47

the Holy One to be caused, or only the Son, which no one of the heretics ever dared to say.

And yet, if we should grant to define things theologized indefinitely by the saints, this too could easily be constructed by anyone who wishes. But immediately this man, if he should not repent, will be subjected to the anathema: “For if anyone,” it says, “preaches a gospel contrary to what we have preached, let him be anathema.” But what do you not say, you who also say the Spirit is from the Son and for this reason (p. 252) defining things theologized indefinitely by the saints and cunningly contradicting with your definition him who theologizes that the Spirit is not said to be also from the Son? Can you show that you are not almost entirely like this guilty person? “I can show you,” he says, “many of the theologians who oppose this theology of the Damascene and grant that ‘to proceed’ can be understood as of the Son.”

Indeed! And is there, among the theologians, and that concerning the most necessary things on which our entire faith depends, a contradiction? Is it at all possible for opposing theologies to exist, or for both theologians according to them? Not at all. Therefore we shall strike this one or those ones from the choir of the orthodox, according to you. But what of this, with the evangelical and apostolic sayings being such and so clarifying the things of the Spirit, as we have previously shown, shall we not in every way reconcile what seems to disagree with the concept of piety revealed through them? And if we are unable to restore some of the patristic sayings to that meaning, shall we not leave it aside, as being unable to understand it, and continue holding no less to the confessed piety? It is surely clear to everyone that we shall in all ways attend to the concepts of piety proclaimed by the evangelical and apostolic sayings.

Come, however, let us attempt to show as orthodox in relation to them the patristic expressions put forward by the Latins in support of their opinions. And if we should be able to sufficiently resolve the apparent opposition, thanks be to God who has provided to us, lying in the extremities of ignorance and removed from the passionless life, knowledge as an advocate of the truth in (p. 254). But if we should not be able to render such an account in all respects, if anyone is perfect in Christ and wise in divine and spiritual matters, having accepted our intention, let him himself from himself teach the better argument, as we desire and are eager to learn most of all, and supplying what is lacking in us, let him with greater reason shame those who from these things attempt to infer things contrary to piety.

Tell me, who and what are the things said by them? For it is impossible for all the God-bearers not to be in agreement with one another and with Christ the God of the God-bearers, since the inspiration to them is one from the one Spirit of Christ. And in addition to this, after almost all of them is this Damascene, and he was taught by all of them, and he himself testifies to his agreement with them, not saying “I say,” but “we say,” and through himself he also presents them to us as nowhere saying the Spirit is from the Son according to existence. But you seem to me, not grasping the style of their magnanimity, to think such things about them. For indeed the Father is also called the first cause by all, but you have heard how it is said; and the great Athanasius said that the Holy Spirit shines forth from the Word, but you have heard how he said it; and we say the Son is the image of the Father, and the Spirit of the Son, but you have heard how we say it; and very many other things, which seem to be for you, but are consonant with us and not you

47

τό ἅγιον αἰτιατόν ὑπάρχειν ἤ μόνον τόν Υἱόν, ὅ μηδείς ποτε οὐδέν τῶν αἱρετικῶν ἐτόλμησεν εἰπεῖν.

Καίτοι, εἰ προσδιορίζειν δοίημεν τά τεθεολογημένα τοῖς ἁγίοις ἀπροσδιορίστως, καί τοῦτ᾿ ἄν εὐχερῶς κατασκευασθείη παντί τῷ βουλομένῳ˙ ἀλλ᾿ εὐθύς οὗτος, εἰ μή μεταμεληθείη, καθυποβληθήσεται τῷ άναθέματι˙ «εἰ γάρ τις», φησίν, «εὐαγγελίζεται παρ᾿ ὅ εὐηγγελισάμεθα, ἀνάθεμα ἔστω». Τί δέ οὐ φῄς ὁ καί ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ τό Πνεῦμα λέγων καί διά τοῦτο (σελ. 252) προσδιορίζων τά ἀπροσδιορίστως τεθεολογημένα τοῖς ἁγίοις καί τῷ θεολογοῦντι μή καί ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ τό Πνεῦμα λέγεσθαι τῷ προσδιορισμῷ δολίως ἀντιλέγων; Ἆρ᾿ ἔχεις δεῖξαι, ὡς οὐ σχεδόν πάνθ᾿ ὅμοιος τυγχάνεις ὤν τῷ ὑπευθύνῳ τούτῳ; «Ἔχω σοι», φησί, «δεῖξαι πολλούς τῶν θεολόγων ἐναντιουμένους τῇ τοῦ ∆αμασκηνοῦ θεολογίᾳ ταύτῃ καί τό ἐκπορεύειν νοεῖν διδόντας εἶναι τοῦ Υἱοῦ».

Βαβαί˙ καί ὅλως, ἔστιν ἐν τοῖς θεολόγοις, καί ταῦτ᾿ ἐπί τῶν ἀναγκαιοτάτων καί ὧν ἡ πίστις ἡμῶν ἅπασα ἐξήρτηται, ἐναντιότης; Ἔστι δ᾿ ὅλως καί θεολογίας εἶναι τάς ἐναντιουμένας ἤ τούς κατ᾿ αὐτάς θεολόγους ἀμφοτέρους; Ἥκιστα. Οὐκοῦν τοῦτον ἤ ἐκείνους διαγράψομεν τοῦ χοροῦ τῶν ὀρθοδόξων κατά σέ. Τί δέ, τῶν εὐαγγελικῶν καί ἀποστολικῶν ρημάτων οὕτως ἐχόντων καί οὕτω διευκρινούντων τά τοῦ Πνεύματος, καθά προαπεδείξαμεν, οὐ τῇ δι᾿ αὐτῶν πεφανερωμένῃ τῆς εὐσεβείας ἐννοίᾳ παντί τρόπῳ συμβιβάσομεν τό δοκοῦν διαφωνεῖν; Ἄν δέ τι καί μή δυνηθῶμεν τῶν πατερικῶν ρημάτων πρός ἐκείνην ἀποκαταστῆσαι τήν διάνοιαν, οὐκ αὐτό μέν ἀφῶμεν, ὡς μή συνεῖναι δυνηθέντες, τῆς δέ ἀνωμολογημένης εὐσεβείας οὐδέν ἧττον ἀντεχόμενοι διατελέσωμεν; Παντί που δῆλον, ὡς πᾶσι τρόποις ταῖς ἀνακεκηρυγμέναις ὑπό τῶν εὐαγγελικῶν καί ἀποστολικῶν ρημάτων τῆς εὐσεβείας προσέξομεν ἐννοίαις.

Φέρε δ᾿ ὅμως ὀρθοδόξους ἀναδεῖξαι πρός αὐτάς ἐπιχειρήσωμεν τάς ὑπό Λατίνων ὑπέρ τῶν δοκούντων σφίσι προτεινομένας πατερικάς φωνάς. Κἄν μέν διαρκῶς διαλῦσαι σχῶμεν τήν πρός τό φαινόμενον ἀντίθεσιν, τῷ Θεῷ χάρις τῷ καί τοῖς ἐν ἐσχατιαῖς ἡμῖν κειμένοις τῆς ἀγνοίας καί τῆς ἀπαθοῦς ζωῆς ἀπῳκισμένοις γνῶσιν συνήγορον τῆς ἐν (σελ. 254) τῷ ἀληθείας παρασχόντι. Εἰ δ᾿ ἄρα μή τοιοῦτον ἀποδοῦναι κατά πάντα σχοίημεν τόν λόγον, εἴ τις ἐν Χριστῷ τέλειος καί σοφός τά θεῖα καί πνευματικά, τῆς προαιρέσεως ἡμᾶς ἀποδεξάμενος, αὐτός παρ᾿ ἑαυτοῦ τόν κρείττω λόγον διδασκέτω, ποθοῦντας καί μαθητιῶντας ὅτι μάλιστα καί τό ἐνδέον ἡμῶν ἀναπληρῶν ἐντρεπέτω λεγεώτερον τούς τἀναντία τῇ εὐσεβείᾳ συνάγειν ἐκ τούτων πειρωμένους.

Εἰπέ δη, τίνες καί τί τά παρ᾿ ἐκείνων εἰρημένα˙ τῶν γάρ ἀδυνάτων ἐστί μή ὁμολογεῖν ἀλλήλοις ἅπαντας τούς θεοφόρους καί Χριστῷ τῷ Θεῷ τῶν θεοφόρων, μιᾶς αὐτοῖς ἐκ τοῦ ἑνός Πνεύματος τοῦ Χριστοῦ τῆς ἐπιπνοίας οὔσης˙ πρός δέ τούτῳ καί μετ᾿ ἐκείνους σχεδόν ἅπαντας οὗτος ὁ ∆αμασκηνός ἐστι καί ὑπ᾿ ἐκείνων ἁπάντων ἐδιδάχθη καί αὐτός ἑαυτῷ μαρτυρεῖ τήν πρός ἐκείνους συμφωνίαν, οὐ "λέγω" λέγων, ἀλλά "λέγομεν", καί δι᾿ ἑαυτοῦ κἀκείνους παρίστησιν ἡμῖν οὐδαμοῦ ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ τό Πνεῦμα λέγοντας καθ᾿ ὕπαρξιν. Ὑμεῖς δ᾿ ἐοίκατέ μοι τοῦ τῆς αὐτῶν μεγαλονοίας ὕφους μή ἐφικνούμενοι τοιαῦτ᾿ εἴεσθαι περί αὐτῶν. Καί γάρ καί πρῶτον αἴτιον λέγεται παρά πάντων ὁ Πατήρ, ἀλλ᾿ ἤκουσας ὡς λέγεται˙ καί ὁ μέγας Ἀθανάσιος παρά τοῦ Λόγου τό Πνεῦμα τό ἅγιον ἐκλάμπειν εἶπεν, ἀλλ᾿ ἤκουσας ὡς εἶπε˙ καί εἰκόνα Πατρός μέν Υἱόν, Υἱοῦ δέ τό Πνεῦμα λέγομεν, ἀλλ᾿ ἤκουσας ὡς λέγομεν˙ καί πλεῖσθ᾿ ἕτερα, δοκοῦντα πρός ὑμῶν, ἡμῖν ἀλλ᾿ οὐχ ὑμῖν συμβαίνοντα