A Treatise on the soul and its origin,

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Renatus Had Done Him a Kindness by Sending Him the Books Which Had Been Addressed to Him.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—He Receives with a Kindly and Patient Feeling the Books of a Young and Inexperienced Man Who Wrote Against Him in a Tone of Arrogance.

 Chapter 3 [III]—The Eloquence of Vincentius, Its Dangers and Its Tolerableness.

 Chapter 4 [IV.]—The Errors Contained in the Books of Vincentius Victor. He Says that the Soul Comes from God, But Was Not Made Either Out of Nothing o

 Chapter 5 [V.]—Another of Victor’s Errors, that the Soul is Corporeal.

 Chapter 6 [VI.]—Another Error Out of His Second Book, to the Effect, that the Soul Deserved to Be Polluted by the Body.

 Chapter 7 [VII.]—Victor Entangles Himself in an Exceedingly Difficult Question. God’s Foreknowledge is No Cause of Sin.

 Chapter 8 [VIII.]—Victor’s Erroneous Opinion, that the Soul Deserved to Become Sinful.

 Chapter 9.—Victor Utterly Unable to Explain How the Sinless Soul Deserved to Be Made Sinful.

 Chapter 10 [IX.]—Another Error of Victor’s, that Infants Dying Unbaptized May Attain to the Kingdom of Heaven. Another, that the Sacrifice of the Body

 Chapter 11.—Martyrdom for Christ Supplies the Place of Baptism. The Faith of the Thief Who Was Crucified Along with Christ Taken as Martyrdom and Henc

 Chapter 12 [X.]—Dinocrates, Brother of the Martyr St. Perpetua, is Said to Have Been Delivered from the State of Condemnation by the Prayers of the Sa

 Chapter 13 [XI.]—The Sacrifice of the Body and Blood of Christ Will Not Avail for Unbaptized Persons, and Can Not Be Offered for the Majority of Those

 Chapter 14.—Victor’s Dilemma: He Must Either Say All Infants are Saved, or Else God Slays the Innocent.

 Chapter 15 [XII.]—God Does Not Judge Any One for What He Might Have Done If His Life Had Been Prolonged, But Simply for the Deeds He Actually Commits.

 Chapter 16 [XIII.]—Difficulty in the Opinion Which Maintains that Souls are Not by Propagation.

 Chapter 17 [XIV.]—He Shows that the Passages of Scripture Adduced by Victor Do Not Prove that Souls are Made by God in Such a Way as Not to Be Derived

 Chapter 18.—By “Breath” Is Signified Sometimes the Holy Spirit.

 Chapter 19.—The Meaning of “Breath” In Scripture.

 Chapter 20.—Other Ways of Taking the Passage.

 Chapter 21.—The Second Passage Quoted by Victor.

 Chapter 22.—Victor’s Third Quotation.

 Chapter 23.—His Fourth Quotation.

 Chapter 24 [XV.]—Whether or No the Soul is Derived by Natural Descent (Ex Traduce), His Cited Passages Fail to Show.

 Chapter 25.—Just as the Mother Knows Not Whence Comes Her Child Within Her, So We Know Not Whence Comes the Soul.

 Chapter 26 [XVI.]—The Fifth Passage of Scripture Quoted by Victor.

 Chapter 27 [XVII.]—Augustin Did Not Venture to Define Anything About the Propagation of the Soul.

 Chapter 28.—A Natural Figure of Speech Must Not Be Literally Pressed.

 Chapter 29 [XVIII.]—The Sixth Passage of Scripture Quoted by Victor.

 Chapter 30—The Danger of Arguing from Silence.

 Chapter 31.—The Argument of the Apollinarians to Prove that Christ Was Without the Human Soul of This Same Sort.

 Chapter 32 [XIX.]—The Self-Contradiction of Victor as to the Origin of the Soul.

 Chapter 33.—Augustin Has No Objection to the Opinion About the Propagation of Souls Being Refuted, and that About Their Insufflation Being Maintained.

 Chapter 34.—The Mistakes Which Must Be Avoided by Those Who Say that Men’s Souls are Not Derived from Their Parents, But are Afresh Inbreathed by God

 Chapter 35 [XX.]—Conclusion.

 Book II.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Depraved Eloquence an Injurious Accomplishment.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—He Asks What the Great Knowledge is that Victor Imparts.

 Chapter 3.—The Difference Between the Senses of the Body and Soul.

 Chapter 4.—To Believe the Soul is a Part of God is Blasphemy.

 Chapter 5 [III.]—In What Sense Created Beings are Out of God.

 Chapter 6.—Shall God’s Nature Be Mutable, Sinful, Impious, Even Eternally Damned.

 Chapter 7.—To Think the Soul Corporeal an Error.

 [IV.] Nor shall I find fault if your humble thanks to your instructor were further earned by your having acquired from discussions with him some other

 Chapter 8.—The Thirst of the Rich Man in Hell Does Not Prove the Soul to Be Corporeal.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—How Could the Incorporeal God Breathe Out of Himself a Corporeal Substance?

 Chapter 10 [VI.]—Children May Be Found of Like or of Unlike Dispositions with Their Parents.

 Chapter 11 [VII.]—Victor Implies that the Soul Had a “State” And “Merit” Before Incarnation.

 Chapter 12 [VIII.]—How Did the Soul Deserve to Be Incarnated?

 Chapter 13 [IX.]—Victor Teaches that God Thwarts His Own Predestination.

 Chapter 14 [X.]—Victor Sends Those Infants Who Die Unbaptized to Paradise and the Heavenly Mansions, But Not to the Kingdom of Heaven.

 Chapter 15 [XI.]—Victor “Decides” That Oblations Should Be Offered Up for Those Who Die Unbaptized.

 Chapter 16 [XII.]—Victor Promises to the Unbaptized Paradise After Their Death, and the Kingdom of Heaven After Their Resurrection, Although He Admits

 Chapter 17.—Disobedient Compassion and Compassionate Disobedience Reprobated. Martyrdom in Lieu of Baptism.

 Chapter 18 [XIII.]—Victor’s Dilemma and Fall.

 Chapter 19 [XIV.]—Victor Relies on Ambiguous Scriptures.

 Chapter 20.—Victor Quotes Scriptures for Their Silence, and Neglects the Biblical Usage.

 Chapter 21 [XV.]—Victor’s Perplexity and Failure.

 Chapter 22 [XVI.]—Peter’s Responsibility in the Case of Victor.

 Chapter 23 [XVII.]—Who They are that are Not Injured by Reading Injurious Books.

 Book III.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Augustin’s Purpose in Writing.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—Why Victor Assumed the Name of Vincentius. The Names of Evil Men Ought Never to Be Assumed by Other Persons.

 Chapter 3 [III.]—He Enumerates the Errors Which He Desires to Have Amended in the Books of Vincentius Victor. The First Error.

 Chapter 4 [IV.]—Victor’s Simile to Show that God Can Create by Breathing Without Impartation of His Substance.

 Chapter 5.—Examination of Victor’s Simile: Does Man Give Out Nothing by Breathing?

 Chapter 6.—The Simile Reformed in Accordance with Truth.

 Chapter 7 [V.]—Victor Apparently Gives the Creative Breath to Man Also.

 Chapter 8 [VI.]—Victor’s Second Error. (See Above in Book I. 26 [XVI.].)

 Chapter 9 [VII.]—His Third Error. (See Above in Book II. 11 [VII.].)

 Chapter 10.—His Fourth Error. (See Above in Book I. 6 [VI.] and Book II. 11 [VII.].)

 Chapter 11 [VIII.]—His Fifth Error. (See Above in Book I. 8 [VIII.] and Book II. 12 [VIII.].)

 Chapter 12 [IX.]—His Sixth Error. (See Above in Book I. 10-12 [IX., X.], and in Book II. 13, 14 [IX., X.].)

 Chapter 13 [X]—His Seventh Error. (See Above in Book II. 13 [IX.].)

 Chapter 14.—His Eighth Error. (See Above in Book II. 13 [IX.].)

 Chapter 15 [XI.]—His Ninth Error. (See Above in Book II. 14 [X.].)

 Chapter 16.—God Rules Everywhere: and Yet the “Kingdom of Heaven” May Not Be Everywhere.

 Chapter 17.—Where the Kingdom of God May Be Understood to Be.

 Chapter 18 [XII.]—His Tenth Error. (See Above in Book I. 13 [XI.] and Book II. 15 [XI.]).

 Chapter 19 [XIII.]—His Eleventh Error. (See Above in Book I. 15 [XII.] and Book II. 16.)

 Chapter 20 [XIV.]—Augustin Calls on Victor to Correct His Errors. (See Above in Book II. 22 [XVI.].)

 Chapter 21.—Augustin Compliments Victor’s Talents and Diligence.

 Chapter 22 [XV.]—A Summary Recapitulation of the Errors of Victor.

 Chapter 23.—Obstinacy Makes the Heretic.

 Book IV.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—The Personal Character of This Book.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Points Which Victor Thought Blameworthy in Augustin.

 Chapter 3.—How Much Do We Know of the Nature of the Body?

 Chapter 4 [III.]—Is the Question of Breath One that Concerns the Soul, or Body, or What?

 Chapter 5 [IV.]—God Alone Can Teach Whence Souls Come.

 Chapter 6 [V.]—Questions About the Nature of the Body are Sufficiently Mysterious, and Yet Not Higher Than Those of the Soul.

 Chapter 7 [VI.]—We Often Need More Teaching as to What is Most Intimately Ours Than as to What is Further from Us.

 Chapter 8.—We Have No Memory of Our Creation.

 Chapter 9 [VII.]—Our Ignorance of Ourselves Illustrated by the Remarkable Memory of One Simplicius.

 Chapter 10.—The Fidelity of Memory The Unsearchable Treasure of Memory The Powers of a Man’s Understanding Sufficiently Understood by None.

 Chapter 11.—The Apostle Peter Told No Lie, When He Said He Was Ready to Lay Down His Life for the Lord, But Only Was Ignorant of His Will.

 Chapter 12 [VIII.]—The Apostle Paul Could Know the Third Heaven and Paradise, But Not Whether He Was in the Body or Not.

 Chapter 13 [IX.]—In What Sense the Holy Ghost is Said to Make Intercession for Us.

 Chapter 14 [X.]—It is More Excellent to Know That the Flesh Will Rise Again and Live for Evermore, Than to Learn Whatever Scientific Men Have Been Abl

 Chapter 15 [XI.]—We Must Not Be Wise Above What is Written.

 Chapter 16.—Ignorance is Better Than Error. Predestination to Eternal Life, and Predestination to Eternal Death.

 Chapter 17 [XII.]—A Twofold Question to Be Treated Concerning the Soul Is It “Body”? and is It “Spirit”? What Body is.

 Chapter 18.—The First Question, Whether the Soul is Corporeal Breath and Wind, Nothing Else Than Air in Motion.

 Chapter 19 [XIII.]—Whether the Soul is a Spirit.

 Chapter 20 [XIV.]—The Body Does Not Receive God’s Image.

 Chapter 21 [XV.]—Recognition and Form Belong to Souls as Well as Bodies.

 Chapter 22.—Names Do Not Imply Corporeity.

 Chapter 23 [XVI.]—Figurative Speech Must Not Be Taken Literally.

 Chapter 24.—Abraham’s Bosom—What It Means.

 Chapter 25 [XVII.]—The Disembodied Soul May Think of Itself Under a Bodily Form.

 Chapter 26 [XVIII.]—St. Perpetua Seemed to Herself, in Some Dreams, to Have Been Turned into a Man, and Then Have Wrestled with a Certain Egyptian.

 Chapter 27.—Is the Soul Wounded When the Body is Wounded?

 Chapter 28.—Is the Soul Deformed by the Body’s Imperfections?

 Chapter 29 [XIX.]—Does the Soul Take the Body’s Clothes Also Away with It?

 Chapter 30.—Is Corporeity Necessary for Recognition?

 Chapter 31 [XX.]—Modes of Knowledge in the Soul Distinguished.

 Chapter 32.—Inconsistency of Giving the Soul All the Parts of Sex and Yet No Sex.

 Chapter 33.—The Phenix After Death Coming to Life Again.

 Chapter 34 [XXI.]—Prophetic Visions.

 Chapter 35.—Do Angels Appear to Men in Real Bodies?

 Chapter 36 [XXII.]—He Passes on to the Second Question About the Soul, Whether It is Called Spirit.

 Chapter 37 [XXIII.]—Wide and Narrow Sense of the Word “Spirit.”

 Chapter 38 [XXIV.]—Victor’s Chief Errors Again Pointed Out.

 Chapter 39.—Concluding Admonition.

Chapter 11 [VII.]—Victor Implies that the Soul Had a “State” And “Merit” Before Incarnation.

Would you hesitate yourself to reprobate what he has said concerning the soul? “You will not have it,” he says, “that the soul contracts from the sinful flesh the health, to which holy state you can see it in due course pass by means of the flesh, so as to amend its state through that by which it had lost its merit? Or is it because baptism washes the body that what is believed to be conferred by baptism does not pass on to the soul or spirit? It is only right, therefore, that the soul should, by means of the flesh, repair that old condition which it had seemed to have gradually lost through the flesh, in order that it may begin a regenerate state by means of that whereby it had deserved to be polluted.”67    See below, Book iii. 9. Now, do observe how grave an error this teacher has fallen into! He says that “the soul repairs its condition by means of the flesh through which it had lost its merit.” The soul, then, must have possessed some state and some good merit previous to the flesh, which he would have that it recovers through the flesh, when the flesh is cleansed in the laver of regeneration. Therefore, previous to the flesh, the soul had lived somewhere in a good state and merit, which state and merit it lost when it came into the flesh. His words are, “that the soul repairs by means of the flesh that primitive condition which it had seemed to have gradually lost through the flesh.” The soul, then, possessed before the flesh, an ancient condition (for his term “primitive” describes the antiquity of the state); and what could that ancient condition have possibly been, but a blessed and laudable state? Now, he avers that this happiness is recovered through the sacrament of baptism, although he will not admit that the soul derives its origin through propagation from that soul which was once manifestly happy in paradise. How is it, then, that in another passage he says that “he constantly affirms of the soul that it exists not by propagation, nor comes out of nothing, nor exists by its own self, nor previous to the body”? You see how in this place he insists that souls do exist prior to the body somewhere or other, and that in so happy a state that the same happiness is restored to them by means of baptism. But, as if forgetful of his own views, he goes on to speak of its “beginning a regenerate state by means of that,” meaning the flesh, “whereby it had deserved to be polluted.” In a previous statement he had indicated some good desert which had been lost by means of the flesh; now, however, he speaks of some evil desert, by means of which it had happened that the soul had to come, or be sent, into the flesh; for his words are, “By which it had deserved to be polluted;” and if it deserved to be polluted, its merits could not, of course, have been good. Pray let him tell us what sin it had committed previous to its pollution by the flesh, in consequence of which it merited such pollution by the flesh. Let him, if he can, explain to us a matter which is utterly beyond his power, because it is certainly far above his reach to discover what to tell us on this subject which shall be true.

CAPUT VII.

11. An vero tu reprobare dubitabis, quod cum de anima loqueretur, «Non vis,» inquit, animam ex carne peccati contrahere valetudinem, ad quam vicissim sanctificationem videas transire per carnem, ut per ipsam reparet statum, per quam perdiderat meritum? Aut numquid quia Baptismo corpus abluitur, non transit ad animam vel spiritum, quod creditur conferri per Baptismum? Merito ergo per carnem, priscam reparat habitudinem, quam visa fuerat paulisper amisisse per carnem, ut per eam incipiat renasci, per quam meruerat inquinari» (Infra, lib. 3, n. 9)? Vide in his verbis, quantum iste tuus erraverit doctor. Dixit, «animam per carnem reparare statum, per quam perdiderat meritum.» Habuit ergo anima aliquem statum et aliquod meritum bonum ante carnem, quod vult eam reparare per carnem, quando caro lavacro regenerationis abluitur. Vixerat itaque alicubi ante carnem in statu et merito bono; quem statum et quod meritum perdidit, cum venisset in carnem. Dixit, «eam per carnem reparare habitudinem priscam, quam visa fuerat paulisper amisisse per carnem.» Habuit ergo ante carnem habitudinem antiquam; hoc est enim «priscam:» et ista qualis esse potuit, nisi beata atque laudabilis habitudo? Quam reparari per sacramentum Baptismatis asseverat; cum eam nolit ex illa originem trahere per propaginem , quam constat in paradiso aliquando fuisse felicem. Quomodo igitur alio loco «animam» se dicit «constanter asserere, non ex traduce, neque ex nihilo, neque per semetipsam, neque ante corpus?» Ecce isto loco vult animas ante corpus alicubi vivere tam beate, ut eadem illis per Baptismum beatitudo reddatur. Et tanquam sui rursus oblitus adjungit et dicit: «Ut per eam,» id est, per carnem, «incipiat renasci, per quam meruerat inquinari.» Superius meritum significaverat bonum perditum fuisse per carnem: nunc autem significat malum meritum, quo factum est ut veniret vel mitteretur in carnem, dicendo, «per quam meruerat inquinari.» Si enim meretur inquinari, non est utique meritum bonum. Dicat, quid peccavit antequam per carnem inquinaretur, ut per carnem inquinari mereretur. Dicat, si potest, quod nullo modo potest; quia invenire hic quid verum dicat, omnino non potest.