196

ζ΄. He calls the Evaeans hypocrisy. Now hypocrisy is a pretense of friendship, or hatred covered by the appearance of friendship; or enmity enacted through good-will, or envy imitating the character of love; or a sin-loving disposition that takes in its beholders by a display of virtuous manners; or a life that has decorum in pretense of virtue, but not in reality; or a pretense of justice, maintained by the appearance of being so, or a manner of moral philosophy, concealing the latent destitution of virtue in one's mind; or deceit, having the form of truth, which those who imitate the serpent in the crookedness of their ways practice.

η΄. God is the cause of beings, and of the good things that exist in beings. Therefore, the one who labors for virtue and knowledge, and does not, in proportion to his progress in grace, correspondingly extend his acknowledgement of his own incapacity, has not escaped the evil of pride. But he who practices what is good for the sake of his own glory has preferred himself to God, being impaled on the nail of vainglory. And he who does or pursues virtue in order to be seen by men, has placed human approval far above divine, being nursed in the passion of men-pleasing. And he who evilly uses for deception only the solemnity of virtue in his manners, and covers the wicked disposition of his mind with the apparent form of piety, trades virtue for the deceit of hypocrisy. Therefore, the intelligible Asbacaphath has led the purpose of each of these away to other things than the cause.

θ΄. The words of God, he says, when spoken merely, according to pronunciation alone, are not heard, not having as their voice the action of those who speak them. But if they are uttered by the practice of the commandments, they both have the demons melting away at such a voice, and men obediently building the divine temple of the heart through the progress of the works of righteousness.

ι΄. Zerubbabel here he took to mean the practical mind, as being more warlike; and Joshua, the contemplative, as a priest, and one appointed to make supplication to God always.

ια΄. By the division of soul and spirit he means the difference between the virtues of nature, whose principles we possess naturally, and those from the Spirit, whose grace we receive as a gift; for the Word, when judging, makes a clear distinction between these.

ιβ΄. The divine word is marrow, which nourishes the divine thoughts within us, which are like bones, that sustain the body of the virtues. And a joint is the manner of practice, according to which the union of the thoughts with the divine words is naturally brought about for one fulfillment of virtue.

ιγ΄. (589) And the thoughts and intentions, of which the Word is a judge, he says are, the dispositions of the soul towards both the divine words and the thoughts, and, that is, the causes of these same dispositions. For thought moves memory, to which disposition is proper; but intention looks to an end, which characterizes a cause.

ιδ΄. Knowledge in its essence, he says, is God; but the mind clearly precedes all knowledge, to which it is naturally subject; therefore God is also beyond this, because He is established beyond-infinitely above every mind, to which knowledge of any kind is naturally subject.

ιε΄. The demons who war by defect of virtue are those who teach fornication and drunkenness, love of money and envy, and such things; but those who war by excess are those who teach conceit and vainglory and pride, and such things; and through the right they covertly inject the left.

ιστ΄. The definition of virtue is the union of human weakness, through acknowledgement, with the divine power. Therefore, the one who defines himself by the weakness of nature, towards

196

ζ΄. Εὐαίους λέγει τήν ὑπόκρισιν. Ὑπόκρισις δέ ἐστι φιλίας προσποίησις, ἤ μῖσος σχήματι φιλίας κεκαλυμμένον· ἤ ἔχθρα δι᾿ εὐνοίας ἐνεργουμένη, ἤ φθόνος ἀγάπης χαρακτῆρα μιμούμενος· ἤ φιλαμαρτήμων διάθεσις, τῇ τῶν κατ᾿ ἀρετήν ἠθῶν προβολῇ τούς θεωμένους λαμβάνουσα· ἤ βίος ἀρετῆς πλάσματι, ἀλλ᾿ οὐ πράγματι τό κόσμιον ἔχω ἤ δικαιοσύνης προσποίησις, τῇ τοῦ εἶναι δοκήσει συντηρουμένη, ἤ τρόπος ἠθικῆς φιλοσοφίας, τήν κατ᾿ ἀρετήν συγκαλύπτων τῆς γνώμης λανθάνουσαν στέρησιν· ἤ ἀπάτη, ἀληθείας ἔχουσα μόρφωσιν, ἥν οἱ τόν ὄφιν τῇ τῶν ἠθῶν σκολιότητι μιμούμενοι ἐπιτηδεύουσι.

η΄. Τῶν ὄντων αἰτία, καί τῶν ἐν τοῖς οὖσιν ὄντων ἀγαθῶν ἐστιν ὁ Θεός. Ὁ τοίνυν περί τήν ἀρετήν καί τήν γνῶσιν πονούμενος, καί μή τῷ μέτρῳ τῆς ἐν χάριτι προκοπῆς συνεπεκτείνων τῆς οἰκείας ἀνικανότητος τήν ἐπιγνωμοσύνην, τό τῆς ὑπερηφανείας κακόν οὐ διέφυγεν. Ὁ δέ δόξης ἕνεκεν ἰδίας τό καλόν ἐπιτηδεύων, ἑαυτόν τοῦ Θεοῦ προετίμησε, τῷ τῆς κενῆς δόξης ἥλῳ περιπαρείς. Ὁ δέ πρός τό θεαθῆναι τοῖς ἀνθρώποις ποιῶν ἤ διώκων τήν ἀρετήν, τῆς θείας πολλῷ τήν ἀνθρωπίνην ὑπερέθηκεν ἀποδοχήν, τῷ τῆς ἀνθρωπαρεσκίας πάθει νοσηλευόμενος. Ὁ δέ μόνῃ τῇ κατ᾿ ἀρετήν σεμνότητι πρός ἀπάτην κακούργως ἐπιχρώσας τά ἤθη, καί τήν πονηράν τῆς γνώμης διάθεσιν τῷ φαινομένῳ σχήματι τῆς εὐσεβείας ἐπικαλύπτων, τῷ τῆς ὑποκρίσεως ἐξωνεῖται δόλῳ τήν ἀρετήν. Οὐκοῦν ἐπ᾿ ἄλλα παρά τήν αἰτίαν ἑκάστου τούτων ἀπήγαγε τόν σκοπόν, ὁ νοητός Ἀσβακαφάθ.

θ΄. Οἱ λόγοι τοῦ Θεοῦ ψιλῶς κατά μόνην λαλούμενοι τήν προφοράν, φησίν, οὐκ ἀκούονται, φωνήν, τήν τῶν αὐτούς λαλούντων πρᾶξιν, οὐκ ἔχοντες. Εἰ δέ τῇ πράξει τῶν ἐντολῶν ἐκφωνοῦνται, τούς τε δαίμονας ἔχουσι τῇ τοιαύτῃ διατηκομένους φωνῇ, καί τούς ἀνθρώπους τῇ προκοπῇ τῶν ἔργων τῆς δικαιοσύνης εὐπειθῶς τόν θεῖον τῆς καρδίας οἰκοδομοῦντας ναόν.

ι΄. Τόν Ζοροβάβελ ἐνταῦθα, εἰς τόν πρακτικόν νοῦν ἔλαβεν, ὡς πολεμικώτερον· τόν δέ Ἰησοῦν, εἰς τόν θεωρητικόν, ὡς ἱερέα, καί διά παντός τήν ἐντυχίαν πρός τόν Θεόν ποιεῖσθαι τεταγμένον.

ια΄. Μερισμόν ψυχῆς καί πνεύματος λέγει τήν διαφοράν τῶν ἐκ φύσεως ἀρετῶν, ὧν φυσικῶς ἔχομεν τούς λόγους, καί τῶν ἐκ Πνεύματος, ὧν κατά δωρεάν δεχόμεθα τήν χάριν· τούτων γάρ εὐκρινῶς τήν διαστολήν ποιεῖται κρίνων ὁ λόγος.

ιβ΄. Μυελός ἐστιν ὁ θεῖος λόγος, ὁ τούς ἐν ἡμῖν ὥσπερ ὀστᾶ θείους διατρέφων λογισμούς, τούς ὑποτρέφοντας τό σῶμα τῶν ἀρετῶν. Ἁρμός δέ ἐστιν, ὁ τῆς πράξεως τρόπος, καθ᾿ ὅν ἡ πρός τούς θείους λόγους τῶν λογισμῶν γίνεσθαι πέφυκεν ἕνωσις πρός μίαν ἀρετῆς ἐκπλήρωσιν.

ιγ΄. (589) Τάς ἐνθυμήσεις δέ καί τάς ἐννοίας, ὧν ἐστι κριτικός ὁ Λόγος φησίν εἶναι, τά τῆς ψυχῆς ἐπί τε τοῖς θείοις λόγοις καί τοῖς λογισμοῖς σχέσεις, καί τάς αὐτῶν δηλαδή τῶν σχέσεων αἰτίας. Ἡ γάρ ἐνθύμησις κινεῖ μνήμην, ἧς οἰκεῖον ἡ σχέσις· ἡ δέ ἔννοια, πέρας ἀποσκοπεῖ, ὅπερ αἰτίαν χαρακτηρίζει.

ιδ΄. Ἡ κατ᾿ οὐσίαν γνῶσις, φησίν, ἔστιν ὁ Θεός· προηγεῖται δέ σαφῶς πάσης γνώσεως ὁ νοῦς, ᾧ καί ὑποπίπτειν πέφυκεν· ἄρα καί ὑπέρ ταύτην ἐστίν ὁ Θεός, ὅτι καί ὑπέρ πάντα νοῦν, ᾧ γνῶσις καθοτιοῦν πέφυκεν ὑποπίπτειν, ὑπεραπείρως καθέστηκεν.

ιε΄. Οἱ κατ᾿ ἔλλειψιν ἀρετῆς πολεμοῦντες δαίμονές εἰσιν, οἱ πορνείαν καί μέθην, φυλαργυρίαν τε καί φθόνον, καί τοιαῦτα διδάσκοντες· οἱ δέ καθ᾿ ὑπερβολήν πολεμοῦντές εἰσιν, οἱ τήν οἴησιν καί τήν κενοδοξίαν καί τήν ὑπερημάνειαν, καί τά τοιαῦτα διδάσκοντες· καί διά τῶν δεξιῶν τοῖς ἀριστεροῖς ἐπικεκρυμμένως ἐμπείροντες.

ιστ΄. Ἀρετῆς ὅρος ἐστίν, ἡ τῆς ἀνθρωπίνης ἀσθενείας κατ᾿ ἐπίγνωσιν πρός τήν θείαν δύναμιν ἕνωσις. Ὁ τοίνυν ἑαυτόν τῇ ἀσθενείᾳ περιγράφων τῆς φύσεως, πρός