Chapter XIV.

After this he continues:  “Their union is the more wonderful, the more it can be shown to be based on no substantial reason.  And yet rebellion is a substantial reason, as well as the advantages which accrue from it, and the fear of external enemies.  Such are the causes which give stability to their faith.”  To this we answer, that our union does thus rest upon a reason, or rather not upon a reason, but upon the divine working,407    θείας ἐνεργείας. so that its commencement was God’s teaching men, in the prophetical writings, to expect the advent of Christ, who was to be the Saviour of mankind.  For in so far as this point is not really refuted (although it may seem to be by unbelievers), in the same proportion is the doctrine commended as the doctrine of God, and Jesus shown to be the Son of God both before and after His incarnation.  I maintain, moreover, that even after His incarnation, He is always found by those who possess the acutest spiritual vision to be most God-like, and to have really come down to us from God, and to have derived His origin or subsequent development not from human wisdom, but from the manifestation408    ἐπιφανείας. of God within Him, who by His manifold wisdom and miracles established Judaism first, and Christianity afterwards; and the assertion that rebellion, and the advantages attending it, were the originating causes of a doctrine which has converted and improved so many men was effectually refuted.

Μετὰ ταῦτά φησι· Θαυμασιώτερον μὴν τὸ σύνθημα αὐτῶν τοσῷδε, ὅσῳ γε μᾶλλον ἐξ οὐδεμιᾶς ὑποθέσεως ἀξιόχρεω συνεστὸς ἐλέγχοιτο. Ἀλλ' ἔστιν ἀξιόχρεως ὑπόθεσις ἡ στάσις καὶ ἡ δι' αὐτὴν ὠφέλεια καὶ τὸ τῶν ἔξωθεν δέος· ταῦτα βεβαιοῖ τὴν πίστιν αὐτοῖς. Καὶ πρὸς τοῦτο δὲ φήσομεν ὅτι οὕτως ἐξ ὑποθέσεως, μᾶλλον δὲ οὐδ' ὑποθέσεως ἀλλὰ θείας ἐνεργείας τὸ σύνθημα ἡμῶν ἐστιν, ὥστε τὴν ἀρχὴν αὐτοῦ εἶναι θεόν, ἐν προφήταις διδάσκοντα τοὺς ἀνθρώπους ἐλπίσαι ἐπιδημίαν Χριστοῦ, σώσοντος τοὺς ἀνθρώπους. Ὅσον γὰρ τοῦτο οὐκ ἀληθῶς ἐλέγχεται, κἂν δοκῇ ὑπὸ τῶν ἀπίστων ἐλέγχεσθαι, ἐπὶ τοσοῦτον ὁ λόγος ὡς θεοῦ λόγος συνίσταται, καὶ ὁ Ἰησοῦς υἱὸς ὢν θεοῦ καὶ πρὶν ἐνανθρωπῆσαι καὶ ἐνανθρωπήσας ἀποδείκνυται. Ἐγὼ δέ φημι ὅτι καὶ μετὰ τὴν ἐνανθρώπησιν ἀεὶ εὑρίσκεται τοῖς ἔχουσιν ὀφθαλμοὺς ψυχῆς ὀξυδερκεστάτους θεοπρεπέστατος καὶ ἀληθῶς θεόθεν πρὸς ἡμᾶς κατελθών, καὶ οὐκ ἀπὸ συνέσεως ἀνθρωπίνης τὴν ἀρχὴν ἢ τὰ ἑξῆς τῇ ἀρχῇ ἔχων ἀλλ' ἀπὸ τῆς τοῦ θεοῦ ἐπιφανείας, ποικίλῃ σοφίᾳ καὶ ποικίλαις δυνάμεσι συστήσαντος πρότερον μὲν τὸν ἰουδαϊσμὸν μετὰ δ' αὐτὸν τὸν χριστιανισμόν· ἠλέγχθη δὲ καὶ τὸ στάσιν νομίζεσθαι καὶ τὴν διὰ τὴν στάσιν ὠφέλειαν ἀρχὴν εἶναι τῷ τοσούτους ἐπιστρέψαντι καὶ βελτιώσαντι λόγῳ.