Chap. XXIX.—Of the Christian Religion, and of the Union of Jesus with the Father.

Some one may perhaps ask how, when we say that we worship one God only, we nevertheless assert that there are two, God the Father and God the Son: which assertion has driven many into the greatest error. For when the things which we say seem to them probable, they consider that we fail in this one point alone, that we confess that there is another God, and that He is mortal. We have already spoken of His mortality: now let us teach concerning His unity. When we speak of God the Father and God the Son, we do not speak of them as different, nor do we separate each: because the Father cannot exist without the Son, nor can the Son be separated from the Father, since the name of Father866    [i.e., the Everlasting Father implies the Everlasting Son.]   cannot be given without the Son, nor can the Son be begotten without the Father. Since, therefore, the Father makes the Son, and the Son the Father, they both have one mind, one spirit, one substance; but the former867    Ille, i.e., the Father.   is as it were an overflowing fountain, the latter868    Hic, i.e., the Son.   as a stream flowing forth from it: the former as the sun, the latter as it were a ray869    Thus, Heb. i. 3, the Son is described as the effulgence of the Father’s glory: ἀπαύγασμα τη̑ς δόξης αὐψου̑.   extended from the sun. And since He is both faithful to the Most High Father, and beloved by Him, He is not separated from Him; just as the stream is not separated from the fountain, nor the ray from the sun: for the water of the fountain is in the stream, and the light of the sun is in the ray: just as the voice cannot be separated from the mouth, nor the strength or hand from the body. When, therefore, He is also spoken of by the prophets as the hand, and strength, and word of God, there is plainly no separation; for the tongue, which is the minister of speech, and the hand, in which the strength is situated, are inseparable portions of the body.  

We may use an example more closely connected with us. When any one has a son whom he especially loves, who is still in the house, and in the power870    In manu patris. Among the Romans the father had the power of life and death over his children.   of his father, although he concede to him the name and power of a master, yet by the civil law the house is one, and one person is called master. So this world871    [Mundus una Dei domus. World here = universe. See vol. ii. p. 136, note 2, this series.]   is the one house of God; and the Son and the Father, who unanimously inhabit the world, are one God, for the one is as two, and the two are as one. Nor is that wonderful, since the Son is in the Father, for the Father loves the Son, and the Father is in the Son; for He faithfully obeys the will of the Father, nor does He ever do nor has done anything except what the Father either willed or commanded. Lastly, that the Father and the Son are but one God, Isaiah showed in that passage which we have brought forward before,872    Ch. xiii.   when he said:873    Isa. xlv. 14.   “They shall fall down unto Thee, and make supplication unto Thee, since God is in Thee, and there is no other God besides Thee.” And he also speaks to the same purport in another place:874    Isa. xliv. 6.   “Thus saith God the King of Israel, and His Redeemer, the everlasting God; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.” When he had set forth two persons, one of God the King, that is, Christ, and the other of God the Father, who after His passion raised Him from the dead, as we have said875    Ch. xix.   that the prophet Hosea showed,876    Hos. xiii. 14.   who said, “I will redeem Him from the power of the grave:” nevertheless, with reference to each person, he introduced the words, “and beside me there is no God,” when he might have said “beside us;” but it was not right that a separation of so close a relationship should be made by the use of the plural number. For there is one God alone, free, most high, without any origin; for He Himself is the origin of all things, and in Him at once both the Son and all things are contained. Wherefore, since the mind and will of the one is in the other, or rather, since there is one in both, both are justly called one God; for whatever is in the Father877    Thus Christ Himself speaks, John x. 30, “I and my Father are one;” and iii. 35, “The Father loveth the Son, and hath given all things into His hand.”   flows on to the Son, and whatever is in the Son descends from the Father. Therefore that highest and matchless God cannot be worshipped except through the Son. He who thinks that he worships the Father only, as he does not worship the Son, so he does not worship even the Father. But he who receives the Son, and bears His name, he truly together with the Son worships the Father also, since the Son is the ambassador, and messenger, and priest of the Most High Father. He is the door of the greatest temple, He the way of light, He the guide to salvation, He the gate of life.  

0538B CAPUT XXIX. De religione christiana, et de Jesu cum Patre conjunctione.

Fortasse quaerat aliquis, quomodo, cum Deum nos unum colere dicamus, duos tamen esse asseveremus, Deum Patrem et Deum Filium: quae asseveratio plerosque in maximum impegit errorem. Quibus cum probabilia videantur esse, quae dicimus, in hoc uno labare nos arbitrantur, quod et alterum, et mortalem Deum fateamur. De mortalitate jam diximus: nunc de unitate doceamus. Cum dicimus Deum Patrem, et Deum Filium, non diversum dicimus, nec utrumque secernimus; quia nec Pater sine Filio esse potest, nec 0538C Filius a Patre secerni, si quidem nec Pater sine Filio nuncupari, nec Filius potest sine Patre generari. Cum 0539A igitur et Pater Filium faciat, et Filius Patrem, 0539A una utrique mens, unus spiritus, una substantia est: sed ille quasi exuberans fons est, hic tamquam defluens ex eo rivus; ille tamquam sol, hic quasi radius a sole porrectus. Qui quoniam summo Patri et fidelis, et carus est, non separatur: sicut nec rivus a fonte, nec radius a sole; quia et aqua fontis in rivo est, et solis lumen in radio: aeque nec vox ab ore sejungi, nec virtus, aut manus a corpore divelli potest. Cum igitur a prophetis idem manus Dei, et virtus, et sermo dicatur, utique nulla discretio est; quia et lingua sermonis ministra, et manus in qua est virtus, individuae sunt corporis portiones.

Propiore uti exemplo libet. Cum quis habet filium, quem unice diligit; qui tamen sit in domo, et in manu patris, licet ei nomen domini potestatemque concedat, 0539B civili tamen jure et domus una, et unus dominus nominatur. Sic hic mundus una Dei domus est; et Filius ac Pater, qui unanimes incolunt mundum, Deus unus, quia et unus est tamquam duo, et duo tamquam unus. Neque id mirum, cum et Filius sit in Patre, quia Pater diligit Filium, et Pater in Filio, quia voluntati Patris fideliter paret, nec unquam, faciat aut fecerit, nisi quod Pater aut voluit, aut jussit. Denique unum Deum esse tam patrem, quam filium, Esaias in illo exemplo, quod superius posuimus, ostendit, cum diceret: Adorabunt te, et in te precabuntur, quoniam in te Deus est; et non est alius Deus praeter te. Sed et alio loco similiter ait: Sic dicit Deus rex Israel; et qui eruit eum Deus aeternus: Ego primus, 0539Cet ego novissimus; et praeter me non est Deus. Cum duas Personas proposuisset, Dei regis, id est, Christi; et Dei Patris, qui eum post passionem ab inferis excitavit, sicut ostendisse diximus Oseam prophetam, qui ait: Et de manu inferorum eruam eum: tamen ad utramque Personam referens, intulit, Et 0540Apraeter me non est Deus, cum posset dicere praeter nos: sed fas non erat plurali numero separationem tantae necessitudinis fieri. Unus est enim solus, liber, Deus summus, carens origine, quia ipse est origo rerum; et in eo simul et Filius, et omnia continentur. Quapropter cum mens et voluntas alterius in altero sit, vel potius una in utroque, merito unus Deus uterque appellatur, quia quidquid est in Patre, ad Filium transfluit, et quidquid in Filio, a Patre descendit. Non potest igitur ille summus, ac singularis Deus nisi per Filium coli. Qui solum Patrem se colere putat, sicut Filium non colit, ita ne Patrem quidem. Qui autem Filium suscipit, et nomen ejus gerit, is vero cum Filio simul et Patrem colit, quoniam legatus, et nuntius, et sacerdos summi Patris est Filius. Hic templi maximi janua est, hic lucis via, hic dux salutis, hic ostium 0540B vitae.