Religious Communities of the Name of Jesus
Feast of the Holy Name of Mary
Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary
United Dioceses of Narni and Terni
Catholic Young Men's National Union
Feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Sisters of Charity of Nazareth
Sts. Nereus and Achilleus, Domitilla and Pancratius
Felix-Jean-Baptiste-Joseph Nève
Vicariate Apostolic of New Caldonia
Vicariate Apostolic of New Hebrides
Vicariate Apostolic of New Pomerania
Republic and Diocese of Nicaragua
Nicene and Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed
Diocese of Nicopolis (Nicopolitana)
Titular Archdiocese of Nicosia
Diocese of Nicotera and Tropea
Juan Eusebio Nieremberg y Otin
Nominalism, Realism, Conceptualism
Prefecture Apostolic of the Northern Territory
Notitia Provinciarum et Civitatum Africae
(Nazarenos, Nazarenus).
As a name applied to Christ, the word Nazarene occurs only once in the Douai Version, viz. in Matt., ii, 23, where the Vulgate reading is Nazaroeus (Nazoraios). Elsewhere (Matt., xxvi, 71; Mark, i, 24; x, 47; xiv, 67; Luke, iv, 34; John, xvii, 5; Acts, ii, 22 etc.) Jesus Nazarenus is uniformly translated "Jesus of Nazareth". In Acts, xxiv, 5 the Christians are spoken of by Tertullus as "the sect of the Nazarenes". The name has obvious reference to Nazareth, the early home of the Saviour, and it is applied to Him in the Gospels only by those who are outside the circle of His intimate friends. In the Acts, however, it is employed by St. Peter and St. Paul, and by the risen Lord Himself, according to Paul's account of his conversion given to the multitude of angry Jews who had attacked him in the Temple (Acts, xxii, 8). In Matt., ii, 23 we read that "coming he dwelt in a city said by the prophets: That he shall be called a Nazarene". No explicit prediction to this effect is found in the recorded Old Testament prophecies, and various theories have been advanced to explain the reference. Some would connect the passage with the netzer (flower) of Is., xi, 1; others with the netzure (dregs, Douai) of Is., xlix, 6, but these interpretations seem far-fetched, to say nothing of other difficulties. That the quality of Nazarite is alluded to by the Evangelist is disapproved by the fact that Christ was not a Nazarite, nor is the theory that reference is here made to some lost or merely traditional prophecy supported by any positive proof. No more plausible explanation has been found that the one given by St. Jerome in his "Commentary on St. Matthew", viz. that the mention of the "prophets" in the plural precludes references to any single passage, and points rather to the general predictions that the Messias would be despised (cf. John, i, 46).
James F. Driscoll.