A Treatise on the soul and its origin,

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Renatus Had Done Him a Kindness by Sending Him the Books Which Had Been Addressed to Him.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—He Receives with a Kindly and Patient Feeling the Books of a Young and Inexperienced Man Who Wrote Against Him in a Tone of Arrogance.

 Chapter 3 [III]—The Eloquence of Vincentius, Its Dangers and Its Tolerableness.

 Chapter 4 [IV.]—The Errors Contained in the Books of Vincentius Victor. He Says that the Soul Comes from God, But Was Not Made Either Out of Nothing o

 Chapter 5 [V.]—Another of Victor’s Errors, that the Soul is Corporeal.

 Chapter 6 [VI.]—Another Error Out of His Second Book, to the Effect, that the Soul Deserved to Be Polluted by the Body.

 Chapter 7 [VII.]—Victor Entangles Himself in an Exceedingly Difficult Question. God’s Foreknowledge is No Cause of Sin.

 Chapter 8 [VIII.]—Victor’s Erroneous Opinion, that the Soul Deserved to Become Sinful.

 Chapter 9.—Victor Utterly Unable to Explain How the Sinless Soul Deserved to Be Made Sinful.

 Chapter 10 [IX.]—Another Error of Victor’s, that Infants Dying Unbaptized May Attain to the Kingdom of Heaven. Another, that the Sacrifice of the Body

 Chapter 11.—Martyrdom for Christ Supplies the Place of Baptism. The Faith of the Thief Who Was Crucified Along with Christ Taken as Martyrdom and Henc

 Chapter 12 [X.]—Dinocrates, Brother of the Martyr St. Perpetua, is Said to Have Been Delivered from the State of Condemnation by the Prayers of the Sa

 Chapter 13 [XI.]—The Sacrifice of the Body and Blood of Christ Will Not Avail for Unbaptized Persons, and Can Not Be Offered for the Majority of Those

 Chapter 14.—Victor’s Dilemma: He Must Either Say All Infants are Saved, or Else God Slays the Innocent.

 Chapter 15 [XII.]—God Does Not Judge Any One for What He Might Have Done If His Life Had Been Prolonged, But Simply for the Deeds He Actually Commits.

 Chapter 16 [XIII.]—Difficulty in the Opinion Which Maintains that Souls are Not by Propagation.

 Chapter 17 [XIV.]—He Shows that the Passages of Scripture Adduced by Victor Do Not Prove that Souls are Made by God in Such a Way as Not to Be Derived

 Chapter 18.—By “Breath” Is Signified Sometimes the Holy Spirit.

 Chapter 19.—The Meaning of “Breath” In Scripture.

 Chapter 20.—Other Ways of Taking the Passage.

 Chapter 21.—The Second Passage Quoted by Victor.

 Chapter 22.—Victor’s Third Quotation.

 Chapter 23.—His Fourth Quotation.

 Chapter 24 [XV.]—Whether or No the Soul is Derived by Natural Descent (Ex Traduce), His Cited Passages Fail to Show.

 Chapter 25.—Just as the Mother Knows Not Whence Comes Her Child Within Her, So We Know Not Whence Comes the Soul.

 Chapter 26 [XVI.]—The Fifth Passage of Scripture Quoted by Victor.

 Chapter 27 [XVII.]—Augustin Did Not Venture to Define Anything About the Propagation of the Soul.

 Chapter 28.—A Natural Figure of Speech Must Not Be Literally Pressed.

 Chapter 29 [XVIII.]—The Sixth Passage of Scripture Quoted by Victor.

 Chapter 30—The Danger of Arguing from Silence.

 Chapter 31.—The Argument of the Apollinarians to Prove that Christ Was Without the Human Soul of This Same Sort.

 Chapter 32 [XIX.]—The Self-Contradiction of Victor as to the Origin of the Soul.

 Chapter 33.—Augustin Has No Objection to the Opinion About the Propagation of Souls Being Refuted, and that About Their Insufflation Being Maintained.

 Chapter 34.—The Mistakes Which Must Be Avoided by Those Who Say that Men’s Souls are Not Derived from Their Parents, But are Afresh Inbreathed by God

 Chapter 35 [XX.]—Conclusion.

 Book II.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Depraved Eloquence an Injurious Accomplishment.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—He Asks What the Great Knowledge is that Victor Imparts.

 Chapter 3.—The Difference Between the Senses of the Body and Soul.

 Chapter 4.—To Believe the Soul is a Part of God is Blasphemy.

 Chapter 5 [III.]—In What Sense Created Beings are Out of God.

 Chapter 6.—Shall God’s Nature Be Mutable, Sinful, Impious, Even Eternally Damned.

 Chapter 7.—To Think the Soul Corporeal an Error.

 [IV.] Nor shall I find fault if your humble thanks to your instructor were further earned by your having acquired from discussions with him some other

 Chapter 8.—The Thirst of the Rich Man in Hell Does Not Prove the Soul to Be Corporeal.

 Chapter 9 [V.]—How Could the Incorporeal God Breathe Out of Himself a Corporeal Substance?

 Chapter 10 [VI.]—Children May Be Found of Like or of Unlike Dispositions with Their Parents.

 Chapter 11 [VII.]—Victor Implies that the Soul Had a “State” And “Merit” Before Incarnation.

 Chapter 12 [VIII.]—How Did the Soul Deserve to Be Incarnated?

 Chapter 13 [IX.]—Victor Teaches that God Thwarts His Own Predestination.

 Chapter 14 [X.]—Victor Sends Those Infants Who Die Unbaptized to Paradise and the Heavenly Mansions, But Not to the Kingdom of Heaven.

 Chapter 15 [XI.]—Victor “Decides” That Oblations Should Be Offered Up for Those Who Die Unbaptized.

 Chapter 16 [XII.]—Victor Promises to the Unbaptized Paradise After Their Death, and the Kingdom of Heaven After Their Resurrection, Although He Admits

 Chapter 17.—Disobedient Compassion and Compassionate Disobedience Reprobated. Martyrdom in Lieu of Baptism.

 Chapter 18 [XIII.]—Victor’s Dilemma and Fall.

 Chapter 19 [XIV.]—Victor Relies on Ambiguous Scriptures.

 Chapter 20.—Victor Quotes Scriptures for Their Silence, and Neglects the Biblical Usage.

 Chapter 21 [XV.]—Victor’s Perplexity and Failure.

 Chapter 22 [XVI.]—Peter’s Responsibility in the Case of Victor.

 Chapter 23 [XVII.]—Who They are that are Not Injured by Reading Injurious Books.

 Book III.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—Augustin’s Purpose in Writing.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—Why Victor Assumed the Name of Vincentius. The Names of Evil Men Ought Never to Be Assumed by Other Persons.

 Chapter 3 [III.]—He Enumerates the Errors Which He Desires to Have Amended in the Books of Vincentius Victor. The First Error.

 Chapter 4 [IV.]—Victor’s Simile to Show that God Can Create by Breathing Without Impartation of His Substance.

 Chapter 5.—Examination of Victor’s Simile: Does Man Give Out Nothing by Breathing?

 Chapter 6.—The Simile Reformed in Accordance with Truth.

 Chapter 7 [V.]—Victor Apparently Gives the Creative Breath to Man Also.

 Chapter 8 [VI.]—Victor’s Second Error. (See Above in Book I. 26 [XVI.].)

 Chapter 9 [VII.]—His Third Error. (See Above in Book II. 11 [VII.].)

 Chapter 10.—His Fourth Error. (See Above in Book I. 6 [VI.] and Book II. 11 [VII.].)

 Chapter 11 [VIII.]—His Fifth Error. (See Above in Book I. 8 [VIII.] and Book II. 12 [VIII.].)

 Chapter 12 [IX.]—His Sixth Error. (See Above in Book I. 10-12 [IX., X.], and in Book II. 13, 14 [IX., X.].)

 Chapter 13 [X]—His Seventh Error. (See Above in Book II. 13 [IX.].)

 Chapter 14.—His Eighth Error. (See Above in Book II. 13 [IX.].)

 Chapter 15 [XI.]—His Ninth Error. (See Above in Book II. 14 [X.].)

 Chapter 16.—God Rules Everywhere: and Yet the “Kingdom of Heaven” May Not Be Everywhere.

 Chapter 17.—Where the Kingdom of God May Be Understood to Be.

 Chapter 18 [XII.]—His Tenth Error. (See Above in Book I. 13 [XI.] and Book II. 15 [XI.]).

 Chapter 19 [XIII.]—His Eleventh Error. (See Above in Book I. 15 [XII.] and Book II. 16.)

 Chapter 20 [XIV.]—Augustin Calls on Victor to Correct His Errors. (See Above in Book II. 22 [XVI.].)

 Chapter 21.—Augustin Compliments Victor’s Talents and Diligence.

 Chapter 22 [XV.]—A Summary Recapitulation of the Errors of Victor.

 Chapter 23.—Obstinacy Makes the Heretic.

 Book IV.

 Chapter 1 [I.]—The Personal Character of This Book.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—The Points Which Victor Thought Blameworthy in Augustin.

 Chapter 3.—How Much Do We Know of the Nature of the Body?

 Chapter 4 [III.]—Is the Question of Breath One that Concerns the Soul, or Body, or What?

 Chapter 5 [IV.]—God Alone Can Teach Whence Souls Come.

 Chapter 6 [V.]—Questions About the Nature of the Body are Sufficiently Mysterious, and Yet Not Higher Than Those of the Soul.

 Chapter 7 [VI.]—We Often Need More Teaching as to What is Most Intimately Ours Than as to What is Further from Us.

 Chapter 8.—We Have No Memory of Our Creation.

 Chapter 9 [VII.]—Our Ignorance of Ourselves Illustrated by the Remarkable Memory of One Simplicius.

 Chapter 10.—The Fidelity of Memory The Unsearchable Treasure of Memory The Powers of a Man’s Understanding Sufficiently Understood by None.

 Chapter 11.—The Apostle Peter Told No Lie, When He Said He Was Ready to Lay Down His Life for the Lord, But Only Was Ignorant of His Will.

 Chapter 12 [VIII.]—The Apostle Paul Could Know the Third Heaven and Paradise, But Not Whether He Was in the Body or Not.

 Chapter 13 [IX.]—In What Sense the Holy Ghost is Said to Make Intercession for Us.

 Chapter 14 [X.]—It is More Excellent to Know That the Flesh Will Rise Again and Live for Evermore, Than to Learn Whatever Scientific Men Have Been Abl

 Chapter 15 [XI.]—We Must Not Be Wise Above What is Written.

 Chapter 16.—Ignorance is Better Than Error. Predestination to Eternal Life, and Predestination to Eternal Death.

 Chapter 17 [XII.]—A Twofold Question to Be Treated Concerning the Soul Is It “Body”? and is It “Spirit”? What Body is.

 Chapter 18.—The First Question, Whether the Soul is Corporeal Breath and Wind, Nothing Else Than Air in Motion.

 Chapter 19 [XIII.]—Whether the Soul is a Spirit.

 Chapter 20 [XIV.]—The Body Does Not Receive God’s Image.

 Chapter 21 [XV.]—Recognition and Form Belong to Souls as Well as Bodies.

 Chapter 22.—Names Do Not Imply Corporeity.

 Chapter 23 [XVI.]—Figurative Speech Must Not Be Taken Literally.

 Chapter 24.—Abraham’s Bosom—What It Means.

 Chapter 25 [XVII.]—The Disembodied Soul May Think of Itself Under a Bodily Form.

 Chapter 26 [XVIII.]—St. Perpetua Seemed to Herself, in Some Dreams, to Have Been Turned into a Man, and Then Have Wrestled with a Certain Egyptian.

 Chapter 27.—Is the Soul Wounded When the Body is Wounded?

 Chapter 28.—Is the Soul Deformed by the Body’s Imperfections?

 Chapter 29 [XIX.]—Does the Soul Take the Body’s Clothes Also Away with It?

 Chapter 30.—Is Corporeity Necessary for Recognition?

 Chapter 31 [XX.]—Modes of Knowledge in the Soul Distinguished.

 Chapter 32.—Inconsistency of Giving the Soul All the Parts of Sex and Yet No Sex.

 Chapter 33.—The Phenix After Death Coming to Life Again.

 Chapter 34 [XXI.]—Prophetic Visions.

 Chapter 35.—Do Angels Appear to Men in Real Bodies?

 Chapter 36 [XXII.]—He Passes on to the Second Question About the Soul, Whether It is Called Spirit.

 Chapter 37 [XXIII.]—Wide and Narrow Sense of the Word “Spirit.”

 Chapter 38 [XXIV.]—Victor’s Chief Errors Again Pointed Out.

 Chapter 39.—Concluding Admonition.

Chapter 2 [II.]—Why Victor Assumed the Name of Vincentius. The Names of Evil Men Ought Never to Be Assumed by Other Persons.

The first thing which caused me some anxiety about you was the title which appeared in your books with your name; for on inquiring of those who knew you, and were probably your associates in opinion, who Vincentius Victor was, I found that you had been a Donatist, or rather a Rogatist, but had lately come into communion with the catholic Church. Now, while I was rejoicing, as one naturally does at the recovery of those whom he sees rescued from that system of error,—and in your case my joy was all the greater because I saw that your ability, which so much delighted me in your writings, had not remained behind with the enemies of truth,—additional information was given me by your friends which caused me sorrow amid my joy, to the effect that you wished to have the name Vincentius prefixed to your own name, inasmuch as you still held in affectionate regard the successor of Rogatus, who bore this name, as a great and holy man, and that for this reason you wished his name to become your surname. Some persons also told me that you had, moreover, boasted about his having appeared in some sort of a vision to you, and assisted you in composing those books the subject of which I have discussed with you in this small work of mine, and to such an extent as to dictate to you himself the precise topics and arguments which you were to write about. Now, if all this be true, I no longer wonder at your having been able to make those statements which, if you will only lend a patient ear to my admonition, and with the attention of a catholic duly consider and weigh those books, you will undoubtedly come to regret having ever advanced. For he who, according to the apostle’s portrait, “transforms himself into an angel of light,”95    Tobit iv. 5, 6; compare ii. 10.    2 Cor. xi. 14. has transformed himself before you into a shape which you believe to have been, or still to be, an angel of light. In this way, indeed, he is less able to deceive catholics when his transformations are not into angels of light, but into heretics; now, however, that you are a catholic, I should be sorry for you to be beguiled by him. He will certainly feel torture at your having learnt the truth, and so much the more in proportion to the pleasure he formerly experienced in having persuaded you to believe error. With a view, however, to your refraining from loving a dead person, when the love can neither be serviceable to yourself nor profitable to him, I advise you to consider for a moment this one point—that he is not, of course, a just and holy man, since you withdrew yourself from the snares of the Donatists or Rogatists on the score of their heresy; but if you do think him to be just and holy, you ruin yourself by holding communion with catholics. You are, indeed, only feigning yourself a catholic if you are in mind the same as he was on whom you bestow your love; and you are aware how terribly the Scripture has spoken on this subject: “The Holy Spirit of discipline will flee from the man who feigns.”96    Ps. xiii. 3.    Wisd. i. 5. If, however, you are sincere in communicating with us, and do not merely pretend to be a catholic, how is it that you still love a dead man to such a degree as to be willing even now to boast of the name of one in whose errors you no longer permit yourself to be held? We really do not like your having such a surname, as if you were the monument of a dead heretic. Nor do we like your book to have such a title as we should say was a false one if we read it on his tomb. For we are sure Vincentius is not Victor, the conqueror, but Victus, the conquered;—may it be, however, with fruitful effect, even as we wish you to be conquered by the truth! And yet your thought was an astute and skilful one, when you designated the books, which you wish us to suppose were dictated to you by his inspiration, by the name of Vincentius Victor; as much as to intimate that it was rather he than you who wished to be designated by the victorious appellation, as having been himself the conqueror of error, by revealing to you what were to be the contents of your written treatise. But of what avail is all this to you, my son? Be, I pray you, a true catholic, not a feigned one, lest the Holy Spirit should flee from you, and that Vincentius be unable to profit you at all, into whom the most malignant spirit of error has transformed himself for the purpose of deceiving you; for it is from that one that all these evil opinions have proceeded, notwithstanding the artful fraud which has persuaded you to the contrary. If this admonition shall only induce you to correct these errors with the humility of a God-fearing man and the peaceful submission of a catholic, they will be regarded as the mistakes of an over-zealous young man, who is eager rather to amend them than to persevere in them. But if he shall have by his influence prevailed on you to contend for these opinions with obstinate perseverance, which God forbid, it will in such a case be necessary to condemn them and their author as heretical, as is required by the pastoral and remedial nature of the Church’s charge, to check the dire contagion before it quietly spreads through the heedless masses, while wholesome correction is neglected, under the name but without the reality of love.

CAPUT II.

2. Prius me in libris tuis titulus tui nominis pro te sollicitum reddidit. Cum enim quis esset Vincentius Victor, ab eis qui te noverant, et forte aderant, requisissem; audivi te fuisse Donatistam, 0511 vel potius Rogatistam, nuper autem communicasse Catholicae. Et cum gauderem tantum, quantum de his solemus, quos ab illo errore liberatos esse cognoscimus; imo vero etiam multo amplius, quod ingenium tuum, quod delectabar in litteris tuis, videbam non remansisse apud adversarios veritatis: additum est a referentibus, quo me inter illa gaudia contristaret, ideo te cognominari voluisse Vincentium, quod Rogati successorem, qui hoc nomine appellatus est, adhuc tanquam magnum et sanctum virum animo teneas; et ob hoc illius nomen, tuum volueris esse cognomen. Nec defuerunt qui dicerent, etiam hoc a te fuisse jactatum , quod ipse tibi nescio qua visione apparuerit, atque ad hos conficiendos libros, de quibus tecum agere isto nostro opusculo institui, sic adjuverit, ut ea tibi scribenda , quantum ad res ipsas rationesque attinet, ipse dictaret. Quod si verum est, jam te illa dicere potuisse non miror, quae, si patienter auscultes admonitioni meae, et eos libros catholica mente consideres atque pertractes, te dixisse procul dubio poenitebit. Ille quippe qui se, sicut eum prodit Apostolus, transfigurat in angelum lucis (II Cor. XI, 14), in eum tibi est transfiguratus, quem tu fuisse vel esse tanquam lucis angelum credis. Et eo quidem modo minus ad decipiendos Catholicos valet, quando se non in lucis angelos, sed in haereticos transfigurat: sed te ab eo falli jam catholicum nollem. Crucietur ergo te didicisse quae vera sunt, quanto magis laetatus fuerat se tibi persuasisse quae falsa sunt. Ut autem non diligas hominem mortuum, cujus dilectio tibi obesse potest, prodesse illi non potest; hoc breviter intuearis admoneo; quod utique ille non est sanctus et justus, si tu haereticorum Donatistarum vel Rogatistarum laqueos evasisti: si autem illum sanctum et justum arbitraris, tu communicando Catholicis interisti. Profecto enim te catholicum fingis, si animo illud es , quod erat ille quem diligis. Et nosti quam terribiliter scriptum sit, quod Spiritus sanctus disciplinae fugiet fictum (Sap. I, 5). Si autem veraciter communicans, non te catholicum fingis; quid adhuc haereticum mortuum sic diligis, ut ejus velis te jactare adhuc nomine, cujus jam non teneris errore? Nolumus te habere tale cognomentum, tanquam sis haeretici mortui monumentum. Nolumus talem titulum habere librum tuum, qualem falsum esse diceremus, si in ejus sepulcro legeremus. Non enim Vincentium victorem scimus esse, sed victum: et utinam fructuose, sicut te vinci volumus veritate. Astute autem putaris et callide, cum libros tuos, quos credi cupis illo tibi revelante dictatos, appellas Vincentii Victoris, non tam Vincentium te quam illum vocari voluisse Victorem, velut tibi revelando quae scriberes, vicisset errorem. Utquid tibi ista, fili? Esto potius verus, non fictus catholicus, ne te fugiat Spiritus sanctus, et nihil tibi 0512 possit prodesse Vincentius, in quem se ad te fallendum transfiguravit malignissimus spiritus: ejus quippe sunt illa, qualibet tibi fraude persuasa. Quae si admonitus pia humilitate et catholica pace correxeris, errores fuisse judicabuntur studiosissimi juvenis, emendari potius quam in eis remanere cupientis. Si autem pro eis tibi etiam contentionem, quod absit, persuaserit pervicacem; jam tanquam haeretica dogmata cum suo necesse erit auctore damnari, cura scilicet pastorali et medicinali, priusquam per incautum vulgus serpant dira contagia, cum dilectionis non veritate, sed nomine, salubris negligitur disciplina .