Dubious or spurious writings.

 A sectional confession of faith.

 Part ii.—dubious or spurious writings.

 Ii.

 Iii.

 Iv.

 V.

 Vi.

 Vii.

 Viii.

 Ix.

 X.

 Xi.

 Xii.

 Xiii.

 Xiv.

 Xv.

 Xvi.

 Xvii.

 Xviii.

 Xix.

 Xx.

 Xxi.

 Xxii.

 Xxiii.

 A fragment of the same declaration of faith, accompanied by glosses. —from gregory thaumaturgus, as they say, in his sectional confession of faith.

 Elucidations.

 On the trinity.

 On the trinity.

 Elucidation.

 Twelve topics on the faith.

 Twelve topics on the faith.

 Topic ii.

 Topic iii.

 Topic iv.

 Topic v.

 Topic vi.

 Topic vii.

 Topic viii.

 Topic ix.

 Topic x.

 Topic xi.

 Topic xii.

 Elucidations.

 On the subject of the soul.

 On the subject of the soul.

 I. wherein is the criterion for the apprehension of the soul.

 Ii. whether the soul exists.

 Iii. whether the soul is a substance.

 Iv. whether the soul is incorporeal.

 V. whether the soul is simple or compound.

 Vi. whether our soul is immortal.

 Vii. whether our soul is rational.

 Elucidations.

 Four homilies.

 Four homilies.

 The second homily.

 The third homily.

 The fourth homily.

 Elucidations.

 On all the saints.

 On all the saints.

 Elucidations.

 On the gospel according to matthew.

Elucidations.

I can do no better than follow Dupin as to the authorship of these Homilies. He thinks the style of Proclus (of Constantinople) may be detected in them, though the fourth is beyond him for eloquence, and has even been thought worthy of St. Chrysostom. It was produced after Nicæa, and probably after Ephesus, its somewhat exaggerated praises of the θεοτόκος being unusual at an earlier period. The titles of these Homilies are the work of much later editors; and interpolations probably occur frequently, by the same hands.