Chapter XXIII.—Hermogenes Pursued to Another Passage of Scripture. The Absurdity of His Interpretation Exposed.

But he draws an argument from the following words, where it is written:  “And the earth was without form, and void.”221    Gen. i. 2. For he resolves222    Redigit in. the word earth into Matter, because that which is made out of it is the earth.  And to the word was he gives the same direction, as if it pointed to what had always existed unbegotten and unmade. It was without form, moreover, and void, because he will have Matter to have existed shapeless and confused, and without the finish of a maker’s hand.223    Inconditam: we have combined the two senses of the word. Now these opinions of his I will refute singly; but first I wish to say to him, by way of general answer: We are of opinion that Matter is pointed at in these terms. But yet does the Scripture intimate that, because Matter was in existence before all, anything of like condition224    Tale aliquid. was even formed out of it? Nothing of the kind. Matter might have had existence, if it so pleased—or rather if Hermogenes so pleased. It might, I say, have existed, and yet God might not have made anything out of it, either as it was unsuitable to Him to have required the aid of anything, or at least because He is not shown to have made anything out of Matter. Its existence must therefore be without a cause, you will say. Oh, no! certainly225    Plane: ironical. not without cause. For even if the world were not made out of it, yet a heresy has been hatched there from; and a specially impudent one too, because it is not Matter which has produced the heresy, but the heresy has rather made Matter itself.

CAPUT XXIII.

Sed ex sequentibus argumentatur, quia scriptum sit: Terra autem erat invisibilis et incomposita. 0218B Nam et terrae nomen redigit in materiam , quia terra sit quae facta est ex illa. Et erat in hoc dirigit, quasi quae semper retro fuerit innata et infecta. Invisibilis autem et rudis, quia informem et confusam et inconditam vult fuisse materiam. Has quidem opiniones ejus singillatim revincam, sed interim volo sic ei respondere. Putamus his articulis materiam demonstrari. Numquid tamen, quia erat ante omnia, et tale aliquid esse ex ea factum Scriptura significat? Atquin nihil tale significat. Fuerit licet materia, quantum sibi licet, vel potius Hermogeni: potuit et fuisse, et tamen nihil Deus ex illa fecisse, vel quia non decebat Deum alicujus eguisse, certe quia nec ostenditur quicquam ex materia fecisse. Sine caussa ergo esset, inquis. Non 0218C plane adeo sine caussa. Nam etsi mundus non est factus ex illa, sed haeresis facta est, et quidem hoc impudentior, quod non ex materia facta est haeresis, sed materiam ipsam potius haeresis fecit.