The Seven Books of Arnobius Against the Heathen.…
The Seven Books of Arnobius Against the Heathen.
42. You worship, says my opponent , one who was born a mere But the He exhibited
16. But, they say , while we are moving swiftly down towards our mortal bodies, to be all even
35. But, say my opponents , if souls are mortal and One than we anything must who is if into
45. But let this monstrous and impious fancy be put far from us
74. And why, my opponent says , did God, the Ruler and Lord of the universe you ask
25. Unxia, my opponent says , presides over the anointing of door-posts
34. Some of your learned men —men, too, who do not chatter merely
12. But let them be true, as you maintain, yet will you have us also believe deity who are
32. But you err, says my opponent , and are mistaken, and show, even in criticising these gratify
7. But why do I speak of the body story in men’s minds which is of all
36. You say that some of them cause excite and these things these to be
38. If the immortal gods cannot be angry, says my opponent is the meaning of had they if
48. But some one will perhaps say that the care of such a god has been denied being to the city
40. Nigidius taught that the dii Penates were Neptune and Apollo, who once, on fixed terms, girt Ilium817 The ms. reads immortalium, corrected in the edd. urbem Ilium. with walls. He himself again, in his sixteenth book, following Etruscan teaching, shows that there are four kinds of Penates; and that one of these pertains to Jupiter, another to Neptune, the third to the shades below, the fourth to mortal men, making some unintelligible assertion. Cæsius himself, also, following this teaching, thinks that they are Fortune, and Ceres, the genius Jovialis,818 Supposed to be either the genius attending Jupiter; the family god as sent by him; or the chief among the genii, sometimes mentioned simply as Genius. and Pales, but not the female deity commonly received,819 Lit., “whom the commonalty receives.” but some male attendant and steward of Jupiter. Varro thinks that they are the gods of whom we speak who are within, and in the inmost recesses of heaven, and that neither their number nor names are known. The Etruscans say that these are the Consentes and Complices,820 Consentes (those who are together, or agree together, i.e., councillors) and Complices (confederate, or agreeing) are said by some to be the twelve gods who composed the great council of heaven; and, in accordance with this, the words una oriantur et occidant una might be translated “rise and sit down together,” i.e., at the council table. But then, the names and number of these are known; while Arnobius says, immediately after, that the names of the dii Consentes are not known and has already quoted Varro, to the effect that neither names nor number are known. Schelling (über die Gotth. v. Samothr , quoted by Orelli) adopts the reading (see following note), “of whom very little mention is made,” i.e., in prayers or rites, because they are merely Jove’s councillors, and exercise no power over men, and identifies them with the Samothracian Cabiri—Κάβειροι and Consentes being merely Greek and Latin renderings of the name. and name them because they rise and fall together, six of them being male, and as many female, with unknown names and pitiless dispositions,821 So the ms. and all edd. reading miserationis parcissimæ, except Gelenius, who reads nationis barbarissimæ—“of a most barbarous nation;” while Ursinus suggested memorationis parc.—“of whom very little mention is made,”—the reading approved by Schelling. but they are considered the counsellors and princes of Jove supreme. There were some, too, who said that Jupiter, Juno, and Minerva were the dii Penates, without whom we cannot live and be wise, and by whom we are ruled within in reason, passion, and thought. As you see, even here, too, nothing is said harmoniously, nothing is settled with the consent of all, nor is there anything reliable on which the mind can take its stand, drawing by conjecture very near to the truth. For their opinions are so doubtful, and one supposition so discredited822 Lit., “shaken to its foundations.” by another, that there is either no truth in them all, or if it is uttered by any, it is not recognised amid so many different statements.
XL. Nigidius Penates deos Neptunum esse atque Apollinem prodidit, qui quondam muris urbem Ilium conditione adjuncta cinxerunt. Idem rursus in libro sexto exponit et decimo, disciplinas Ethruscas sequens, genera esse Penatium quatuor, et esse Jovis ex his alios, alios Neptuni, inferorum tertios, mortalium hominum quartos, inexplicabile nescio quid dicens. Caesius et ipse has sequens Fortunam arbitratur, 0994B et Cererem, Genium Jovialem, ac Palem, sed 0995A non illam feminam, quam vulgaritas accipit, sed masculini nescio quem generis ministrum Jovis, ac villicum. Varro, qui sunt introrsus, atque in intimis penetralibus coeli deos esse censet, quos loquimur, nec eorum numerum, nec nomina sciri. Hos Consentes, 0996A et Complices Ethrusci aiunt, et nominant, quod una oriantur, et occidant una: sex mares, et totidem foeminas nominibus ignotis, et miserationis parcissimae: sed eos summi Jovis consiliarios, ac 0997A principes existimari. Nec defuerunt, qui scriberent Jovem, Junonem ac Minervam, deos penates existere, sine quibus vivere ac sapere nequeamus, sed qui penitus nos regant ratione, calore, ac spiritu. Ut videtis, et hic quoque nihil concinens dicitur, nihil una pronuntiatione finitur: nec est aliquid fidum, quo insistere mens possit veritati suae proxima suspicione conjiciens. Ita enim labant sententiae, alteraque opinio ab altera convellitur, ut aut nihil ex omnibus 0998A verum sit: aut si ab aliquo dicitur, tot rerum diversitatibus nesciatur.