ACTA BENEDICTI PP. XVI

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale632

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 633

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale634

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 635

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale636

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 637

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale638

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 639

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale640

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 641

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale642

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 643

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale644

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 645

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale646

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 647

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale648

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 649

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale650

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 651

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale652

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 653

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale654

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 655

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale656

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 657

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale658

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 659

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale660

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 661

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale662

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 663

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale664

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 665

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale666

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 667

 werden und nicht zu viele einseitige Polemiken hervorzurufen. Ich würde

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 669

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale670

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 671

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale672

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 673

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale674

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 675

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale676

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 677

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale678

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 679

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale680

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 681

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale682

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 683

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale684

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 685

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale686

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 687

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale688

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 689

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale690

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 691

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale692

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 693

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale694

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 695

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale696

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 697

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale698

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 699

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale700

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 701

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale702

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 703

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale704

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 705

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale706

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 707

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale708

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 709

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale710

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 711

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale712

 Congregatio pro Episcopis 713

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale714

 Diarium Romanae Curiae 715

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale716

 Diarium Romanae Curiae 717

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale718

Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale688

(a) The nature of the Framework Document

The text in question was published as the Framework Document, the sub-

title of which describes it as a "report" of the Advisory Committee. In fact, it

is, as Cardinal Daly and Archbishop Connell had earlier explained, not an

official document of the Irish Bishops' Conference but a document of the

Irish Catholic Bishops' Advisory Committee on Child Sexual Abuse by

Priests and Religious, which holds the copyright. In the Foreword, signed

by Cardinal Daly and by the Reverend John Byrne OSA, then President of

the Conference of Religious of Ireland, the text is continuously referred to as

a "report" and is recommended "to individual dioceses and congregations as a

framework for addressing the issue of child sexual abuse" (p. [9]). The authors

of the Foreword also state: "This document is far from being the final word on

how to address the issues which have been raised. In common with others in

society the Church must continuously seek ways to improve its response to this

grave wrong, the sexual abuse of children" (p. [10]).

Subsequently, in a letter addressed to Archbishop Storero on 10 October

1996, the then Secretary of the Irish Bishops' Conference, Bishop Michael

Smith, in reference to the Framework Document confirmed that "The docu-

ment was not promulgated by decree of the Episcopal Conference nor was it

approved by the Conference. It was accepted by the Conference and offered to

each individual Bishop and religious Superior as guidelines that could - and

indeed should - be followed in dealing with allegations of child sexual abuse

against priests and religious." As the Cloyne Report acknowledges, "The under-

standing was that each diocese or religious institute would enact its own

particular protocol for dealing with complaints" (4.16).

The Congregation for the Clergy wrote to Archbishop Storero on 21

January 1997 and pointed out the existence of various difficulties

concerning the Framework Document, which the Nuncio subsequently

communicated to the Bishops. These are commented on in the following

sections.

The Congregation's description of the Framework Document as a "study

document", which was based on the explanations of its nature as provided by

the Irish Bishops and in the published text itself, was not a dismissal of the

serious efforts undertaken by the Irish Bishops to address the grave problem

of child sexual abuse. The Congregation, taking cognizance of the Bishops'

intention not to make the document binding, while at the same time aware

that each individual Bishop intended to adopt it for his Diocese to deal with