Contra Celsum ΠΡΟΣ ΤΟΝ ΕΠΙΓΕΓΡΑΜΜΕΝΟΝ ΚΕΛΣΟΥ ΑΛΗΘΗ ΛΟΓΟΝ ΩΡΙΓΕΝΟΥΣ ΤΟΜΟΙ Ηʹ
ΠΡΟΣ ΤΟΝ ΕΠΙΓΕΓΡΑΜΜΕΝΟΝ ΚΕΛΣΟΥ ΑΛΗΘΗ ΛΟΓΟΝ ΩΡΙΓΕΝΟΥΣ ΤΟΜΟΣ ΠΡΩΤΟΣ
ΠΡΟΣ ΤΟΝ ΕΠΙΓΕΓΡΑΜΜΕΝΟΝ ΚΕΛΣΟΥ ΑΛΗΘΗ ΛΟΓΟΝ ΩΡΙΓΕΝΟΥΣ ΤΟΜΟΣ ∆ΕΥΤΕΡΟΣ
ΠΡΟΣ ΤΟΝ ΕΠΙΓΕΓΡΑΜΜΕΝΟΝ ΚΕΛΣΟΥ ΑΛΗΘΗ ΛΟΓΟΝ ΩΡΙΓΕΝΟΥΣ ΤΟΜΟΣ ΤΡΙΤΟΣ
ΠΡΟΣ ΤΟΝ ΕΠΙΓΕΓΡΑΜΜΕΝΟΝ ΚΕΛΣΟΥ ΑΛΗΘΗ ΛΟΓΟΝ ΩΡΙΓΕΝΟΥΣ ΤΟΜΟΣ ΤΕΤΑΡΤΟΣ
ΠΡΟΣ ΤΟΝ ΕΠΙΓΕΓΡΑΜΜΕΝΟΝ ΚΕΛΣΟΥ ΑΛΗΘΗ ΛΟΓΟΝ ΩΡΙΓΕΝΟΥΣ ΤΟΜΟΣ ΠΕΜΠΤΟΣ
ΠΡΟΣ ΤΟΝ ΕΠΙΓΕΓΡΑΜΜΕΝΟΝ ΚΕΛΣΟΥ ΑΛΗΘΗ ΛΟΓΟΝ ΩΡΙΓΕΝΟΥΣ ΤΟΜΟΣ ΕΚΤΟΣ
ΠΡΟΣ ΤΟΝ ΕΠΙΓΕΓΡΑΜΜΕΝΟΝ ΚΕΛΣΟΥ ΑΛΗΘΗ ΛΟΓΟΝ ΩΡΙΓΕΝΟΥΣ ΤΟΜΟΣ ΕΒ∆ΟΜΟΣ
ΠΡΟΣ ΤΟΝ ΕΠΙΓΕΓΡΑΜΜΕΝΟΝ ΚΕΛΣΟΥ ΑΛΗΘΗ ΛΟΓΟΝ ΩΡΙΓΕΝΟΥΣ ΤΟΜΟΣ ΟΓ∆ΟΟΣ
Chapter LXXII.
In the next place, speaking as in the person of a teacher of our doctrine, he expresses himself as follows: “Wise men reject what we say, being led into error, and ensnared by their wisdom.” In reply to which we say that, since wisdom is the knowledge of divine and human things and of their causes, or, as it is defined by the word of God, “the breath of the power of God, and a pure influence flowing from the glory of the Almighty; and the brightness of the everlasting light, and the unspotted mirror of the power of God, and the image of His goodness,”587 Cf. Wisd. of Solom. vii. 25, 26. no one who was really wise would reject what is said by a Christian acquainted with the principles of Christianity, or would be led into error, or ensnared by it. For true wisdom does not mislead, but ignorance does, while of existing things knowledge alone is permanent, and the truth which is derived from wisdom. But if, contrary to the definition of wisdom, you call any one whatever who dogmatizes with sophistical opinions wise, we answer that in conformity with what you call wisdom, such an one rejects the words of God, being misled and ensnared by plausible sophisms. And since, according to our doctrine, wisdom is not the knowledge of evil, but the knowledge of evil, so to speak, is in those who hold false opinions and who are deceived by them, I would therefore in such persons term it ignorance rather than wisdom.
Εἶτα ὡς ἐκ προσώπου τοῦ διδάσκοντος τὸν ἡμέτερον λόγον τοιαῦτά φησιν· Οἱ σοφοὶ γὰρ ἀποτρέπονται τὰ ὑφ' ἡμῶν λεγόμενα, ὑπὸ τῆς σοφίας πλανώμενοι καὶ παραπο διζόμενοι. Φήσομεν οὖν καὶ πρὸς τοῦτο ὅτι, εἴπερ ἡ σοφία ἐπιστήμη "θείων" ἐστὶ "καὶ ἀνθρωπίνων" πραγμάτων καὶ τῶν τούτων αἰτίων ἤ, ὡς ὁ θεῖος λόγος ὁρίζεται, "Ἀτμὶς" "τῆς τοῦ θεοῦ δυνάμεως καὶ ἀπόρροια τῆς τοῦ παντοκράτορος δόξης εἰλικρινὴς" καὶ "ἀπαύγασμα" "φωτὸς ἀϊδίου καὶ ἔσοπτρον ἀκηλίδωτον τῆς τοῦ θεοῦ ἐνεργείας καὶ εἰκὼν τῆς ἀγαθότητος αὐτοῦ", οὐκ ἄν τις ὢν σοφὸς ἀποτρέποιτο τὰ ὑπὸ χριστιανοῦ ἐπιστήμονος τοῦ χριστιανισμοῦ λεγόμενα οὐδὲ πλανηθείη ἂν ἢ παραποδίζοιτο ὑπ' αὐτῆς. Ἡ γὰρ ἀληθὴς σοφία οὐ πλανᾷ ἀλλ' ἡ ἀμαθία, καὶ μόνον τῶν ὄντων βέβαιον ἐπιστήμη, καὶ ἀλήθεια ἅπερ ἐκ σοφίας παραγίνεται. Ἐὰν δὲ παρὰ τὸν τῆς σοφίας ὅρον τὸν ὅ τι ποτ' οὖν δογματίζοντα μετά τινων σοφισμάτων λέγῃς σοφόν, φήσομεν ὅτι ἀληθῶς ὁ κατὰ τὴν ὑπὸ σοῦ λεγομένην σοφίαν ποιὸς ἀποτρέπεται τοὺς λόγους τοῦ θεοῦ, πλανώμενος ὑπὸ τῶν πιθανοτήτων καὶ σοφισμάτων καὶ παραποδιζόμενος ὑπ' αὐτῶν. Καὶ ἐπεὶ κατὰ τὸν ἡμέτερον λόγον "οὐκ ἔστι σοφία πονηρίας ἐπιστήμη", "πονηρίας" δέ, ἵν' οὕτως ὀνομάσω, "ἐπιστήμη" ἐστὶν ἐν τοῖς ψευδο δοξοῦσι καὶ ὑπὸ σοφισματίων ἠπατημένοις, διὰ τοῦτο ἀμαθίαν εἴποιμι μᾶλλον ἢ σοφίαν ἐν τοῖς τοιούτοις.