ACTA BENEDICTI PP. XVI

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale632

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 633

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale634

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 635

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale636

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 637

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale638

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 639

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale640

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 641

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale642

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 643

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale644

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 645

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale646

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 647

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale648

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 649

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale650

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 651

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale652

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 653

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale654

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 655

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale656

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 657

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale658

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 659

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale660

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 661

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale662

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 663

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale664

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 665

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale666

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 667

 werden und nicht zu viele einseitige Polemiken hervorzurufen. Ich würde

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 669

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale670

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 671

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale672

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 673

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale674

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 675

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale676

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 677

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale678

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 679

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale680

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 681

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale682

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 683

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale684

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 685

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale686

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 687

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale688

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 689

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale690

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 691

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale692

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 693

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale694

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 695

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale696

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 697

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale698

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 699

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale700

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 701

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale702

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 703

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale704

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 705

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale706

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 707

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale708

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 709

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale710

 Acta Benedicti Pp. XVI 711

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale712

 Congregatio pro Episcopis 713

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale714

 Diarium Romanae Curiae 715

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale716

 Diarium Romanae Curiae 717

 Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale718

Acta Apostolicae Sedis - Commentarium Officiale696

20 July 2011. However, it has significant reservations about some elements

of the speech.

In particular, the accusation that the Holy See attempted "to frustrate an

Inquiry in a sovereign, democratic republic as little as three years ago, not three

decades ago", which Mr Kenny made no attempt to substantiate, is un-

founded. Indeed, when asked, a Government spokesperson clarified that

Mr Kenny was not referring to any specific incident. In fact, accusations of

interference by the Holy See are belied by the many Reports cited as the

basis for such criticisms. Those Reports - lauded for their exhaustive in-

vestigation of sexual abuse and the way it was managed - contain no evi-

dence to suggest that the Holy See meddled in the internal affairs of the Irish

State or, for that matter, was involved in the day-to-day management of

Irish dioceses or religious congregations with respect to sexual abuse issues.

Indeed, what is impressive about these Reports, and the vast information

that they rely upon, is that there is no support for these accusations.

The Cloyne Report itself contains no statement that would lend support to

Mr Kenny's accusations. In fact, when the Apostolic Nuncio in Ireland was

asked by the Commission of Inquiry "to submit to it any information which you

have about the matters under investigation", the Commission received a reply to

the effect that the Apostolic Nunciature "does not determine the handling of

cases of sexual abuse in Ireland and therefore is unable to assist you in this

matter. In fact, such cases are managed according to the responsibility of local

ecclesiastical authorities, in this instance, the Diocese of Cloyne. Like all eccle-

siastical entities in Ireland, the Diocese of Cloyne is bound to act in accordance

with canon law and with all civil laws and regulations of Ireland as may be

applicable" (2.11).

In this regard, the Holy See wishes to make it quite clear that it in no way

hampered or interfered in the Inquiry into child sexual abuse cases in the

Diocese of Cloyne. Furthermore, at no stage did it seek to interfere with Irish

civil law or impede the civil authority in the exercise of its duties. In point of

fact, as the Apostolic Nuncio's response to the Commission indicates, the

Holy See expected the Diocesan authorities to act in conformity with Irish

civil law. It should also be noted that the Commission of Inquiry acknowl-

edges "the full co-operation it received from all parties involved in the investiga-

tion and their legal advisers" (1.79).

Mr Kenny also cited the then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger to the effect that

"Standards of conduct appropriate to civil society or the workings of a democracy