The Refutation of All Heresies.
Chapter I.—Thales His Physics and Theology Founder of Greek Astronomy.
Chapter III.—Empedocles His Twofold Cause Tenet of Transmigration.
Chapter IV.—Heraclitus His Universal Dogmatism His Theory of Flux Other Systems.
Chapter V.—Anaximander His Theory of the Infinite His Astronomic Opinions His Physics.
Chapter IX.—Parmenides His Theory of “Unity ” His Eschatology.
Chapter X.—Leucippus His Atomic Theory.
Chapter XI.—Democritus His Duality of Principles His Cosmogony.
Chapter XII.—Xenophanes His Scepticism His Notions of God and Nature Believes in a Flood.
Chapter XIII.—Ecphantus His Scepticism Tenet of Infinity.
Chapter XIV.—Hippo His Duality of Principles His Psychology.
Chapter XV.—Socrates His Philosophy Reproduced by Plato.
Chapter XVIII.—The Stoics Their Superiority in Logic Fatalists Their Doctrine of Conflagrations.
Chapter XX.—The Academics Difference of Opinion Among Them.
Chapter XXII.—The Druids Progenitors of Their System.
Chapter I.—System of the Astrologers Sidereal Influence Configuration of the Stars.
Chapter II.—Doctrines Concerning Æons The Chaldean Astrology Heresy Derivable from It.
Chapter VI.—Zodiacal Influence Origin of Sidereal Names.
Chapter VII.—Practical Absurdity of the Chaldaic Art Development of the Art.
Chapter IX.—Further Astronomic Calculations.
Chapter X.—Theory of Stellar Motion and Distance in Accordance with Harmony.
Chapter XI.—Theory of the Size of the Heavenly Bodies in Accordance with Numerical Harmonies.
Chapter XII.—Waste of Mental Energy in the Systems of the Astrologers.
Chapter XVI.—Type of Those Born Under Taurus.
Chapter XVII.—Type of Those Born Under Gemini.
Chapter XVIII.—Type of Those Born Under Cancer.
Chapter XIX.—Type of Those Born Under Leo.
Chapter XX.—Type of Those Born Under Virgo.
Chapter XXI.—Type of Those Born Under Libra.
Chapter XXII.—Type of Those Born Under Scorpio.
Chapter XXIII.—Type of Those Born Under Sagittarius.
Chapter XXIV.—Type of Those Born Under Capricorn.
Chapter XXV.—Type of Those Born Under Aquarius.
Chapter XXVI.—Type of Those Born Under Pisces.
Chapter XXVII.—Futility of This Theory of Stellar Influence.
Chapter XXIX.—Display of Different Eggs.
Chapter XXX.—Self-Slaughter of Sheep.
Chapter XXXI.—Method of Poisoning Goats.
Chapter XXXII.—Imitations of Thunder, and Other Illusions.
Chapter XXXIII.—The Burning Æsculapius Tricks with Fire.
Chapter XXXIV.—The Illusion of the Sealed Letters Object in Detailing These Juggleries.
Chapter XXXVI.—Mode of Managing an Apparition.
Chapter XXXVII.—Illusive Appearance of the Moon.
Chapter XXXVIII.—Illusive Appearance of the Stars.
Chapter XXXIX.—Imitation of an Earthquake.
Chapter XL.—Trick with the Liver.
Chapter XLI.—Making a Skull Speak.
Chapter XLII.—The Fraud of the Foregoing Practices Their Connection with Heresy.
Chapter XLIV.—Egyptian Theory of Nature Their Amulets.
Chapter XLV.—Use of the Foregoing Discussions.
Chapter XLVII.—Opinions of the Heretics Borrowed from Aratus.
Chapter XLIX.—Symbol of the Creature And of Spirit And of the Different Orders of Animals.
Chapter L.—Folly of Astrology.
Chapter V.—Explanation of the System of the Naasseni Taken from One of Their Hymns.
Chapter VI.—The Ophites the Grand Source of Heresy.
Chapter VII.—The System of the Peratæ Their Tritheism Explanation of the Incarnation.
Chapter IX.—System of the Peratæ Explained Out of One of Their Own Books.
Chapter XII.—Compendious Statement of the Doctrines of the Peratæ.
Chapter XIII.—The Peratic Heresy Not Generally Known.
Chapter XVII.—The Sethian Doctrines to Be Learned from the “Paraphrase of Seth.”
Chapter XVIII.—The System of Justinus Antiscriptural and Essentially Pagan.
Chapter XIX.—The Justinian Heresy Unfolded in the “Book of Baruch.”
Chapter XX.—The Cosmogony of Justinus an Allegorical Explanation of Herodotus’ Legend of Hercules.
Chapter XXII.—Oath Used by the Justinian Heretics The Book of Baruch The Repertory of Their System.
Chapter XXIII.—Subsequent Heresies Deducible from the System of Justinus.
Chapter III.—Story of Apsethus the Libyan.
Chapter V.—Simon Appeals to Scripture in Support of His System.
Chapter VI.—Simon’s System Expounded in the Work, Great Announcement Follows Empedocles.
Chapter VII.—Simon’s System of a Threefold Emanation by Pairs.
Chapter X.—Simon’s Explanation of the First Two Books of Moses.
Chapter XI.—Simon’s Explanation of the Three Last Books of the Pentateuch.
Chapter XII.—Fire a Primal Principle, According to Simon.
Chapter XIII.—His Doctrine of Emanation Further Expanded.
Chapter XVI.—Heresy of Valentinus Derived from Plato and Pythagoras.
Chapter XVII.—Origin of the Greek Philosophy.
Chapter XVIII.—Pythagoras’ System of Numbers.
Chapter XIX.—Pythagoras’ Duality of Substances His “Categories.”
Chapter XX.—Pythagoras’ Cosmogony Similar to that of Empedocles.
Chapter XXI.—Other Opinions of Pythagoras.
Chapter XXII.—The “Sayings” Of Pythagoras.
Chapter XXIII.—Pythagoras’ Astronomic System.
Chapter XXVI.—Valentinus’ Explanation of the Existence of Christ and the Spirit.
Chapter XXVII.—Valentinus’ Explanation of the Existence of Jesus Power of Jesus Over Humanity.
Chapter XXVIII.—The Valentinian Origin of the Creation.
Chapter XXIX.—The Other Valentinian Emanations in Conformity with the Pythagorean System of Numbers.
Chapter XXXI.—Further Doctrines of Valentinus Respecting the Æons Reasons for the Incarnation.
Chapter XXXII.—Valentinus Convicted of Plagiarisms from Plato.
Chapter XXXIII.—Secundus’ System of Æons Epiphanes Ptolemæus.
Chapter XXXIV.—System of Marcus A Mere Impostor His Wicked Devices Upon the Eucharistic Cup.
Chapter XXXV.—Further Acts of Jugglery on the Part of Marcus.
Chapter XXXVI.—The Heretical Practices of the Marcites in Regard of Baptism.
Chapter XXXVIII.—Marcus’ System of Letters.
Chapter XXXIX.—The Quaternion Exhibits “Truth.”
Chapter XL.—The Name of Christ Jesus.
Chapter XLI.—Marcus’ Mystic Interpretation of the Alphabet.
Chapter XLII.—His System Applied to Explain Our Lord’s Life and Death.
Chapter XLIII—Letters, Symbols of the Heavens.
Chapter XLIV.—Respecting the Generation of the Twenty-Four Letters.
Chapter XLV.—Why Jesus is Called Alpha.
Chapter XLVI.—Marcus’ Account of the Birth and Life of Our Lord.
Chapter XLVIII.—Their Cosmogony Framed According to These Mystic Doctrines of Letters.
Chapter XLIX.—The Work of the Demiurge Perishable.
Chapter L.—Marcus and Colarbasus Refuted by Irenæus.
Chapter II.—The System of Basilides Derived from Aristotle.
Chapter III.—Sketch of Aristotle’s Philosophy.
Chapter IV.—Aristotle’s General Idea.
Chapter V.—Nonentity as a Cause.
Chapter VI.—Substance, According to Aristotle The Predicates.
Chapter IX.—Basilides Adopts the Aristotelian Doctrine of “Nonentity.”
Chapter X.—Origin of the World Basilides’ Account of the “Sonship.”
Chapter XI.—The “Great Archon” Of Basilides.
Chapter XII.—Basilides Adopts the “Entelecheia” Of Aristotle.
Chapter XIII.—Further Explanation of the “Sonship.”
Chapter XVI.—The System of Saturnilus.
Chapter XVIII.—Source of Marcionism Empedocles Reasserted as the Suggester of the Heresy.
Chapter XIX.—The Heresy of Prepon Follows Empedocles Marcion Rejects the Generation of the Saviour.
Chapter XXI.—The System of Cerinthus Concerning Christ.
Chapter XXII.—Doctrine of the Ebionæans.
Chapter XXIII.—The Heresy of Theodotus.
Chapter XXIV.—The Melchisedecians The Nicolaitans.
Chapter XXV.—The Heresy of Cerdon.
Chapter XXVI.—The Doctrines of Apelles Philumene, His Prophetess.
Chapter I.—Heresies Hitherto Refuted Opinions of the Docetæ.
Chapter IV.—Docetic Doctrine Derived from the Greek Sophists.
Chapter V.—Monoïmus Man the Universe, According to Monoïmus His System of the Monad.
Chapter VI.—Monoïmus’ “Iota ” His Notion of the “Son of Man.”
Chapter VII.—Monoïmus on the Sabbath Allegorizes the Rod of Moses Notion Concerning the Decalogue.
Chapter XI.—The Quartodecimans.
Chapter XII.—The Montanists Priscilla and Maximilla Their Prophetesses Some of Them Noetians.
Chapter III.—Noetianism an Offshoot from the Heraclitic Philosophy.
Chapter IV.—An Account of the System of Heraclitus.
Chapter VIII.—Sect of the Elchasaites Hippolytus’ Opposition to It.
Chapter IX.—Elchasai Derived His System from Pythagoras Practised Incantations.
Chapter X.—Elchasai’s Mode of Administering Baptism Formularies.
Chapter XI.—Precepts of Elchasai.
Chapter XII.—The Heresy of the Elchasaites a Derivative One.
Chapter XIII.—The Jewish Sects.
Chapter XIV.—The Tenets of the Esseni.
Chapter XV.—The Tenets of the Esseni Continued.
Chapter XVI.—The Tenets of the Esseni Continued.
Chapter XVII.—The Tenets of the Esseni Continued.
Chapter XVIII.—The Tenets of the Esseni Continued.
Chapter XIX.—The Tenets of the Esseni Continued.
Chapter XX.—The Tenets of the Esseni Concluded.
Chapter XXI.—Different Sects of the Esseni.
Chapter XXII.—Belief of the Esseni in the Resurrection Their System a Suggestive One.
Chapter XXIII.—Another Sect of the Esseni: the Pharisees.
Chapter XXV.—The Jewish Religion.
Chapter XXVI.—Conclusion to the Work Explained.
Chapter II.—Summary of the Opinions of Philosophers.
Chapter III.—Summary of the Opinions of Philosophers Continued.
Chapter IV.—Summary of the Opinions of Philosophers Continued.
Chapter XV.—Marcion and Cerdo.
Chapter XXI.—The Phrygians or Montanists.
Chapter XXII.—The Phrygians or Montanists Continued.
Chapter XXIII.—Noetus and Callistus.
Chapter XXVI.—Jewish Chronology.
Chapter XXVII.—Jewish Chronology Continued.
Chapter XXVIII.—The Doctrine of the Truth.
Chapter XLVIII.—Invention of the Lyre; Allegorizing the Appearance and Position of the Stars; Origin of the Phœnicians; The Logos Identified by Aratus with the Constellation Canis; Influence of Canis on Fertility and Life Generally.
And (Aratus) says that (the constellations) Lyra and Corona have been placed on both sides near him,—now I mean Engonasis,—but that he bends the knee, and stretches forth both hands, as if making a confession of sin. And that the lyre is a musical instrument fashioned by Logos while still altogether an infant, and that Logos is the same as he who is denominated Mercury among the Greeks. And Aratus, with regard to the construction of the lyre, observes:—
“Then, further, also near the cradle,278 “Pierced it through,” i.e., bored the holes for the strings, or, in other words, constructed the instrument. The Latin version in Buhle’s edition of Aratus is ad cunam (cunabulam) compegit, i.e., he fastened the strings into the shell of the tortoise near his bed. The tortoise is mentioned by Aratus in the first part of the line, which fact removes the obscurity of the passage as quoted by Hippolytus. The general tradition corresponds with this, in representing Mercury on the shores of the Nile forming a lyre out of a dried tortoise. The word translated bed might be also rendered fan, which was used as a cradle, its size and construction being suitable. [See note, p. 46, infra.]
Hermes pierced it through, and said, Call it Lyre.”279 Arat., Phænom., v. 268.
It consists of seven strings, signifying by these seven strings the entire harmony and construction of the world as it is melodiously constituted. For in six days the world was made, and (the Creator) rested on the seventh. If, then, says (Aratus), Adam, acknowledging (his guilt) and guarding the head of the Beast, according to the commandment of the Deity, will imitate Lyra, that is, obey the Logos of God, that is, submit to the law, he will receive Corona that is situated near him. If, however, he neglect his duty, he shall be hurled downwards in company with the Beast that lies underneath, and shall have, he says, his portion with the Beast. And Engonasis seems on both sides to extend his hands, and on one to touch Lyra, and on the other Corona—and this is his confession;—so that it is possible to distinguish him by means of this (sidereal) configuration itself. But Corona nevertheless is plotted against, and forcibly drawn away by another beast, a smaller Dragon, which is the offspring of him who is guarded by the foot280 Or, “son of” (see Arat., Phænom., v. 70). of Engonasis. A man also stands firmly grasping with both hands, and dragging towards the space behind the Serpent from Corona; and he does not permit the Beast to touch Corona. though making a violent effort to do so. And Aratus styles him Anguitenens, because he restrains the impetuosity of the Serpent in his attempt to reach Corona. But Logos, he says, is he who, in the figure of a man, hinders the Beast from reaching Corona, commiserating him who is being plotted against by the Dragon and his offspring simultaneously.
These (constellations), “The Bears,” however, he says, are two hebdomads, composed of seven stars, images of two creations. For the first creation, he affirms, is that according to Adam in labours, this is he who is seen “on his knees” (Engonasis). The second creation, however, is that according to Christ, by which we are regenerated; and this is Anguitenens, who struggles against the Beast, and hinders him from reaching Corona, which is reserved for the man. But “The Great Bear” is, he says, Helice,281 The Abbe Cruice considers that these interpretations, as well as what follows, are taken not from a Greek writer, but a Jewish heretic. No Greek, he supposes, would write, as is stated lower down, that the Greeks were a Phœnician colony. The Jewish heresies were impregnated by these silly doctrines about the stars (see Epiphan., Adv. Hæres., lib. i. De Pharisæis). symbol of a mighty world towards which the Greeks steer their course, that is, for which they are being disciplined. And, wafted by the waves of life, they follow onwards, (having in prospect) some such revolving world or discipline or wisdom which conducts those back that follow in pursuit of such a world. For the term Helice seems to signify a certain circling and revolution towards the same points. There is likewise a certain other “Small Bear” (Cynosuris), as it were some image of the second creation—that formed according to God. For few, he says, there are that journey by the narrow path.282 Reference is here made to Matt. vii. 14. But they assert that Cynosuris is narrow, towards which Aratus283 Arat., Phænom., v. 44. says that the Sidonians navigate. But Aratus has spoken partly of the Sidonians, (but means) the Phœnicians, on account of the existence of the admirable wisdom of the Phœnicians. The Greeks, however, assert that they are Phœnicians, who have migrated from (the shores of) the Red Sea into this country where they even at present dwell, for this is the opinion of Herodotus.284 Herod., Hist., i. 1. Now Cynosura, he says, is this (lesser) Bear, the second creation; the one of limited dimensions, the narrow way, and not Helice. For he does not lead them back, but guides forward by a straight path, those that follow him being (the tail) of Canis. For Canis is the Logos,285 Or, “for creation is the Logos” (see Arat., Phænom., v. 332 et seq.). partly guarding and preserving the flock, that is plotted against by the wolves; and partly like a dog, hunting the beasts from the creation, and destroying them; and partly producing all things, and being what they express by the name “Cyon” (Canis), that is, generator. Hence it is said, Aratus has spoken of the rising of Canis, expressing himself thus: “When, however, Canis has risen, no longer do the crops miss.” This is what he says: Plants that have been put into the earth up to the period of Canis’ rising, frequently, though not having struck root, are yet covered with a profusion of leaves, and afford indications to spectators that they will be productive, and that they appear full of life, (though in reality) not having vitality in themselves from the root. But when the rising of Canis takes place, the living are separated from the dead by Canis; for whatsoever plants have not taken root, really undergo putrefaction. This Canis, therefore, he says, as being a certain divine Logos, has been appointed judge of quick and dead. And as (the influence of) Canis is observable in the vegetable productions of this world, so in plants of celestial growth—in men—is beheld the (power of the) Logos. From some such cause, then, Cynosura, the second creation, is set in the firmament as an image of a creation by the Logos. The Dragon, however, in the centre reclines between the two creations, preventing a transition of whatever things are from the great creation to the small creation; and in guarding those that are fixed in the (great) creation, as for instance Engonasis, observing (at the same time) how and in what manner each is constituted in the small creation. And (the Dragon) himself is watched at the head, he says, by Anguitenens. This image, he affirms, is fixed in heaven, being a certain wisdom to those capable of discerning it. If, however, this is obscure, by means of some other image, he says the creation teaches (men) to philosophize, in regard to which Aratus has expressed himself thus:—
“Neither of Cepheus Iasidas are we the wretched brood.”286 Arat., Phænom., v. 179.
[48] Παρατ(ε)τάχθαι δέ φησιν αὐτῷ ἑκατέρωθεν_λέγω δὴ τῷ Ἐν γόνασι _Λύραν καὶ Στέφανον, αὐτὸν δὲ γόνυ κλίνειν [καὶ] ἐκτετακότα ἀμφοτέρας τὰς χεῖρας, οἱονεὶ περὶ ἁμαρτίας ἐξομολογούμενον. εἶναι δὲ τὴν Λύραν μουσικὸν ὄργανον, ὑπὸ νηπίου ἔτι παντελῶς κατεσκευασμένον τοῦ Λόγου: Λόγον δὲ εἶναι παρὰ τοῖς Ἕλλησιν ἀκούομεν τὸν Ἑρμῆν. φησὶ γὰρ ὁ Ἄρατος περὶ τῆς κατασκευῆς τῆς Λύρας: τὴν δ' ἆρ' ἔτι καὶ παρὰ λίκνῳ Ἑρμείης ἐτόρησε, Λύρην δ' εἶπε[ν] καλέεσθαι. ἑπτάχορδος [δέ] ἐστι, διὰ τῶν ἑπτὰ χορδῶν τὴν πᾶσαν ἁρμονίαν καὶ κατασκευὴν ἐμμελῶς ἔχουσαν τοῦ κόσμου : ἐν ἓξ ἡμέραις γὰρ ἐγένετο ὁ κόσμος, καὶ τῇ ἑβδόμῃ καταπέπαυται. εἰ οὖν, φησίν, ἐξομολογούμενος ὁ Ἀδὰμ καὶ τὴν κεφαλὴν φυλάσσων τοῦ θηρίου κατὰ τὸ πρόσταγμα τοῦ θεοῦ ἐκμιμήσεται τὴν Λύραν, τουτέστι κατακολουθήσει τοῖς τοῦ θεοῦ [τουτέστι πειθόμενος τῷ νόμῳ], παρακείμενον αὐτῷ τὸν Στέφανον λήψεται: ἐὰν δὲ ἀμελήσῃ, συγκατενεχθήσεται τῷ ὑποκειμένῳ θηρίῳ καὶ τὸ μέρος ἕξει, φησί, μετὰ τοῦ θηρίου. ἔοικε δὲ ὁ Ἐν γόνασιν ἑκατέρωθεν ἐπιβάλ[λ]ειν τὰς χεῖρας καὶ τοῦτο μὲν τῆς Λύρας, τοῦτο δὲ [τοῦ] Στεφάνου ἐφάπτεσθαι [τοῦτο δὲ ἐξομολογεῖσθαι], ὡς ἔστιν ἰδεῖν δι' αὐτοῦ τοῦ σχήματος. ἐπιβουλεύεται δὲ ὁμῶς καὶ ἀποσπᾶται ὁ Στέφανος αὐτοῦ ὑπ' ἄλλου θ(η)ρίου, [τοῦ] μικροτέρου δράκοντος, ὅ ἐστι γέννημα τοῦ φυλασσομένου ὑπὸ τοῦ Ἐν γ(ό)νασι τῷ ποδί. ἄνθρωπος δὲ ἕστηκεν, ἑκατέραις ταῖς χερσὶ (κ)αρτερῶς κατασφίγγων καὶ εἰς τὰ ὀπίσω ἕλκων (ἀπὸ) τοῦ Στεφάνου τὸν Ὄφιν καὶ οὐκ ἐῶ[ν] ἐφάπτεσθαι βιαζόμενον τοῦ Στεφάν(ου) τὸ θηρίον: Ὀφιοῦχον δὲ αὐτὸν ὁ Ἄρατος καλεῖ, ὅτι κατέχει τὴν ὁρμὴν τοῦ Ὄφεως, ἐπὶ τὸν Στέφανον ἐλθεῖν πειρωμένου. Λόγος δέ, φησίν, ἐστὶ[ν οὗτος ὁ ἐν] σχήματι ἀνθρώπου, ὁ κωλύων ἐπὶ τὸν Στέφανον ἐλθεῖν τὸ θηρίον, οἰκτείρων τὸν ἐπιβουλευόμενον ὑπὸ τοῦ Δράκοντος, ὁμοῦ καὶ τοῦ γεννήματος ἐκείνου. Αὐταὶ δὲ αἱ Ἄρκτοι, φησίν, ἑβδομάδες εἰσὶ δύο, ἐξ ἑπτὰ ἀστέρων συγκείμεναι, δισσῶν κτίσεων εἰκόνες: πρώτη γάρ, φησίν, [ἐστὶ] [ἡ] κτίσις ἡ κατὰ τὸν Ἀδὰμ ἐν πόνοις, [ὅ ἐστιν] ὁ Ἐν γόνασιν ὁρώμενος: δευτέρα δὲ κτίσις ἐστὶν ἡ κατὰ Χριστόν, δι' ἧς ἀναγεννώμεθα, ὅ ἐστιν ὁ Ὀφιοῦχος [ὁρώμενος], ἀνταγωνιζόμενος τῷ θηρίῳ καὶ κωλύων ἐπὶ τὸν Στέφανον ἐλθεῖν, τὸν ἡτοιμασμένον τῷ Ἀνθρώπῳ. μεγάλη δέ ἐστιν Ἄρκτος ἡ Ἑλίκη, φησίν, [τῆς] μεγάλης κτίσεως σύμβολον, πρὸς ἣν πλέουσιν Ἕλληνες_τουτέστι πρὸς ἣν παιδεύονται_καὶ [ᾗ] διὰ τῶν τοῦ βίου φερόμενοι κυμάτων ἐπακολουθοῦσιν: ἑλίκην τινὰ οὖσαν τὴν τοιαύτην κτίσιν_ἢ διδασκαλίαν ἢ σοφίαν_, εἰς τὰ ὀπίσω ἄγουσαν τοὺς ἑπομένους τῇ τοιαύτῃ κτίσει: στροφὴ γάρ τις [ἡ] τῆς Ἑλίκης προσηγορία, καὶ ἀνακύκλωσις ἐπὶ τὰ αὐτὰ εἶναι δοκεῖ. μικρὰ δέ [ἐσ]τιν ἡ ἑτέρα Ἄρκτος, οἱονεί τις εἰκὼν τῆς δευτέρας κτίσεως, τῆς κατὰ θεὸν κτισθείσης: ὀλίγοι γάρ, φησίν, εἰσὶν οἱ διὰ τῆς στενῆς ὁδοῦ πορευόμενοι. στενὴ[ν] δὲ [ὁδὸν] λέγουσιν εἶναι τὴν Κυνοσουρίδα, πρὸς ἣν ὁ Ἄρατός φησιν ὅτι οἱ Σιδόνιοι ναυτί(λ)λονται. Σιδονίους δὲ ἀπὸ μέρους εἴρηκεν ὁ Ἄρατος [τοὺς] Φοίνικας, διὰ τὸ εἶναι τὴν Φοινίκων σοφίαν θαυμαστήν, Φοίνικας δὲ εἶναι Ἕλληνες λέγουσι τοὺς ἀπὸ τῆς Ἐρυθρᾶς θαλάσσης μετοικήσαντας εἰς τοῦτον τὸν χῶρον, οὗ καὶ νῦν οἰκοῦσι: τοῦτο γὰρ Ἡροδότῳ δοκεῖ. Κυνόσουρα δέ, φησίν, [ἐστὶν] αὕτη ἡ Ἄρκτος, ἡ κτίσις ἡ δευτέρα, ἡ μικρά, ἡ στενὴ ὁδός, καὶ οὐχὶ ἡ Ἑλίκη: οὐ γὰρ εἰς τὰ ὀπίσω ἄγει, ἀλλ' εἰς τὰ ἔμπροσθεν ἐπ' εὐθείας τοὺς ἑπομένους [αὐτῇ] ὁδηγεῖ, κ[ύων] τις οὖσα. κύων γὰρ ὁ Λόγος, τοῦτο μὲν φρουρῶν καὶ φυλάσσων τὸ ἐπιβουλευόμενον ὑπὸ τῶν λύκων ποίμνιον, τοῦτο δὲ ἀπὸ τῆς κτίσεως τὰ θηρία κυνηγῶν καὶ διαφθείρων, τοῦτο δὲ γεννῶν τὰ πάντα καί, ὡ[ς] δή φασι, κύων_τουτέστι γεννῶν. _ἐντεῦθεν, φησίν, ὁ Ἄρατος περὶ τῆς τοῦ Κυνὸς ἀνατολῆς λέγων εἴρηκεν οὕτως: Κυνὸς δὲ ἀνατείλαντος οὐκέτι φυταλιαὶ ἐψεύσαντο. τοῦτο [δέ] ἐστιν ὃ λέγει: τὰ φυτευόμενα φυτὰ εἰς τὴν γῆν μέχρι τῆς τοῦ Κυνὸς ἀνατολῆς πολλάκις μὴ ῥιζοβολήσαντα ὅμως τέθηλε φύλλοις καὶ ἐνδείκνυται τοῖς βλέπουσιν ὅτι ἔσται τελεσφόρα καὶ φαίνεται ζῶντα, οὐκ ἔχοντα [δὲ] ζωὴν ἀπὸ τῆς ῥίζης ἐν αὑτοῖς: ἐπειδὰν δὲ [ἡ] τοῦ Κυνὸς ἀνατολὴ γένηται, ὑπὸ τοῦ Κυνὸς τὰ ζῶντα ἀπὸ τῶν νεκρῶν διακρίνεται: μαραίνεται γὰρ ὄντως ὅσα οὐκ ἐρ[ρ]ιζοβόλησεν. οὗτος οὖν, φησίν, ὁ Κύων, Λόγος τις ὢν θεῖος, «ζώντων καὶ νεκρῶν κριτὴς» καθέστηκε, [καὶ] καθάπερ [ἐπὶ] τῶ[ν] φυτῶν ὁ Κύων τὸ ἄστρον ἐπι[στάτης] τῆς κτίσεως θεωρεῖται, οὕτως ἐπὶ τῶν οὐρανίω(ν) φυτῶν, φησί, [τουτέστι] τῶν ἀνθρώπων, ὁ Λόγος. διὰ τὴν τοιαύτην οὖν αἰτίαν ἡ δευτέρα κτίσις, [ἡ] Κυνόσουρα, λογικῆς κτίσεως (εἰκ)ὼ(ν) ἕστηκεν ἐν οὐρανῷ. μέσος δὲ ὁ Δράκων τῶν δύο κτίσεων ὑπ(ο)τ(είν)εται, τὰ ἀπὸ τῆς μεγάλης κτίσεως κωλύων ἐπὶ τὴν μικρὰν κτίσιν μετελθεῖν, τά τε ἐν τῇ [μεγάλῃ] κτίσει καθεστηκότα_ καθάπερ τὸν Ἐν γόνασι_παραφυλάσσων [καὶ] τηρῶν πῶς καὶ τίνα τρόπον ἕκαστον [τῶν] ἐν τῇ μικρᾷ κτίσει καθέστηκε. τηρεῖται δὲ καὶ αὐτὸς κατὰ τὴν κεφαλήν, φησίν, ὑπὸ τοῦ Ὀφιούχου. αὕτη, φησίν, [τῆς κτίσεως] εἰκὼν ἕστηκεν ἐν οὐρανῷ, σοφία τις οὖσα τοῖς ἰδεῖν δυναμένοις. Εἰ δέ ἐστιν ἀσαφὲς κατα[νοήσει] τοῦτο, δι' ἄλλης εἰκόνος, φησίν, ἡ κτίσις διδάσκει φιλοσοφεῖν, περὶ ἧς ὁ Ἄρατος εἴρηκεν οὕτως: Οὐδ' ἄρα Κηφῆος μογερὸν γένος Ἰασίδαο.