A Treatise on the Soul.

 Having discussed with Hermogenes the single point of the origin of the soul, so far as his assumption led me, that the soul consisted rather in an ada

 Chapter II.—The Christian Has Sure and Simple Knowledge Concerning the Subject Before Us.

 Chapter III.—The Soul’s Origin Defined Out of the Simple Words of Scripture.

 Chapter IV.—In Opposition to Plato, the Soul Was Created and Originated at Birth.

 Chapter V.—Probable View of the Stoics, that the Soul Has a Corporeal Nature.

 Chapter VI.—The Arguments of the Platonists for the Soul’s Incorporeality, Opposed, Perhaps Frivolously.

 Chapter VII.—The Soul’s Corporeality Demonstrated Out of the Gospels.

 Chapter VIII.—Other Platonist Arguments Considered.

 Chapter IX.—Particulars of the Alleged Communication to a Montanist Sister.

 Chapter X.—The Simple Nature of the Soul is Asserted with Plato. The Identity of Spirit and Soul.

 Chapter XI.—Spirit—A Term Expressive of an Operation of the Soul, Not of Its Nature.  To Be Carefully Distinguished from the Spirit of God.

 Chapter XII.—Difference Between the Mind and the Soul, and the Relation Between Them.

 Chapter XIII.—The Soul’s Supremacy.

 Chapter XIV.—The Soul Variously Divided by the Philosophers This Division is Not a Material Dissection.

 Chapter XV.—The Soul’s Vitality and Intelligence. Its Character and Seat in Man.

 Chapter XVI.—The Soul’s Parts. Elements of the Rational Soul.

 Chapter XVII.—The Fidelity of the Senses, Impugned by Plato, Vindicated by Christ Himself.

 Chapter XVIII.—Plato Suggested Certain Errors to the Gnostics.  Functions of the Soul.

 Chapter XIX.—The Intellect Coeval with the Soul in the Human Being. An Example from Aristotle Converted into Evidence Favourable to These Views.

 Chapter XX.—The Soul, as to Its Nature Uniform, But Its Faculties Variously Developed. Varieties Only Accidental.

 Chapter XXI.—As Free-Will Actuates an Individual So May His Character Change.

 Chapter XXII.—Recapitulation. Definition of the Soul.

 Chapter XXIII.—The Opinions of Sundry Heretics Which Originate Ultimately with Plato.

 Chapter XXIV.—Plato’s Inconsistency. He Supposes the Soul Self-Existent, Yet Capable of Forgetting What Passed in a Previous State.

 Chapter XXV.—Tertullian Refutes, Physiologically, the Notion that the Soul is Introduced After Birth.

 Chapter XXVI.—Scripture Alone Offers Clear Knowledge on the Questions We Have Been Controverting.

 Chapter XXVII.—Soul and Body Conceived, Formed and Perfected in Element Simultaneously.

 Chapter XXVIII.—The Pythagorean Doctrine of Transmigration Sketched and Censured.

 Chapter XXIX.—The Pythagorean Doctrine Refuted by Its Own First Principle, that Living Men are Formed from the Dead.

 Chapter XXX.—Further Refutation of the Pythagorean Theory.  The State of Contemporary Civilisation.

 Chapter XXXI.—Further Exposure of Transmigration, Its Inextricable Embarrassment.

 Chapter XXXII.—Empedocles Increased the Absurdity of Pythagoras by Developing the Posthumous Change of Men into Various Animals.

 Chapter XXXIII.—The Judicial Retribution of These Migrations Refuted with Raillery.

 Chapter XXXIV.—These Vagaries Stimulated Some Profane Corruptions of Christianity. The Profanity of Simon Magus Condemned.

 Chapter XXXV.—The Opinions of Carpocrates, Another Offset from the Pythagorean Dogmas, Stated and Confuted.

 Chapter XXXVI.—The Main Points of Our Author’s Subject. On the Sexes of the Human Race.

 Chapter XXXVII.—On the Formation and State of the Embryo. Its Relation with the Subject of This Treatise.

 Chapter XXXVIII.—On the Growth of the Soul. Its Maturity Coincident with the Maturity of the Flesh in Man.

 Chapter XXXIX.—The Evil Spirit Has Marred the Purity of the Soul from the Very Birth.

 Chapter XL.—The Body of Man Only Ancillary to the Soul in the Commission of Evil.

 Chapter XLI.—Notwithstanding the Depravity of Man’s Soul by Original Sin, There is Yet Left a Basis Whereon Divine Grace Can Work for Its Recovery by

 Chapter XLII.—Sleep, the Mirror of Death, as Introductory to the Consideration of Death.

 Chapter XLIII.—Sleep a Natural Function as Shown by Other Considerations, and by the Testimony of Scripture.

 Chapter XLIV.—The Story of Hermotimus, and the Sleeplessness of the Emperor Nero. No Separation of the Soul from the Body Until Death.

 Chapter XLV.—Dreams, an Incidental Effect of the Soul’s Activity.  Ecstasy.

 Chapter XLVI.—Diversity of Dreams and Visions. Epicurus Thought Lightly of Them, Though Generally Most Highly Valued. Instances of Dreams.

 Chapter XLVII.—Dreams Variously Classified. Some are God-Sent, as the Dreams of Nebuchadnezzar Others Simply Products of Nature.

 Chapter XLVIII.—Causes and Circumstances of Dreams. What Best Contributes to Efficient Dreaming.

 Chapter XLIX.—No Soul Naturally Exempt from Dreams.

 Chapter L.—The Absurd Opinion of Epicurus and the Profane Conceits of the Heretic Menander on Death, Even Enoch and Elijah Reserved for Death.

 Chapter LI.—Death Entirely Separates the Soul from the Body.

 Chapter LII.—All Kinds of Death a Violence to Nature, Arising from Sin.—Sin an Intrusion Upon Nature as God Created It.

 Chapter LIII.—The Entire Soul Being Indivisible Remains to the Last Act of Vitality Never Partially or Fractionally Withdrawn from the Body.

 Chapter LIV.—Whither Does the Soul Retire When It Quits the Body?  Opinions of Philosophers All More or Less Absurd. The Hades of Plato.

 Chapter LV.—The Christian Idea of the Position of Hades The Blessedness of Paradise Immediately After Death. The Privilege of the Martyrs.

 Chapter LVI.—Refutation of the Homeric View of the Soul’s Detention from Hades Owing to the Body’s Being Unburied. That Souls Prematurely Separated fr

 Chapter LVII.—Magic and Sorcery Only Apparent in Their Effects.  God Alone Can Raise the Dead.

 Chapter LVIII.—Conclusion. Points Postponed. All Souls are Kept in Hades Until the Resurrection, Anticipating Their Ultimate Misery or Bliss.

Chapter XLVI.—Diversity of Dreams and Visions. Epicurus Thought Lightly of Them, Though Generally Most Highly Valued. Instances of Dreams.

We now find ourselves constrained to express an opinion about the character of the dreams by which the soul is excited. And when shall we arrive at the subject of death? And on such a question I would say, When God shall permit: that admits of no long delay which must needs happen at all events. Epicurus has given it as his opinion that dreams are altogether vain things; (but he says this) when liberating the Deity from all sort of care, and dissolving the entire order of the world, and giving to all things the aspect of merest chance, casual in their issues, fortuitous in their nature. Well, now, if such be the nature of things, there must be some chance even for truth, because it is impossible for it to be the only thing to be exempted from the fortune which is due to all things. Homer has assigned two gates to dreams,282    See the Odyssey, xix. 562, etc. [Also, Æneid, vi. 894.]—the horny one of truth, the ivory one of error and delusion. For, they say, it is possible to see through horn, whereas ivory is untransparent.  Aristotle, while expressing his opinion that dreams are in most cases untrue, yet acknowledges that there is some truth in them. The people of Telmessus will not admit that dreams are in any case unmeaning, but they blame their own weakness when unable to conjecture their signification. Now, who is such a stranger to human experience as not sometimes to have perceived some truth in dreams? I shall force a blush from Epicurus, if I only glance at some few of the more remarkable instances. Herodotus283    See i. 107, etc. relates how that Astyages, king of the Medes, saw in a dream issuing from the womb of his virgin daughter a flood which inundated Asia; and again, in the year which followed her marriage, he saw a vine growing out from the same part of her person, which overspread the whole of Asia. The same story is told prior to Herodotus by Charon of Lampsacus. Now they who interpreted these visions did not deceive the mother when they destined her son for so great an enterprise, for Cyrus both inundated and overspread Asia. Philip of Macedon, before he became a father, had seen imprinted on the pudenda of his consort Olympias the form of a small ring, with a lion as a seal. He had concluded that an offspring from her was out of the question (I suppose because the lion only becomes once a father), when Aristodemus or Aristophon happened to conjecture that nothing of an unmeaning or empty import lay under that seal, but that a son of very illustrious character was portended. They who know anything of Alexander recognise in him the lion of that small ring.  Ephorus writes to this effect.  Again, Heraclides has told us, that a certain woman of Himera beheld in a dream Dionysius’ tyranny over Sicily.  Euphorion has publicly recorded as a fact, that, previous to giving birth to Seleucus, his mother Laodice foresaw that he was destined for the empire of Asia. I find again from Strabo, that it was owing to a dream that even Mithridates took possession of Pontus; and I further learn from Callisthenes that it was from the indication of a dream that Baraliris the Illyrian stretched his dominion from the Molossi to the frontiers of Macedon. The Romans, too, were acquainted with dreams of this kind.  From a dream Marcus Tullius (Cicero) had learnt how that one, who was yet only a little boy, and in a private station, who was also plain Julius Octavius, and personally unknown to (Cicero) himself, was the destined Augustus, and the suppressor and destroyer of (Rome’s) civil discords. This is recorded in the Commentaries of Vitellius. But visions of this prophetic kind were not confined to predictions of supreme power; for they indicated perils also, and catastrophes: as, for instance, when Cæsar was absent from the battle of Philippi through illness, and thereby escaped the sword of Brutus and Cassius, and then although he expected to encounter greater danger still from the enemy in the field, he quitted his tent for it, in obedience to a vision of Artorius, and so escaped (the capture by the enemy, who shortly after took possession of the tent); as, again, when the daughter of Polycrates of Samos foresaw the crucifixion which awaited him from the anointing of the sun and the bath of Jupiter.284    See an account of her vision and its interpretation in Herodot. iv. 124. So likewise in sleep revelations are made of high honours and eminent talents; remedies are also discovered, thefts brought to light, and treasures indicated. Thus Cicero’s eminence, whilst he was still a little boy, was foreseen by his nurse. The swan from the breast of Socrates soothing men, is his disciple Plato.  The boxer Leonymus is cured by Achilles in his dreams. Sophocles the tragic poet discovers, as he was dreaming, the golden crown, which had been lost from the citadel of Athens. Neoptolemus the tragic actor, through intimations in his sleep from Ajax himself, saves from destruction the hero’s tomb on the Rhoetean shore before Troy; and as he removes the decayed stones, he returns enriched with gold.  How many commentators and chroniclers vouch for this phenomenon? There are Artemon, Antiphon, Strato, Philochorus, Epicharmus, Serapion, Cratippus, and Dionysius of Rhodes, and Hermippus—the entire literature of the age.  I shall only laugh at all, if indeed I ought to laugh at the man who fancied that he was going to persuade us that Saturn dreamt before anybody else; which we can only believe if Aristotle, (who would fain help us to such an opinion,) lived prior to any other person.  Pray forgive me for laughing.  Epicharmus, indeed, as well as Philochorus the Athenian, assigned the very highest place among divinations to dreams.  The whole world is full of oracles of this description: there are the oracles of Amphiaraus at Oropus, of Amphilochus at Mallus, of Sarpedon in the Troad, of Trophonius in Bœotia, of Mopsus in Cilicia, of Hermione in Macedon, of Pasiphäe in Laconia. Then, again, there are others, which with their original foundations, rites, and historians, together with the entire literature of dreams, Hermippus of Berytus in five portly volumes will give you all the account of, even to satiety.  But the Stoics are very fond of saying that God, in His most watchful providence over every institution, gave us dreams amongst other preservatives of the arts and sciences of divination, as the especial support of the natural oracle. So much for the dreams to which credit has to be ascribed even by ourselves, although we must interpret them in another sense. As for all other oracles, at which no one ever dreams, what else must we declare concerning them, than that they are the diabolical contrivance of those spirits who even at that time dwelt in the eminent persons themselves, or aimed at reviving the memory of them as the mere stage of their evil purposes, going so far as to counterfeit a divine power under their shape and form, and, with equal persistence in evil, deceiving men by their very boons of remedies, warnings, and forecasts,—the only effect of which was to injure their victims the more they helped them; while the means whereby they rendered the help withdrew them from all search after the true God, by insinuating into their minds ideas of the false one? And of course so pernicious an influence as this is not shut up nor limited within the boundaries of shrines and temples: it roams abroad, it flies through the air, and all the while is free and unchecked. So that nobody can doubt that our very homes lie open to these diabolical spirits, who beset their human prey with their fantasies not only in their chapels but also in their chambers.

CAPUT XLVI.

Ecce rursus urgemur, etiam de ipsorum somniorum retractatu, quibus anima jactatur, exprimere. Et quando perveniemus ad mortem? Et hic dixerim, cum Deus dederit: nullae longae morae ejus quod eveniet. Vana in totum somnia Epicurus judicavit, liberans a negotiis divinitatem, et dissolvens ordinem rerum, et in passivitate omnia spargens, ut eventui 0726C exposita, et fortuita. Porro, si ita est, ergo erit aliquis et veritatis eventus, quia non capit solam eam eventui omnibus debito eximi. Homerus duas portas divisit somniis, corneam veritatis, fallaciae eburneam. Respicere est enim, inquiunt, per cornu, ebur 0727A autem caecum est. Aristoteles, majore sententiam mendacio recitans, agnoscit et veram . Telmessenses nulla somnia evacuant, imbecillitatem conjectationis incusant. Quis autem tam extraneus humanitatis, ut non aliquam aliquando visionem fidelem senserit? Pauca de insignioribus perstringens, Epicuro pudorem imperabo. Astyages Medorum regnator, quod filiae Mandanae adhuc virginis vesicam in diluvionem Asiae finxisse somnio viderit, Herodotus refert: item anno post nuptias ejus ex hisdem locis vitem exortam toti Asiae incubasse. Hoc etiam Charon Lampsacenus Herodoto prior tradit. Qui filium ejus tanto operi interpretati sunt, non fefellrunt; siquidem Asiam Cyrus et mersit et pressit. Philippus Macedo nondum pater, Olympiadis uxoris 0727B naturam obsignasse viderat annulo: leo erat signum. Crediderat praeclusam genituram, opinor, quia leo semel pater est. Aristodemus vel Aristophon conjectans, imo nihil vacuum obsignari; filium, et quidem maximi impetus, portendi. Alexandrum qui sciunt, leonem annuli recognoscunt: 0728A Ephorus scribit. Sed et Dionysii Siciliae tyrannidem Himeraea quaedam somniavit: Heraclides prodidit. Et Seleuco regnum Asiae Laodice mater nondum eum enixa praevidit: Euphorion provulgavit. Mithridatem quoque ex somnio Ponti potitum a Strabone cognosco. Et Baralirem Illyricum a Molossis usque Macedoniam ex somnio dominatum de Callisthene disco. Noverunt et Romani veritatis hujusmodi somnia. Reformatorem imperii, puerulum adhuc et privatum loci, et Julium Octavium tantum, et sibi ignotum, Marcus Tullius jam et Augustum, et civilium turbinum sepultorem de somnio norat; in Vitellii commentariis conditum est. Nec haec sola species erit summarum praedicatrix potestatum, sed et periculorum et exitiorum; ut 0728B cum Caesar in proelio perduellium Bruti et Cassii Philippis aeger, majus tamen alias discrimen, Artorii visione, destituto tabernaculo, evadit: ut cum Polycrati Samio filia crucem prospicit de solis unguine et lavacro Jovis . Revelantur et honores et ingenia per quietem, praestantur et medelae, produntur 0729A et furta, conferuntur et thesauri. Ciceronis denique dignitatem, parvuli etiam nunc, gerula jam sua inspexerat, Cycnus de sinu Socratis, demulcens homines, discipulus Plato est. Cleonymus pyctes ab Achille curatur in somnis. Coronam auream cum ex arce Athenae perdidissent, Sophocles tragicus somniando redinvenit. Neoptolemus tragoedus, apud Rheteum Trojae, sepulcrum Ajacis , monitus in romnis ab ipso, ruina liberat; et cum lapidum senia deponit, dives inde auro redit. Quanti autem commentatores et adfirmatores in hanc rem! Artemon, Antiphon, Strato, Philochorus, Epicharmus, Serapion, Cratippus, et Dionysius rhodius, Hermippus, tota saeculi literatura. Solum, si forte, ridebo, 0730A qui se existimavit persuasurum, quod prior omnibus Saturnus somniarit : nisi si et prior omnibus vixit Aristoteles. Ignosce ridenti. Caeterum, Epicharmus etiam summum apicem inter divinationes somniis extulit, cum Philochoro Atheniensi. Nam et oraculis hoc genus stipatus est orbis; ut Amphiarai apud Oropum, Amphilochi apud Mallum, Sarpedonis in Troade, Trophonii in Boeotia Mopsi in Cilicia, Hermoniae in Macedonia, Pasiphaae in Laconica. Caetera cum suis et originibus, et ritibus, et relationibus, cum omni deinceps historia somniorum, Hermippus Beritensis quinione voluminum satiatissime exhibebit 0731A . Sed et Stoici Deum malunt providentissimum humanae institutioni, inter caetera praesidia divinatricum artium et disciplinarum, somnia quoque nobis indidisse, peculiare solatium naturalis oraculi. Haec quantum ad fidem somniorum a nobis quoque consignandam, et taliter interpretandam. Nam de oraculis etiam caeteris, apud quae nemo dormitat, quid aliud pronuntiabimus, quam daemoniacam esse rationem eorum spirituum, qui jam tunc in ipsis hominibus habitaverint, vel memorias eorum affectaverint ad omnem malitiae suae scenam, in ista aeque specie divinitatem mentientes, eademque industria etiam per beneficia fallentes medicinarum, et admonitionum, et praenuntiationum, quae magis laedant juvando, dum per ea quae juvant, ab 0731B inquisitione verae divinitatis abducunt, ex insinuatione falsae. Et utique non clausa vis est, nec sacrariorum circumscribitur terminis; vaga et pervolatica, et interim libera est: quo nemo dubitaverit, domus quoque daemoniis patere; nec tantum in adytis, sed in cubiculis homines imaginihus circum venire.