Our Lord’s Sermon on the Mount.

 Chapter I.

 Chapter II.

 Chapter III.

 Chapter IV.

 Chapter V.

 Chapter VI.

 Chapter VII.

 Chapter VIII.

 Chapter IX.

 Chapter X.

 Chapter XI.

 Chapter XII.

 Chapter XIII.

 Chapter XIV.

 Chapter XV.

 Chapter XVI.

 Chapter XVII.

 Chapter XVIII.

 Chapter XIX.

 Chapter XX.

 Chapter XXI.

 Chapter XXII.

 Chapter XXIII.

 Book II.

 Chapter I.

 Chapter II.

 Chapter III.

 Chapter IV.

 Chapter V.

 Chapter VI.

 Chapter VII.

 Chapter VIII.

 Chapter IX.

 Chapter X.

 Chapter XI.

 Chapter XII.

 Chapter XIII.

 Chapter XIV.

 Chapter XV.

 Chapter XVI.

 Chapter XVII.

 Chapter XVIII.

 Chapter XIX.

 Chapter XX.

 Chapter XXI.

 Chapter XXII.

 Chapter XXIII.

 Chapter XXIV.

 Chapter XXV.

Chapter VIII.

20. In this sentence the meaning is twofold.72    Here begins the second part of the Sermon. In it our Lord sets forth His relation as a lawgiver to the Mosaic law, especially as currently interpreted according to the letter only (Meyer, Alford etc.). We must deal with it in both ways. For He who says, “I am not come73    Veni; Greek, ἦλθον. to destroy the law, but to fulfil,” means it either in the way of adding what is wanting, or of doing what is in it. Let us then consider that first which I have put first: for he who adds what is wanting does not surely destroy what he finds, but rather confirms it by perfecting it; and accordingly He follows up with the statement, “Verily I say unto you,74    A decisive assertion of authority. Asseveratio gravissima ei propria, qui per se ipsum et per suam veritatem asseverat (Bengel). The prophet’s most emphatic statement was, “Thus saith the Lord.” Christ speaks in His own name, as the fount of authority (v. 20 and often: John iii. 3, xiv. 12, etc.). Till heaven and earth pass, one iota or one tittle shall in nowise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” For, if even those things which are added for completion are fulfilled, much more are those things fulfilled which are sent in advance as a commencement. Then, as to what He says, “One iota or one tittle shall in nowise pass from the law,” nothing else can be understood but a strong expression of perfection, since it is pointed out by means of single letters, among which letters “iota” is smaller than the others, for it is made by a single stroke; while a “tittle” is but a particle of some sort at the top of even that. And by these words He shows that in the law all the smallest particulars even are to be carried into effect.75    “Christ’s words are decisive against all those who would set aside the Old Testament as without significance, or inconsistent with the New Testament” (Alford). Christ declares the New to be rooted in the Old; its consummation, not its destruction. The essence and purport of the law, the “whole law,” was fulfilled by Him (Meyer). Theophylact well compares the law to a sketch, which Christ (like the painter) does not destroy, but fills out. After that He subjoins: “Whosoever, therefore, shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven.” Hence it is the least commandments that are meant by “one iota” and “one tittle.” And therefore, “whosoever shall break and shall teach [men] so,”—i.e. in accordance with what he breaks, not in accordance with what he finds and reads,—“shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven;” and therefore, perhaps, he will not be in the kingdom of heaven at all, where only the great can be. “But whosoever shall do and teach [men] so,”76    Sic; Greek, οὗτος; Vulgate, hic.i.e. who shall not break, and shall teach men so, in accordance with what he does not break,—“shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” But in regard to him who shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven, it follows that he is also in the kingdom of heaven, into which the great are admitted: for to this what follows refers.

CAPUT VIII.---20. In hac sententia sensus duplex est; secundum utrumque tractandum est. Nam qui dicit, Non veni solvere Legem, sed implere; aut addendo dicit quod minus habet, aut faciendo quod habet: illud ergo prius consideremus, quod primo posui. Nam qui addit quod minus habet, non utique solvit quod invenit, sed magis perficiendo confirmat: et ideo sequitur, et dicit, Amen dico vobis, donec transeat coelum et terra, iota unum aut unus apex non transiet a Lege, donec omnia fiant. Dum enim fiunt etiam illa quae adduntur ad perfectionem, multo magis fiunt illa quae praemissa sunt ad inchoationem. Quod autem ait, Iota unum, aut unus apex non transiet a Lege, nihil potest aliud intelligi nisi vehemens expressio perfectionis , quando per litteras singulas demonstrata est: inter quas litteras iota minor est caeteris, quia uno ductu fit; apex autem est etiam ipsius aliqua in summo particula. Quibus verbis ostendit in Lege ad effectum etiam minima quaeque perduci. Deinde subjicit: Qui enim solverit unum de mandatis istis minimis, et docuerit sic homines, minimus vocabitur in regno coelorum. Mandata ergo minima significantur per unum iota et unum apicem. Qui ergo solverit et docuerit sic, id est, secundum id quod solvit, non secundum id quod invenit et legit, minimus vocabitur in regno coelorum: et fortasse ideo non erit in regno coelorum, ubi nisi magni esse non possunt. Qui autem fecerit et docuerit sic , hoc est, qui non solverit, et docuerit sic, secundum id quod non solvit, magnus vocabitur in regno coelorum. Qui vero magnus vocabitur in regno coelorum, sequitur ut etiam sit in regno coelorum, quo magni admittuntur: ad hoc enim pertinet quod sequitur.