Pacandus

 Bartolommeo Pacca

 St. Pachomius

 George Michael Pachtler

 Pacificus

 Bl. Pacificus of Ceredano

 St. Pacificus of San Severino

 Lucas Pacioli

 Diocese of Paderborn

 Juan de Padilla

 Diocese of Padua

 University of Padua

 Paganism

 Mario Pagano

 Ven. Anthony Page

 Antoine Pagi

 Santes Pagnino

 Religious Painting

 Pakawá Indians

 Palæography

 Palæontology

 Juan de Palafox y Mendoza

 Ven. Thomas Palasor

 Rhenish Palatinate

 Palatini

 Prefecture Apostolic of Palawan

 Diocese of Palencia

 Paleopolis

 Gabriele Paleotti

 Archdiocese of Palermo

 University of Palermo

 Diocese of Palestrina

 Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina

 Frederick Apthorp Paley

 Pall

 Andrea Palladio

 St. Palladius

 Palladius

 Pietro Sforza Pallavicino

 Pallium

 Ven. Vincent Mary Pallotti

 Palma Vecchio

 William Palmer

 Domenico Palmieri

 Luigi Palmieri

 Palm in Christian Symbolism

 Palm Sunday

 Palmyra

 Francisco Palou

 Paltus

 Peter Paludanus

 Pamelius

 Diocese of Pamiers

 St. Pammachius

 St. Pamphilus of Cæsarea

 Diocese of Pamplona

 Republic and Diocese of Panama

 Pandects

 Pandulph

 Panemotichus

 Pange Lingua Gloriosi

 Francesco Panigarola

 Arnold Pannartz and Konrad Sweinheim

 Pano Indians

 Panopolis

 Panpsychism

 Pantænus

 St. Pantaleon

 Pantheism

 Onofrio Panvinio

 Gregorio Panzani

 Ven. Angelo Paoli

 Papacy

 Pápago Indians

 Papal Arbitration

 Papal Elections

 Paphnutius

 Paphos

 St. Papias

 Bernardus Papiensis

 Nicholas Papini

 Parables

 Parabolani

 Theophrastus Paracelsus

 Paraclete

 François Para du Phanjas

 Parætonium

 Paraguay

 Books of Paralipomenon

 Diocese of Parahyba

 Parallelism

 Psycho-Physical Parallelism

 Paralus

 Diocese of Paraná

 Parasceve

 Paray-le-Monial

 Ignace-Gaston Pardies

 Pardons of Brittany

 Ambroise Paré

 Francisco Pareja

 Parents

 Diocese of Parenzo-Pola

 Giuseppe Parini

 Paris

 University of Paris

 Alexis-Paulin Paris

 Gaston-Bruno-Paulin Paris

 Matthew Paris

 Parish

 Parium

 Abbey of the Park

 Anthony Parkinson

 Parlais

 Filippo Parlatore

 Diocese of Parma

 Antoine-Augustin Parmentier

 Il Parmigiano

 Parnassus

 Parochial Mass

 Parœcopolis

 Dominique Parrenin

 Parsis

 Partnership

 Paolo Paruta

 Blaise Pascal

 St. Pascal Baylon

 Pasch or Passover

 Pope Paschal I

 Pope Paschal II

 Paschal III

 Paschal Candle

 Paschal Tide

 St. Paschasius

 St. Paschasius Radbertus

 Carlo Passaglia

 Diocese of Passau

 Ven. Joseph Passerat

 Domenico Passignano

 Domenico Passionei

 Passionists

 Passion Music

 Commemoration of the Passion of Christ

 Passion Offices

 Devotion to the Passion of Jesus Christ

 Passion of Jesus Christ in the Four Gospels

 Passion Plays

 Passions

 Passion Sunday

 Passiontide

 Passos

 Louis Pasteur

 Diocese of Pasto

 Pastor

 Crusade of the Pastoureaux

 Patagonia

 Patara

 Paten

 Ven. William Patenson

 Mental Pathology

 Coventry Patmore

 Patmos

 Patras

 Patriarch

 Patriarch and Patriarchate

 Patrician Brothers

 St. Patrick

 Francis Xavier Patrizi

 Patrology

 Feast of the Patronage of Our Lady

 Patron and Patronage

 Patron Saints

 Diocese of Patti

 St. Paul

 Pope Paul I

 Pope Paul II

 Pope Paul III

 Pope Paul IV

 Pope Paul V

 St. Paula

 Johannes Pauli

 Paulicians

 St. Paulinus

 St. Paulinus, Bishop of Nola

 St. Paulinus II, Patriarch of Aquileia

 Paulinus a S. Bartholomaeo

 Paulinus of Pella

 Paulists

 Paul of Burgos

 Paul of Middelburg

 Paul of Samosata

 St. Paul of the Cross

 St. Paul the Hermit

 St. Paul the Simple

 Paulus Diaconus

 Paulus Venetus

 Diocese of Pavia

 Nicolas Pavillon

 Pax

 Pax in the Liturgy

 Mariano Payeras

 Peter Pázmány

 Peace Congresses

 War of the Peasants (1524-25)

 Peba Indians

 John Pecham

 Reginald Pecock

 Pectoral

 Pectorale

 Pednelissus

 Pedro de Cordova

 Pelagia

 Pope Pelagius I

 Pope Pelagius II

 Pelagius and Pelagianism

 Ambrose Pelargus

 Paul Pelisson-Fontanier

 Pella

 Pierre-Joseph Pelletier

 Silvio Pellico

 Guillaume Pellissier

 Diocese of Pelotas

 Théophile-Jules Pelouze

 Madeleine de La Peltrie

 Pelusium

 Diocese of Pembroke

 Francisco Peña

 Penal Laws

 Luis Ignatius Peñalver y Cardenas

 Penance

 Henry Pendleton

 Penelakut Indians

 Los Hermanos Penitentes

 Penitential Canons

 Penitential Orders

 Confraternities of Penitents

 Diocese of Penne and Atri

 Pennsylvania

 Penobscot Indians

 Ecclesiastical Pension

 Pentacomia

 Pentapolis

 Pentateuch

 Feast of Pentecost (of the Jews)

 Diocese of Peoria

 Peoria Indians

 Pepin the Short

 John Percy

 Peregrinus

 Benedict Pereira

 Juan Perez

 Ginés Pérez de Hita

 Christian and Religious Perfection

 Pergamus

 Perge

 Giovanni Battista Pergolesi

 Pericui Indians

 Diocese of Périgueux

 Periodi

 Periodical Literature

 Perjury

 Franz Michael Permaneder

 Joseph Maria Pernter

 Religious of Perpetual Adoration

 Religious of the Perpetual Adoration

 Sisters of the Perpetual Adoration

 Perpetual Adorers of the Blessed Sacrament

 Sisters of Our Lady of Perpetual Help

 Our Lady of Perpetual Succour

 St. Perpetuus

 Diocese of Perpignan

 Adolphe Perraud

 Charles Perrault

 Claude Perrault

 Henri Perreyve

 Giovanni Perrone

 Stephen Joseph Perry

 Persecution

 Coptic Persecutions

 Final Perseverance

 Persia

 Ignatius Persico

 Person

 Ecclesiastical Person

 Personality

 Robert Persons

 Diocese of Perth

 Publius Helvius Pertinax

 Peru

 Archdiocese of Perugia

 Perugino (Pietro Vannucci)

 Baldassare Peruzzi

 Diocese of Pesaro

 Pescennius Niger

 Tilmann Pesch

 Diocese of Pescia

 Pessimism

 Pessinus

 Pestalozzi and Pestalozzianism

 Denis Pétau

 St. Peter

 Epistles of St. Peter

 Sarah Peter

 Sts. Peter Baptist and Twenty-five Companions

 Peterborough Abbey

 Diocese of Peterborough

 Bl. Peter Canisius

 Peter Cantor

 Peter Cellensis

 St. Peter Chrysologus

 St. Peter Claver

 Peter Comestor

 St. Peter Damian

 Peter de Blois

 Peter de Honestis

 St. Peter de Regalado

 Peter de Vinea

 Bl. Peter Faber

 St. Peter Fourier

 Peter Fullo

 St. Peter Gonzalez

 Bl. Peter Igneus

 Peter Lombard (2)

 Bl. Pierre-Louis-Marie Chanel (1)

 Peter Mongus

 St. Peter Nolasco

 St. Peter of Alcántara

 St. Peter of Alexandria

 Peter of Aquila

 St. Peter of Arbues

 Peter of Auvergne

 Peter of Bergamo

 Peter of Poitiers

 St. Peter of Sebaste

 St. Peter of Verona

 Peterspence

 Gerlac Peterssen

 Peter the Hermit

 St. Peter Urseolus

 Petinessus

 Matthieu Petit-Didier

 Petitions to the Holy See

 Petra

 Francesco Petrarch

 Family of Petre

 Petrobrusians

 St. Petronilla

 St. Petronius

 Diocese of Petropolis

 Ottavio dei Petrucci

 Petrus Alfonsus

 Petrus Bernardinus

 Petrus Diaconus

 Petrus de Natalibus

 Petun Nation

 George von Peuerbach

 Conrad Peutinger

 William Peyto

 Pez

 Franz Pfanner

 Johannes Pfefferkorn

 Adolf Pfister

 Julius von Pflug

 Pforta

 Phacusa

 Pharao

 Pharbætus

 Pharisees

 Pharsalus

 Phaselis

 Phasga

 Phenomenalism

 Philadelphia

 Archdiocese of Philadelphia

 Philanthropinism

 St. Philastrius

 Philemon

 St. Philip the Apostle

 Volume 13

 Philip II (Augustus)

 Philip II

 Philip IV

 St. Philip Benizi

 St. Philip of Jesus

 Philip of the Blessed Trinity

 Philippi (1)

 Philippi (2)

 Epistle to the Philippians

 Philippine Islands

 Philippopolis (1)

 Philippopolis (2)

 St. Philip Romolo Neri

 Peter Philips

 Philip the Arabian

 Philistines

 Robert Phillip

 George Phillips

 Philo Judæus

 Philomelium

 St. Philomena

 Philosophy

 Philoxenus

 Phocæa

 Phœnicia

 Photinus

 Photius of Constantinople

 Phylacteries

 History of Physics

 Physiocrats

 Physiologus

 Diocese of Piacenza

 Giambattista Pianciani

 Giovanni da Pianô Carpine

 Piatto Cardinalizio

 Diocese of Piauhy

 Diocese of Piazza Armerina

 Giuseppe Piazzi

 Ven. John Pibush

 Jean Picard

 Alessandro Piccolomini

 Jacopo Piccolomini-Ammannati

 Pichler

 Vitus Pichler

 Ven. Thomas Pickering

 Bernardine a Piconio

 François Picquet

 Louis-Edouard-Désiré Pie

 Piedmont

 Peter Piel

 Pie Pelicane, Jesu, Domine

 Pierius

 Bl. Pierre de Castelnau

 Pierre de Maricourt

 Jean Pierron

 Philippe Pierson

 Pietism

 Albert (Pigghe) Pighius

 Ven. Giuseppe Maria Pignatelli

 Ven. William Pike

 Nuestra Señora Del Pilar

 Pontius Pilate

 Ven. Thomas Pilchard

 Pilgrimage of Grace

 Pilgrimages

 Piligrim

 Pillar of Cloud

 Pima Indians

 Pinara

 Diocese of Pinar del Rio

 Ippolito Pindemonte

 John de Pineda

 Diocese of Pinerolo

 Alexandre Guy Pingré

 Mattheus Pinna da Encarnaçao

 Fernão Mendes Pinto

 Pinturicchio

 Martín Alonso Pinzón

 Sebastiano del Piombo

 St. Pionius

 Pious Fund of the Californias

 Pious Society of Missions

 Giambattista Piranesi

 Ernricus Pirhing

 Pirkheimer

 Piro Indians

 Archdiocese of Pisa

 University of Pisa

 Council of Pisa

 Piscataway Indians

 Piscina

 Charles Constantine Pise

 Pisidia

 Synod of Pistoia

 Diocese of Pistoia and Prato

 Johann Pistorius

 Pierre Pithou

 Joseph Pitoni

 Jean-Baptiste-François Pitra

 John Pitts

 Diocese of Pittsburg

 Pityus

 Pope St. Pius I

 Pope Pius II

 Pope Pius III

 Pope Pius IV

 Pope St. Pius V

 Pope Pius VI

 Pope Pius VII

 Pope Pius VIII

 Pope Pius IX

 Pope Pius X

 Piusverein

 Francisco Pizarro

 Galla Placidia

 St. Placidus

 Plagues of Egypt

 Plain Chant

 Henry Beaufort Plantagenet

 Christophe Plantin

 Plants in the Bible

 Diocese of Plasencia

 Bartolomeo Platina

 Plato and Platonism

 Pierre-Guillaume-Frédéric Le Play

 Plegmund

 Plenarium

 Plenary Council

 Joseph-Octave Plessis

 Georgius Gemistus Plethon

 Diocese of Plock

 Charles Plowden

 Edmund Plowden

 Francis Plowden

 Robert Plowden

 Thomas Plowden

 Thomas Percy Plowden

 Charles Plumier

 Ven. Oliver Plunket

 Pluscarden Priory

 Diocese of Plymouth

 Plymouth Brethren

 Pneumatomachi

 Hebrew Poetry of the Old Testament

 Giovanni Francesco Poggio Bracciolini

 Diocese of Poggio Mirteto

 Pogla

 Diocese of Poitiers

 Poland

 John Bede Polding

 Reginald Pole

 Polemonium

 Giovanni Poleni

 Poles in the United States

 Diocese of Policastro

 Melchior de Polignac

 Lancelot Politi

 Politian

 Science of Political Economy

 Antonio and Piero Benci Pollajuolo

 Marco Polo

 Polybotus

 St. Polycarp

 Polycarpus

 Polyglot Bibles

 Polystylum

 Polytheism

 Pomaria

 Marquis de Pombal

 Pomerania

 Pompeiopolis

 Pietro Pomponazzi

 John Ponce

 Juan Ponce de León

 Joseph Anthony de la Rivière Poncet

 Archdiocese of Pondicherry

 Pontefract Priory

 Pope St. Pontian

 Pontifical Colleges

 Pontificale

 Pontificalia

 Pontifical Mass

 Abbey of Pontigny

 Pontius Carbonell

 Diocese of Pontremoli

 Pontus

 Pools in Scripture

 Diocese of Poona

 Care of Poor by the Church

 Little Sisters of the Poor

 Poor Brothers of St. Francis Seraphicus

 Poor Catholics

 Sisters of the Poor Child Jesus

 Poor Clares

 Poor Handmaids of Jesus Christ

 Poor Laws

 Sisters of the Poor of St. Francis

 Poor Servants of the Mother of God

 Archdiocese of Popayán

 Alexander Pope

 Pope

 Election of the Popes

 Chronological Lists of Popes

 The List of Popes

 St. Poppo

 Popular Devotions

 Theories of Population

 Giovanni Antonio Pordenone

 Odoric of Pordenone

 Ven. Thomas Pormort

 Porphyreon

 St. Porphyrius

 Serafino Porrecta

 Carlo Porta

 Giacomo della Porta

 Diocese of Portalegre

 Diocese of Port Augusta

 Archdiocese of Port-au-Prince

 Porter

 Francis Porter

 George Porter

 Portiuncula

 Diocese of Portland

 Diocese of Port Louis

 Archdiocese of Porto Alegre

 Diocese of Porto Alegre

 Diocese of Porto and Santa-Rufina

 Archdiocese of Port of Spain

 Porto Rico

 Diocese of Portoviejo

 Portraits of the Apostles

 Port-Royal

 Diocese of Portsmouth

 Portugal

 Portuguese East Africa

 Portuguese West Africa

 Diocese of Port Victoria

 Positivism

 Demoniacal Possession

 Antonius Possevinus

 St. Possidius

 Postcommunion

 Ven. Nicholas Postgate

 Postulant

 Postulation

 Potawatomi Indians

 Robert Joseph Pothier

 Jean-François-Albert du Pouget

 Thomas Pounde

 Nicolas Poussin

 Poverty

 Poverty and Pauperism

 Ven. Philip Powel

 William Poynter

 Andreas Pozzo

 Diocese of Pozzuoli

 Jean-Martin de Prades

 Jerome de Prado

 Praelatus Nullius

 Pragmatic Sanction

 Pragmatism

 Archdiocese of Prague

 University of Prague

 Praxeas

 Praxedes and Pudentiana

 George Pray

 Prayer

 Prayer-Books

 Feast of the Prayer of Christ

 Preacher Apostolic

 Order of Preachers

 Preadamites

 Prebend

 Precaria

 Precedence

 Precentor

 Canonical Precept

 Precious Blood

 Archconfraternity of the Most Precious Blood

 Congregation of the Most Precious Blood

 Congregations of the Precious Blood

 Count Humbert-Guillaume de Precipiano

 Preconization

 Predestinarianism

 Predestination

 Preface

 Prefect Apostolic

 Prelate

 Joseph Henri Marie de Prémare

 Premonstratensian Canons

 Abbey of Prémontré

 Presbyterianism

 Presbytery

 Prescription

 Presence of God

 Order of the Presentation

 Religious Congregations of the Presentation

 Right of Presentation

 Presentation Brothers

 Congregation of the Presentation of Mary

 Feast of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary

 Prester John

 Thomas Preston

 Thomas Scott Preston

 Presumption

 Presumption (in Canon Law)

 Pretorium

 Pride

 Priene

 Priest

 Assistant Priest

 High Priest

 Priesthood

 Confraternities of Priests

 Priests' Communion League

 Priests' Eucharistic League

 Primacy

 Primate

 Prime

 The Primer

 Primicerius

 Sts. Primus and Felician

 Diocese of Prince Albert

 Prior

 Prioress

 Priory

 St. Prisca

 Priscianus

 Priscillianism

 Prisons

 Ecclesiastical Prisons

 Privilege

 Ecclesiastical Privileges

 Faltonia Proba

 Probabilism

 Marcus Aurelius Probus

 Roman Processional

 Processions

 Sts. Processus and Martinian

 St. Proclus

 Proconnesus

 Procopius of Caesarea

 Adelaide Anne Procter

 Procurator

 Religious Profession

 Divine Promise (in Scripture)

 Promotor Fidei

 Promulgation

 Proof

 Sacred Congregation of Propaganda

 Society for the Propagation of the Faith

 Property

 Property Ecclesiastical

 Ecclesiastical Property in the United States

 Prophecy

 Prophecy, Prophet, and Prophetess

 Proprium

 Franz Isidor Proschko

 Proselyte

 Prose or Sequence

 Karl Proske

 Tiro Prosper of Aquitaine

 Protectorate of Missions

 Protectories

 Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America

 Protestantism

 Prothonotary Apostolic

 Protocol

 Protopope

 Sts. Protus and Hyacinth

 Father Prout

 Léon Abel Provancher

 Book of Proverbs

 Congregations of Providence

 Diocese of Providence

 Divine Providence

 Ecclesiastical Province

 Provincial

 Provincial Council

 Canonical Provision

 Statute of Provisors

 Provost

 Prudence

 Aurelius Clemens Prudentius

 Prudentius

 Prüm

 Prusias ad Hypium

 Prussia

 Diocese of Przemysl

 Diocese of Przemysl, Sambor, and Sanok

 Psalms

 Alphabetic Psalms

 Psalterium

 Nicholas Psaume

 Michael Psellus

 Psychology

 Psychotherapy

 Ptolemais

 Ptolemais (Saint-Jean d'Acre)

 Ptolemy the Gnostic

 Publican

 Public Honesty (Decency)

 Pueblo Indians

 Pierre Puget

 George Ellis Pugh

 Augustus Welby Northmore Pugin

 Victor-Alexandre Puiseux

 Casimir Pulaski

 Diocese of Pulati

 St. Pulcheria

 Luigi Pulci

 Robert Pullen

 Pulpit

 Capital Punishment

 Diocese of Puno

 John Baptist Purcell

 Purgatorial Societies

 Purgatory

 St. Patrick's Purgatory

 Purim

 Puritans

 Pusey and Puseyism

 Pustet

 Putative Marriage

 Erycius Puteanus

 Joseph Putzer

 Pierre Puvis de Chavannes

 Puyallup Indians

 Johann Ladislaus von Oberwart Pyrker

 Pyrrhonism

 Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism

 Pyx

Psychology


(Gr. psyche, logos; Lat. psychologia; Fr. psychologie; Ger. Seelenkunde)

In the most general sense, psychology is the science which treats of the soul and its operations. During the past century, however, the term has come to be frequently employed to denote the latter branch of knowledge - the science of the phenomena of the mind, of the processes or states of human consciousness. Moreover, the increasing differentiation, characteristic of the advance of all departments of knowledge in recent years, has manifested itself in so marked a manner in psychological investigation that there are already severe distinct fields of psychological work, each putting forward claims to be recognized as a separate science. The term psychologia seems to have first come into use about the end of the sixteenth century (Goclenius, 1590, Casmann's "Psychologia Anthropologica", 1594). But the popularization of the name dates from Ch. Wolff in the eighteenth century.

History

Aristotle may well be deemed the founder of this as of so many other sciences, though by him it is not distinguished from general biology, which is itself part of physics, or the study of nature. His treatise peri psyches ("De Anima") was during two thousand years virtually the universal textbook of psychology, and it still well repays study. In the investigation of vital phenomena Aristotle employed to some extent all the methods of modern science: observation, internal and external; comparison; experiment; hypothesis; and induction; as well as deduction and speculative reasoning. He defines the soul as the "Entelechy or form of a natural body potentially possessing life". He distinguishes three kinds of souls, or grades of life, the vegetative, the sensitive, and the intellectual or rational. In man the higher virtually includes the lower. He investigates the several functions of nutrition, appetency, locomotion, sensuous perception, and intellect or reason. The last is confined to man. The working of the senses is discussed by him in detail; and diligent anatomical and physiological study, as well as careful introspective observation of our conscious processes, is manifested. Knowledge starts from sensation, but sense only apprehends the concrete and singular thing. It is the function of the intellect to abstract the universal essence. There is a radical distinction between thought and sentiency. The intellect or reason (nous) is separate from sense and immortal, though how precisely we are to conceive this nous and its "separateness" is one of the most puzzling problems in Aristotle's psychology. Indeed, the doctrines of free will and personal immortality are not easily reconciled with parts of Aristotle's teaching.

Scholastic period

There is little effort at systematic treatment of psychology from Aristotle to the medieval philosophers. For Epicurus, psychology was a branch of physics in subordination to a theory of hedonistic ethics. With the introduction of Christianity certain psychological problems such as the immortality and the origin of the soul, free will and moral habits at once assumed a vastly increased importance and raised the treatise "De Anima", to one of the most important branches of philosophy. Moreover, the angels being assumed to be spirits in many ways resembling the human soul conceived as separate from the human body, a speculative theory of the nature, attributes, and operations of the angelic beings, partly based on Scriptural texts, partly deduced by analogical reasoning from human psychology, gradually grew up and received its final elaboration in the Middle Ages in the metaphysical theology of the Schoolmen. The Christian mystics were naturally led to consider the character of the soul's knowledge of God. But their treatment of psychological questions is generally vague and obscure, whilst their language indulges much in allegory and symbolism. Indeed, the greatest of the mystics were not sympathetic with the employment of Scholastic or scientific methods in the handling of mystic experience. The great controversy between Realism and Nominalism from the early Middle Ages directed much attention to the theory of knowledge and the problem of the origin of ideas. However, although psychological observation was appealed to, the epistemological discussions were largely metaphysical in character during this period. To Albertus Magnus and St. Thomas the popularization of the psychology of Aristotle throughout Europe during the thirteenth century was mainly due. In Questions lxxv to xc of part I of the "Summa Theologica", St. Thomas gives a very fairly complete and systematic account of the leading topics connected with the soul. However, questions of biology, general metaphysics, and theology were constantly interwoven with psychology for many centuries afterwards. Indeed, the liberal use made of physiological evidence in psychological discussions is a marked feature in the treatment of this branch of philosophy throughout the entire history of scholastic philosophy. But although there is plenty of proof of acute observation of mental activities, the usual appeal in discussion is rather to metaphysical analysis and deductive argument than to systematic introspective observation and induction, so characteristic of modern psychology. The treatise "De Anima" of Suarez is a very good example of scholastic psychology at the close of the Middle Ages. The treatise, containing six books, starts in book I with an inquiry into the essence of the soul. Recalling Aristotle's definition of the soul as the form of the body, the author proceeds to examine the relations of the vegetative, sensitive, and rational soul. Next, in book II he treats of the faculties of the soul in general and their relation to the soul as an essence. In book III he investigates the nature and working of the cognitive faculties, and especially of the senses. In book IV he inquires into the character of the activity of the intellect. In book V he deals with faculties of appetency and free will. Book VI is devoted to a speculative consideration of the condition and mode of operation of the soul in a future life. In each question he begins with a summary of previous opinions and then puts forward his own solution. The order of treatment starting from the essence and passing thence to the faculties and their operations is characteristic of the scholastic treatises generally. The method is mainly deductive and the argument metaphysical, though in dealing with the senses there is constant appeal to recognized physiological authorities from Aristotle to Vesalius.

In psychology as well as in other branches of philosophy the influence of Descartes was considerable though indirect. His subjective starting-point, cogito, ergo sum, his insistence on methodic doubt, his advocacy of reflection on thought and close scrutiny of our fundamental ideas, all tended to encourage the method of internal observation, whilst the mechanical explanation of the "Traité des Passions" favoured the advent of physiological psychology. It was probably, however, John Locke's "Essay on the Human Understanding" (1690) which did most to foster the method of analytic introspection which constitutes the principal feature of modern psychological method. Notwithstanding the confused and inconsistent metaphysics and the many grave psychological blunders with which that work abounds, yet his frequent appeal to inner experience, his honest efforts to describe mental processes, and the quantity of acute observations scattered throughout the work, coming also at an age when the inductive method was rapidly rising in popularity, achieved a speedy and wide success for his book, and gave a marked empirical bent to all future English psychology.

Psychological observation and analysis were still more skilfully used by Bishop Berkeley as a principle of explanation in his "Theory of Vision", and then employed by him to establish his psychological creed of Idealism. Finally, David Hume, the true founder of the Associationist school of psychology, still further increased the importance of the method of introspective analysis by the daring sceptical conclusions he claimed to establish by its means. The subsequent British adherents of the Associationist school Hartley, the two Mills, Bain, and Herbert Spencer, continued this method and tradition along the same lines. There is constant direct appeal to inner experience combined with systematic effort to trace the genesis of the highest, most spiritual, and most complex mental conceptions back to elementary atomic states of sensuous consciousness. Universal ideas, necessary truths, the ideas of self, time, space, causality as well as the conviction of an external material world were all explained as the outcome of sensations and association. The reality of any higher activities or faculties essentially different from the lower sensuous powers was denied, and all the chief data formerly employed in establishing the simplicity, spirituality, and substantiality of the soul were rejected. Rational or metaphysical psychology was thus virtually extinguished and erased from English philosophical literature during the nineteenth century. Even the more orthodox representatives of the Scotch school, Reid and Dugald Stewart, who avoided all metaphysical argument and endeavoured to controvert Hume with his own weapons of appeal exclusively to experience and observation, had only further confirmed the tendency in the direction of a purely empirical psychology. The great need in English psychological literature throughout most of the nineteenth century, on the side of those defending a spiritual doctrine of the human mind, was a systematic and thorough treatment of empirical psychology. Excellent pieces of work on particular questions were done by Martineau, W. G. Ward, and other writers, but nearly all the systematic treatises on psychology were produced by the disciples of the Sensationist or Materialistic schools. Yet, if philosophy is to be based on experience, then assuredly it is on the carefully-scrutinized and well-established results of empirical psychology that any satisfactory rational metaphysical doctrine respecting the nature of the soul, its origin, and its destiny must be built. It was in their faulty though often plausible analysis and interpretation of our states of consciousness that the greatest errors in philosophy and psychology of Bain, the two Mills, Spencer, and their disciples had their source; it is only by more careful introspective observation and a more searching analysis of the same mental facts that these errors can be exposed and solid foundations laid for a true metaphysical psychology of the soul.

In France, Condillac, La Mettrie, Holbach, and Bonnet developed the Sensationalism of Locke's psychology into an increasingly crude Materialism. To oppose this school later on, Royer-Collard, Cousin, Jouffroy, and Maine de Biran turned to the work of Reid and the "common sense" Scotch school, appropriating their method and results in empirical psychology. Some of these writers, moreover, sought to carry their reasoning beyond the mere inductions of empirical psychology, in order to construct on this enlarged experience a genuine philosophy of the soul, as "principle" and subject of the states and activities immediately revealed to introspective observation.

In Germany the purely empirical tendency which had reduced psychology in England to a mere positivistic science of mental facts did not meet with quite the same success. Metaphysics and philosophy proper never fell there into the degradation which they experienced in England in the beginning of the nineteenth century. And although the old conception of a philosophical science of the nature and attributes of the soul was rejected by Kant, and abandoned in the systems of Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel, yet mere Phenomenalism was never completely triumphant in Germany. Herbart, whilst denying the reality of faculties, postulates a simple soul as the underlying subject of the presentations or ideas which form our conscious life. Hermann Lotze, laying similar stress on the importance of scientific observation of our mental states, insists even more strongly that our introspective experience correctly interpreted affords abundant metaphysical justification for the doctrine of an immaterial soul. Meanwhile the earlier attempts of Herbart to express mental activities in mathematical formulæ led to a more successful line of experimental research in the hands of Weber, Fechner, Wundt, and others. The aim of this school is to attain the possible quantitative measurement of conscious states. As this is ordinarily not directly possible, much industry and ingenuity have been devoted to measuring quantitatively, by the aid of skilfully devised instruments, the immediate physical antecedents and effects of sundry mental activities, by which it is hoped to secure accurate quantitative descriptions of the mental states themselves. Psychological laboratories devoted to research of this kind have been set up in several countries, especially in Germany and America. One of the most successful so far is that at the Catholic University of Louvain, and another has lately been established at that of Washington. In Great Britain, however, the special home of empirical psychology since Locke, the new movement in favour of experimental psychology has not, at all events down to the present time, met with much success. The advance of physiological science, and especially of that of the brain and nervous system, has also reacted on psychology, stimulating closer inquiry into the relations between mental and bodily processes. It cannot, however, be maintained that the progress of physiological knowledge, considerable though it is, has brought us appreciably nearer to the solution of the great problem, how body and mind act on each other. The study of nervous pathology, of mental disease and of abnormal mental states, such as those of hypnotism and double-consciousness, has also opened up new fields of psychological research, constantly widening with the last thirty years.

Scope of Psychology

As we have already observed, recent writers commonly confine the term psychology to the science of the phenomena of the mind. Thus William James, probably the psychologist of widest influence during the past twenty years, defines psychology as "The Science of Mental Life, both of its phenomena and their conditions". ("Principles", I, 1). Wundt's definition is: "the science which investigates the whole content of Experience in its relations to the Subject". ("Outlines", 3rd ed., 3). Other writers describe it as, "the science of the facts apprehended by our internal sense", or again, "the science of our states of consciousness, their laws of succession and concomitancy". The common feature of all these definitions is the limitation of the scope of psychology to the phenomena of the mind directly observable by introspection. In this view it is a purely positivist science from which all philosophical problems are to be excluded, as rigorously as from chemistry or geology. It is, in fact; la psychologie sans âme. If such questions as the nature, origin, or destiny of the soul are to be discussed at all, it must be, according to these writers, not in psychology, but in some branch of speculation to be styled the metaphysics or ontology of the human mind, and to be completely isolated from science.

In direct contrast with this view is that ordinarily adopted by Catholic writers hitherto. By them, psychology has usually been conceived as one of the most important branches of philosophy. In their view it may be best described as the philosophical science, which investigates the nature, attributes, and activities of the soul or mind of man. By soul, or mind, is understood the ultimate principle within me by which I think, feel, will, and by which my body is animated. Whilst the soul and the mind are conceived as fundamentally one, the latter term is usually employed to designate the animating principle viewed as subject of my conscious or mental operations; the former denotes it as the root of all vital activities. By terming their branch of knowledge a philosophical science, it is implied that psychology ought to include not only a doctrine of the laws of succession and concomitance of our conscious states, but an inquiry into their ultimate cause. Any adequate study of the human mind, it is contended, naturally presents itself in two stages, empirical or phenomenal psychology, and rational or metaphysical psychology. Though conveniently separated for didactic treatment the two are organically connected. Our metaphysical conclusions as to the nature of the soul must rest on the evidence supplied by our experience of the character of its activities. On the other hand, any effort at thorough treatment of our mental operations, and especially any attempt at explanation of the higher forms or products of consciousness, it is urged, is quite impossible without the adoption of some metaphysical theory as to the nature of the underlying subject or agents of these states. Professor Dewey has justly observed: "The philosophic implications embedded in the very heart of psychology are not got rid of when they are kept out of sight. Some opinion regarding the nature of the mind and its relations to reality will show itself on almost every page, and the fact that this opinion is introduced without the conscious intention of the writer, may serve to confuse both the author and his reader" ("Psychology", IV). Ladd, and others also, recognize the evil of "clandestine" metaphysics when smuggled into what claims to be purely "scientific" non-philosophical treatments of psychology.

Psychology is not in the same position as the physical sciences here. Whilst investigating a question in geology, chemistry, or mechanics, we may, at least temporarily, prescind from our metaphysical creed, but not so - judging from the past history - when giving our psychological accounts and explanations of mental products, such as universal concepts, the notions of moral obligation, responsibility, personal identity, time, or the perception of an external material world, or the simple judgment, two and two must make four. The view, therefore, of those philosophers who maintain that the intrinsic connexions between many of the questions of empirical and rational psychology are so indissoluble that they cannot be divorced, seems to have solid justification. Of course we can call the study of the phenomena of the mind, "Psychology", and that of its inner nature, the "Philosophy of the Mind"; and we may treat each in a separate volume. That is merely a matter of terminology and convenience. But the important point is that in the explanatory treatment of the higher intellectual and rational processes, it will practically be impossible for the psychologist to preserve a philosophically neutral attitude. A truly scientific psychology, therefore, should comprise:


  • (1) a thorough investigation by introspective observation and analysis of our various mental activities - cognitive and appetitive, sensuous and rational - seeking to resolve all products of the mind back to their original elements, determining as far as possible their organic conditions, and tracing the laws of their growth;
  • (2) based on the results of this study, a rational theory or explanatory account of the nature of the agent or subject of these activities, with its chief properties.

Method of Psychology

The primary method of investigation in empirical or phenomenal psychology is introspection or reflective observation of our own mental states. This is the ultimate source of all knowledge of mental facts; even the information gathered immediately from other quarters has finally to be interpreted in terms of our own subjective experience. Introspection is, however, liable to error; consequently, it has to be employed with care and helped and corrected by all the supplementary sources of psychological knowledge available. Among the chief of these are: the internal experience of other observers communicated through language; the study of the human mind as exhibited in different periods of life from infancy to old age, and in different races and grades of civilization; as embodied in various languages and literatures; and as revealed in the absence of particular senses, and in abnormal or pathological conditions such as dreams, hypnotism, and forms of insanity. Moreover, the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of the brain and nervous system supply valuable data as to the organic conditions of conscious states. Experimental psychology, psychophysics, and psychometry help towards accuracy and precision in the description of certain forms of mental activity. And the comparative study of the lower animals may also afford useful assistance in regard to some questions of human psychology. By the utilization of these several sources of information the data furnished to the psychologist by the introspective observation of his own individual mind may be enlarged, tested and corrected, and may thus acquire in a certain degree the objective and universal character of the observations on which the physical sciences are built. Introspection is frequently spoken of as the subjective method, these other sources of information as supplementary objective methods of psychological study.

Branches of Psychology

Indeed some of them have rapidly grown to be such large and important fields of research that they now claim to be recognized as special departments of psychology, or even sciences in their own right. Thus we have comparative psychology including animal psychology, child psychology, and race psychology. Again psychiatry or psychopathology, the science of mental disease, also physiological psychology, which, in a broad sense, includes all systematic study of the organic conditions of mental life, or, as Ladd defines it, "psychology approached and studied from the physiological side".

Experimental Psychology

A special department of physiological psychology which has recently risen rapidly into favour in some countries is experimental psychology, alluded to above in our historical sketch. It is at times styled the "New Psychology" by its more enthusiastic supporters. It seeks to secure precision and an objective standard in the description of mental states by controlling their conditions by skilful devices and ingenious apparatus. Its chief success so far has been in its efforts to measure the varying intensity of sensations, the delicacy of sense-organs and "reaction-time" or the rapidity of a faculty's response to stimulation. Certain properties of memory have also been made the subject of measuring experiments and more recently considerable industry has been devoted, especially by Külpe and the Würzburg school, to bring some aspects of the higher activities of intellect and will within the range of the laboratory apparatus. Opinions still differ much as to both the present value and future prospects of experimental psychology. Whilst Wundt, the leader of the new movement for the past fifty years, places the only hope of psychological progress in the experimental method, William James's judgment on the entire literature of the subject since Fechner (1840) was that "its proper psychological outcome is just nothing at all" ("Principles", I, 534). Apart, however from the very modest positive results, especially in the higher forms of mental life, which the experimental method has achieved or may achieve in the future, its exercise may nevertheless prove a valuable agency in the training of the psychological specialist, both in increasing his appreciation of the value of the most minute accuracy in descriptions of mental states, and also by fostering in him habits of precision and skill in systematic introspection.

Classification

The Faculties

In empirical psychology, with modern writers, the next step after determining the method of the science is to attempt a classification of the phenomena of mental life. In the scholastic philosophy the equivalent operation was the systematic division of the faculties of the soul. Apart from vegetative and locomotive powers the Schoolmen, following Aristotle, adopted a bipartite division of faculties into those of cognition and appetency. The former they subdivided into sensuous, and intellectual or rational. The sensuous faculties they again subdivided into the five external senses and the internal activities of imagination, sensuous memory, sensus communis, and vis cogitativa. But there was much disagreement as to the number, character, and boundary lines of these internal forms of sensuous cognition. There were also divergences of opinion as to the nature of the faculties in general in themselves and to what extent there was a distinctio realis between faculties and the essence of the soul. But, on the other hand, there was general agreement as to an essential difference between all sensuous and intellectual or spiritual powers of the mind. The possession of the latter constitutes the differentia which separates man from the irrational animals.

Content of Empirical Psychology

The psychologist naturally begins with the treatment of the phenomena of sentiency. The several senses, their organic structure and functions, the various forms of sentient activity with their cognitive, hedonic and appetitive properties and their special characteristics have to be carefully analyzed, compared, and described. Next, imagination and memory are similarly studied, and the laws of their operation, growth, and development diligently traced. The discussion of the organic appetites springing from sensations, and the investigation of the nature and conditions of the most elementary forms of pleasure and pain may also appropriately come here. Intellect follows. The consideration of this faculty includes the study of the processes of conception, judgment, reasoning, rational attention, and selfconscious reflection. These, however, are all merely different functions of the same spiritual cognitive power - the intellect. Psychology inquires into their modes of operation, their special features, and the general conditions of their growth and development. From the higher power of cognition it proceeds to the study of spiritual appetency, rational desire, and free volition. The relations of will to knowledge, the qualities of conative activity, and the effects of repeated volitions in the production of habit, constitute the chief subjects of investigation here. In connexion with these higher forms of cognition and desire, there will naturally be undertaken the study of conscience and the phenomena of the emotions.

Genetic Treatment a marked characteristic of Modern Empirical Psychology

The constant aim of modern psychology is to analyse all complex mental operations into their simplest elements and to trace back to their first beginning all acquired or composite habits and faculties, and to show how they have been generated or could have been generated from the fewest original aptitudes or fundamental activities of the mind. This is sound scientific procedure - recognized in the Scholastic aphorism, Entia non sunt multiplicanda prœter necessitatem. We may not postulate a special faculty for any mental state which can be accounted for by the co-operation of already recognized activities of the soul. But the labour and skill devoted during the past century and a half to this combined analytic and synthetic procedure has developed one feature of modern psychology by which it is differentiated in a most marked manner from that of the Middle Ages and of Aristotle. The present-day treatment is pronouncedly genetic. Thus, whilst the Schoolmen in their account of mental operations, such as perception, conception, or desire, considered these processes almost solely as elicited by the normal adult human being already in full possession and control of matured mental powers, the chief interest of the modern psychologist is to trace the growth of these powers from their first and simplest manifestations in infancy, and to discriminate what is the product of experience and acquired habits from that which is the immediate outcome of the innate capabilities of the soul. This is particularly noticeable if we compare the treatment of the mental operation of perception as given in most Scholastic textbooks with that to be found in any modern handbook of psychology. The point of view is usually quite different. Since much of the most plausible modern attacks on Scholastic psychological doctrine has been made in this manner, the genetic treatment from the Thomist standpoint of many psychological questions seems to us to be among the most urgent tasks imposed nowadays on the neo-Scholastic psychologist. The value of such work from a philosophical standpoint would seem to be distinctly greater than that of any results likely to be achieved in quantitative experimental psychology. Obviously there is nothing in the Thomistic conception of the soul and its operations incompatible with a diligent investigation into the unfolding of its various aptitudes and powers.

Rational Psychology

From the study of the character of the activities of the mind in experimental psychology, the student now passes on to inquire into the nature of the principle from which they proceed. This constitutes the more philosophical or metaphysical division of the science. For, as we have indicated, the analysis and explanatory accounts of the higher forms and products of mental activity, which the scientific psychologist is compelled to undertake even in phenomenal psychology, involve metaphysical assumption and conclusions which he cannot escape - certainly not by merely ignoring them. Still, it is in this second stage that he will formally evolve the logical consequences to which his previous study of the several forms of mental activity lead up. His method here will be both inductive and deductive; both analytic and synthetic. He argues from effect to cause. From the character of the mental activities already scrutinized with so much care, he now concludes as to the nature of the subject to which they belong. From what the mind does, he seeks to learn what it is. In particular, from the simple spiritual nature of the higher activities of intellect and will, he infers that the being, the ultimate principle from which they proceed, must be of a simple and spiritual nature. Consequently, it cannot be the brain or any corporeal substance. Having established the simplicity and spirituality of the soul, he then goes on to deduce further conclusions as to its origin, the nature of its union with the body, and its future destiny. In this way by rational arguments the Scholastic thinkers claim to prove that the human soul can only have arisen by creation, that it is naturally incorruptible, and that the boundless aspirations of the intellect, the insatiable yearnings of the will, and the deepest convictions of the moral reason all combine to establish a future life of the soul after death.

Important special questions of psychology are treated under the articles ANIMISM; ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS; CONSCIOUSNESS; ENERGY; FACULTIES OF THE SOUL; FORM; FREE WILL; IDEA; IMAGINATION; IMMORTALITY; INDIVIDUAL, INDIVIDUALITY; INTELLECT; LIFE; PERSONALITY.

General Psychology: among the Scholastic Latin manuals there is much uniformity of treatment. URRÁBURA, Psychologia, I, II (Rome and Paris, 1894), is exhaustive. HICKEY, Psychologia (2nd ed., Dublin and New York, 1910) is an easy useful introduction; BOEDDER, Psychologia Rationalis (4th ed., Freiburg and New York, 1903). English: MAHER, Psychology, Empirical and Rational (7th ed., New York and London, 1911). French: MERCIER, Psychologie (4th ed., Louvain, 1903); GARDAIR, Philosophie de St Thomas (Paris, 1892-95); FARGES, Etudes Philosophiques, I-VI (Paris, 1890-95). German: GUTBERLET, Die Psychologie (Münster, 1896). English works of various schools: LADD, Psychology, Descriptive and Explanatory (New York and London, 1895); IDEM, Philosophy of Mind (New York and London, 1895); JAMES, Principles of Psychology (New York and London, 1890); STOUT, Analytical Psychology (London and New York, 1902); SPENCER, Principles of Psychology (New York and London, 1904); BAIN, Senses and Intellect; IDEM, Emotions and Will (London, 1894). Physiological: LADD, Elements of Physiological Psychology (New York and London, 1894); WUNDT, Principles of Physiological Psychology (tr., New York and London, 1904). Experimental: TITCHENER, Experimental Psychology, parts I, II (4 vols., New York and London, 1901-05); KÜLPE, Outlines of Psychology (tr. New York and London, 1894); MEUMAN, Vorlesungen, Experimentelle Pädagogik (Leipzig, 1907). Comparative: WASMANN, Instinct and Intelligence (tr. New York and London, 1903); IDEM, Psychology of Ants and Animals (1905); MIVART, Origin of Human Reason (London, 1889). Child Psychology: TRACY, Psychology of Childhood (Boston, 1907); PREYER, The Mind of the Child, vol. I-II (tr. New York and London, 1901); PEREZ, First Three Years of Childhood (tr. New York and London, 1892); MARENHOLZ-BULON, Child and Child Nature (tr. London, 1904); SULLY, Children's Ways (London, 1898); BURKE, Child Study (Dublin, 1908). History: general histories of philosophy, such as TURNER, History of Philosophy (Boston and London, 1903); DE WULF, History of Philosophy (tr. London and New York, 1909); STÖCKL, History of Philosophy (tr. New York and Dublin, 1887); PERRIER, Revival of Scholastic Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century (New York, 1909), contains also a useful bibliography of neo-Scholastic philosophy; SIEBECK, Gesch. der Psychol. (1904). See also: BALDWIN, Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology; and EISLER, Wörterbuch (Berlin, 1904).

Michael Maher.