Dubious or Spurious Writings.

 A Sectional Confession of Faith.

 Part II.—Dubious or Spurious Writings.

 II.

 III.

 IV.

 V.

 VI.

 VII.

 VIII.

 IX.

 X.

 XI.

 XII.

 XIII.

 XIV.

 XV.

 XVI.

 XVII.

 XVIII.

 XIX.

 XX.

 XXI.

 XXII.

 XXIII.

 To maintain two natures in the one Christ, makes a Tetrad of the Trinity, says he for he expressed himself thus: “And it is the true God, the unincar

 Elucidations.

 On the Trinity.

 On the Trinity.

 Elucidation.

 Twelve Topics on the Faith.

 Twelve Topics on the Faith.

 Topic II.

 Topic III.

 Topic IV.

 Topic V.

 Topic VI.

 Topic VII.

 Topic VIII.

 Topic IX.

 Topic X.

 Topic XI.

 Topic XII.

 Elucidations.

 On the Subject of the Soul.

 You have instructed us, most excellent Tatian, to forward for your use a discourse upon the soul, laying it out in effective demonstrations. And this

 I. Wherein is the Criterion for the Apprehension of the Soul.

 II. Whether the Soul Exists.

 III. Whether the Soul is a Substance.

 IV. Whether the Soul is Incorporeal.

 V. Whether the Soul is Simple or Compound.

 VI. Whether Our Soul is Immortal.

 VII. Whether Our Soul is Rational.

 Elucidations.

 Four Homilies.

 The First Homily.

 The Second Homily.

 The Third Homily.

 The Fourth Homily.

 Elucidations.

 On All the Saints.

 Grant thy blessing, Lord.

 Elucidations.

 (Chapter VI. 22, 23.)

A Fragment of the Same Declaration of Faith, Accompanied by Glosses.97 From the book against the Monophysites by Leontius of Jerusalem, in Mai, Script. Vet., vol. vii. p. 147.—From Gregory Thaumaturgus, as They Say, in His Sectional Confession of Faith.

To maintain two natures98 φύσεις. in the one Christ, makes a Tetrad of the Trinity, says he; for he expressed himself thus: “And it is the true God, the unincarnate, that was manifested in the flesh, perfect with the true and divine perfection, not with two natures; nor do we speak of worshipping four (persons), viz., God, and the Son of God, and man, and the Holy Spirit.” First, however, this passage is misapprehended, and is of very doubtful import. Nevertheless it bears that we should not speak of two persons in Christ, lest, by thus acknowledging Him as God, and as in the perfect divinity, and yet speaking of two persons, we should make a Tetrad of the divine persons, counting that of God the Father as one, and that of the Son of God as one, and that of the man as one, and that of the Holy Spirit as one. But, again, it bears also against recognising two divine natures,99 φύσεις. and rather for acknowledging Him to be perfect God in one natural divine perfection, and not in two; for his object is to show that He became incarnate without change, and that He retains the divinity without duplication.100 ἀδιπλασιάστως. Accordingly he says shortly: “And while the affections of the flesh spring, the energy101 δύναμις. retains the impassibility proper to it. He, therefore, who introduces the (idea of) passion into the energy is impious; for it was the Lord of glory that appeared in human form, having taken to Himself the human economy.”