Chapter I.—On the Authority of the Gospels.
Chapter II.—On the Order of the Evangelists, and the Principles on Which They Wrote.
Chapter IV.—Of the Fact that John Undertook the Exposition of Christ’s Divinity.
Chapter IX.—Of Certain Persons Who Pretend that Christ Wrote Books on the Arts of Magic.
Chapter XIII.—Of the Question Why God Suffered the Jews to Be Reduced to Subjection.
Chapter XVII.—In Opposition to the Romans Who Rejected the God of Israel Alone.
Chapter XIX.—The Proof that This God is the True God.
Chapter XXII.—Of the Opinion Entertained by the Gentiles Regarding Our God.
Chapter XXIII.—Of the Follies Which the Pagans Have Indulged in Regarding Jupiter and Saturn.
Chapter XXVIII.—Of the Predicted Rejection of Idols.
Chapter XXXI.—The Fulfilment of the Prophecies Concerning Christ.
Chapter XXXIV.—Epilogue to the Preceding.
Chapter VI.—On the Position Given to the Preaching of John the Baptist in All the Four Evangelists.
Chapter VII.—Of the Two Herods.
Chapter XII.—Concerning the Words Ascribed to John by All the Four Evangelists Respectively.
Chapter XIII.—Of the Baptism of Jesus.
Chapter XIV.—Of the Words or the Voice that Came from Heaven Upon Him When He Had Been Baptized.
Chapter XVI.—Of the Temptation of Jesus.
Chapter XVII.—Of the Calling of the Apostles as They Were Fishing.
Chapter XVIII.—Of the Date of His Departure into Galilee.
Chapter XIX.—Of the Lengthened Sermon Which, According to Matthew, He Delivered on the Mount.
Chapter XXI.—Of the Order in Which the Narrative Concerning Peter’s Mother-In-Law is Introduced.
Chapter XXIX.—Of the Two Blind Men and the Dumb Demoniac Whose Stories are Related Only by Matthew.
Chapter XVII.—Of the Harmony of the Four Evangelists in Their Notices of the Draught of Vinegar.
Chapter X.—Of the Evangelist John, and the Distinction Between Him and the Other Three.
Chapter XXXIII.—A Statement in Opposition to Those Who Make the Complaint that the Bliss of Human Life Has Been Impaired by the Entrance of Christian Times.
51. Finally, as to the complaint which they make with respect to the impairing of the bliss of human life by the entrance of Christian times, if they only peruse the books of their own philosophers, who reprehend those very things which are now being taken out of their way in spite of all their unwillingness and murmuring, they will indeed find that great praise is due to the times of Christ. For what diminution is made in their happiness, unless it be in what they most basely and luxuriously abused, to the great injury of their Creator? or unless, perchance, it be the case that evil times originate in such circumstances as these, in which throughout almost all states the theatres are failing, and with them, too, the dens of vice and the public profession of iniquity: yea, altogether the forums and cities in which the demons used to be worshipped are falling. How comes it, then, that they are falling, unless it be in consequence of the failure of those very things, in the lustful and sacrilegious use of which they were constructed? Did not their own Cicero, when commending a certain actor of the name of Roscius, call him a man so clever as to be the only one worthy enough to make it due for him to come upon the stage; and yet, again, so good a man as to be the only one so worthy as to make it due for him not to approach it?155 See Cicero’s Oration in behalf of Roscius. What else did he disclose with such remarkable clearness by this saying, but the fact that the stage was so base there, that a person was under the greater obligation not to connect himself with it, in proportion as he was a better man than most? And yet their gods were pleased with such things of shame as he deemed fit only to be removed to a distance from good men. But we have also an open confession of the same Cicero, where he says that he had to appease Flora, the mother of sports, by frequent celebration;156 See Cicero, Against Verres, 5. in which sports such an excess of vice is wont to be exhibited, that, in comparison with them, others are respectable, from engaging in which, nevertheless, good men are prohibited. Who is this mother Flora, and what manner of goddess is she, who is thus conciliated and propitiated by a practice of vice indulged in with more than usual frequency and with looser reins? How much more honourable now was it for a Roscius to step upon the stage, than for a Cicero to worship a goddess of this kind! If the gods of the Gentile nations are offended because the supplies are lessened which are instituted for the purpose of such celebrations, it is apparent of what character those must be who are delighted with such things. But if, on the other hand, the gods themselves in their wrath diminish these supplies, their anger yields us better services than their placability. Wherefore let these men either confute their own philosophers, who have reprehended the same practices on the side of wanton men; or else let them break in pieces those gods of theirs who have made such demands upon their worshippers, if indeed they still find any such deities either to break in pieces or to conceal. But let them cease from their blasphemous habit of charging Christian times with the failure of their true prosperity,—a prosperity, indeed, so used by them that they were sinking into all that is base and hurtful,—lest thereby they be only putting us all the more emphatically in mind of reasons for the ampler praise of the power of Christ.
CAPUT XXXIII. In eos qui rerum humanarum felicitatem per christiana tempora deminutam esse conqueruntur.
51. Deinde quod de felicitatis rerum humanarum deminutione per christiana tempora conqueruntur, si libros philosophorum suorum legant, ea reprehendentium, quae nunc eis etiam recusantibus et murmurantibus subtrahuntur, tum vero magnam laudem reperient temporum christianorum. Quid enim eis minuitur felicitatis, nisi quod pessime luxurioseque abutebantur in magnam Creatoris injuriam? Nisi forte hinc sunt tempora mala, quia per omnes pene civitates cadunt theatra, caveae turpitudinum et publicae professiones flagitiorum ; cadunt et fora vel moenia, in quibus daemonia colebantur. Unde enim cadunt, nisi inopia rerum, quarum lascivo et sacrilego usu constructa sunt? Nonne Cicero eorum cum Roscium quemdam laudaret histrionem, ita peritum dixit, ut solus esset dignus qui in scenam deberet intrare; ita virum bonum, ut solus esset dignus qui eo non deberet accedere (Cic. Orat. pro Roscio)? quid aliud apertissime ostendens, nisi illam scenam esse tam turpem, ut tanto minus ibi esse homo debeat, quanto fuerit magis vir bonus? et tamen dii eorum tali dedecore placabantur, quale a viris bonis removendum esse censebat. Est etiam hinc ejusdem ipsius Ciceronis aperta confessio, ubi ait, sibi Floram matrem ludorum celebritate placandam (Cic. in Verrem, act. 5). In quibus ludis tanta exhiberi turpitudo consuevit, ut in eorum comparatione caeteri honesti sint, a quibus tamen etiam ipsis agendis viri boni prohibentur. Quae ista est Flora mater, qualis dea est, quam celebrior et habenis effusioribus laxata conciliat et propitiat turpitudo? Quanto jam honestius in scenam Roscius intrabat, quam Cicero deam talem colebat? Si deminuta rerum copia, quae in haec celebranda funduntur, dii Gentium offenduntur, apparet quales sint qui talibus delectantur. Si autem ipsi irati ista minuunt, utilius irascuntur quam placantur. Quapropter, aut philosophos suos arguant, qui talia in luxuriosis hominibus reprehenderunt; aut deos suos frangant, qui talia de suis cultoribus exegerunt: si tamen jam inveniunt vel quos frangant, vel quos abscondant: Christianorum vero temporibus defectum rerum secundarum quibus in turpia et noxia defluebant, blasphemando imputare desistant, ne magis nos unde amplius Christi potestas laudetur, admoneant.