Chapter III.

But observe how, in his desire to subvert our opinions, he who never acknowledged himself throughout his whole treatise to be an Epicurean, is convicted of being a deserter to that sect.  And now is the time for you, (reader), who peruse the works of Celsus, and give your assent to what has been advanced, either to overturn the belief in a God who visits the human race, and exercises a providence over each individual man, or to grant this, and prove the falsity of the assertions of Celsus.  If you, then, wholly annihilate providence, you will falsify those assertions of his in which he grants the existence of “God and a providence,” in order that you may maintain the truth of your own position; but if, on the other hand, you still admit the existence of providence, because you do not assent to the dictum of Celsus, that “neither has a God nor the son of a God come down nor is to come down1004    κατέρχεσθαι.    ἐνεῖδον.    Ps. liv. 5. to mankind,” why not rather carefully ascertain from the statements made regarding Jesus, and the prophecies uttered concerning Him, who it is that we are to consider as having come down to the human race as God, and the Son of God?—whether that Jesus who said and ministered so much, or those who under pretence of oracles and divinations, do not reform the morals of their worshippers, but who have besides apostatized from the pure and holy worship and honour due to the Maker of all things, and who tear away the souls of those who give heed to them from the one only visible and true God, under a pretence of paying honour to a multitude of deities?

Ὅρα δὴ ὅτι βουλόμενος τὰ ἡμέτερα ἀνελεῖν ὁ μὴ ὁμολογήσας δι' ὅλου τοῦ συγγράμματος ἐπικούρειος εἶναι πρὸς τὸν Ἐπίκουρον αὐτομολῶν ἐλέγχεται. Ὥρα δή σοι τῷ ἐντυγχάνοντι τοῖς Κέλσου λόγοις καὶ συγκατατιθεμένῳ τοῖς προκειμένοις ἤτοι ἀναιρεῖν τὸ θεὸν ἐπιδημεῖν, προνοούμενον ἀνθρώπων τῶν καθ' ἕνα, ἢ τιθέντι τὸ τοιοῦτον ψευδοποιεῖν τὸν Κέλσου λόγον. Εἰ μὲν οὖν πάντῃ πρόνοιαν ἀναιρεῖς, ψευδοποιήσεις αὐτοῦ τοὺς λόγους, ἐν οἷς τίθησι θεοὺς καὶ πρόνοιαν, ἵνα ταῦτα φήσῃς εἶναι ἀληθῆ· εἰ δὲ τίθης οὐδὲν ἧττον πρόνοιαν, ὡς οὐ συγκατατιθέμενος Κέλσῳ λέγοντι μήτε θεὸν μήτε θεοῦ παῖδα κατεληλυθέναι ἢ κατέρχεσθαι πρὸς ἀνθρώπους, διὰ τί οὐχὶ ἐπιμελῶς ἐξετάσεις ἐκ τῶν περὶ Ἰησοῦ ἡμῖν λελεγμένων καὶ τῶν περὶ αὐτοῦ προφητευο μένων, τίνα μᾶλλον χρὴ νομίζειν θεὸν καὶ θεοῦ παῖδα κατεληλυθέναι πρὸς ἀνθρώπους, τὸν τοσαῦτα οἰκονομήσαντα καὶ ποιήσαντα Ἰησοῦν ἢ τοὺς προφάσει χρησμῶν καὶ μαντειῶν μὴ ἐπανορθοῦντας μὲν τὰ ἤθη τῶν θεραπευομένων καὶ προσέτι δ' ἀποστάντας τῆς εἰλικρινοῦς καὶ καθαρᾶς πρὸς τὸν τῶν ὅλων ποιητὴν σεβασμίου τιμῆς καὶ σχίζοντας τὴν τῶν προσεχόντων αὐτοῖς ψυχὴν προφάσει τιμῆς πλειόνων θεῶν ἀπὸ τοῦ ἑνὸς καὶ μόνου ἐναργοῦς καὶ ἀληθινοῦ θεοῦ;