The Festal Letters, and their Index.
B.—The Festal Letters, and Their Index,
*XII.— (Probably for 340 a.d.) To the Beloved Brother, and our fellow Minister Serapion .
From Letter XXII .— (For 350.)
From Letter XXIV .— (For 352.)
From Letter XXVIII .— (For 356.)
From Letter XLIII.— (For 371.)
Letter XLVII.— To the Church of Alexandria on the same occasion.
Letter XLVIII.— Letter to Amun . Written before 354 a.d.
Letter XLIX.— Letter to Dracontius . Written a.d. 354 or 355.
Letter L.— First Letter to Lucifer .
Letter LI.— Second Letter to Lucifer.
Letter LII.— First Letter to Monks . (Written 358–360).
Letter LIII.— Second Letter to Monks.
Letter LIV.— To Serapion, concerning the death of Arius.
Letter LV.— Letter to Rufinianus.
Letter LVI.— To the Emperor Jovian.
Letter LVII.— First Letter to Orsisius .
Letter LVIII.— Second Letter to Orsisius .
Letter LX.— To Adelphius , Bishop and Confessor: against the Arians.
Letter LXI.— Letter to Maximus. (Written about 371 a.d.)
Letter LXII.— To John and Antiochus .
Letter LXIII.— Letter to the Presbyter Palladius .
Letter LXIV.—To Diodorus (fragment).
To my lord, son, and most beloved fellow-minister Diodorus [bishop of Tyre]994 This fragment (Migne xxvi. 1261) is given by Facundus, Def. Tr. Cap. iv. 2, who claims it as addressed to Diodorus of Tarsus, the famous Antiochene confessor and master of Chrysostom and Theodore. Unfortunately this is impossible, as Diodore became bishop of Tarsus not before 378, i.e. after Athan. was dead. The letter itself decides for Diodorus of Tyre, whom Paulinus of Antioch had quite unwarrantably ordained to this see (cf. Rufin, H. E. ii. 21). Whether (as has been held on the authority of Rufinus) Diodorus, or (as Le Quien, Or. Chr. ii. 865 sq. holds) Zeno, the nominee of Meletius, was first in the field in the unseemly scramble, is doubtful. Zeno is already bishop in 365 (Soz. vi. 12); the date of the appointment of Diodorus, whose claim is at any rate no better than that of Paulinus himself, is quite uncertain (see also Prolegg. ch. ii. §§9, 10). Diodorus was the friend and correspondent of Epiphanius, and of Timothy, bishop of Alexandria, second from Athanasius. Facundus confuses him in these particulars also with his namesake of Tarsus, but the mistake is thoroughly sifted by Tillemont, Mem. viii. pp. 238, 712. The letter is important, along with Letter 56, and the correspondence of S. Basil, as illustrating the attitude of Athanasius with regard to the unhappy schism of Antioch., Athanasius greeting in the Lord.
I thank my Lord, Who is everywhere establishing His doctrine, and chiefly so by means of His own sons, such as actual fact shews you to be. For before your Reverence wrote, we knew how great grace has been brought to pass in Tyre by means of your perseverance. And we rejoice with you that by your means Tyre also has learned the right word of piety. And I indeed took an opportunity of writing to you, longed-for and beloved: but I marvel at your not having replied to my letter. Be not then slow to write at once, knowing that you give me refreshment, as a son to his father, and make me exceeding glad, as a herald of truth. And enter upon no controversy with the heretics, but overcome their argumentativeness with silence, their ill-will with courtesy. For thus your speech shall be ‘with grace, seasoned with salt995 Col. iv. 6.,’ while they [will be judged] by the conscience of all.…