by aurelius augustin, bishop of hippo

 Chapter 1.—Introduction: Address to Boniface.

 Chapter 2.—Why Heretical Writings Must Be Answered.

 Chapter 3.—Why He Addresses His Book to Boniface.

 Chapter 4 [II.]—The Calumny of Julian,—That the Catholics Teach that Free Will is Taken Away by Adam’s Sin.

 Chapter 5.—Free Choice Did Not Perish With Adam ’s Sin. What Freedom Did Perish.

 Chapter 6 [III.]—Grace is Not Given According to Merits.

 Chapter 7.—He Concludes that He Does Not Deprive the Wicked of Free Will.

 Chapter 8 [IV.]—The Pelagians Demolish Free Will.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—Another Calumny of Julian,—That “It is Said that Marriage is Not Appointed by God.”

 Chapter 10—The Third Calumny,—The Assertion that Conjugal Intercourse is Condemned.

 Chapter 11 [VI.]—The Purpose of the Pelagians in Praising the Innocence of Conjugal Intercourse.

 Chapter 12.—The Fourth Calumny,—That the Saints of the Old Testament are Said to Be Not Free from Sins.

 Chapter 13 [VIII.]—The Fifth Calumny,—That It is Said that Paul and the Rest of the Apostles Were Polluted by Lust.

 Chapter 14.—That the Apostle is Speaking in His Own Person and that of Others Who Are Under Grace, Not Still Under Law.

 Chapter 15 [IX.]—He Sins in Will Who is Only Deterred from Sinning by Fear.

 Chapter 16.—How Sin Died, and How It Revived.

 Chapter 17 [X.]—“The Law is Spiritual, But I Am Carnal,” To Be Understood of Paul.

 Chapter 18.—How the Apostle Said that He Did the Evil that He Would Not.

 Chapter 19.—What It is to Accomplish What is Good.

 Chapter 20.—In Me, that Is, in My Flesh.

 Chapter 21.—No Condemnation in Christ Jesus.

 Chapter 22.—Why the Passage Referred to Must Be Understood of a Man Established Under Grace.

 Chapter 23 [XI.]—What It is to Be Delivered from the Body of This Death.

 Chapter 24.—He Concludes that the Apostle Spoke in His Own Person, and that of Those Who are Under Grace.

 Chapter 25 [XII.]—The Sixth Calumny,—That Augustin Asserts that Even Christ Was Not Free from Sins.

 Chapter 26 [XIII.]—The Seventh Calumny,—That Augustin Asserts that in Baptism All Sins are Not Remitted.

 Chapter 27.—In What Sense Lust is Called Sin in the Regenerate.

 Chapter 28 [XIV.]—Many Without Crime, None Without Sin.

 Chapter 29 [XV.]—Julian Opposes the Faith of His Friends to the Opinions of Catholic Believers. First of All, of Free Will.

 Chapter 30.—Secondly, of Marriage.

 Chapter 31.—Thirdly, of Conjugal Intercourse.

 Chapter 32 [XVI.]—The Aprons Which Adam and Eve Wore.

 Chapter 33.—The Shame of Nakedness.

 Chapter 34 [XVII.]—Whether There Could Be Sensual Appetite in Paradise Before the Fall.

 Chapter 35.—Desire in Paradise Was Either None at All, or It Was Obedient to the Impulse of the Will.

 Chapter 36 [XVIII.]—Julian’s Fourth Objection, that Man is God’s Work, and is Not Constrained to Evil or Good by His Power.

 Chapter 37 [XIX.]—The Beginning of a Good Will is the Gift of Grace.

 Chapter 38 [XX.]—The Power of God’s Grace is Proved.

 Chapter 39 [XXI.]—Julian’s Fifth Objection Concerning the Saints of the Old Testament.

 Chapter 40 [XXII.]—The Sixth Objection, Concerning the Necessity of Grace for All, and Concerning the Baptism of Infants.

 Chapter 41 [XXIII.]—The Seventh Objection, of the Effect of Baptism.

 Chapter 42 [XXIV.]—He Rebuts the Conclusion of Julian’s Letter.

 Book II.

 Chapter 1.—Introduction The Pelagians Impeach Catholics as Manicheans.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Heresies of the Manicheans and Pelagians are Mutually Opposed, and are Alike Reprobated by the Catholic Church.

 Chapter 3.—How Far the Manicheans and Pelagians are Joined in Error How Far They are Separated.

 Chapter 4.—The Two Contrary Errors.

 Chapter 5 [III.]—The Calumny of the Pelagians Against the Clergy of the Roman Church.

 Chapter 6 [IV.]—What Was Done in the Case of Cœlestius and Zosimus.

 Chapter 7.—He Suggests a Dilemma to Cœlestius.

 Chapter 8.—The Catholic Faith Concerning Infants.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—He Replies to the Calumnies of the Pelagians.

 Chapter 10.—Why the Pelagians Falsely Accuse Catholics of Maintaining Fate Under the Name of Grace.

 Chapter 11 [VI.]—The Accusation of Fate is Thrown Back Upon the Adversaries.

 Chapter 12.—What is Meant Under the Name of Fate.

 Chapter 13 [VII.]—He Repels the Calumny Concerning the Acceptance of Persons.

 Chapter 14.—He Illustrates His Argument by an Example.

 Chapter 15.—The Apostle Meets the Question by Leaving It Unsolved.

 Chapter 16.—The Pelagians are Refuted by the Case of the Twin Infants Dying, the One After, and the Other Without, the Grace of Baptism.

 Chapter 17 [VIII.]—Even the Desire of an Imperfect Good is a Gift of Grace, Otherwise Grace Would Be Given According to Merits.

 Chapter 18.—The Desire of Good is God’s Gift.

 Chapter 19 [IX.]—He Interprets the Scriptures Which the Pelagians Make Ill Use of.

 Chapter 20.—God’s Agency is Needful Even in Man’s Doings.

 Chapter 21.—Man Does No Good Thing Which God Does Not Cause Him to Do.

 Chapter 22 [X.]—According to Whose Purpose the Elect are Called.

 Chapter 23.—Nothing is Commanded to Man Which is Not Given by God.

 Book III.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Statement.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Misrepresentation of the Pelagians Concerning the Use of the Old Law.

 Chapter 3.—Scriptural Confirmation of the Catholic Doctrine.

 Chapter 4 [III.]—Misrepresentation Concerning the Effect of Baptism.

 Chapter 5.—Baptism Puts Away All Sins, But It Does Not at Once Heal All Infirmities.

 Chapter 6 [IV.]—The Calumny Concerning the Old Testament and the Righteous Men of Old.

 Chapter 7.—The New Testament is More Ancient Than the Old But It Was Subsequently Revealed.

 Chapter 8.—All Righteous Men Before and After Abraham are Children of the Promise and of Grace.

 Chapter 9.—Who are the Children of the Old Covenant.

 Chapter 10.—The Old Law Also Given by God.

 Chapter 11.—Distinction Between the Children of the Old and of the New Testaments.

 Chapter 12.—The Old Testament is Properly One Thing—The Old Instrument Another.

 Chapter 13.—Why One of the Covenants is Called Old, the Other New.

 Chapter 14 [V.]—Calumny Concerning the Righteousness of the Prophets and Apostles.

 Chapter 15.—The Perfection of Apostles and Prophets.

 Chapter 16 [VI.]—Misrepresentation Concerning Sin in Christ.

 Chapter 17 [VII.]—Their Calumny About the Fulfilment of Precepts in the Life to Come.

 Chapter 18.—Perfection of Righteousness and Full Security Was Not Even in Paul in This Life.

 Chapter 19.—In What Sense the Righteousness of Man in This Life is Said to Be Perfect.

 Chapter 20.—Why the Righteousness Which is of the Law is Valued Slightly by Paul.

 Chapter 21.—That Righteousness is Never Perfected in This Life.

 Chapter 22.—Nature of Human Righteousness and Perfection.

 Chapter 23.—There is No True Righteousness Without the Faith of the Grace of Christ.

 Chapter 24 [VIII.]—There are Three Principal Heads in the Pelagian Heresy.

 Chapter 25 [IX.]—He Shows that the Opinion of the Catholics is the Mean Between that of the Manicheans and Pelagians, and Refutes Both.

 Chapter 26 [X.]—The Pelagians Still Strive After a Hiding-Place, by Introducing the Needless Question of the Origin of the Soul.

 Book IV.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—The Subterfuges of the Pelagians are Five.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Praise of the Creature.

 Chapter 3 [III.]—The Catholics Praise Nature, Marriage, Law, Free Will, and the Saints, in Such Wise as to Condemn as Well Pelagians as Manicheans.

 Chapter 4 [IV.]—Pelagians and Manicheans on the Praise of the Creature.

 Chapter 5.—What is the Special Advantage in the Pelagian Opinions?

 Chapter 6.—Not Death Alone, But Sin Also Has Passed into Us by Means of Adam.

 Chapter 7.—What is the Meaning of “In Whom All Have Sinned”?

 Chapter 8.—Death Passed Upon All by Sin.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—Of the Praise of Marriage.

 Chapter 10.—Of the Praise of the Law.

 Chapter 11.—The Pelagians Understand that the Law Itself is God’s Grace.

 Chapter 12 [VI.]—Of the Praise of Free Will.

 Chapter 13.—God’s Purposes are Effects of Grace.

 Chapter 14.—The Testimonies of Scripture in Favour of Grace.

 Chapter 15.—From Such Scriptures Grace is Proved to Be Gratuitous and Effectual.

 Chapter 16.—Why God Makes of Some Sheep, Others Not.

 Chapter 17 [VII.]—Of the Praise of the Saints.

 Chapter 18.—The Opinion of the Saints Themselves About Themselves.

 Chapter 19.—The Craft of the Pelagians.

 Chapter 20 [VIII.]—The Testimonies of the Ancients Against the Pelagians.

 Chapter 21.—Pelagius, in Imitation of Cyprian, Wrote a Book of Testimonies.

 Chapter 22.—Further References to Cyprian.

 Chapter 23.—Further References to Cyprian.

 Chapter 24.—The Dilemma Proposed to the Pelagians.

 Chapter 25 [IX.]—Cyprian’s Testimonies Concerning God’s Grace.

 Chapter 26.—Further Appeals to Cyprian’s Teaching.

 Chapter 27 [X.]—Cyprian’s Testimonies Concerning the Imperfection of Our Own Righteousness.

 Chapter 28.—Cyprian’s Orthodoxy Undoubted.

 Chapter 29 [XI.]—The Testimonies of Ambrose Against the Pelagians and First of All Concerning Original Sin.

 Chapter 30.—The Testimonies of Ambrose Concerning God’s Grace.

 Chapter 31.—The Testimonies of Ambrose on the Imperfection of Present Righteousness.

 Chapter 32 [XII.]—The Pelagian’s Heresy Arose Long After Ambrose.

 Chapter 33.—Opposition of the Manichean and Catholic Dogmas.

 Chapter 34.—The Calling Together of a Synod Not Always Necessary to the Condemnation of Heresies.

Chapter 27 [X.]—Cyprian’s Testimonies Concerning the Imperfection of Our Own Righteousness.

Let us, then, see that third point, which in these men is not less shocking to every member of Christ and to His whole body,—that they contend that there are in this life, or that there have been, righteous men having absolutely no sin.338    This assertion of the Pelagians was condemned in an African Council in 418. In which presumption they most manifestly contradict the Lord’s Prayer, wherein, with truthful heart and with daily words, all the members of Christ cry aloud, “Forgive us our debts.” Let us see, then, what Cyprian, most glorious in the Lord, thought of this,—what he not only said for the instruction of the Churches, not, of course, of the Manicheans, but of the catholics, but also committed to letters and to memory. In the epistle on “Works and Alms,” he says: “Let us then acknowledge, beloved brethren, the wholesome gift of the divine mercy, and let us who cannot be without some wound of conscience heal our wounds by the spiritual remedies for the cleansing and purging of our sins. Nor let any one so flatter himself with the notion of a pure and immaculate heart, as, in dependence on his own innocence, to think that the medicine needs not to be applied to his wounds; since it is written, ‘Who shall boast that he hath a clean heart, or who shall boast that he is pure from sins?’339    Prov. xx. 9. And again, in his epistle, John lays it down and says, ‘If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.’340    1 John i. 8. But if no one can be without sin, and whoever should say that he is without fault is either proud or foolish, how needful, how kind is the divine mercy, which, knowing that there are still found some wounds in those that have been healed, has given even after their healing wholesome remedies for the curing and healing of their wounds anew!”341    Cyprian, work cited, ch. 2; The Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. v. p. 476. Again, in the same treatise he says: “And since there cannot fail daily to be sins committed in the sight of God, there failed not daily sacrifices wherewith the sins might be cleansed away.”342    Ibid., p. 480. Also, in the treatise on the Mortality, he says: “Our warfare is with avarice, with immodesty, with anger, with ambition; our trying and toilsome wrestling with carnal vices, with the enticements of the world. The mind of man besieged, and on every hand invested with the onsets of the devil, scarcely meets the repeated attacks, scarcely resists them. If avarice is prostrated, lust springs up. If lust is overcome, ambition takes its place. If ambition is despised, anger exasperates, pride puffs up, wine-bibbing entices; envy breaks concord; jealousy cuts friendship; you are constrained to curse, which the divine law forbids; you are compelled to swear, which is not lawful. So many persecutions the soul suffers daily, with so many risks is the heart wearied; and yet it delights to abide here long among the devil’s weapons, although it should rather be our craving and wish to hasten to Christ by the aid of a quicker death.”343    Ibid. work cited, chs. 3, 4, p. 470. Again, in the same treatise he says: “The blessed Apostle Paul in his epistle lays it down, saying, ‘To me to live is Christ, and to die is gain;’344    Phil. i. 21. counting it the greatest gain no longer to be held by the snares of this world, no longer to be liable to the sins and vices of the flesh.”345    Cyprian, ibid. Moreover, on the Lord’s Prayer, explaining what it is we ask when we say, “Hallowed be thy name,” he says, among other matters: “For we have need of daily sanctification, that we, who daily fall away, may wash out our sins by continual sanctification.”346    Cyprian, work cited, ch. 9, p. 450. Again, in the same treatise, when he would explain our saying, “Forgive us our debts,” he says: “And how necessarily, how providently and salutarily, are we admonished that we are sinners, since we are compelled to entreat for our sins; and while pardon is asked for from God, the soul recalls its own consciousness of guilt. Lest any one should flatter himself as being innocent, and by exalting himself should more deeply perish, he is instructed and taught that he sins daily, in that he is bidden to entreat daily for his sins. Thus, moreover, John also in his epistle warns us, and says: ‘If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. But if we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins.’”347    Cyprian, ibid. ch. 16 (xxii.), p. 453. Rightly, also, he proposed in his letter to Quirinus his own most absolute judgment on this subject, to which he subjoined the divine testimonies, “That no one is without filth and without sin.”348    Cyprian, Testimonies, iii. 54; The Ante-Nicene Fathers, v. p. 529. There also he set down those testimonies by which original sin is confirmed, which these men endeavour to twist into I know not what new and evil meanings, whether what the holy Job says, “No one is pure from filth, not one even if his life be of one day upon the earth,”349    Job xiv. 4, 5. or what is read in the Psalm, “Behold, I was conceived in iniquity; and in sins hath my mother nourished me in the womb.”350    Ps. li. 5. To which testimonies, on account of those also who are already holy in mature age, since even they are not without filth and sin, he added also that word of the most blessed John, which he often mentions in many other places besides, “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves;”351    1 John i. 8. and other passages of the same sentiment, which are asserted by all catholics, by way of opposing those “who deceive themselves, and the truth is not in them.”

CAPUT X.

0629

27. Cypriani testimonia de justitiae nostrae imperfectione. Illud jam tertium videamus, quod non minus in istis omne Christi membrum et totum ejus corpus exhorret, quia contendunt esse in hac vita, vel fuisse justos, nullum habentes omnino peccatum . Qua praesumptione apertissime orationi dominicae contradicunt, in qua omnia membra Christi, Dimitte nobis debita nostra, veraci corde et quotidianis vocibus clamant. Videamus ergo quid etiam ex hoc Cyprianus in Domino gloriosissimus senserit; quid ad instruendas Ecclesias, non utique Manichaeorum, sed Catholicorum, non solum dixerit, verum etiam litteris, memoriaeque mandaverit. In epistola de Opere et Eleemosynis: «Agnoscamus itaque, fratres,» inquit, «dilectissimi, divinae indulgentiae salubre munus, et emundandis purgandisque peccatis nostris, qui sine aliquo conscientiae vulnere esse non possumus, medelis spiritualibus vulnera nostra curemus. Nec quisquam sic sibi de puro atque de immaculato pectore blandiatur, ut innocentia sua fretus medicinam non putet adhibendam esse vulneribus: cum scriptum sit, Quis gloriabitur castum se habere cor? aut quis gloriabitur mundum se esse a peccatis (Prov. XX, 9)? et iterum in Epistola sua Joannes ponat et dicat, Si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos decipimus, et veritas in nobis non est (I Joan. I, 8). Si autem nemo esse sine peccato potest, et quisquis se inculpatum dixerit, aut superbus aut stultus est: quam necessaria, quam benigna est divina clementia; quae cum sciat non deesse sanatis quaedam postmodum vulnera, dedit curandis denuo sanandisque vulneribus remedia salutaria?» Rursus in eadem: «Et quoniam quotidie,» inquit, «deesse non potest quod peccetur in conspectu Dei; sacrificia quotidiana non deerant , quibus possent peccata tergi.» Item in epistola de Mortalitate: «Cum avaritia,» inquit, «nobis, cum impudicitia, cum ira, cum ambitione congressio est; cum carnalibus vitiis, cum illecebris saecularibus assidua et molesta luctatio est: obsessa mens hominis, et undique diaboli infestatione vallata, vix occurrit singulis, vix resistit. Si avaritia prostrata est, exsurgit libido; si libido compressa est, succedit ambitio; si ambitio contempta est, ira exasperat, inflat superbia, vinolentia invitat, invidia concordiam rumpit, amicitiam zelus abscindit: cogeris maledicere, quod divina lex prohibet; compelleris jurare, quod non licet. Tot persecutiones animus quotidie patitur, 0630 tot periculis pectus urgetur , et delectat hic inter diaboli gladios diu stare; cum magis concupiscendum sit et optandum, ad Christum subveniente velocius morte properare.» Item in ipsa: «Beatus,» inquit. «apostolus Paulus in Epistola sua ponit et dicit, Mihi vivere Christus est, et mori lucrum (Philipp. I, 21): lucrum maximum computans jam saecularibus laqueis non teneri, jam nullis peccatis et vitiis carnis obnoxium fieri.» Item de oratione dominica, exponens quod petimus dicentes, Sanctificetur nomen tuum; ait inter caetera: «Opus est enim nobis quotidiana sanctificatione, ut qui quotidie delinquimus, delicta nostra sanctificatione assidua repurgemus.» Rursus in eadem, cum exponeret quod dicimus, Dimitte nobis debita nostra (Matth. VI, 9, 12): «Quam necessarie autem,» inquit, «quam providenter et salubriter admonemur, quod peccatores sumus, qui pro peccatis rogare compellimur; ut dum indulgentia de Deo petitur, conscientiae suae animus recordetur! Ne quis sibi quasi innocens placeat, et se extollendo plus pereat, instruitur et docetur peccare se quotidie, dum quotidie pro peccatis jubetur orare. Sic denique et Joannes in Epistola sua monet dicens, Si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos decipimus, et veritas in nobis non est. Si autem confessi fuerimus peccata nostra, fidelis et justus estqui nobis peccata dimittat» (I Joan. I, 8 et 9). Merito et ad Quirinum de hac re absolutissimam sententiam suam proposuit, cui testimonia divina subjungeret, «Neminem sine sorde et sine peccato esse» (Lib. 3, cap. 54): ubi etiam illa testimonia posuit, quibus confirmatur originale peccatum, quae conantur isti in nescio quos alios novos sensus pravosque convertere: sive quod ait sanctus Job, Neminem esse sine sorde, nec cujus sit vita diei unius super terram (Job XIV, 5, sec. LXX); sive quod in Psalmo legitur, In facinore conceptus sum, et in peccatis me mater mea in utero aluit (Psal. L, 7). Quibus testimoniis, propter eos etiam qui jam in aetate majori sunt sancti, quia nec ipsi sunt sine sorde atque peccato, adjunxit etiam illud beatissimi Joannis, quod multis et aliis locis saepe commemorat: Si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus; et caetera ejusdem sententiae, quae ab omnibus Catholicis non tacentur adversus istos, qui se ipsos decipiunt, et in eis veritas non est.