Chapter 16.—The Old Philosophers are Not to Be Consulted Concerning the Resurrection and Concerning Things to Come.
21. These people also blame us for believing the resurrection of the flesh, and rather wish us to believe themselves concerning these things. As though, because they have been able to understand the high and unchangeable substance by the things which are made,517 Rom. i. 20 for this reason they had a claim to be consulted concerning the revolutions of mutable things, or concerning the connected order of the ages. For pray, because they dispute most truly, and persuade us by most certain proofs, that all things temporal are made after a science that is eternal, are they therefore able to see clearly in the matter of this science itself, or to collect from it, how many kinds of animals there are, what are the seeds of each in their beginnings, what measure in their increase, what numbers run through their conceptions, births, ages, settings; what motions in desiring things according to their nature, and in avoiding the contrary? Have they not sought out all these things, not through that unchangeable wisdom, but through the actual history of places and times, or have trusted the written experience of others? Wherefore it is the less to be wondered at, that they have utterly failed in searching out the succession of more lengthened ages, and in finding any goal of that course, down which, as though down a river, the human race is sailing, and the transition thence of each to its own appropriate end. For these are subjects which historians could not describe, inasmuch as they are far in the future, and have been experienced and related by no one. Nor have those philosophers, who have profiled better than others in that high and eternal science, been able to grasp such subjects with the understanding; otherwise they would not be inquiring as they could into past things of the kind, such as are in the province of historians, but rather would foreknow also things future; and those who are able to do this are called by them soothsayers, but by us prophets:
CAPUT XVI.
21. Philosophi veteres de resurrectione ac rebus futuris non consulendi. Hi etiam resurrectionem carnis nos credere reprehendunt, sibique potius etiam de his rebus credi volunt. Quasi vero, quia praecelsam incommutabilemque substantiam per illa quae facta sunt intelligere potuerunt (Rom. I, 20), propterea de conversione rerum mutabilium, aut de contexto saeculorum ordine consulendi sint. Numquid enim quia verissime disputant, et documentis certissimis persuadent, aeternis rationibus omnia temporalia fieri, propterea potuerunt in ipsis rationibus perspicere, vel ex ipsis colligere quot sint animalium genera, quae semina singulorum in exordiis, qui modus in incrementis, qui numeri per conceptus, per ortus, per aetates, per occasus, qui motus in appetendis quae secundum naturam sunt, fugiendisque contrariis? Nonne ista omnia, non per illam incommutabilem sapientiam, sed per locorum ac temporum historiam quaesierunt, et ab aliis experta atque conscripta crediderunt? Quo minus mirandum est, nullo modo eos potuisse prolixiorum saeculorum seriem vestigare, et quamdam metam hujus excursus, quo tanquam fluvio genus decurrit humanum, atque inde conversionem ad suum cuique debitum terminum. Ista enim nec historici scribere potuerunt longe futura et a nullo experta atque narrata. Nec isti philosophi caeteris meliores in illis summis aeternisque rationibus intellectu talia contemplati sunt: alioquin non ejusdem generis praeterita quae potuerunt historici inquirerent, sed potius et futura praenoscerent; quod qui potuerunt, ab eis vates, a nostris Prophetae appellati sunt.