Treatises of St. Athanasius

  Annotations on Theological Subjects in the foregoing Treatises, alphabetically arranged.

 Adam

 Alexander's Encyclical

 Angels

 Apostle

 The Arians

 Arian Tenets and Reasonings

 Asterius

 Athanasius

 The Vicarious Atonement

 Chameleons

 Cursus Publicus

 Definitions

 Deification

 Economical Language

 Ecumenical

 Eusebius

 The Father Almighty

 The Flesh

 Use of Force in Religion

 Freedom of Our Moral Nature

 Grace of God

 The Divine Hand

 Heresies

 Heretics

 Hieracas

 Hypocrisy, Hypocrites

 Idolatry of Arianism

 Ignorance Assumed Economically by Our Lord

 Image

 Imperial Titles and Honours

 The Incarnation

 The Divine Indwelling

 Marcellus

 The Blessed Mary

 Mediation

 Meletius

 Two Natures of Emmanuel

 The Nicene Tests of Orthodoxy

 Omnipresence of God

 Paul of Samosata

 Personal Acts and Offices of Our Lord

 Philosophy

 Priesthood of Christ

 Private Judgment on Scripture  (Vid. art. Rule of Faith .)

 The Rule of Faith

 Sabellius

 Sanctification

 Scripture Canon

 Authority of Scripture

 Scripture Passages

 Semi-Arians

 Son of God

 Spirit of God

 Theognostus

 Tradition

 The Holy Trinity in Unity

 Two Wills in Christ

 Wisdom

 The Word of God

 The [ Agenneton ], or Ingenerate

 The [ Aeigennes ]

 [ Aion ]

 [ Akratos ]

 [ Aletheia ]

 [ Alogia,Alogos ]

 [ Anthropos ]

 [ Antidosis ton idiomaton ]

 [ Apaugasma ]

 [ Aporrhoe ]

 [ Areiomanitai ]

 The [ Atreptos ]

 [ Boule, kata boulesin ]

 [ Gennema ]

 The [ Geneton,Genneton ]

 [ Demiourgos ]

 [ Diabolikos ]

 [ Eidos ]

 [ Ensarkos parousia ]

 The [ Exoukontion ]

 [ Epinoia ]

 [ Epispeiras ]

 [ Eusebeia ]

 [ Theandrike energeia ]

 [ Theomachos, Christomachos ]

 [ Theotes ] (vid. Trinity )

 [ Theotokos ]

 [ Katapetasma ]

 [ Kurios, Kurios ]

 [ Logos,  endiathetos kai prophorikos ]

 [ Mia physis ]  ( of our Lord's Godhead and of His Manhood ).

 [ Monarchia ]

 [ Monogenes ]

 The [ Homoion ]

 [ Homoousios ]

 [ Onomata ]

 [ Organon ]

 [ Orthos ]

 [ Ousia, on ]

 [ Peribole ]

 [ Pege ]

 [ Probole ]

 [ Prototokos ]  Primogenitus, First-born

 [ Rheustos ]

 [Sunkatabasis]

 [ Sumbebekos ]

 The [ Teleion ]

 [ Trias ]  

 [ Huiopator ]

 [ Christomachos ]

  Catholicism and Religious Thought Fairbairn

  Development of Religious Error

  Catholicism and Reason Barry

  Reason and Religion Fairbairn

  Further remarks

  On the Inspiration of Scripture

  Preface to Froude's Remains

  Hymni Ecclesiae

   Library of Fathers Preface, St. Cyril

  Library of Fathers Preface, St. Cyprian

  Library of Fathers Preface, St. Chrysostom

  Catena Aurea

  Memoir  of  Henry W. Wilberforce

 Notes of a Visit to the Russian Church  by the Late William Palmer, M.A.  Selected and Arranged by Cardinal Newman

Priesthood of Christ

 "THE expressions He became and He was made," says Athanasius, on Hebr. iii. 2, (vid. Orat. ii. § 8,) "must not be understood as if the Word, considered as the Word, were made, (vid. art. Personal Acts, etc.,) but because the Word, being Framer of all, afterwards was made High Priest, by putting on a body which was made.

 In a certain true sense our Lord may be called a Mediator before He became incarnate, but the Arians, even Eusebius, seem to have made His mediatorship consist essentially in His divine nature, instead of holding that it was His office, and that He was made Mediator when He came in the flesh. Eusebius, like Philo and the Platonists, considers Him as made in the beginning the "Eternal Priest of the Father." Demonst. v. 3. de Laud. C. p. 503 fin. "an intermediate divine power," p. 525, "mediating and joining generated substance to the Ingenerate," p. 528.

 The Arians considered that our Lord's Priesthood preceded His Incarnation, and belonged to His Divine Nature, and was in consequence the token of an inferior divinity. The notice of it therefore in Heb. iii. 1, 2, did but confirm them in their interpretation of the words made, etc. For the Arians, vid. Epiph. Hær, 69, 37. Eusebius too had distinctly declared, "Qui videbatur, erat agnus Dei; qui occultabatur sacerdos Dei." advers. Sabell. i. p. 2, b. vid. also Demonst. i. 10, p. 38, iv. 16, p. 193, v. 3, p. 223, vid. contr. Marc. pp. 8 and 9, 66, 74, 95. Even S. Cyril of Jerusalem makes a similar admission, Catech. x. 14. Nay, S. Ambrose calls the Word, "plenum justitiæ sacerdotalis," de fug. Sæc. 3, 14. S. Clement Alex. before them speaks once or twice of the [ logos archiereus ], e.g. Strom. ii. 9 fin. and Philo still earlier uses similar language, de Profug. p. 466 (whom S. Ambrose follows), de Somniis, p. 597. vid. Thomassin. de Incarn. x. 9. Nestorius on the other hand maintained that the Man Christ Jesus was the Priest; Cyril adv. Nest. p. 64. And Augustine and Fulgentius may be taken to countenance him, de Consens. Evang. i. 6, and ad Thrasim. iii. 30. The Catholic doctrine is, that the Divine Word is Priest in and according to His manhood. vid. the parallel use of [ prototokos ] infr. art. in voc. "As He is called Prophet and even Apostle for His humanity," says S. Cyril Alex., "so also Priest." Glaph. ii. p. 58. And so Epiph. loc. cit. Thomassin. loc. cit. makes a distinction between a divine Priesthood or Mediatorship, such as the Word may be said to sustain between the Father and all creatures, and an earthly and sacrificial for the sake of sinners. vid. also Huet. Origenian. ii. 3, § 4, 5.