The fount of knowledge i: the philosophical chapters

 Preface

 Chapter 1

 Chapter 2

 Chapter 3

 Chapter 4

 Chapter 4 (variant)

 Chapter 5

 Chapter 6

 Chapter 6 (variant)

 Chapter 7

 Chapter 8

 Chapter 9

 Chapter 10

 Chapters 9-10 (variants)

 Chapter 11

 Chapter 12

 Chapter 13

 Chapter 14

 Chapter 15

 Chapter 16

 The term subject is taken in two ways: as subject of existence and as subject of predication. we have a subject of existence in such a case as that of

 Chapter 17

 Chapter 18

 Chapter 19

 Chapter 20

 Chapter 21

 Chapter 22

 Chapter 23

 Chapter 24

 Chapter 25

 Chapter 26

 Chapter 27

 Chapter 28

 Chapter 29

 Chapter 30

 Chapter 31

 Chapter 32

 Chapter 33

 Chapter 34

 Chapter 35

 Chapter 36

 Chapter 37

 Chapter 38

 Chapter 39

 Chapter 40

 Chapter 41

 Chapter 42

 Chapter 43

 Chapter 44

 Chapter 45

 Chapter 46

 Substance, then, is a most general genus. the body is a species of substance, and genus of the animate. the animate is a species of body, and genus of

 Chapter 48

 Chapter 49

 Chapter 50

 Chapter 51

 Chapter 52

 Chapter 53

 Chapter 54

 Chapter 55

 Chapter 56

 Chapter 57

 Chapter 58

 Chapter 59

 Chapter 60

 Chapter 61

 Chapter 62

 Chapter 63

 Chapter 64

 Chapter 65

 Chapter 67 [!]

 Chapter 66 [!]

 Chapter 68

 Explanation of expressions

Chapter 64

One should know that the purpose of the logical process is to make a clear statement of proof. The proof is a syllogism, and this syllogism is made up of two true premises and the conclusion. For example, if I want to prove that the soul is immortal, I say: ‘Everything that is perpetually in motion is immortal.’ This is a premise. Then I state a second premise: ‘The soul is perpetually in motion. Then the conclusion: ‘Therefore, the soul is immortal. Each part of the premise is called a term. A term is that into which every premise is resolved. For example, the premise goes: ‘Everything that is perpetually in motion is immortal. The part ‘everything, in so far as it is a part of the premise, is called a term. The ‘that is perpetually in motion is likewise called a term, as is the ‘immortal, and also the ‘is.

One should know that all the premises must be true and that the conclusion must follow from the premises. For, if one of the premises were found to be false, or the conclusion, then it would not be a syllogism, but a paralogism. Furthermore, there is the simple word, the noun, the verbal phrase, the statement, and the term. In respect to their subject, these five do not differ from one another. Their difference is only relative. ‘Man, for example, as a simple significant term, is called a simple word; as subject, it is called a noun; as fulfilling the functions of a predicate, it is called a verbal phrase; as part of an affirmation and negation, it is called statement; and as part of a premise and of a syllogism, it is called a term.

One should know that in the premise, that is, in the affirmation and negation, the subject is called a noun, whereas the predicate is called a verbal phrase. For example, ‘the man walks is an affirmation. ‘The man is the subject, and is called noun. ‘Walks fulfills the function of a predicate, and is called a verbal phrase. In ‘Socrates is noble the subject is ‘Socrates and it is called a noun. The phrase ‘is noble fulfills the function of a predicate, and, as a part of the affirmation, is called a verbal phrase. Even though grammarians call ‘noble a complementary word, yet, to put it simply, whatever accompanies the ‘is is a verbal phrase.

It should be known that there is no difference between