240

we shall turn. He professes to refute us for saying that the divine is not incorruptible by nature. But we alienate from nature only those things which become acquired by some and can be lost; but as for those things without which the subject has no nature to be conceived, how could anyone be accused of separating nature itself from itself? If, then, our argument maintained that incorruptibility was an after-growth for God, as if it once was not with him or as if it would one day not exist, he would have had an occasion to say these things in slander against 2.1.449 us. But if our argument defines that the divine is always the same and what it is now it has always been, and that nothing is added to it by any augmentation or addition of things not present, but that it is always in everything conceived and spoken of as good, how are we slandered for not testifying to its incorruptibility according to nature? 2.1.450 But he pretends to have taken the starting-points for such a slander of the argument from the saying read out to the teacher, as though we were procuring incorruptibility for God from the juxtaposition of the ages. If, then, our saying had been brought forward by us, the argument might perhaps have been suspect for a defense, as though we were now correcting ourselves and shifting the culpable expressions to what is blameless; but since our words are spoken by the enemy, what stronger proof of the truth could there be than the very testimony of those 2.1.451 who oppose us? How then does our argument run, which Eunomius brings forward for slander against us? "1When," he says, "we cast our mind upon the succeeding ages, we have termed incorruptible that which is indefinite and infinite and comprehended by no end."2 Does Eunomius think that to procure is the same as to term? And who is so outside of the established order as to be ignorant of the specific meanings of these 2.1.452 words? For one procures who acquires what is not his, but one terms who names what is in a signifying way. How then, in these matters, is the guardian of the truth not ashamed to conclude his slander with such manifest calumny? And just as those who from some affliction do not see, behave unseemly in the sight of those who do see, thinking that what is not seen by them is also unknown by the healthy, such a thing has this sharp-sighted and quick-witted man suffered, and he thinks his own maiming 2.1.453 with respect to the truth is also in his hearers. And who is so foolish as not to set the slandered words beside the slander and from the reading of both detect the malice of the writer? Our argument terms it incorruptible; he accuses one who procures incorruptibility. What does procuring have in common with saying? Each one is rightly held accountable for his own words, not to suffer blame for those of others. But now he accuses us and his bitterness is directed at us, but he condemns no one, according to the true 2.1.454 argument, but himself. For if procuring incorruptibility for God is culpable, and this is said by no one else but him alone, then the slanderer becomes his own accuser, slandering his own words, not ours. And concerning the name related to unbegottenness, we say that just as the endlessness of life is called incorruptible, so its beginninglessness was named unbegotten; but this man says that we, from the ages, procure for him the primacy over all begotten things. 2.1.455 I pass over the blasphemy that he makes the only-begotten God common with every begotten thing, with a comprehensive term dragging the Son of God down to notions of equal honor with everything that subsists through generation; but I will set forth in my argument his inconceivable malice to the more intelligent of my hearers. 20From the ages Basil procures for God the primacy over all begotten things20. What is this inconceivable empty talk? Does a man become God's agent and procure for him through the ages the primacy? What 2.1.456 is the vain futility of these insubstantial words, if the teacher said in some indicative terms that which exceeds on both sides the durational extension of the ages of the divine substance

240

τραπησόμεθα. ἐλέγχειν ἡμᾶς ἐπαγγέλλεται ὡς μὴ φύσει λέγοντας ἄφθαρτον εἶναι τὸ θεῖον. ἡμεῖς δὲ μόνα τῆς φύσεως ἀλλοτριοῦμεν ἐκεῖνα ὅσα ἐπίκτητα γίνεταί τισι καὶ ἀπόκτητα· ὧν δὲ ἄνευ τὸ ὑποκείμενον νοηθῆναι φύσιν οὐκ ἔχει, πῶς ἄν τις ἐν αἰτίᾳ γένοιτο ὡς αὐτὴν ἑαυτῆς διαχωρίζων τὴν φύσιν; εἰ μὲν οὖν ἐπιγεννηματικὴν τῷ θεῷ τὴν ἀφθαρσίαν ὁ ἡμέτερος λόγος ἐπρέσβευεν ὥς ποτε περὶ αὐτὸν μὴ οὖσαν ἢ ὡς οὐκ ἐσομένην ποτέ, καιρὸν ἂν εἶχε ταῦτα ἐπὶ διαβολῇ καθ' 2.1.449 ἡμῶν λέγειν. εἰ δὲ ἀεὶ ὡσαύτως ἔχειν καὶ ὃ νῦν ἐστι πάν τοτε εἶναι τὸ θεῖον ὁ ἡμέτερος διορίζεται λόγος καὶ οὐδὲν ἐκ παραυξήσεως αὐτῷ τινος καὶ προσθήκης τῶν μὴ προσ όντων προσγίνεσθαι, ἀλλ' ἐν παντὶ τῷ κατὰ τὸ ἀγαθὸν νοουμένῳ καὶ λεγομένῳ πάντοτε εἶναι, πῶς μὴ κατὰ φύσιν αὐτῷ προσμαρτυρεῖν τὴν ἀφθαρσίαν διαβαλλόμεθα; 2.1.450 Ἀλλ' ἐκ τῆς ὑπαναγνωσθείσης τῷ διδασκάλῳ ῥή σεως τῆς τοιαύτης τοῦ λόγου διαβολῆς εἰληφέναι τὰς ἀφορμὰς σχηματίζεται, ὡς ἐκ τῆς παραθέσεως τῶν αἰώνων τῷ θεῷ τὴν ἀφθαρσίαν ἡμῶν ποριζόντων. εἰ μὲν οὖν παρ' ἡμῶν τὸ ἡμέτερον ῥητὸν προεφέρετο, ὕποπτος ἂν ἦν ἴσως εἰς ἀπολογίαν ὁ λόγος, ὡς νῦν ἡμῶν ἐπιδιορθουμένων καὶ πρὸς τὸ ἀνεύθυνον μετατιθέντων τὰς ὑπαιτίους φωνάς· ἐπεὶ δὲ παρὰ τοῦ ἐχθροῦ τὰ ἡμέτερα λέγεται, τίς ἂν ἰσχυροτέρα γένοιτο τῆς ἀληθείας ἀπόδειξις αὐτῆς τῆς τῶν 2.1.451 ἀντιδικούντων ἡμῖν μαρτυρίας; πῶς τοίνυν ὁ παρ' ἡμῶν ἔχει λόγος ὃν ἐπὶ διαβολῇ προχειρίζεται καθ' ἡμῶν ὁ Εὐνόμιος; "1ὅταν, φησί, τοῖς ἐπερχομένοις αἰῶσι τὸν νοῦν ἐπιβάλωμεν, τὸ ἀόριστον καὶ ἄπειρον καὶ οὐδενὶ τέλει κατα ληπτὸν προσηγορεύσαμεν ἄφθαρτον."2 ἆρα τῷ πορίσαι τὸ προσαγορεῦσαι ταὐτὸν ὁ Εὐνόμιος οἴεται; καὶ τίς οὕτως ἔξω τοῦ καθεστηκότος ἐστίν, ὡς τὰς ἰδιαζούσας τῶν ῥη 2.1.452 μάτων τούτων ἀγνοεῖν ἐμφάσεις; πορίζει μὲν γὰρ ὁ τὸ μὴ προσὸν αὐτῷ κτησάμενος, προσαγορεύει δὲ ὁ τὸ ὂν σημαν τικῶς ὀνομάζων. πῶς οὖν ἐπὶ τούτοις ὁ τῆς ἀληθείας φροντιστὴς οὐκ αἰσχύνεται ἐν προδήλῳ τῇ συκοφαντίᾳ τὴν διαβολὴν συμπεραίνων; καὶ καθάπερ οἱ ἔκ τινος πάθους μὴ βλέποντες ἐν ὄψεσι τῶν βλεπόντων ἀσχημονοῦσι τὸ παρ' αὐτῶν μὴ ὁρώμενον καὶ παρὰ τῶν ὑγιαινόντων ἀγνοεῖσθαι νομίζοντες, τοιοῦτόν τι πέπονθεν ὁ ὀξυδερκὴς οὗτος καὶ ταχὺς τὴν διάνοιαν τὴν ἰδίαν πρὸς τὴν ἀλήθειαν πήρωσιν 2.1.453 καὶ ἐν τοῖς ἀκούουσιν οἴεται. καὶ τίς οὕτως ἠλίθιος ὡς μὴ παραθεῖναι τῇ διαβολῇ τὰ συκοφαντούμενα ῥήματα καὶ ἐκ τῆς ἑκατέρων ἀναγνώσεως τὴν κακουργίαν τοῦ λογο γράφου φωρᾶσαι; ὁ ἡμέτερος λόγος προσαγορεύει τὸ ἄφθαρ τον, ἐκεῖνος κατηγορεῖ τοῦ τὴν ἀφθαρσίαν πορίζοντος. τί κοινὸν ἔχει τὸ πορίζειν τῷ λέγειν; ἀπὸ τῶν ἰδίων ἕκαστος εὐθύνεσθαι δίκαιος, οὐκ ἐκ τῶν ἀλλοτρίων ὑπέχειν τὰς μέμψεις. νυνὶ δὲ κατηγορεῖ μὲν ἡμῶν καὶ ἡ πικρία πρὸς ἡμᾶς βλέπει, κατακρίνει δὲ οὐδένα κατά γε τὸν ἀληθῆ 2.1.454 λόγον ἢ ἑαυτόν. εἰ γὰρ τὸ πορίζειν τῷ θεῷ τὴν ἀφθαρ σίαν ὑπαίτιον, τοῦτο δὲ παρ' οὐδενὸς ἄλλου πλὴν παρ' αὐτοῦ λέγεται μόνου, ἄρα αὐτὸς ἑαυτοῦ γίνεται ὁ συκο φάντης κατήγορος, τὸ ἑαυτοῦ διαβάλλων, οὐ τὸ ἡμέτερον. καὶ περὶ τοῦ κατὰ τὴν ἀγεννησίαν ὀνόματος ἡμεῖς μέν φαμεν, ὅτι ὥσπερ τὸ ἀτελεύτητον τῆς ζωῆς ἄφθαρτον, οὕτως τὸ ἄναρχον αὐτῆς ἀγέννητον ὠνομάσθη· οὑτοσὶ δὲ παρὰ τῶν αἰώνων ἡμᾶς λέγει κατὰ πάντων τῶν γεννητῶν προξενεῖν αὐτῷ τὰ πρεσβεῖα. 2.1.455 Σιωπῶ τὸ βλάσφημον ὅτι κοινοποιεῖ πρὸς πᾶν γεννητὸν τὸν μονογενῆ θεόν, τῇ περιληπτικῇ φωνῇ πρὸς ὁμοτίμους ὑπολήψεις παντὶ τῷ διὰ γενέσεως ὑφεστῶτι τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ θεοῦ κατάγων· ἀλλὰ τὴν ἀδιανόητον αὐτοῦ κακουργίαν τοῖς συνετωτέροις τῶν ἀκροατῶν προθήσω τῷ λόγῳ. 20παρὰ τῶν αἰώνων προξενεῖ Βασίλειος κατὰ πάντων τῶν γεννητῶν τῷ θεῷ τὰ πρεσβεῖα20. τίς ἡ ἀδιανόητος αὕτη κενοφωνία; πρόξενος θεοῦ ἄνθρωπος γίνεται καὶ προξενεῖ διὰ τῶν αἰώνων αὐτῷ τὰ πρεσβεῖα; τίς 2.1.456 ἡ ματαία τῶν ἀνυποστάτων τούτων ῥημάτων κενεμβασία, εἰ τὸ ὑπερεκπῖπτον τὴν διαστηματικὴν τῶν αἰώνων παρά τασιν ἐφ' ἑκάτερα τῆς θείας οὐσίας ἐμφαντικοῖς τισιν ὀνό μασιν ὁ διδάσκαλος εἶπεν