A Treatise on the Predestination of the Saints,

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Introduction.

 For on consideration of your letters, I seem to see that those brethren on whose behalf you exhibit a pious care that they may not hold the poetical o

 Chapter 3 [II.]—Even the Beginning of Faith is of God’s Gift.

 Chapter 4.—Continuation of the Preceding.

 Chapter 5.—To Believe is to Think with Assent.

 Chapter 6.—Presumption and Arrogance to Be Avoided.

 Chapter 7 [III.]—Augustin Confesses that He Had Formerly Been in Error Concerning the Grace of God.

 Chapter 8 [IV.]—What Augustin Wrote to Simplicianus, the Successor of Ambrose, Bishop of Milan.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—The Purpose of the Apostle in These Words.

 Chapter 10.—It is God’s Grace Which Specially Distinguishes One Man from Another.

 Chapter 11 [VI.]—That Some Men are Elected is of God’s Mercy.

 Chapter 12 [VII.]—Why the Apostle Said that We are Justified by Faith and Not by Works.

 Chapter 13 [VIII.]—The Effect of Divine Grace.

 Chapter 14.—Why the Father Does Not Teach All that They May Come to Christ.

 Chapter 15.—It is Believers that are Taught of God.

 Chapter 16.—Why the Gift of Faith is Not Given to All.

 Chapter 17 [IX.]—His Argument in His Letter Against Porphyry, as to Why the Gospel Came So Late into the World.

 Chapter 18.—The Preceding Argument Applied to the Present Time.

 Chapter 19 [X]—In What Respects Predestination and Grace Differ.

 Chapter 20.—Did God Promise the Good Works of the Nations and Not Their Faith, to Abraham?

 Chapter 21.—It is to Be Wondered at that Men Should Rather Trust to Their Own Weakness Than to God’s Strength.

 Chapter 22.—God’s Promise is Sure.

 Chapter 23 [XII.]—Remarkable Illustrations of Grace and Predestination in Infants, and in Christ.

 Chapter 24.—That No One is Judged According to What He Would Have Done If He Had Lived Longer.

 Chapter 25 [XIII.]—Possibly the Baptized Infants Would Have Repented If They Had Lived, and the Unbaptized Not.

 Chapter 26 [XIV]—Reference to Cyprian’s Treatise “On the Mortality.”

 Chapter 27.—The Book of Wisdom Obtains in the Church the Authority of Canonical Scripture.

 Chapter 28.—Cyprian’s Treatise “On the Mortality.”

 Chapter 29.—God’s Dealing Does Not Depend Upon Any Contingent Merits of Men.

 Chapter 30 [XV.]—The Most Illustrious Instance of Predestination is Christ Jesus.

 Chapter 31.—Christ Predestinated to Be the Son of God.

 Chapter 32 [XVI.]—The Twofold Calling.

 Chapter 33.—It is in the Power of Evil Men to Sin But to Do This or That by Means of that Wickedness is in God’s Power Alone.

 Chapter 34 [XVII.]—The Special Calling of the Elect is Not Because They Have Believed, But in Order that They May Believe.

 Chapter 35 [XVIII.]—Election is for the Purpose of Holiness.

 Chapter 36.—God Chose the Righteous Not Those Whom He Foresaw as Being of Themselves, But Those Whom He Predestinated for the Purpose of Making So.

 Chapter 37.—We Were Elected and Predestinated, Not Because We Were Going to Be Holy, But in Order that We Might Be So.

 Chapter 38 [XIX.]—What is the View of the Pelagians, and What of the Semi-Pelagians, Concerning Predestination.

 Chapter 39—The Beginning of Faith is God’s Gift.

 Chapter 40 [XX.]—Apostolic Testimony to the Beginning of Faith Being God’s Gift.

 Chapter 41.—Further Apostolic Testimonies.

 Chapter 42.—Old Testament Testimonies.

 Chapter 43 [XXI.]—Conclusion.

Chapter 29.—God’s Dealing Does Not Depend Upon Any Contingent Merits of Men.

And thus, unless we indulge in reckless disputation, the entire question is concluded concerning him who is taken away lest wickedness should alter his understanding. And the book of Wisdom, which for such a series of years has deserved to be read in Christ’s Church, and in which this is read, ought not to suffer injustice because it withstands those who are mistaken on behalf of men’s merit, so as to come in opposition to the most manifest grace of God: and this grace chiefly appears in infants, and while some of these baptized, and some not baptized, come to the end of this life, they sufficiently point to God’s mercy and His judgment,—His mercy, indeed, gratuitous, His judgment, of debt. For if men should be judged according to the merits of their life, which merits they have been prevented by death from actually having, but would have had if they had lived, it would be of no advantage to him who is taken away lest wickedness should alter his understanding; it would be of no advantage to those who die in a state of lapse if they should die before. And this no Christian will venture to say. Wherefore our brethren, who with us on behalf of the catholic faith assail the pest of the Pelagian error, ought not to such an extent to favour the Pelagian opinion, wherein they conceive that God’s grace is given according to our merits, as to endeavour (which they cannot dare) to invalidate a true sentiment, plainly and from ancient times Christian,—“He was taken away, lest wickedness should alter his understanding;” and to build up that which we should think, I do not say, no one would believe, but no one would dream,—to wit, that any deceased person would be judged according to those things which he would have done if he had lived for a more lengthened period. Surely thus what we say manifests itself clearly to be incontestable,—that the grace of God is not given according to our merits; so that ingenious men who contradict this truth are constrained to say things which must be rejected from the ears and from the thoughts of all men.

29. Ac per hoc, si absit nimis inconsiderata contentio, tota quaestio ista finita est de illo qui raptus est, ne malitia mutaret intellectum ejus. Nec ideo liber Sapientiae, qui tanta numerositate annorum legi meruit in Ecclesia Christi, in quo et hoc legitur, pati debet injuriam, quoniam resistit eis qui pro meritis hominum falluntur, ut veniant contra Dei manifestissimam gratiam: quae maxime apparet in parvulis; quorum cum alii baptizati, alii non baptizati vitae hujus terminum sumunt, satis indicant misericordiam et judicium; misericordiam quidem gratuitam, judicium debitum. Si enim judicarentur homines pro meritis suae vitae, quae non habuerunt morte praeventi, sed habituri essent, si viverent; nihil prodesset ei qui raptus est, ne malitia mutaret intellectum ejus; nihil prodesset eis qui lapsi moriuntur, si ante morerentur: quod nullus dicere christianus audebit. Quocirca non debent fratres nostri, qui nobiscum pro catholica fide perniciem Pelagiani erroris impugnant, huic Pelagianae in tantum favere opinioni, qua opinantur gratiam Dei secundum merita nostra dari; ut quod illi audere non possunt, sententiam veram plane et antiquitus christianam, Raptus est, ne malitia mutaret intellectum ejus, destruere moliantur; et id astruere, quod, non dico crediturum, sed somniaturum neminem putaremus, secundum ea scilicet judicari quemque mortuorum, quae gesturus fuerat, si tempore prolixiore vixisset. Ita quippe claret invictum esse quod dicimus, gratiam Dei non secundum merita nostra dari, ut huic veritati contradicentes ingeniosi homines haec, ab omnium auribus et cogitationibus abigenda, dicere cogerentur.