by aurelius augustin, bishop of hippo

 Chapter 1.—Introduction: Address to Boniface.

 Chapter 2.—Why Heretical Writings Must Be Answered.

 Chapter 3.—Why He Addresses His Book to Boniface.

 Chapter 4 [II.]—The Calumny of Julian,—That the Catholics Teach that Free Will is Taken Away by Adam’s Sin.

 Chapter 5.—Free Choice Did Not Perish With Adam ’s Sin. What Freedom Did Perish.

 Chapter 6 [III.]—Grace is Not Given According to Merits.

 Chapter 7.—He Concludes that He Does Not Deprive the Wicked of Free Will.

 Chapter 8 [IV.]—The Pelagians Demolish Free Will.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—Another Calumny of Julian,—That “It is Said that Marriage is Not Appointed by God.”

 Chapter 10—The Third Calumny,—The Assertion that Conjugal Intercourse is Condemned.

 Chapter 11 [VI.]—The Purpose of the Pelagians in Praising the Innocence of Conjugal Intercourse.

 Chapter 12.—The Fourth Calumny,—That the Saints of the Old Testament are Said to Be Not Free from Sins.

 Chapter 13 [VIII.]—The Fifth Calumny,—That It is Said that Paul and the Rest of the Apostles Were Polluted by Lust.

 Chapter 14.—That the Apostle is Speaking in His Own Person and that of Others Who Are Under Grace, Not Still Under Law.

 Chapter 15 [IX.]—He Sins in Will Who is Only Deterred from Sinning by Fear.

 Chapter 16.—How Sin Died, and How It Revived.

 Chapter 17 [X.]—“The Law is Spiritual, But I Am Carnal,” To Be Understood of Paul.

 Chapter 18.—How the Apostle Said that He Did the Evil that He Would Not.

 Chapter 19.—What It is to Accomplish What is Good.

 Chapter 20.—In Me, that Is, in My Flesh.

 Chapter 21.—No Condemnation in Christ Jesus.

 Chapter 22.—Why the Passage Referred to Must Be Understood of a Man Established Under Grace.

 Chapter 23 [XI.]—What It is to Be Delivered from the Body of This Death.

 Chapter 24.—He Concludes that the Apostle Spoke in His Own Person, and that of Those Who are Under Grace.

 Chapter 25 [XII.]—The Sixth Calumny,—That Augustin Asserts that Even Christ Was Not Free from Sins.

 Chapter 26 [XIII.]—The Seventh Calumny,—That Augustin Asserts that in Baptism All Sins are Not Remitted.

 Chapter 27.—In What Sense Lust is Called Sin in the Regenerate.

 Chapter 28 [XIV.]—Many Without Crime, None Without Sin.

 Chapter 29 [XV.]—Julian Opposes the Faith of His Friends to the Opinions of Catholic Believers. First of All, of Free Will.

 Chapter 30.—Secondly, of Marriage.

 Chapter 31.—Thirdly, of Conjugal Intercourse.

 Chapter 32 [XVI.]—The Aprons Which Adam and Eve Wore.

 Chapter 33.—The Shame of Nakedness.

 Chapter 34 [XVII.]—Whether There Could Be Sensual Appetite in Paradise Before the Fall.

 Chapter 35.—Desire in Paradise Was Either None at All, or It Was Obedient to the Impulse of the Will.

 Chapter 36 [XVIII.]—Julian’s Fourth Objection, that Man is God’s Work, and is Not Constrained to Evil or Good by His Power.

 Chapter 37 [XIX.]—The Beginning of a Good Will is the Gift of Grace.

 Chapter 38 [XX.]—The Power of God’s Grace is Proved.

 Chapter 39 [XXI.]—Julian’s Fifth Objection Concerning the Saints of the Old Testament.

 Chapter 40 [XXII.]—The Sixth Objection, Concerning the Necessity of Grace for All, and Concerning the Baptism of Infants.

 Chapter 41 [XXIII.]—The Seventh Objection, of the Effect of Baptism.

 Chapter 42 [XXIV.]—He Rebuts the Conclusion of Julian’s Letter.

 Book II.

 Chapter 1.—Introduction The Pelagians Impeach Catholics as Manicheans.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Heresies of the Manicheans and Pelagians are Mutually Opposed, and are Alike Reprobated by the Catholic Church.

 Chapter 3.—How Far the Manicheans and Pelagians are Joined in Error How Far They are Separated.

 Chapter 4.—The Two Contrary Errors.

 Chapter 5 [III.]—The Calumny of the Pelagians Against the Clergy of the Roman Church.

 Chapter 6 [IV.]—What Was Done in the Case of Cœlestius and Zosimus.

 Chapter 7.—He Suggests a Dilemma to Cœlestius.

 Chapter 8.—The Catholic Faith Concerning Infants.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—He Replies to the Calumnies of the Pelagians.

 Chapter 10.—Why the Pelagians Falsely Accuse Catholics of Maintaining Fate Under the Name of Grace.

 Chapter 11 [VI.]—The Accusation of Fate is Thrown Back Upon the Adversaries.

 Chapter 12.—What is Meant Under the Name of Fate.

 Chapter 13 [VII.]—He Repels the Calumny Concerning the Acceptance of Persons.

 Chapter 14.—He Illustrates His Argument by an Example.

 Chapter 15.—The Apostle Meets the Question by Leaving It Unsolved.

 Chapter 16.—The Pelagians are Refuted by the Case of the Twin Infants Dying, the One After, and the Other Without, the Grace of Baptism.

 Chapter 17 [VIII.]—Even the Desire of an Imperfect Good is a Gift of Grace, Otherwise Grace Would Be Given According to Merits.

 Chapter 18.—The Desire of Good is God’s Gift.

 Chapter 19 [IX.]—He Interprets the Scriptures Which the Pelagians Make Ill Use of.

 Chapter 20.—God’s Agency is Needful Even in Man’s Doings.

 Chapter 21.—Man Does No Good Thing Which God Does Not Cause Him to Do.

 Chapter 22 [X.]—According to Whose Purpose the Elect are Called.

 Chapter 23.—Nothing is Commanded to Man Which is Not Given by God.

 Book III.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Statement.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Misrepresentation of the Pelagians Concerning the Use of the Old Law.

 Chapter 3.—Scriptural Confirmation of the Catholic Doctrine.

 Chapter 4 [III.]—Misrepresentation Concerning the Effect of Baptism.

 Chapter 5.—Baptism Puts Away All Sins, But It Does Not at Once Heal All Infirmities.

 Chapter 6 [IV.]—The Calumny Concerning the Old Testament and the Righteous Men of Old.

 Chapter 7.—The New Testament is More Ancient Than the Old But It Was Subsequently Revealed.

 Chapter 8.—All Righteous Men Before and After Abraham are Children of the Promise and of Grace.

 Chapter 9.—Who are the Children of the Old Covenant.

 Chapter 10.—The Old Law Also Given by God.

 Chapter 11.—Distinction Between the Children of the Old and of the New Testaments.

 Chapter 12.—The Old Testament is Properly One Thing—The Old Instrument Another.

 Chapter 13.—Why One of the Covenants is Called Old, the Other New.

 Chapter 14 [V.]—Calumny Concerning the Righteousness of the Prophets and Apostles.

 Chapter 15.—The Perfection of Apostles and Prophets.

 Chapter 16 [VI.]—Misrepresentation Concerning Sin in Christ.

 Chapter 17 [VII.]—Their Calumny About the Fulfilment of Precepts in the Life to Come.

 Chapter 18.—Perfection of Righteousness and Full Security Was Not Even in Paul in This Life.

 Chapter 19.—In What Sense the Righteousness of Man in This Life is Said to Be Perfect.

 Chapter 20.—Why the Righteousness Which is of the Law is Valued Slightly by Paul.

 Chapter 21.—That Righteousness is Never Perfected in This Life.

 Chapter 22.—Nature of Human Righteousness and Perfection.

 Chapter 23.—There is No True Righteousness Without the Faith of the Grace of Christ.

 Chapter 24 [VIII.]—There are Three Principal Heads in the Pelagian Heresy.

 Chapter 25 [IX.]—He Shows that the Opinion of the Catholics is the Mean Between that of the Manicheans and Pelagians, and Refutes Both.

 Chapter 26 [X.]—The Pelagians Still Strive After a Hiding-Place, by Introducing the Needless Question of the Origin of the Soul.

 Book IV.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—The Subterfuges of the Pelagians are Five.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Praise of the Creature.

 Chapter 3 [III.]—The Catholics Praise Nature, Marriage, Law, Free Will, and the Saints, in Such Wise as to Condemn as Well Pelagians as Manicheans.

 Chapter 4 [IV.]—Pelagians and Manicheans on the Praise of the Creature.

 Chapter 5.—What is the Special Advantage in the Pelagian Opinions?

 Chapter 6.—Not Death Alone, But Sin Also Has Passed into Us by Means of Adam.

 Chapter 7.—What is the Meaning of “In Whom All Have Sinned”?

 Chapter 8.—Death Passed Upon All by Sin.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—Of the Praise of Marriage.

 Chapter 10.—Of the Praise of the Law.

 Chapter 11.—The Pelagians Understand that the Law Itself is God’s Grace.

 Chapter 12 [VI.]—Of the Praise of Free Will.

 Chapter 13.—God’s Purposes are Effects of Grace.

 Chapter 14.—The Testimonies of Scripture in Favour of Grace.

 Chapter 15.—From Such Scriptures Grace is Proved to Be Gratuitous and Effectual.

 Chapter 16.—Why God Makes of Some Sheep, Others Not.

 Chapter 17 [VII.]—Of the Praise of the Saints.

 Chapter 18.—The Opinion of the Saints Themselves About Themselves.

 Chapter 19.—The Craft of the Pelagians.

 Chapter 20 [VIII.]—The Testimonies of the Ancients Against the Pelagians.

 Chapter 21.—Pelagius, in Imitation of Cyprian, Wrote a Book of Testimonies.

 Chapter 22.—Further References to Cyprian.

 Chapter 23.—Further References to Cyprian.

 Chapter 24.—The Dilemma Proposed to the Pelagians.

 Chapter 25 [IX.]—Cyprian’s Testimonies Concerning God’s Grace.

 Chapter 26.—Further Appeals to Cyprian’s Teaching.

 Chapter 27 [X.]—Cyprian’s Testimonies Concerning the Imperfection of Our Own Righteousness.

 Chapter 28.—Cyprian’s Orthodoxy Undoubted.

 Chapter 29 [XI.]—The Testimonies of Ambrose Against the Pelagians and First of All Concerning Original Sin.

 Chapter 30.—The Testimonies of Ambrose Concerning God’s Grace.

 Chapter 31.—The Testimonies of Ambrose on the Imperfection of Present Righteousness.

 Chapter 32 [XII.]—The Pelagian’s Heresy Arose Long After Ambrose.

 Chapter 33.—Opposition of the Manichean and Catholic Dogmas.

 Chapter 34.—The Calling Together of a Synod Not Always Necessary to the Condemnation of Heresies.

Chapter 4 [IV.]—Pelagians and Manicheans on the Praise of the Creature.

These things being so, what advantage is it to new heretics, enemies of the cross of Christ and opposers of divine grace, that they seem sound from the error of the Manicheans, if they are dying by another pestilence of their own? What advantage is it to them, that in the praise of the creature they say “that the good God is the maker of those that are born, by whom all things were made, and that the children of men are His work,” whom the Manicheans say are the work of the prince of darkness; when between them both, or among them both, God’s creation, which is in infants, is perishing? For both of them refuse to have it delivered by Christ’s flesh and blood,—the one, because they destroy that very flesh and blood, as if He did not take upon Him these at all in man or of man; and the other, because they assert that there is no evil in infants from which they should be delivered by the sacrament of this flesh and blood. Between them lies the human creature in infants, with a good origination, with a corrupted propagation, confessing for its goods a most excellent Creator, seeking for its evils a most merciful Redeemer, having the Manicheans as disparagers of its benefits, having the Pelagians as deniers of its evils, and both as persecutors. And although in infancy there is no power to speak, yet with its silent look and its hidden weakness it addresses the impious vanity of both, saying to the one, “Believe that I am created by Him who creates good things;” and saying to the other, “Suffer me to be healed by Him who created me.” The Manicheans say, “There is nothing of this infant save the good soul to be delivered; the rest,” which belongs not to the good God, but to the prince of darkness, “is to be rejected.” The Pelagians say, “Certainly there is nothing of this infant to be delivered, because we have shown the whole to be safe.” Both lie; but now the accuser of the flesh alone is more bearable than the praiser, who is convicted of cruelty against the whole. But neither does the Manichean help the human soul by blaspheming God, the Author of the entire man; nor does the Pelagian permit the divine grace to come to the help of human infancy by denying original sin. Therefore it is by the catholic faith that God has mercy, seeing that by condemning both mischievous doctrines it comes to the help of the infant for salvation. It says to the Manicheans, “Hear the apostle crying, ‘Know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost in you?’256    1 Cor. vi. 19. and believe that the good God is the Creator of bodies, because the temple of the Holy Ghost cannot be the work of the prince of darkness.” It says to the Pelagians, “The infant that you look upon ‘was conceived in iniquity, and in sin its mother nourished it in the womb.’257    Ps. li. 5. Why, as if in defending it as free from all mischief, do you not permit it to be delivered by mercy? No one is pure from uncleanness, not even the infant whose life is of one day upon the earth.258    Job xiv. 4, 5. See LXX. Allow the wretched creatures to receive remission of sins, through Him who alone neither as small nor great could have any sin.”

CAPUT IV.

De laude creaturae, Pelagiani, Manichaei. His ita se habentibus, quid prodest novellis haereticis, inimicis crucis Christi et divinae oppugnatoribus gratiae, quod a Manichaeorum errore sani videntur, et alia sua pestilentia moriuntur? Quid eis prodest, quod in laude 0612 creaturae dicunt, «Deum bonum nascentium conditorem, per quem facta sunt omnia, ejusque opus esse filios hominum,» quos Manichaei dicunt opus esse principis tenebrarum; cum inter utrosque, vel apud utrosque Dei creatura, quae est in infantibus pereat? Utrique enim nolunt eam Christi carne et sanguine liberari: illi quia ipsam carnem et sanguinem Christi, tanquam haec omnino in homine vel ex homine non susceperit, destruunt; isti autem, quia nullum malum inesse infantibus asserunt, unde per Sacramentum carnis hujus et sanguinis liberentur. Jacet inter illos in parvulis humana creatura institutione bona, propagatione vitiata; bonis suis confitens optimum conditorem, malis suis quaerens misericordissimum redemptorem; Manichaeos habens bonorum suorum vituperatores, Pelagianos habens malorum suorum negatores, utrosque persecutores. Et quamvis per infantiam loqui non valeat, specie tamen tacita et infirmitate abdita impiam vanitatem utrorumque compellat, et illis dicens, Ab eo qui bona creat, credite me creari; et istis dicens, Ab eo qui me creavit, sinite me sanari. Manichaeus dicit: Nihil est hujus infantis, nisi anima bona liberanda; caetera non ad Deum bonum, sed ad principem tenebrarum pertinentia respuenda . Pelagianus dicit: Imo hujus infantis nihil est liberandum, quia totum ostendimus salvum. Ambo mentiuntur: sed jam mitior est carnis solius accusator, quam qui in universum convincitur saevire laudator. Sed nec Manichaeus humanae animae subvenit, blasphemando auctorem totius hominis Deum; nec Pelagianus humanae infantiae divinam gratiam subvenire permittit, negando originale peccatum. Deus ergo miseretur per catholicam fidem, quae utramque redarguendo perniciem, infanti subvenit ad salutem; Manichaeis dicens, Audite Apostolum clamantem, Nescitis quia corpus vestrum templum est in vobis Spiritus sancti (I Cor. VI, 19)? et Deum bonum creatorem credite corporum, quia non potest esse templum Spiritus sancti opus principis tenebrarum: Pelagianis dicens, In iniquitatibus conceptus est, et in peccatis eum mater ejus in utero aluit (Psal. L, 7), quem conspicitis parvulum. Quid eum tanquam ab omni noxa liberum defendendo, non permittitis per indulgentiam liberari? Nemo mundus a sorde, nec infans cujus est diei unius vita super terram (Job XIV, 5, sec. LXX). Sinite miserum remissionem accipere peccatorum, per eum qui solus nec parvus nec magnus potuit habere peccatum.