων, πάντων. ...