On the Resurrection of the Flesh.
Chapter X.—Holy Scripture Magnifies the Flesh, as to Its Nature and Its Prospects.
Chapter XI.—The Power of God Fully Competent to Effect the Resurrection of the Flesh.
Chapter XII.—Some Analogies in Nature Which Corroborate the Resurrection of the Flesh.
Chapter XXV.—St. John, in the Apocalypse, Equally Explicit in Asserting the Same Great Doctrine.
Chapter XXVII.—Certain Metaphorical Terms Explained of the Resurrection of the Flesh.
Chapter XXVIII.—Prophetic Things and Actions, as Well as Words, Attest This Great Doctrine.
Chapter XXIX.—Ezekiel’s Vision of the Dry Bones Quoted.
Chapter XXXI.—Other Passages Out of the Prophets Applied to the Resurrection of the Flesh.
Chapter XXXVI.—Christ’s Refutation of the Sadducees, and Affirmation of Catholic Doctrine.
Chapter XXXIX.—Additional Evidence Afforded to Us in the Acts of the Apostles.
Chapter XLI.—The Dissolution of Our Tabernacle Consistent with the Resurrection of Our Bodies.
Chapter XLII.—Death Changes, Without Destroying, Our Mortal Bodies. Remains of the Giants.
Chapter XLV.—The Old Man and the New Man of St. Paul Explained.
Chapter XLVII.—St. Paul, All Through, Promises Eternal Life to the Body.
Chapter L.—In What Sense Flesh and Blood are Excluded from the Kingdom of God.
Chapter LXII.—Our Destined Likeness to the Angels in the Glorious Life of the Resurrection.
Chapter LX.—All the Characteristics of Our Bodies—Sex, Various Limbs, Etc.—Will Be Retained, Whatever Change of Functions These May Have, of Which Point, However, We are No Judges. Analogy of the Repaired Ship.
But behold how persistently they still accumulate their cavils against the flesh, especially against its identity, deriving their arguments even from the functions of our limbs; on the one hand saying that these ought to continue permanently pursuing their labours and enjoyments, as appendages to the same corporeal frame; and on the other hand contending that, inasmuch as the functions of the limbs shall one day come to an end, the bodily frame itself must be destroyed, its permanence without its limbs being deemed to be as inconceivable, as that of the limbs themselves without their functions! What, they ask, will then be the use of the cavity of our mouth, and its rows of teeth, and the passage of the throat, and the branch-way of the stomach, and the gulf of the belly, and the entangled tissue of the bowels, when there shall no longer be room for eating and drinking? What more will there be for these members to take in, masticate, swallow, secrete, digest, eject? Of what avail will be our very hands, and feet, and all our labouring limbs, when even all care about food shall cease? What purpose can be served by loins, conscious of seminal secretions, and all the other organs of generation, in the two sexes, and the laboratories of embryos, and the fountains of the breast, when concubinage, and pregnancy, and infant nurture shall cease? In short, what will be the use of the entire body, when the entire body shall become useless? In reply to all this, we have then already settled the principle that the dispensation of the future state ought not to be compared with that of the present world, and that in the interval between them a change will take place; and we now add the remark, that these functions of our bodily limbs will continue to supply the needs of this life up to the moment when life itself shall pass away from time to eternity, as the natural body gives place to the spiritual, until “this mortal puts on immorality, and this corruptible puts on incorruption:”463 1 Cor. xv. 53. so that when life shall itself become freed from all wants, our limbs shall then be freed also from their services, and therefore will be no longer wanted. Still, although liberated from their offices, they will be yet preserved for judgment, “that every one may receive the things done in his body.”464 2 Cor. v. 10. For the judgment-seat of God requires that man be kept entire. Entire, however, he cannot be without his limbs, of the substance of which, not the functions, he consists; unless, forsooth, you will be bold enough to maintain that a ship is perfect without her keel, or her bow, or her stern, and without the solidity of her entire frame. And yet how often have we seen the same ship, after being shattered with the storm and broken by decay, with all her timbers repaired and restored, gallantly riding on the wave in all the beauty of a renewed fabric! Do we then disquiet ourselves with doubt about God’s skill, and will, and rights? Besides, if a wealthy shipowner, who does not grudge money merely for his amusement or show, thoroughly repairs his ship, and then chooses that she should make no further voyages, will you contend that the old form and finish is still not necessary to the vessel, although she is no longer meant for actual service, when the mere safety of a ship requires such completeness irrespective of service? The sole question, therefore, which is enough for us to consider here, is whether the Lord, when He ordains salvation for man, intends it for his flesh; whether it is His will that the selfsame flesh shall be renewed. If so, it will be improper for you to rule, from the inutility of its limbs in the future state, that the flesh will be incapable of renovation. For a thing may be renewed, and yet be useless from having nothing to do; but it cannot be said to be useless if it has no existence. If, indeed, it has existence, it will be quite possible for it also not to be useless; it may possibly have something to do; for in the presence of God there will be no idleness.
CAPUT LX.
Ecce autem, ut adhuc controversiam exaggerent , carni maxime eidem, de officiis quoque membrorum argumentantur, aut et ipsa dicentes permanere debere in suis operibus et fructibus, ut eidem corpulentiae adscripta; aut, quia constet discessura esse officia membrorum, corpulentiam quoque eradant: cujus scilicet perseverantia credenda non sit utique sine membris, quia nec membra credenda sint sine 0882B officiis. Quo enim jam, inquiunt, spelunca haec oris, et dentium statio, et gulae lapsus, et compitum stomachi, et alvi gurges, et intestinorum perplexa proceritas, cum esui et potui locus non erit? Quo hujusmodi membra admittunt, subigunt, devolvunt, dividunt, digerunt, egerunt? quo manus ipsae et pedes et operarii quique artus, cum victus etiam cura cessabit? quo renes conscii seminum, et reliqua genitalium utriusque sexus, et conceptuum stabula, et uberum fontes, decessuro concubitu, et foetu, et educatu? postremo, quo totum corpus, totum scilicet vacaturum? Ad haec ergo praestruximus, non oportere committi futurorum atque praesentium dispositiones, intercessura tunc demutatione: et nunc superstruimus officia ista membrorum necessitatibus 0882C vitae hujus eo usque consistere, donec et ipsa vita transferatur a temporalitate in aeternitatem, sicut animale corpus in spiritale, dum mortale istud induet immortalitatem, et corruptivum istud incorruptelam (I Cor. XV); et ipsa autem liberata tunc vita a necessitatibus, liberabuntur et membra ab officiis; nec ideo non erunt necessaria. Licet enim officiis liberentur, sed judiciis retinentur; ut quis referat per corpus, prout gessit (II Cor. V). Salvum enim hominem 0883A tribunal Dei exigit; salvum vero sine membris non licet eum, ex quorum non officiis, sed substantiis constat. Nisi forte, et navem sine carina, sine prora, sine puppi, sine compaginis totius incolumitate salvam adseverabis. Et tamen navem procella dissipatam, vel carie dissolutam, redactis et recuratis omnibus membris, eamdem saepe conspeximus etiam titulo restitutionis gloriantem. De Dei artificio, et arbitrio, et jure, torquemur? Porro, si dives Dominus et liberalis, adfectui aut gloriae suae praestans solam navis restitutionem, hactenus eam voluerit operari, idcirco tu negabis necessariam illi compaginem pristinam, ut exinde jam vacaturam, cum soli saluti navis sine operatione conveniat? Igitur hoc tantummodo discere sufficit, an Dominus, 0883B hominem saluti destinando, carnem destinarit, an eamdem velit denuo esse, quam non debebis ex futura membrorum vacatione praescribere denuo esse non posse. Licet enim esse quid denuo, et nihilominus vacare; nec potest autem dici vacare, si non sit. At enim si sit, poterit et non vacare: nihil enim apud Deum vacabit.