Against Hermogenes.

 Chapter I.—The Opinions of Hermogenes, by the Prescriptive Rule of Antiquity Shown to Be Heretical. Not Derived from Christianity, But from Heathen Ph

 Chapter II.—Hermogenes, After a Perverse Induction from Mere Heretical Assumptions, Concludes that God Created All Things Out of Pre-Existing Matter.

 Chapter III.—An Argument of Hermogenes. The Answer:  While God is a Title Eternally Applicable to the Divine Being, Lord and Father are Only Relative

 Chapter IV.—Hermogenes Gives Divine Attributes to Matter, and So Makes Two Gods.

 Chapter V.—Hermogenes Coquets with His Own Argument, as If Rather Afraid of It. After Investing Matter with Divine Qualities, He Tries to Make It Some

 Chapter VI.—The Shifts to Which Hermogenes is Reduced, Who Deifies Matter, and Yet is Unwilling to Hold Him Equal with the Divine Creator.

 Chapter VII.—Hermogenes Held to His Theory in Order that Its Absurdity May Be Exposed on His Own Principles.

 Chapter VIII.—On His Own Principles, Hermogenes Makes Matter, on the Whole, Superior to God.

 Chapter IX.—Sundry Inevitable But Intolerable Conclusions from the Principles of Hermogenes.

 Chapter X.—To What Straits Hermogenes Absurdly Reduces the Divine Being. He Does Nothing Short of Making Him the Author of Evil.

 Chapter XI.—Hermogenes Makes Great Efforts to Remove Evil from God to Matter. How He Fails to Do This Consistently with His Own Argument.

 Chapter XII.—The Mode of Controversy Changed. The Premisses of Hermogenes Accepted, in Order to Show into What Confusion They Lead Him.

 Chapter XIII.—Another Ground of Hermogenes that Matter Has Some Good in It.  Its Absurdity.

 Chapter XIV.—Tertullian Pushes His Opponent into a Dilemma.

 Chapter XV.—The Truth, that God Made All Things from Nothing, Rescued from the Opponent’s Flounderings.

 Chapter XVI.—A Series of Dilemmas.  They Show that Hermogenes Cannot Escape from the Orthodox Conclusion.

 Chapter XVII.—The Truth of God’s Work in Creation. You Cannot Depart in the Least from It, Without Landing Yourself in an Absurdity.

 Chapter XVIII.—An Eulogy on the Wisdom and Word of God, by Which God Made All Things of Nothing.

 Chapter XIX.—An Appeal to the History of Creation. True Meaning of the Term Beginning, Which the Heretic Curiously Wrests to an Absurd Sense.

 Chapter XX.—Meaning of the Phrase—In the Beginning. Tertullian Connects It with the Wisdom of God, and Elicits from It the Truth that the Creation Was

 Chapter XXI.—A Retort of Heresy Answered. That Scripture Should in So Many Words Tell Us that the World Was Made of Nothing is Superfluous.

 Chapter XXII.—This Conclusion Confirmed by the Usage of Holy Scripture in Its History of the Creation.  Hermogenes in Danger of the Woe Pronounced Aga

 Chapter XXIII.—Hermogenes Pursued to Another Passage of Scripture. The Absurdity of His Interpretation Exposed.

 Chapter XXIV.—Earth Does Not Mean Matter as Hermogenes Would Have It.

 Chapter XXV.—The Assumption that There are Two Earths Mentioned in the History of the Creation, Refuted.

 Chapter XXVI.—The Method Observed in the History of the Creation, in Reply to the Perverse Interpretation of Hermogenes.

 Chapter XXVII.—Some Hair-Splitting Use of Words in Which His Opponent Had Indulged.

 Chapter XXVIII.—A Curious Inconsistency in Hermogenes Exposed.  CertainExpressions in The History of Creation Vindicated in The True Sense.

 Chapter XXIX.—The Gradual Development of Cosmical Order Out of Chaos in the Creation, Beautifully Stated.

 Chapter XXX.—Another Passage in the Sacred History of the Creation, Released from the Mishandling of Hermogenes.

 Chapter XXXI.—A Further Vindication of the Scripture Narrative of the Creation, Against a Futile View of Hermogenes.

 Chapter XXXII.—The Account of the Creation in Genesis a General One, Corroborated, However, by Many Other Passages of the Old Testament, Which Give Ac

 Chapter XXXIII.—Statement of the True Doctrine Concerning Matter. Its Relation to God’s Creation of the World.

 Chapter XXXIV.—A Presumption that All Things Were Created by God Out of Nothing Afforded by the Ultimate Reduction of All Things to Nothing.  Scriptur

 Chapter XXXV.—Contradictory Propositions Advanced by Hermogenes Respecting Matter and Its Qualities.

 Chapter XXXVI.—Other Absurd Theories Respecting Matter and Its Incidents Exposed in an Ironical Strain. Motion in Matter. Hermogenes’ Conceits Respect

 Chapter XXXVII.—Ironical Dilemmas Respecting Matter, and Sundry Moral Qualities Fancifully Attributed to It.

 Chapter XXXIII.—Other Speculations of Hermogenes, About Matter and Some of Its Adjuncts, Shown to Be Absurd. For Instance, Its Alleged Infinity.

 Chapter XXXIX.—These Latter Speculations Shown to Be Contradictory to the First Principles Respecting Matter, Formerly Laid Down by Hermogenes.

 Chapter XL.—Shapeless Matter an Incongruous Origin for God’s Beautiful Cosmos. Hermogenes Does Not Mend His Argument by Supposing that Only a Portion

 Chapter XLI.—Sundry Quotations from Hermogenes. Now Uncertain and Vague are His Speculations Respecting Motion in Matter, and the Material Qualities o

 Chapter XLII.—Further Exposure of Inconsistencies in the Opinions of Hermogenes Respecting the Divine Qualities of Matter.

 Chapter XLIII.—Other Discrepancies Exposed and Refuted Respecting the Evil in Matter Being Changed to Good.

 Chapter XLIV.—Curious Views Respecting God’s Method of Working with Matter Exposed. Discrepancies in the Heretic’s Opinion About God’s Local Relation

 Chapter XLV.—Conclusion. Contrast Between the Statements of Hermogenes and the Testimony of Holy Scripture Respecting the Creation. Creation Out of No

Chapter XXXI.—A Further Vindication of the Scripture Narrative of the Creation, Against a Futile View of Hermogenes.

But this circumstance, too, will be caught at, that Scripture meant to indicate of the heaven only, and this earth of yours,315    Ista: the earth, which has been the subject of contention. that God made it in the beginning, while nothing of the kind is said of the above-mentioned specific parts;316    Speciebus. and therefore that these, which are not described as having been made, appertain to unformed Matter. To this point317    Scrupulo: doubt or difficulty. also we must give an answer. Holy Scripture would be sufficiently explicit, if it had declared that the heaven and the earth, as the very highest works of creation, were made by God, possessing of course their own special appurtenances,318    Suggestus: “Hoc est, apparatus, ornatus” (Oehler). which might be understood to be implied in these highest works themselves. Now the appurtenances of the heaven and the earth, made then in the beginning, were the darkness and the deep, and the spirit, and the waters. For the depth and the darkness underlay the earth.  Since the deep was under the earth, and the darkness was over the deep, undoubtedly both the darkness and the deep were under the earth. Below the heaven, too, lay the spirit319    It will be observed that Tertullian applies the spiritus to the wind as a creature. and the waters. For since the waters were over the earth, which they covered, whilst the spirit was over the waters, both the spirit and the waters were alike over the earth. Now that which is over the earth, is of course under the heaven. And even as the earth brooded over the deep and the darkness, so also did the heaven brood over the spirit and the waters, and embrace them.  Nor, indeed, is there any novelty in mentioning only that which contains, as pertaining to the whole,320    Qua summale. and understanding that which is contained as included in it, in its character of a portion.321    Qua portionale. Suppose now I should say the city built a theatre and a circus, but the stage322    Scena. was of such and such a kind, and the statues were on the canal, and the obelisk was reared above them all, would it follow that, because I did not distinctly state that these specific things323    Has species. were made by the city, they were therefore not made by it along with the circus and the theatre? Did I not, indeed, refrain from specially mentioning the formation of these particular things because they were implied in the things which I had already said were made, and might be understood to be inherent in the things in which they were contained? But this example may be an idle one as being derived from a human circumstance; I will take another, which has the authority of Scripture itself.  It says that “God made man of the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living soul.”324    Gen. ii. 7. Now, although it here mentions the nostrils,325    Both in the quotation and here, Tertullian read “faciem” where we read “nostrils.” it does not say that they were made by God; so again it speaks of skin326    Cutem: another reading has “costam,” rib. and bones, and flesh and eyes, and sweat and blood, in subsequent passages,327    See Gen. ii. 21, 23; iii. 5, 19; iv. 10. and yet it never intimated that they had been created by God. What will Hermogenes have to answer? That the human limbs must belong to Matter, because they are not specially mentioned as objects of creation? Or are they included in the formation of man? In like manner, the deep and the darkness, and the spirit and the waters, were as members of the heaven and the earth. For in the bodies the limbs were made, in the bodies the limbs too were mentioned. No element but what is a member of that element in which it is contained. But all elements are contained in the heaven and the earth.

CAPUT XXXI.

Sed et illud utique captabitur: de coelo solo et de terra ista Scripturam significasse, quod eam 0225B in principio Deus fecerit, de speciebus autem supradictis nihil tale: et ideo eas quae factae non significentur, ad infectam materiam pertinere. Respondebimus huic quoque scrupulo. Scriptura divina satis dissereret , si summas ipsas rerum a Deo factas commendasset coelum et terram, habentes utique suggestus suos proprios, qui in ipsis summis intelligi possent. Suggestus autem coeli et terrae primo tunc fuerint tenebrae, et abyssus, et spiritus, et aquae. Nam terrae quidem suberat abyssus et tenebrae. Si enim abyssus infra terram, tenebrae autem super abyssum, sine dubio et tenebrae et abyssus infra terram. Coelo vero spiritus et aquae subjacebant: nam si aquae super terram, quae eam texerant, spiritus autem super aquas, pariter et spiritus et aquae 0225C super terram. Quae vero super terram, ea utique infra coelum. Et sicut terra abysso et tenebris, ita et coelum spiritui et aquis incubabat, et complectebantur . Et ita novum non est, ut id solum quod continet nominetur, qua summale: in isto autem intelligatur 0226A et quod continetur, qua portionale. Ecce, si dicam, Civitas exstruxit theatrum et circum: scena autem erat talis et talis, et statuae super Euripum , et obeliscus super omnia ferebatur: quia non et has species edixerim factas a civitate, non erunt ab ea cum circo et theatro? an ideo non adjeci factas has quoque species, quia inerant eis quae facta praedixeram, et inesse quibus inerant, intelligi poterant? Sed vacet hoc exemplum, ut humanum: aliud de auctoritate Scripturae ipsius arripiam. Fecit, inquit, Deus hominem de terra, et adflavit in faciem ejus flatum vitae, et factus est homo in animam vivam. Faciem quidem ejus hic nominat, sed nec ipsam factam a Deo dixit: costam vero et ossa, et carnem, et oculos, et sudorem, et sanguinem (Gen. II, 21, 23; III, 5, 0226B 29; IV, 10) postea loquitur, quae nec tunc facta a Deo significavit. Quid respondebit Hermogenes? Numquid et membra hominis ad materiam pertinebunt, quia non nominatim facta referuntur? An et haec in hominis factitatione censentur? Proinde membra erunt coeli et terrae abyssus et tenebrae, spiritus et aquae. In corporibus enim membra sunt facta: in corporibus et membra sunt nominata. Nullum elementum non membrum est ejus elementi quo continetur: omnia autem elementa coelo aut terra continentur.