Fifteen Books of Aurelius Augustinus,

 Chapter 1.—This Work is Written Against Those Who Sophistically Assail the Faith of the Trinity, Through Misuse of Reason. They Who Dispute Concerning

 Chapter 2.—In What Manner This Work Proposes to Discourse Concerning the Trinity.

 Chapter 3.—What Augustin Requests from His Readers. The Errors of Readers Dull of Comprehension Not to Be Ascribed to the Author.

 Chapter 4.—What the Doctrine of the Catholic Faith is Concerning the Trinity.

 Chapter 5.—Of Difficulties Concerning the Trinity: in What Manner Three are One God, and How, Working Indivisibly, They Yet Perform Some Things Severa

 Chapter 6.—That the Son is Very God, of the Same Substance with the Father. Not Only the Father, But the Trinity, is Affirmed to Be Immortal. All Thin

 Chapter 7.—In What Manner the Son is Less Than the Father, and Than Himself.

 Chapter 8.—The Texts of Scripture Explained Respecting the Subjection of the Son to the Father, Which Have Been Misunderstood. Christ Will Not So Give

 Chapter 9.—All are Sometimes Understood in One Person.

 Chapter 10.—In What Manner Christ Shall Deliver Up the Kingdom to God, Even the Father. The Kingdom Having Been Delivered to God, Even the Father, Chr

 Chapter 11.—By What Rule in the Scriptures It is Understood that the Son is Now Equal and Now Less.

 Chapter 12.—In What Manner the Son is Said Not to Know the Day and the Hour Which the Father Knows. Some Things Said of Christ According to the Form o

 Chapter 13.—Diverse Things are Spoken Concerning the Same Christ, on Account of the Diverse Natures of the One Hypostasis [Theanthropic Person]. Why I

 Book II.

 Preface.

 Chapter 1.—There is a Double Rule for Understanding the Scriptural Modes of Speech Concerning the Son of God. These Modes of Speech are of a Threefold

 Chapter 2.—That Some Ways of Speaking Concerning the Son are to Be Understood According to Either Rule.

 Chapter 3.—Some Things Concerning the Holy Spirit are to Be Understood According to the One Rule Only.

 Chapter 4.—The Glorification of the Son by the Father Does Not Prove Inequality.

 Chapter 5.—The Son and Holy Spirit are Not Therefore Less Because Sent. The Son is Sent Also by Himself. Of the Sending of the Holy Spirit.

 Chapter 6.—The Creature is Not So Taken by the Holy Spirit as Flesh is by the Word.

 Chapter 7.—A Doubt Raised About Divine Appearances.

 Chapter 8.—The Entire Trinity Invisible.

 Chapter 9.—Against Those Who Believed the Father Only to Be Immortal and Invisible. The Truth to Be Sought by Peaceful Study.

 Chapter 10—Whether God the Trinity Indiscriminately Appeared to the Fathers, or Any One Person of the Trinity. The Appearing of God to Adam. Of the Sa

 Chapter 11.—Of the Same Appearance.

 Chapter 12.—The Appearance to Lot is Examined.

 Chapter 13.—The Appearance in the Bush.

 Chapter 14.—Of the Appearance in the Pillar of Cloud and of Fire.

 Chapter 15.—Of the Appearance on Sinai. Whether the Trinity Spake in that Appearance or Some One Person Specially.

 Chapter 16.—In What Manner Moses Saw God.

 Chapter 17.—How the Back Parts of God Were Seen. The Faith of the Resurrection of Christ. The Catholic Church Only is the Place from Whence the Back P

 Chapter 18.—The Vision of Daniel.

 Book III.

 Preface.—Why Augustin Writes of the Trinity. What He Claims from Readers. What Has Been Said in the Previous Book.

 Chapter 1.—What is to Be Said Thereupon.

 Chapter 2.—The Will of God is the Higher Cause of All Corporeal Change. This is Shown by an Example.

 Chapter 3.—Of the Same Argument.

 Chapter 4.—God Uses All Creatures as He Will, and Makes Visible Things for the Manifestation of Himself.

 Chapter 5.—Why Miracles are Not Usual Works.

 Chapter 6.—Diversity Alone Makes a Miracle.

 Chapter 7.—Great Miracles Wrought by Magic Arts.

 Chapter 8.—God Alone Creates Those Things Which are Changed by Magic Art.

 Chapter 9.—The Original Cause of All Things is from God.

 Chapter 10.—In How Many Ways the Creature is to Be Taken by Way of Sign. The Eucharist.

 Chapter 11.—The Essence of God Never Appeared in Itself. Divine Appearances to the Fathers Wrought by the Ministry of Angels. An Objection Drawn from

 Book IV.

 Preface.—The Knowledge of God is to Be Sought from God.

 Chapter 1.—We are Made Perfect by Acknowledgement of Our Own Weakness. The Incarnate Word Dispels Our Darkness.

 Chapter 2.—How We are Rendered Apt for the Perception of Truth Through the Incarnate Word.

 Chapter 3.—The One Death and Resurrection of The Body of Christ Harmonizes with Our Double Death and Resurrection of Body and Soul, to the Effect of S

 Chapter 4.—The Ratio of the Single to the Double Comes from the Perfection of the Senary Number. The Perfection of The Senary Number is Commended in t

 Chapter 5.—The Number Six is Also Commended in the Building Up of the Body of Christ and of the Temple at Jerusalem.

 Chapter 6.—The Three Days of the Resurrection, in Which Also the Ratio of Single to Double is Apparent.

 Chapter 7.—In What Manner We are Gathered from Many into One Through One Mediator.

 Chapter 8.—In What Manner Christ Wills that All Shall Be One in Himself.

 Chapter 9.—The Same Argument Continued.

 Chapter 10.—As Christ is the Mediator of Life, So the Devil is the Mediator of Death.

 Chapter 11.—Miracles Which are Done by Demons are to Be Spurned.

 Chapter 12.—The Devil the Mediator of Death, Christ of Life.

 Chapter 13.—The Death of Christ Voluntary. How the Mediator of Life Subdued the Mediator of Death. How the Devil Leads His Own to Despise the Death of

 Chapter 14.—Christ the Most Perfect Victim for Cleansing Our Faults. In Every Sacrifice Four Things are to Be Considered.

 Chapter 15.—They are Proud Who Think They are Able, by Their Own Righteousness, to Be Cleansed So as to See God.

 Chapter 16.—The Old Philosophers are Not to Be Consulted Concerning the Resurrection and Concerning Things to Come.

 Chapter 17.—In How Many Ways Things Future are Foreknown. Neither Philosophers, Nor Those Who Were Distinguished Among the Ancients, are to Be Consult

 Chapter 18.—The Son of God Became Incarnate in Order that We Being Cleansed by Faith May Be Raised to the Unchangeable Truth.

 Chapter 19.—In What Manner the Son Was Sent and Proclaimed Beforehand. How in the Sending of His Birth in the Flesh He Was Made Less Without Detriment

 Chapter 20.—The Sender and the Sent Equal. Why the Son is Said to Be Sent by the Father. Of the Mission of the Holy Spirit. How and by Whom He Was Sen

 Chapter 21.—Of the Sensible Showing of the Holy Spirit, and of the Coeternity of the Trinity. What Has Been Said, and What Remains to Be Said.

 Book V.

 Chapter 1.—What the Author Entreats from God, What from the Reader. In God Nothing is to Be Thought Corporeal or Changeable.

 Chapter 2.—God the Only Unchangeable Essence.

 Chapter 3.—The Argument of the Arians is Refuted, Which is Drawn from the Words Begotten and Unbegotten.

 Chapter 4.—The Accidental Always Implies Some Change in the Thing.

 Chapter 5.—Nothing is Spoken of God According to Accident, But According to Substance or According to Relation.

 Chapter 6.—Reply is Made to the Cavils of the Heretics in Respect to the Same Words Begotten and Unbegotten.

 Chapter 7.—The Addition of a Negative Does Not Change the Predicament.

 Chapter 8.—Whatever is Spoken of God According to Substance, is Spoken of Each Person Severally, and Together of the Trinity Itself. One Essence in Go

 Chapter 9.—The Three Persons Not Properly So Called [in a Human Sense].

 Chapter 10.—Those Things Which Belong Absolutely to God as an Essence, are Spoken of the Trinity in the Singular, Not in the Plural.

 Chapter 11.—What is Said Relatively in the Trinity.

 Chapter 12.—In Relative Things that are Reciprocal, Names are Sometimes Wanting.

 Chapter 13.—How the Word Beginning (Principium) is Spoken Relatively in the Trinity.

 Chapter 14.—The Father and the Son the Only Beginning (Principium) of the Holy Spirit.

 Chapter 15.—Whether the Holy Spirit Was a Gift Before as Well as After He Was Given.

 Chapter 16.—What is Said of God in Time, is Said Relatively, Not Accidentally.

 Book VI.

 Chapter 1.—The Son, According to the Apostle, is the Power and Wisdom of the Father. Hence the Reasoning of the Catholics Against the Earlier Arians.

 Chapter 2 .—What is Said of the Father and Son Together, and What Not.

 Chapter 3.—That the Unity of the Essence of the Father and the Son is to Be Gathered from the Words, “We are One.” The Son is Equal to the Father Both

 Chapter 4.—The Same Argument Continued.

 Chapter 5.—The Holy Spirit Also is Equal to the Father and the Son in All Things.

 Chapter 6.—How God is a Substance Both Simple and Manifold.

 Chapter 7.—God is a Trinity, But Not Triple (Triplex).

 Chapter 8.—No Addition Can Be Made to the Nature of God.

 Chapter 9.—Whether One or the Three Persons Together are Called the Only God.

 Chapter 10.—Of the Attributes Assigned by Hilary to Each Person. The Trinity is Represented in Things that are Made.

 Book VII.

 Chapter 1.—Augustin Returns to the Question, Whether Each Person of the Trinity by Itself is Wisdom. With What Difficulty, or in What Way, the Propose

 Chapter 2.—The Father and the Son are Together One Wisdom, as One Essence, Although Not Together One Word.

 Chapter 3.—Why the Son Chiefly is Intimated in the Scriptures by the Name of Wisdom, While Both the Father and the Holy Spirit are Wisdom. That the Ho

 Chapter 4.—How It Was Brought About that the Greeks Speak of Three Hypostases, the Latins of Three Persons. Scripture Nowhere Speaks of Three Persons

 Chapter 5.—In God, Substance is Spoken Improperly, Essence Properly.

 Chapter 6.—Why We Do Not in the Trinity Speak of One Person, and Three Essences. What He Ought to Believe Concerning the Trinity Who Does Not Receive

 Book VIII.

 Preface.—The Conclusion of What Has Been Said Above. The Rule to Be Observed in the More Difficult Questions of the Faith.

 Chapter 1.—It is Shown by Reason that in God Three are Not Anything Greater Than One Person.

 Chapter 2.—Every Corporeal Conception Must Be Rejected, in Order that It May Be Understood How God is Truth.

 Chapter 3.—How God May Be Known to Be the Chief Good. The Mind Does Not Become Good Unless by Turning to God.

 Chapter 4.—God Must First Be Known by an Unerring Faith, that He May Be Loved.

 Chapter 5.—How the Trinity May Be Loved Though Unknown.

 Chapter 6.—How the Man Not Yet Righteous Can Know the Righteous Man Whom He Loves.

 Chapter 7.—Of True Love, by Which We Arrive at the Knowledge of the Trinity. God is to Be Sought, Not Outwardly, by Seeking to Do Wonderful Things wit

 Chapter 8.—That He Who Loves His Brother, Loves God Because He Loves Love Itself, Which is of God, and is God.

 Chapter 9.—Our Love of the Righteous is Kindled from Love Itself of the Unchangeable Form of Righteousness.

 Chapter 10.—There are Three Things in Love, as It Were a Trace of the Trinity.

 Book IX.

 Chapter 1.—In What Way We Must Inquire Concerning the Trinity.

 2. And this being so, let us direct our attention to those three things which we fancy we have found. We are not yet speaking of heavenly things, nor

 Chapter 3.—The Image of the Trinity in the Mind of Man Who Knows Himself and Loves Himself. The Mind Knows Itself Through Itself.

 Chapter 4.—The Three are One, and Also Equal, Viz The Mind Itself, and the Love, and the Knowledge of It. That the Same Three Exist Substantially, and

 Chapter 5.—That These Three are Several in Themselves, and Mutually All in All.

 Chapter 6.—There is One Knowledge of the Thing in the Thing Itself, and Another in Eternal Truth Itself. That Corporeal Things, Too, are to Be Judged

 Chapter 7.—We Conceive and Beget the Word Within, from the Things We Have Beheld in the Eternal Truth. The Word, Whether of the Creature or of the Cre

 Chapter 8.—In What Desire and Love Differ.

 Chapter 9.—In the Love of Spiritual Things the Word Born is the Same as the Word Conceived. It is Otherwise in the Love of Carnal Things.

 Chapter 10.—Whether Only Knowledge that is Loved is the Word of the Mind.

 Chapter 11.—That the Image or Begotten Word of the Mind that Knows Itself is Equal to the Mind Itself.

 Chapter 12.—Why Love is Not the Offspring of the Mind, as Knowledge is So. The Solution of the Question. The Mind with the Knowledge of Itself and the

 Book X.

 Chapter 1.—The Love of the Studious Mind, that Is, of One Desirous to Know, is Not the Love of a Thing Which It Does Not Know.

 Chapter 2.—No One at All Loves Things Unknown.

 Chapter 3.—That When the Mind Loves Itself, It is Not Unknown to Itself.

 Chapter 4.—How the Mind Knows Itself, Not in Part, But as a Whole.

 Chapter 5.—Why the Soul is Enjoined to Know Itself. Whence Come the Errors of the Mind Concerning Its Own Substance.

 Chapter 6.—The Opinion Which the Mind Has of Itself is Deceitful.

 Chapter 7.—The Opinions of Philosophers Respecting the Substance of the Soul. The Error of Those Who are of Opinion that the Soul is Corporeal, Does N

 Chapter 8.—How the Soul Inquires into Itself. Whence Comes the Error of the Soul Concerning Itself.

 Chapter 9.—The Mind Knows Itself, by the Very Act of Understanding the Precept to Know Itself.

 Chapter 10.—Every Mind Knows Certainly Three Things Concerning Itself—That It Understands, that It Is, and that It Lives.

 Chapter 11.—In Memory, Understanding [or Intelligence], and Will, We Have to Note Ability, Learning, and Use. Memory, Understanding, and Will are One

 Chapter 12.—The Mind is an Image of the Trinity in Its Own Memory, and Understanding, and Will.

 Book XI.

 Chapter 1.—A Trace of the Trinity Also In the Outer Man.

 Chapter 2.—A Certain Trinity in the Sight. That There are Three Things in Sight, Which Differ in Their Own Nature. In What Manner from a Visible Thing

 Chapter 3.—The Unity of the Three Takes Place in Thought, Viz Of Memory, of Ternal Vision, and of Will Combining Both.

 Chapter 4.—How This Unity Comes to Pass.

 Chapter 5.—The Trinity of the Outer Man, or of External Vision, is Not an Image of God. The Likeness of God is Desired Even in Sins. In External Visio

 Chapter 6.—Of What Kind We are to Reckon the Rest (Requies), and End (Finis), of the Will in Vision.

 Chapter 7.—There is Another Trinity in the Memory of Him Who Thinks Over Again What He Has Seen.

 Chapter 8.—Different Modes of Conceiving.

 Chapter 9.—Species is Produced by Species in Succession.

 Chapter 10.—The Imagination Also Adds Even to Things We Have Not Seen, Those Things Which We Have Seen Elsewhere.

 Chapter 11.—Number, Weight, Measure.

 Book XII.

 Chapter 1.—Of What Kind are the Outer and the Inner Man.

 Chapter 2.—Man Alone of Animate Creatures Perceives the Eternal Reasons of Things Pertaining to the Body.

 Chapter 3.—The Higher Reason Which Belongs to Contemplation, and the Lower Which Belongs to Action, are in One Mind.

 Chapter 4.—The Trinity and the Image of God is in that Part of the Mind Alone Which Belongs to the Contemplation of Eternal Things.

 Chapter 5.—The Opinion Which Devises an Image of the Trinity in the Marriage of Male and Female, and in Their Offspring.

 Chapter 6. —Why This Opinion is to Be Rejected.

 Chapter 7.—How Man is the Image of God. Whether the Woman is Not Also the Image of God. How the Saying of the Apostle, that the Man is the Image of Go

 Chapter 8.—Turning Aside from the Image of God.

 Chapter 9.—The Same Argument is Continued.

 Chapter 10.—The Lowest Degradation Reached by Degrees.

 Chapter 11.—The Image of the Beast in Man.

 Chapter 12.—There is a Kind of Hidden Wedlock in the Inner Man. Unlawful Pleasures of the Thoughts.

 Chapter 13.—The Opinion of Those Who Have Thought that the Mind Was Signified by the Man, the Bodily Sense by the Woman.

 Chapter 14.—What is the Difference Between Wisdom and Knowledge. The Worship of God is the Love of Him. How the Intellectual Cognizance of Eternal Thi

 Chapter 15.—In Opposition to the Reminiscence of Plato and Pythagoras. Pythagoras the Samian. Of the Difference Between Wisdom and Knowledge, and of S

 Book XIII.

 Chapter 1.—The Attempt is Made to Distinguish Out of the Scriptures the Offices of Wisdom and of Knowledge. That in the Beginning of John Some Things

 Chapter 2.—Faith a Thing of the Heart, Not of the Body How It is Common and One and the Same in All Believers. The Faith of Believers is One, No Othe

 Chapter 3.—Some Desires Being the Same in All, are Known to Each. The Poet Ennius.

 Chapter 4.—The Will to Possess Blessedness is One in All, But the Variety of Wills is Very Great Concerning that Blessedness Itself.

 Chapter 5.—Of the Same Thing.

 Chapter 6.—Why, When All Will to Be Blessed, that is Rather Chosen by Which One Withdraws from Being So.

 Chapter 7.—Faith is Necessary, that Man May at Some Time Be Blessed, Which He Will Only Attain in the Future Life. The Blessedness of Proud Philosophe

 Chapter 8.—Blessedness Cannot Exist Without Immortality.

 Chapter 9.—We Say that Future Blessedness is Truly Eternal, Not Through Human Reasonings, But by the Help of Faith. The Immortality of Blessedness Bec

 Chapter 10.—There Was No Other More Suitable Way of Freeing Man from the Misery of Mortality Than The Incarnation of the Word. The Merits Which are Ca

 Chapter 11.—A Difficulty, How We are Justified in the Blood of the Son of God.

 Chapter 12.—All, on Account of the Sin of Adam, Were Delivered into the Power of the Devil.

 Chapter 13.—Man Was to Be Rescued from the Power of the Devil, Not by Power, But by Righteousness.

 Chapter 14.—The Unobligated Death of Christ Has Freed Those Who Were Liable to Death.

 Chapter 15.—Of the Same Subject.

 Chapter 16.—The Remains of Death and the Evil Things of the World Turn to Good for the Elect. How Fitly the Death of Christ Was Chosen, that We Might

 Chapter 17.—Other Advantages of the Incarnation.

 Chapter 18.—Why the Son of God Took Man Upon Himself from the Race of Adam, and from a Virgin.

 Chapter 19.—What in the Incarnate Word Belongs to Knowledge, What to Wisdom.

 Chapter 20.—What Has Been Treated of in This Book. How We Have Reached by Steps to a Certain Trinity, Which is Found in Practical Knowledge and True F

 Book XIV.

 Chapter 1.—What the Wisdom is of Which We are Here to Treat. Whence the Name of Philosopher Arose. What Has Been Already Said Concerning the Distincti

 Chapter 2.—There is a Kind of Trinity in the Holding, Contemplating, and Loving of Faith Temporal, But One that Does Not Yet Attain to Being Properly

 Chapter 3.—A Difficulty Removed, Which Lies in the Way of What Has Just Been Said.

 Chapter 4.—The Image of God is to Be Sought in the Immortality of the Rational Soul. How a Trinity is Demonstrated in the Mind.

 Chapter 5.—Whether the Mind of Infants Knows Itself.

 Chapter 6.—How a Kind of Trinity Exists in the Mind Thinking of Itself. What is the Part of Thought in This Trinity.

 Chapter 7.—The Thing is Made Plain by an Example. In What Way the Matter is Handled in Order to Help the Reader.

 Chapter 8.—The Trinity Which is the Image of God is Now to Be Sought in the Noblest Part of the Mind.

 Chapter 9.—Whether Justice and the Other Virtues Cease to Exist in the Future Life.

 Chapter 10.—How a Trinity is Produced by the Mind Remembering, Understanding, and Loving Itself.

 Chapter 11.—Whether Memory is Also of Things Present.

 Chapter 12.—The Trinity in the Mind is the Image of God, in that It Remembers, Understands, and Loves God, Which to Do is Wisdom.

 Chapter 13.—How Any One Can Forget and Remember God.

 Chapter 14.—The Mind Loves God in Rightly Loving Itself And If It Love Not God, It Must Be Said to Hate Itself. Even a Weak and Erring Mind is Always

 Chapter 15.—Although the Soul Hopes for Blessedness, Yet It Does Not Remember Lost Blessedness, But Remembers God and the Rules of Righteousness. The

 Chapter 16.—How the Image of God is Formed Anew in Man.

 Chapter 17.—How the Image of God in the Mind is Renewed Until the Likeness of God is Perfected in It in Blessedness.

 Chapter 18.—Whether the Sentence of John is to Be Understood of Our Future Likeness with the Son of God in the Immortality Itself Also of the Body.

 Chapter 19.—John is Rather to Be Understood of Our Perfect Likeness with the Trinity in Life Eternal. Wisdom is Perfected in Happiness.

 Book XV.

 Chapter 1.—God is Above the Mind.

 Chapter 2.—God, Although Incomprehensible, is Ever to Be Sought. The Traces of the Trinity are Not Vainly Sought in the Creature.

 Chapter 3.—A Brief Recapitulation of All the Previous Books.

 Chapter 4.—What Universal Nature Teaches Us Concerning God.

 Chapter 5.—How Difficult It is to Demonstrate the Trinity by Natural Reason.

 Chapter 6.—How There is a Trinity in the Very Simplicity of God. Whether and How the Trinity that is God is Manifested from the Trinities Which Have B

 Chapter 7.—That It is Not Easy to Discover the Trinity that is God from the Trinities We Have Spoken of.

 Chapter 8.—How the Apostle Says that God is Now Seen by Us Through a Glass.

 Chapter 9.—Of the Term “Enigma,” And of Tropical Modes of Speech.

 Chapter 10.—Concerning the Word of the Mind, in Which We See the Word of God, as in a Glass and an Enigma.

 Chapter 11.—The Likeness of the Divine Word, Such as It Is, is to Be Sought, Not in Our Own Outer and Sensible Word, But in the Inner and Mental One.

 Chapter 12.—The Academic Philosophy.

 Chapter 13.—Still Further of the Difference Between the Knowledge and Word of Our Mind, and the Knowledge and Word of God.

 Chapter 14.—The Word of God is in All Things Equal to the Father, from Whom It is.

 Chapter 15.—How Great is the Unlikeness Between Our Word and the Divine Word. Our Word Cannot Be or Be Called Eternal.

 Chapter 16.—Our Word is Never to Be Equalled to the Divine Word, Not Even When We Shall Be Like God.

 Chapter 17.—How the Holy Spirit is Called Love, and Whether He Alone is So Called. That the Holy Spirit is in the Scriptures Properly Called by the Na

 Chapter 18.—No Gift of God is More Excellent Than Love.

 Chapter 19.—The Holy Spirit is Called the Gift of God in the Scriptures. By the Gift of the Holy Spirit is Meant the Gift Which is the Holy Spirit. Th

 Chapter 20.—Against Eunomius, Saying that the Son of God is the Son, Not of His Nature, But of His Will. Epilogue to What Has Been Said Already.

 Chapter 21.—Of the Likeness of the Father and of the Son Alleged to Be in Our Memory and Understanding. Of the Likeness of the Holy Spirit in Our Will

 Chapter 22.—How Great the Unlikeness is Between the Image of the Trinity Which We Have Found in Ourselves, and the Trinity Itself.

 Chapter 23.—Augustin Dwells Still Further on the Disparity Between the Trinity Which is in Man, and the Trinity Which is God. The Trinity is Now Seen

 Chapter 24.—The Infirmity of the Human Mind.

 Chapter 25.—The Question Why the Holy Spirit is Not Begotten, and How He Proceeds from the Father and the Son, Will Only Be Understood When We are in

 Chapter 26.—The Holy Spirit Twice Given by Christ. The Procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and from the Son is Apart from Time, Nor Can He B

 Chapter 27.—What It is that Suffices Here to Solve the Question Why the Spirit is Not Said to Be Begotten, and Why the Father Alone is Unbegotten. Wha

 Chapter 28.—The Conclusion of the Book with a Prayer, and an Apology for Multitude of Words.

Chapter 17.—How the Back Parts of God Were Seen. The Faith of the Resurrection of Christ. The Catholic Church Only is the Place from Whence the Back Parts of God are Seen. The Back Parts of God Were Seen by the Israelites. It is a Rash Opinion to Think that God the Father Only Was Never Seen by the Fathers.

Not unfitly is it commonly understood to be prefigured from the person of our Lord Jesus Christ, that His “back parts” are to be taken to be His flesh, in which He was born of the Virgin, and died, and rose again; whether they are called back parts305    Posteriora on account of the posteriority of mortality, or because it was almost in the end of the world, that is, at a late period,306    Posterius that He deigned to take it: but that His “face” was that form of God, in which He “thought it not robbery to be equal with God,”307    Phil. ii. 6 which no one certainly can see and live; whether because after this life, in which we are absent from the Lord,308    2 Cor. v. 6 and where the corruptible body presseth down the soul,309    Wisd. ix. 15 we shall see “face to face,”310    1 Cor. xiii. 12 as the apostle says—(for it is said in the Psalms, of this life, “Verily every man living is altogether vanity;”311    Ps. xxxix. 5 and again, “For in Thy sight shall no man living be justified;”312    Ps. cxliii. 2 and in this life also, according to John, “It doth not yet appear what we shall be, but we know,” he says, “that when He shall appear, we shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is,”313    1 John iii. 2 which he certainly intended to be understood as after this life, when we shall have paid the debt of death, and shall have received the promise of the resurrection);—or whether that even now, in whatever degree we spiritually understand the wisdom of God, by which all things were made, in that same degree we die to carnal affections, so that, considering this world dead to us, we also ourselves die to this world, and say what the apostle says, “The world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world.”314    Gal. vi. 14 For it was of this death that he also says, “Wherefore, if ye be dead with Christ, why as though living in the world are ye subject to ordinances?”315    Col. ii. 20. Viventes de hoc mundo decernitis. Not therefore without cause will no one be able to see the “face,” that is, the manifestation itself of the wisdom of God, and live. For it is this very appearance, for the contemplation of which every one sighs who strives to love God with all his heart, and with all his soul, and with all his mind; to the contemplation of which, he who loves his neighbor, too, as himself builds up his neighbor also as far as he may; on which two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.316    Matt. xxii. 37–40 And this is signified also in Moses himself. For when he had said, on account of the love of God with which he was specially inflamed, “If I have found grace in thy sight, show me now Thyself plainly, that I may find grace in Thy sight;” he immediately subjoined, on account of the love also of his neighbor, “And that I may know that this nation is Thy people.” It is therefore that “appearance” which hurries away every rational soul with the desire of it, and the more ardently the more pure that soul is; and it is the more pure the more it rises to spiritual things; and it rises the more to spiritual things the more it dies to carnal things. But whilst we are absent from the Lord, and walk by faith, not by sight,317    2 Cor. v. 6, 7 we ought to see the “back parts” of Christ, that is His flesh, by that very faith, that is, standing on the solid foundation of faith, which the rock signifies,318    [Augustin here gives the Protestant interpretation of the word “rock,” in the passage, “on this rock I will build my church.”—W.G.T.S.] and beholding it from such a safe watch-tower, namely in the Catholic Church, of which it is said, “And upon this rock I will build my Church.”319    Matt. xvi. 18 For so much the more certainly we love that face of Christ, which we earnestly desire to see, as we recognize in His back parts how much first Christ loved us.

29. But in the flesh itself, the faith in His resurrection saves and justifies us. For, “If thou shalt believe,” he says, “in thine heart, that God hath raised Him from the dead, thou shalt be saved;”320    Rom. x. 9 and again, “Who was delivered,” he says, “for our offenses, and was raised again for our justification.”321    Rom. iv. 25 So that the reward of our faith is the resurrection of the body of our Lord.322    [The meaning seems to be, that the vivid realization that Christ’s body rose from the dead is the reward of a Christian’s faith. The unbeliever has no such reward.—W.G.T.S.] For even His enemies believe that that flesh died on the cross of His passion, but they do not believe it to have risen again. Which we believing most firmly, gaze upon it as from the solidity of a rock: whence we wait with certain hope for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body;323    Rom. viii. 23 because we hope for that in the members of Christ, that is, in ourselves, which by a sound faith we acknowledge to be perfect in Him as in our Head. Thence it is that He would not have His back parts seen, unless as He passed by, that His resurrection may be believed. For that which is Pascha in Hebrew, is translated Passover.324    Transitus = passing by. Whence John the Evangelist also says, “Before the feast of the Passover, when Jesus knew that His hour was come, that He should pass out of this world unto the Father.”325    John xiii. 1

30. But they who believe this, but believe it not in the Catholic Church, but in some schism or in heresy, do not see the back parts of the Lord from “the place that is by Him.” For what does that mean which the Lord says, “Behold, there is a place by me, and thou shalt stand upon a rock?” What earthly place is “by” the Lord, unless that is “by Him” which touches Him spiritually? For what place is not “by” the Lord, who “reacheth from one end to another mightily, and sweetly doth order all things,”326    Wisd. viii. 1 and of whom it is said, “Heaven is His throne, and earth is His footstool;” and who said, “Where is the house that ye build unto me, and where is the place of my rest? For has not my hand made all those things?”327    Isa. lxvi. 1, 2 But manifestly the Catholic Church itself is understood to be “the place by Him,” wherein one stands upon a rock, where he healthfully sees the “Pascha Domini,” that is, the “Passing by”328    Transitus of the Lord, and His back parts, that is, His body, who believes in His resurrection. “And thou shalt stand,” He says, “upon a rock while my glory passeth by.” For in reality, immediately after the majesty of the Lord had passed by in the glorification of the Lord, in which He rose again and ascended to the Father, we stood firm upon the rock. And Peter himself then stood firm, so that he preached Him with confidence, whom, before he stood firm, he had thrice from fear denied;329    Matt. xxvi. 70–74 although, indeed, already before placed in predestination upon the watch-tower of the rock, but with the hand of the Lord still held over him that he might not see. For he was to see His back parts, and the Lord had not yet “passed by,” namely, from death to life; He had not yet been glorified by the resurrection.

31. For as to that, too, which follows in Exodus, “I will cover thee with mine hand while I pass by, and I will take away my hand and thou shalt see my back parts;” many Israelites, of whom Moses was then a figure, believed in the Lord after His resurrection, as if His hand had been taken off from their eyes, and they now saw His back parts. And hence the evangelist also mentions that prophesy of Isaiah, “Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes.”330    Isa. vi. 10; Matt. xiii. 15 Lastly, in the Psalm, that is not unreasonably understood to be said in their person, “For day and night Thy hand was heavy upon me.” “By day,” perhaps, when He performed manifest miracles, yet was not acknowledged by them; but “by night,” when He died in suffering, when they thought still more certainly that, like any one among men, He was cut off and brought to an end. But since, when He had already passed by, so that His back parts were seen, upon the preaching to them by the Apostle Peter that it behoved Christ to suffer and rise again, they were pricked in their hearts with the grief of repentance,331    Acts ii. 37, 41 that that might come to pass among the baptized which is said in the beginning of that Psalm, “Blessed are they whose transgressions are forgiven, and whose sins are covered;” therefore, after it had been said, “Thy hand is heavy upon me,” the Lord, as it were, passing by, so that now He removed His hand, and His back parts were seen, there follows the voice of one who grieves and confesses and receives remission of sins by faith in the resurrection of the Lord: “My moisture,” he says, “is turned into the drought of summer. I acknowledged my sin unto Thee, and mine iniquity have I not hid. I said, I will confess my transgressions unto the Lord, and Thou forgavest the iniquity of my sin.”332    Ps. xxxii. 4, 5 For we ought not to be so wrapped up in the darkness of the flesh, as to think the face indeed of God to be invisible, but His back visible, since both appeared visibly in the form of a servant; but far be it from us to think anything of the kind in the form of God; far be it from us to think that the Word of God and the Wisdom of God has a face on one side, and on the other a back, as a human body has, or is at all changed either in place or time by any appearance or motion.333    [This explanation of the “back parts” of Christ to mean his resurrection, and of “the place that is by him,” to mean the church, is an example of the fanciful exegesis into which Augustin, with the fathers generally, sometimes falls. The reasoning, here, unlike that in the preceding chapter, is not from the immediate context, and hence extraneous matter is read into the text.—W.G.T.S.]

32. Wherefore, if in those words which were spoken in Exodus, and in all those corporeal appearances, the Lord Jesus Christ was manifested; or if in some cases Christ was manifested, as the consideration of this passage persuades us, in others the Holy Spirit, as that which we have said above admonishes us; at any rate no such result follows, as that God the Father never appeared in any such form to the Fathers. For many such appearances happened in those times, without either the Father, or the Son, or the Holy Spirit being expressly named and designated in them; but yet with some intimations given through certain very probable interpretations, so that it would be too rash to say that God the Father never appeared by any visible forms to the fathers or the prophets. For they gave birth to this opinion who were not able to understand in respect to the unity of the Trinity such texts as, “Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God;”334    1 Tim. i. 17 and, “Whom no man hath seen, nor can see.”335    1 Tim. vi. 16 Which texts are understood by a sound faith in that substance itself, the highest, and in the highest degree divine and unchangeable, whereby both the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit is the one and only God. But those visions were wrought through the changeable creature, made subject to the unchangeable God, and did not manifest God properly as He is, but by intimations such as suited the causes and times of the several circumstances.

CAPUT XVII.

Posteriora Dei quomodo visa. Resurrectionis Christi fides. Catholica Ecclesia sola est locus unde videntur posteriora Dei. Posteriora Dei ab Israelitis visa. Deum Patrem solum nunquam Patribus visum existimare temeraria opinio est. Non incongruenter ex persona Domini nostri Jesu Christi praefiguratum solet intelligi, ut posteriora ejus accipiantur caro ejus, in qua de Virgine natus est, et mortuus, et resurrexit; sive propter posterioritatem mortalitatis posteriora dicta sint, sive quod eam prope in fine saeculi, hoc est, posterius suscipere dignatus est: facies autem ejus illa Dei forma, in qua non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo Patri (Philipp. II, 6), quam nemo utique potest videre et vivere; sive quia post hanc vitam, in qua peregrinamur a Domino (II Cor. V, 6), et ubi corpus quod corrumpitur aggravat animam (Sap. IX, 15), videbimus facie ad faciem, sicut dicit Apostolus (I Cor. XIII, 12) (de hac enim vita in Psalmis dicitur, Verumtamen universa vanitas omnis homo vivens [Psal. XXXVIII, 6]; et iterum, Quoniam non justificabitur coram te omnis vivens [Psal. CXLII, 2]. In qua vita etiam, secundum Joannem, nondum apparuit quid erimus. Scimus autem, inquit, quia cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus; quoniam videbimus eum sicuti est [I Joan. III, 2]: quod utique post hanc vitam 0864 intelligi voluit, cum mortis debitum solverimus, et resurrectionis promissum receperimus); sive quod etiam nunc in quantum Dei Sapientiam per quam facta sunt omnia, spiritualiter intelligimus, in tantum carnalibus affectibus morimur, ut mortuum nobis hunc mundum deputantes, nos quoque ipsi huic mundo moriamur, et dicamus quod ait Apostolus, Mundus mihi crucifixus est, et ego mundo (Galat. VI, 14). De hac enim morte item dixit, Si autem mortui estis cum Christo, quid adhuc velut viventes de hoc mundo decernitis (Coloss. II, 20)? Non ergo immerito nemo poterit faciem, id est, ipsam manifestationem Sapientiae Dei videre et vivere. Ipsa est enim species, cui contemplandae suspirat omnis qui affectat Deum diligere ex toto corde, et ex tota anima, et ex tota mente: ad quam contemplandam etiam proximum quantum potest aedificat, qui diligit et proximum sicut se ipsum: in quibus duobus praeceptis tota Lex pendet et Prophetae (Matth. XXII, 37-40). Quod significatur etiam in ipso Moyse. Nam cum dixisset, propter dilectionem Dei qua praecipue flagrabat, Si inveni gratiam in conspectu tuo, ostende mihi temetipsum manifeste, ut sim inveniens gratiam ante te; continuo propter dilectionem etiam proximi subjecit atque ait, Et ut sciam quia populus tuus est gens haec. Illa est ergo species quae rapit omnem animam rationalem desiderio sui, tanto ardentiorem quanto mundiorem, et tanto mundiorem quanto ad spiritualia resurgentem: tanto autem ad spiritualia resurgentem, quanto a carnalibus morientem. Sed dum peregrinamur a Domino, et per fidem ambulamus, non per speciem (II Cor. V, 6, 7), posteriora Christi, hoc est carnem, per ipsam fidem videre debemus, id est in solido fidei fundamento stantes, quod significat petra; et eam de tali tutissima specula intuentes, in catholica scilicet Ecclesia, de qua dictum est, Et super hanc petram aedificabo Ecclesiam meam (Matth. XVI, 18). Tanto enim certius diligimus, quam videre desideramus faciem Christi, quanto in posterioribus ejus agnoscimus quantum nos prior dilexerit Christus.

29. Sed in ipsa carne fides resurrectionis ejus salvos facit, atque justificat, Si enim credideris, inquit, in corde tuo, quia Deus illum suscitavit a mortuis, salvus eris (Rom. X, 9): et iterum, Qui traditus est, inquit, propter delicta nostra, et resurrexit propter justificationem nostram (Id. IV, 25). Ideoque meritum fidei nostrae resurrectio corporis Domini est. Nam mortuam esse illam carnem in cruce passionis, etiam inimici ejus credunt, sed resurrexisse non credunt. Quod firmissime nos credentes, tanquam de petrae soliditate contuemur: unde certa spe adoptionem exspectamus redemptionem corporis nostri (Id. VIII, 23); quia hoc in membris Christi speramus, quae nos ipsi sumus, quod perfectum esse in ipso tanquam in capite nostro fidei sanitate cognoscimus. Inde non vult, nisi cum transierit, videri posteriora sua, ut in ejus resurrectionem credatur. Pascha enim hebraeum verbum dicitur, quod Transitus interpretatur. Unde 0865 et Joannes evangelista dicit: Ante diem festum Paschae, sciens Jesus quia venit hora ejus, ut transeat de hoc mundo ad Patrem (Joan. XIII, 1).

30. Hoc autem qui credunt, nec tamen in Catholica , sed in schismate aliquo aut in haeresi credunt, non de loco qui est penes eum vident posteriora Domini. Quid enim sibi vult quod ait Dominus, Ecce locus est penes me, et stabis super petram? Quis locus terrenus est penes Dominum, nisi hoc est penes eum quod eum spiritualiter attingit? Nam quis locus non est penes Dominum, qui attingit a fine usque ad finem fortiter, et disponit omnia suaviter (Sap. VIII, 1); et cujus dictum est coelum sedes, et terra scabellum pedum ejus; et qui dixit, Quam domum aedificabitis mihi? aut quis locus quietis meae? Nonne manus mea fecit haec omnia (Isai. LXVI, 1, 2)? Sed videlicet intelligitur locus penes eum in quo statur super petram, ipsa Ecclesia catholica, ubi salubriter videt Pascha Domini, id est transitum Domini, et posteriora ejus, id est, corpus ejus, qui credit in resurrectionem ejus. Et stabis, inquit, super petram, statim ut transiet mea majestas. Revera enim statim ut transiit majestas Domini in clarificatione Domini qua resurgens ascendit ad Patrem, solidati sumus super petram. Et ipse Petrus tunc solidatus est, ut cum fiducia praedicaret, quem, priusquam esset solidatus, ter timore negaverat (Matth. XXVI, 70-74), jam quidem praedestinatione positus in specula petrae, sed adhuc manu Domini sibi superposita ne videret. Posteriora enim ejus visurus erat, et nondum ille transierat, utique a morte ad vitam, nondum resurrectione clarificatus erat.

31. Nam et quod sequitur in Exodo, et dicit, Tegam manu mea super te, donec transeam; et auferam manum meam, et tunc videbis posteriora mea: multi Israelitae quorum tunc figura erat Moyses, post resurrectionem Domini crediderunt in eum, tanquam jam videntes posteriora ejus, remota manu ejus ab oculis suis. Unde et Isaiae talem prophetiam evangelista commemorat: Incrassa cor populi hujus, et aures eorum oppila, et oculos eorum grava (Isai. VI, 10; Matth. XIII, 15). Denique in Psalmo non absurde intelligitur ex eorum persona dici, Quoniam die ac nocte gravata est super me manus tua. Die fortasse, cum manifesta miracula faceret, nec ab eis agnosceretur; nocte autem, cum in passione moreretur, quando certius putaverunt, sicut quemlibet hominem, peremptum et exstinctum. Sed quoniam cum transisset ut ejus posteriora viderentur, praedicante sibi apostolo Petro, quia oportebat Christum pati et resurgere, compuncti sunt dolore poenitentiae (Act. II, 37, 41), ut fieret in baptizatis quod in capite ejus psalmi dicitur, Beati quorum remissae sunt iniquitates, et quorum tecta sunt peccata: propterea cum dictum esset, Gravata est super me manus tua, tanquam Domino transeunte, ut jam removeret manum, et viderentur posteriora ejus, sequitur vox dolentis et confitentis, et ex fide 0866 resurrectionis Domini peccatorum remissionem accipientis: Conversus sum, inquit, in aerumna mea, cum infigeretur mihi spina. Peccatum meum cognovi, et injustitiam meam non operui. Dixi, Pronuntiabo adversum me injustitiam meam Domino, et tu remisisti impietatem cordis mei (Psal. XXXI, 1-5). Neque enim tanto carnis nubilo debemus involvi, ut putemus faciem quidem Domini esse invisibilem, dorsum vero visibile: quandoquidem in forma servi utrumque visibiliter apparuit; in forma autem Dei absit ut tale aliquid cogitetur: absit ut Verbum Dei et Sapientia Dei ex una parte habeat faciem, et ex alia dorsum, sicut corpus humanum, aut omnino ulla specie vel motione sive loco sive tempore commutetur.

32. Quapropter, si in illis vocibus quae fiebant in Exodo, et illis omnibus corporalibus demonstrationibus Dominus Jesus Christus ostendebatur; aut alias Christus, sicut loci hujus consideratio persuadet; alias Spiritus sanctus, sicut ea quae supra diximus admonent: non hoc efficitur, ut Deus Pater nunquam tali aliqua specie Patribus visus sit. Multa enim talia visa facta sunt illis temporibus, non evidenter nominato et designato in eis vel Patre, vel Filio, vel Spiritu sancto; sed tamen per quasdam valde probabiles significationes nonnullis indiciis existentibus, ut nimis temerarium sit dicere, Deum Patrem nunquam Patribus aut Prophetis per aliquas visibiles formas apparuisse. Hanc enim opinionem illi pepererunt, qui non potuerunt in unitate Trinitatis intelligere quod dictum est, Regi autem saeculorum immortali, invisibili soli Deo (I Tim. I, 17); et, Quem nemo hominum vidit, nec videre potest (Id. VI, 16). Quod de ipsa substantia summa summeque divina et incommutabili, ubi et Pater et Filius et Spiritus sanctus unus et solus Deus est, per sanam fidem intelligitur. Visiones autem illae per creaturam commutabilem Deo incommutabili subditam factae sunt, non proprie sicuti est, sed significative sicut pro rerum causis et temporibus oportuit, ostendentes Deum.