It may indeed be undignified to give any answer at all to the statements that are foolish we seem to be pointed that way by Solomon’s wise advice, “n

 What then is the charge they bring against us? They accuse us of profanity for entertaining lofty conceptions about the Holy Spirit. All that we, in f

 What then, shall be our way of arguing? We shall answer nothing new, nothing of our own invention, though they challenge us to it we shall fall back

 We can confirm our argument by material instances. Fire naturally imparts the sense of heat to those who touch it, with all its component parts one

 If, then, the Holy Spirit is truly, and not in name only, called Divine both by Scripture and by our Fathers, what ground is left for those who oppose

 For the plea will not avail them in their self-defence, that He is delivered by our Lord to His disciples third in order, and that therefore He is est

 Since, then, it has been affirmed, and truly affirmed, that the Spirit is of the Divine Essence, and since in that one word “Divine” every idea of gre

 But if all must shrink from that, as going even beyond the most revolting blasphemy, then a devout mind must accept the nobler names and conceptions o

 If such is the doctrine concerning Him when followed out , let the same inquiry be made concerning the Son and the Father as well. Do you not confess

 If, then, they agree that the Holy Spirit is perfect absolutely, and it has been admitted in addition that true reverence requires perfection in every

 In what sort of manner, then, can you honour the Deity? How can you heighten the Highest? How can you give glory to that which is above all glory? How

 The heavens proclaim the glory of God , and yet they are counted poor heralds of His worth because His Majesty is exalted, not as far as the heavens,

 What means, then, this lowering and this expanding of their soul, on the part of these men who are enthusiastic for the Father’s honour, and grant to

 “Yes,” replies one of them, “but we have been taught by Scripture that the Father is the Creator, and in the same way that it was ‘through the Son ’ t

 What shall we answer to this? That the thoughts of their hearts are so much idle talk, when they imagine that the Spirit was not always with the Fathe

 The view which is consistent with all reverence is as follows. We are not to think of the Father as ever parted from the Son, nor to look for the Son

 If, on the contrary, this Spirit has the impulse to work, but some overwhelming control hinders His design, they must tell us the wherefore of this hi

 This is the view we take, after the unprofessional way usual with us and we reject all these elaborate sophistries of our adversaries, believing and

 But with regard to service and worship, and the other things which they so nicely calculate about, and bring into prominence, we say this that the Ho

 But if there is any of them who rejects this statement, and this idea involved in the very name of Divinity, and says that which, to the destruction o

 These destroyers of the Spirit’s glory, who relegate Him to a subject world, must tell us of what thing that unction is the symbol. It not a symbol of

 Again, let us look at it in this way. Kingship is most assuredly shown in the rule over subjects. Now what is “subject” to this Kingly Being? The Word

 For notice the amount of absurdity involved in the other alternative all things that we can think of in the actual creation have, by virtue of all ha

 Then let us look to this too. In Holy Baptism, what is it that we secure thereby? Is it not a participation in a life no longer subject to death? I th

 So that if these despisers and impugners of their very own life conceive of the gift as a little one, and decree accordingly to slight the Being who i

 If, then, every height of man’s ability falls below the grandeur of the Spirit (for that is what the Word means in the metaphor of “footstool”), what

 On the contrary the Holy Spirit is, to begin with, because of qualities that are essentially holy, that which the Father, essentially Holy, is and su

 If such, then, is the greatness of the Spirit, and whatever is beautiful, whatever is good, coming from God as it does through the Son, is completed b

 But you will say, “When I think of the Father it is the Son (alone) that I have included as well in that term.” But tell me when you have grasped the

 Do they too, then, mean this by their worship? Well, is it anything but absurdity to think that it is wrong to honour the Holy Spirit with that with w

 [Translation lacking]

But you will say, “When I think of the Father it is the Son (alone) that I have included as well in that term.” But tell me; when you have grasped the notion of the Son have you not admitted therein that of the Holy Spirit too? For how can you confess the Son except by the Holy Spirit? At what moment, then, is the Spirit in a state of separation from the Son, so that when the Father is being worshipped, the worship of the Spirit is not included along with that of the Son? And as regards their worship itself, what in the world do they reckon it to be? They bestow it, as some exquisite piece of honour, upon the God over all, and convey it over, sometimes, so as to reach the Only-begotten also; but the Holy Spirit they regard as unworthy of such a privilege. Now, in the common parlance of mankind, that self-prostration of inferiors upon the ground which they practise when they salute their betters is termed worship. Thus, it was by such a posture that the patriarch Jacob, in his self-humiliation, seems to have wished to show his inferiority when coming to meet his brother and to appease his wrath; for “he bowed himself to the ground,” says the Scripture, “three times”54    The LXX. has προσεκύνησεν ἐπὶ τὴν γῆν ἑπτάκις, Gen. xxxiii. 3.; and Joseph’s brethren, as long as they knew him not, and he pretended before them that he knew them not, by reason of the exaltation of his rank reverenced his sovereignty with this worship; and even the great Abraham himself “bowed himself55    προσεκύνησε τῷ λαῷ τῆς γῆς, τοῖς υἱοῖς τοῦ Χετ, Gen. xxiii. 7.” “to the children of Heth,” a stranger amongst the natives of that land, showing, I opine, by that action, how far more powerful those natives were than sojourners. It is possible to speak of many such actions both in the ancient records, and from examples before our eyes in the world now56    τοῦ βίου. This is a late use of βίος..

Ἀλλ' ἐρεῖς ὅτι πατέρα ἐννοῶν καὶ τὸν υἱὸν τῇ προσηγορίᾳ συμπεριέλαβον. τὸν δὲ υἱόν, εἰπέ μοι, τῇ διανοίᾳ λαβὼν ἆρ' οὐ συμπαρεδέξω καὶ τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἅγιον; οὐκ ἂν ἀντείποις. πῶς γὰρ αὐτὸν ὁμολογήσεις, [εἰ] μὴ ἐν πνεύματι ἁγίῳ; πότε οὖν τοῦ υἱοῦ τὸ πνεῦμα χωρίζεται ὥστε τοῦ πατρὸς προσκυνουμένου μὴ συμπεριλαμβάνεσθαι μετὰ τοῦ υἱοῦ καὶ τοῦ πνεύματος τὴν προσκύνησιν; αὐτὴν δὲ τὴν προσκύνησιν τί ποτε εἶναι λογίζονται, ἣν ὡς ἐξαίρετόν τι γέρας τῷ ἐπὶ πάντων θεῷ χαριζόμενοι καὶ ἕως τοῦ μονογενοῦς ἔσθ' ὅτε τὴν τιμὴν ταύτην διαβιβάζοντες ἀπαξιοῦσι τὸ πνεῦμα τοῦ τοιούτου γέρως; ἡ μὲν γὰρ ἀνθρωπίνη συνήθεια τὴν πρὸς τὸ ἔδαφος τῶν ὑποχειρίων ἐπίκλισιν, ἣν ἀσπαζόμενοι τοὺς δυνατωτέρους ἐπιτηδεύουσι, τοῦτο προσαγορεύει προσκύνησιν: καθὼς φαίνεται καὶ ὁ πατριάρχης Ἰακὼβ τοῦ ἀδελφοῦ τὴν ὀργὴν ἱλεούμενος τὸ καταδεέστερον ὑπὸ ταπεινοφροσύνης διὰ τοῦ τοιούτου σχήματος ἐν τῇ ὑπαντήσει πρὸς αὐτὸν ἐπιδείκνυσθαι. Προσεκύνησε, γάρ φησιν, τρίτον ἐπὶ τὴν γῆν. καὶ οἱ τοῦ Ἰωσὴφ ἀδελφοί, ἕως αὐτοί τε ἠγνόουν κἀκεῖνος τὴν ἄγνοιαν πρὸς αὐτοὺς ὑπεκρίνετο, διὰ τὸ ὑπερέχον τοῦ ἀξιώματος τῇ προσκυνήσει τὴν δυναστείαν ἐτίμησαν. προσκυνεῖ δὲ καὶ ὁ μέγας Ἀβραὰμ τοὺς Χετταίους, τοὺς ἐγχωρίους ὁ ἔπηλυς, δεικνύς, οἶμαι, δι' ὧν ἐποίει, ὅσον οἱ αὐτόχθονες τῶν παροικούντων ἐπικρατέστεροι. καὶ πολλὰ τοιαῦτα λέγειν ἐστὶν ἔκ τε τῶν ἀρχαίων διηγημάτων καὶ ἐκ τῶν παρόντων τοῦ βίου ὑποδειγμάτων.