38. Do you think, wretched heretic of today, that Peter would have been the more blessed now, if he had said, ‘Thou art Christ, God’s perfect creature, His handiwork, though excelling all His other works. Thy beginning was from nothing, and through the goodness of God, Who alone is good, the name of Son has been given Thee by adoption, although in fact Thou wast not born from God?’ What answer, think you, would have been given to such words as these, when this same Peter’s reply to the announcement of the Passion, Be it far from Thee, Lord; this shall not be, was rebuked with, Get thee behind Me, Satan, thou art an offence unto Me308    St. Matt. xvi. 22, 23.? Yet309    Omitting nec. Peter could plead his human ignorance in extenuation of his guilt, for as yet the Father had not revealed all the mystery of the Passion; still, mere defect of faith was visited with this stern condemnation. Now, why was it that the Father did not reveal to Peter your true confession, this faith in an adopted creature? I fancy that God must have grudged him the knowledge of the truth; that He wanted to postpone it to a later age, and keep it as a novelty for your modern preachers. Yes; you may have a change of faith, if the keys of heaven are changed. You may have a change of faith, if there is a change in that Church against which the gates of hell shall not prevail. You may have a change of faith, if there shall be a fresh apostolate, binding and loosing in heaven what it has bound and loosed on earth. You may have a change of faith, if another Christ the Son of God, beside the true Christ, shall be preached. But if that faith which confesses Christ as the Son of God, and that faith only, received in Peter’s person every accumulated blessing, then perforce the faith which proclaims Him a creature, made out of nothing, holds not the keys of the Church and is a stranger to the apostolic faith and power. It is neither the Church’s310    Reading ecclesiæ. faith, nor is it Christ’s.

38. Haereticorum sententia Petro ignota. Non alia nisi Petri fides.---An ne, o miser, quisquis hodie es, haeretice, beatiorem Petrum futurum fuisse existimas, si dixisset: Tu es Christus perfecta Dei creatura, et 0188B supereminens facturis omnibus factura, et qui ex nihilo esse coepisti, et per bonitatem Dei, qui bonus solus est, nomen filii adoptione meruisti, et qui non ex Deo natus es? Et quaero a te, quid auditurus fuerit 162 haec dicens, qui audita passione respondens, Propitius tibi, Domine, non erit istud (Matth. XVI, 22), audierit sibi dici: Vade retro post me, satanas, scandalum mihi es (Ibid. 23)? Nec Petro tamen humana ignorantia profecit ad crimen; non enim ei Pater adhuc omne passionis mysterium revelaverat: sed fides parva sententiam damnationis excepit. Cur igitur non hanc confessionis fidem Pater Petro revelavit, creaturam scilicet et adoptionem? Invidit, credo, hic Petro Deus, ut in tempora posteriora dissimulans, haec nunc vobis novis praedicatoribus 0188C reservaret. Sit sane fides alia, si aliae claves regni coelorum sunt. Sit fides alia, si Ecclesia alia est futura, adversum quam portae inferni non praevalebunt. Sit fides alia, si erit alius apostolatus, ligata et soluta per se in terra, ligans in coelo atque solvens. Sit fides alia, si Christus alius Dei filius, praeter quam 0189A qui est, praedicabitur. Sin vero haec fides sola, confessa Christum Dei filium, omnium beatitudinum gloriam meruit in Petro; necesse est ut ea, quae eum creaturam potius ex nihilo confitebitur, claves regni coelorum non adepta, et extra fidem ac virtutem apostolicam constituta, nec Ecclesia sit illa, nec Christi.