Origen's Commentary on the Gospel of John.

 Book I.

 Origen’s Commentary on the Gospel of John.

 2. The 144,000 Sealed in the Apocalypse are Converts to Christ from the Gentile World.

 3. In the Spiritual Israel the High-Priests are Those Who Devote Themselves to the Study of Scripture.

 4. The Study of the Gospels is the First Fruits Offered by These Priests of Christianity.

 5. All Scripture is Gospel But the Gospels are Distinguished Above Other Scriptures.

 6. The Fourfold Gospel. John’s the First Fruits of the Four. Qualifications Necessary for Interpreting It.

 7. What Good Things are Announced in the Gospels.

 8. How the Gospels Cause the Other Books of Scripture Also to Be Gospel.

 9. The Somatic and the Spiritual Gospel.

 10. How Jesus Himself is the Gospel.

 11. Jesus is All Good Things Hence the Gospel is Manifold.

 12. The Gospel Contains the Ill Deeds Also Which Were Done to Jesus.

 13. The Angels Also are Evangelists.

 14. The Old Testament, Typified by John, is the Beginning of the Gospel.

 15. The Gospel is in the Old Testament, and Indeed in the Whole Universe. Prayer for Aid to Understand the Mystical Sense of the Work in Hand.

 16. Meaning of “Beginning.” (1) in Space.

 17. (2) in Time. The Beginning of Creation.

 18. (3) of Substance.

 19. (4) of Type and Copy.

 20. (5) of Elements and What is Formed from Them.

 21. (6) of Design and Execution.

 22. The Word Was in the Beginning, I.e., in Wisdom, Which Contained All Things in Idea, Before They Existed. Christ’s Character as Wisdom is Prior to

 23. The Title “Word” Is to Be Interpreted by the Same Method as the Other Titles of Christ. The Word of God is Not a Mere Attribute of God, But a Sepa

 24. Christ as Light How He, and How His Disciples are the Light of the World.

 25. Christ as the Resurrection.

 26. Christ as the Way.

 27. Christ as the Truth.

 28. Christ as Life.

 29. Christ as the Door and as the Shepherd.

 30. Christ as Anointed (Christ) and as King.

 31. Christ as Teacher and Master.

 32. Christ as Son.

 33. Christ the True Vine, and as Bread.

 34. Christ as the First and the Last He is Also What Lies Between These.

 35. Christ as the Living and the Dead.

 36. Christ as a Sword.

 37. Christ as a Servant, as the Lamb of God, and as the Man Whom John Did Not Know.

 38. Christ as Paraclete, as Propitiation, and as the Power of God.

 39. Christ as Wisdom and Sanctification and Redemption.

 40. Christ as Righteousness As the Demiurge, the Agent of the Good God, and as High-Priest.

 41. Christ as the Rod, the Flower, the Stone.

 42. Of the Various Ways in Which Christ is the Logos.

 Book II.

 Book II.

 2. In What Way the Logos is God. Errors to Be Avoided on This Question.

 3. Various Relations of the Logos to Men.

 4. That the Logos is One, Not Many. Of the Word, Faithful and True, and of His White Horse.

 5. He (This One) Was in the Beginning with God.

 6. How the Word is the Maker of All Things, and Even the Holy Spirit Was Made Through Him.

 7. Of Things Not Made Through the Logos.

 8. Heracleon’s View that the Logos is Not the Agent of Creation.

 9. That the Logos Present in Us is Not Responsible for Our Sins.

 10. “That Which Was Made Was Life in Him, and the Life Was the Light of Men.” This Involves the Paradox that What Does Not Derive Life from the Logos

 11. How No One is Righteous or Can Truly Be Said to Live in Comparison with God.

 12. Is the Saviour All that He Is, to All?

 13. How the Life in the Logos Comes After the Beginning.

 14. How the Natures of Men are Not So Fixed from the First, But that They May Pass from Darkness to Light.

 15. Heracleon’s View that the Lord Brought Life Only to the Spiritual. Refutation of This.

 16. The Life May Be the Light of Others Besides.

 17. The Higher Powers are Men And Christ is Their Light Also.

 18. How God Also is Light, But in a Different Way And How Life Came Before Light.

 19. The Life Here Spoken of is the Higher Life, that of Reason.

 20. Different Kinds of Light And of Darkness.

 21. Christ is Not, Like God, Quite Free from Darkness: Since He Bore Our Sins.

 22. How the Darkness Failed to Overtake the Light.

 23. There is a Divine Darkness Which is Not Evil, and Which Ultimately Becomes Light.

 24. John the Baptist Was Sent. From Where? His Soul Was Sent from a Higher Region.

 25. Argument from the Prayer of Joseph, to Show that the Baptist May Have Been an Angel Who Became a Man.

 26. John is Voice, Jesus is Speech. Relation of These Two to Each Other.

 27. Significance of the Names of John and of His Parents.

 28. The Prophets Bore Witness to Christ and Foretold Many Things Concerning Him.

 29. The Six Testimonies of the Baptist Enumerated. Jesus’ “Come and See.” Significance of the Tenth Hour.

 30. How John Was a Witness of Christ, and Specially of “The Light.”

 1. He who distinguishes in himself voice and meaning and things for which the meaning stands, will not be offended at rudeness of language if, on enqu

 From the Fifth Book.

 From the Fifth Book.

 2. How Scripture Warns Us Against Making Many Books.

 But he who was made fit to be a minister of the New Covenant, not of the letter, but of the spirit, Paul, who fulfilled the Gospel from Jerusalem roun

 4. I feel myself growing dizzy with all this, and wonder whether, in obeying you, I have not been obeying God, nor walking in the footsteps of the sai

 Book VI.

 Sixth Book.

 2. How the Prophets and Holy Men of the Old Testament Knew the Things of Christ.

 3. “Grace and Truth Came Through Jesus Christ.” These Words Belong to the Baptist, Not the Evangelist. What the Baptist Testifies by Them.

 4. John Denies that He is Elijah or “The” Prophet. Yet He Was “A” Prophet.

 5. There Were Two Embassies to John the Baptist The Different Characters of These.

 6. Messianic Discussion with John the Baptist.

 7. Of the Birth of John, and of His Alleged Identity with Elijah. Of the Doctrine of Transcorporation.

 8. John is a Prophet, But Not the Prophet.

 9. John I. 22.

 10. Of the Voice John the Baptist is.

 11. Of the Way of the Lord, How It is Narrow, and How Jesus is the Way.

 12. Heracleon’s View of the Voice, and of John the Baptist.

 13. John I. 24, 25. Of the Baptism of John, that of Elijah, and that of Christ.

 14. Comparison of the Statements of the Four Evangelists Respecting John the Baptist, the Prophecies Regarding Him, His Addresses to the Multitude and

 15. How the Baptist Answers the Question of the Pharisees and Exalts the Nature of Christ. Of the Shoe-Latchet Which He is Unable to Untie.

 16. Comparison of John’s Testimony to Jesus in the Different Gospels.

 17. Of the Testimony of John to Jesus in Matthew’s Gospel,

 18. Of the Testimony in Mark. What is Meant by the Saviour’s Shoes and by Untying His Shoe-Latchets.

 19. Luke and John Suggest that One May Loose the Shoe-Latchets of the Logos Without Stooping Down.

 20. The Difference Between Not Being “Sufficient” And Not Being “Worthy.”

 21. The Fourth Gospel Speaks of Only One Shoe, the Others of Both. The Significance of This.

 22. How the Word Stands in the Midst of Men Without Being Known of Them.

 23. Heracleon’s View of This Utterance of John the Baptist, and Interpretation of the Shoe of Jesus.

 24. The Name of the Place Where John Baptized is Not Bethany, as in Most Copies, But Bethabara. Proof of This. Similarly “Gergesa” Should Be Read for

 25. Jordan Means “Their Going Down.” Spiritual Meanings and Application of This.

 26. The Story of Israel Crossing Jordan Under Joshua is Typical of Christian Things, and is Written for Our Instruction.

 27. Of Elijah and Elisha Crossing the Jordan.

 28. Naaman the Syrian and the Jordan. No Other Stream Has the Same Healing Power.

 29. The River of Egypt and Its Dragon, Contrasted with the Jordan.

 30. Of What John Learned from Jesus When Mary Visited Elisabeth in the Hill Country.

 31. Of the Conversation Between John and Jesus at the Baptism, Recorded by Matthew Only.

 32. John Calls Jesus a “Lamb.” Why Does He Name This Animal Specially? Of the Typology of the Sacrifices, Generally.

 33. A Lamb Was Offered at the Morning and Evening Sacrifice. Significance of This.

 34. The Morning and Evening Sacrifices of the Saint in His Life of Thought.

 35. Jesus is a Lamb in Respect of His Human Nature.

 36. Of the Death of the Martyrs Considered as a Sacrifice, and in What Way It Operates to the Benefit of Others.

 37. Of the Effects of the Death of Christ, of His Triumph After It, and of the Removal by His Death of the Sins of Men.

 38. The World, of Which the Sin is Taken Away, is Said to Be the Church. Reasons for Not Agreeing with This Opinion.

 Book X.

 Tenth Book.

 2. The Discrepancy Between John and the First Three Gospels at This Part of the Narrative, Literally Read, the Narratives Cannot Be Harmonized: They M

 3. What We are to Think of the Discrepancies Between the Different Gospels.

 4. Scripture Contains Many Contradictions, and Many Statements Which are Not Literally True, But Must Be Read Spiritually and Mystically.

 5. Paul Also Makes Contradictory Statements About Himself, and Acts in Opposite Ways at Different Times.

 6. Different Accounts of the Call of Peter, and of the Imprisonment of the Baptist. The Meaning of “Capernaum.”

 7. Why His Brothers are Not Called to the Wedding And Why He Abides at Capernaum Not Many Days.

 8. How Christ Abides with Believers to the End of the Age, and Whether He Abides with Them After that Consummation.

 9. Heracleon Says that Jesus is Not Stated to Have Done Anything at Capernaum. But in the Other Gospels He Does Many Things There.

 10. Significance of Capernaum.

 11. Why the Passover is Said to Be that of the “Jews.” Its Institution: and the Distinction Between “Feasts of the Lord” And Feasts Not So Spoken of.

 12. Of the Heavenly Festivals, of Which Those on Earth are Typical.

 13. Spiritual Meaning of the Passover.

 14. In the First Three Gospels the Passover is Spoken of Only at the Close of the Ministry In John at the Beginning. Remarks on This. Heracleon on th

 15. Discrepancy of the Gospel Narratives Connected with the Cleansing of the Temple.

 16. The Story of the Purging of the Temple Spiritualized. Taken Literally, It Presents Some Very Difficult and Unlikely Features.

 17. Matthew’s Story of the Entry into Jerusalem. Difficulties Involved in It for Those Who Take It Literally.

 18. The Ass and the Colt are the Old and the New Testament. Spiritual Meaning of the Various Features of the Story. Differences Between John’s Narrati

 19. Various Views of Heracleon on Purging of the Temple.

 20. The Temple Which Christ Says He Will Raise Up is the Church. How the Dry Bones Will Be Made to Live Again.

 21. That the Son Was Raised Up by the Father. The Charge Brought Against Jesus at His Trial Was Based on the Incident Now Before Us.

 22. The Temple of Solomon Did Not Take Forty-Six Years to Build. With Regard to that of Ezra We Cannot Tell How Long It Took. Significance of the Numb

 23. The Temple Spoken of by Christ is the Church. Application to the Church of the Statements Regarding the Building of Solomon’s Temple, and the Numb

 24. The Account of the Building of Solomon’s Temple Contains Serious Difficulties and is to Be Interpreted Spiritually.

 25. Further Spiritualizing of Solomon’s Temple-Building.

 26. The Promises Addressed to Jerusalem in the Prophets Refer to the Church, and are Still to Be Fulfilled.

 27. Of the Belief the Disciples Afterwards Attained in the Words of Jesus.

 28. The Difference Between Believing in the Name of Jesus and Believing in Jesus Himself.

 29. About What Beings Jesus Needed Testimony.

 30. How Jesus Knew the Powers, Better or Worse, Which Reside in Man.

4. That the Logos is One, Not Many. Of the Word, Faithful and True, and of His White Horse.

He was in the beginning with God.” By his three foregoing propositions the Evangelist has made us acquainted with three orders, and he now sums up the three in one, saying, “This (Logos) was in the beginning with God.” In the first premiss we learned where the Logos was: He was in the beginning; then we learned with whom He was, with God; and then who He was, that He was God. He now points out by this word “He,” the Word who is God, and gathers up into a fourth proposition the three which went before, “In the beginning was the Word,” “The Word was with God,” and “The Word was God.” Now he says, He, this (Word) was in the beginning with God. The term beginning may be taken of the beginning of the world, so that we may learn from what is said that the Word was older than the things which were made from the beginning. For if “in the beginning God created heaven and earth,” but “He” was in the beginning, then the Logos is manifestly older than those things which were made at the beginning, older not only than the firmament and the dry land, but than the heavens and earth. Now some one might ask, and not unreasonably, why it is not said, “In the beginning was the Word of God, and the Word of God was with God, and the Word of God was God.” But he who asked such a question could be shown to be taking for granted that there are a plurality of logoi, differing perhaps from each other in kind, one being the word of God, another perhaps the word of angels, a third of men, and so on with the other logoi. Now, if this were so with the Logos, the case would be the same with wisdom and with righteousness. But it would be absurd that there should be a number of things equally to be called “The Word;” and the same would apply to wisdom and to righteousness. We shall be driven to confess that we ought not to look for a plurality of logoi, or of wisdom, or of righteousness, if we look at the case of truth. Any one will confess that there is only one truth; it could never be said in this case that there is one truth of God, and another of the angels, and another of man,—it lies in the nature of things that the truth about anything is one. Now, if truth be one, it is clear that the preparation of it and its demonstration, which is wisdom, must in reason be conceived as one, since what is regarded as wisdom cannot justly claim that title where truth, which is one, is absent from its grasp. But if truth is one and wisdom one, then Reason (Logos) also, which announces truth and makes truth simple and manifest to those who are fitted to receive it, will be one. This we say, by no means denying that truth and wisdom and reason are of God, but we wish to indicate the purpose of the omission in this passage of the words “of God,” and of the form of the statement, “In the beginning the Logos was with God.” The same John in the Apocalypse gives Him His name with the addition “of God,” where he says:213 Apoc. xix. 11–16. “And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse, and He that sat thereon called Faithful and True; and in righteousness doth He judge and make war. And His eyes are as a flame of fire, and on His head are many diadems, and He hath a name written which no one knoweth but He Himself. And He is arrayed in a garment sprinkled with blood, and His name is called214 In the Greek the article is here omitted. Word of God. And His armies in heaven followed Him on white horses, clothed in pure fine linen. And out of His mouth proceedeth a sharp sword, that with it He should smite the nations, and He shall rule them with a rod of iron, and He treadeth the winepress of the fierceness of the wrath of Almighty God. And He hath on His garment and on His thigh a name written: King of kings, and Lord of lords.” In this passage Logos is necessarily spoken of absolutely without the article, and also with the addition Logos of God; had the first not been the case (i.e., had the article been given) we might have been led to take up the meaning wrongly,215 Reading παρεκδέξασθαι, with Huet. and so to depart from the truth about the Logos. For if it had been called simply Logos, and had not been said to be the Logos of God, then we would not be clearly informed that the Logos is the Logos of God. And, again, had it been called Logos of God but not said to be Logos absolutely, then we might imagine many logoi, according to the constitution of each of the rational beings which exist; then we might assume a number of logoi properly so called. Again, in his description in the Apocalypse of the Logos of God, the Apostle and Evangelist (and the Apocalypse entitles him to be styled a prophet, too) says he saw the Word of God in the opened heaven, and that He was riding on a white horse. Now we must consider what he means to convey when he speaks of heaven being opened and of the white horse, and of the Word of God riding on the white horse, and also what is meant by saying that the Word of God is Faithful and True, and that in righteousness He judges and makes war. All this will greatly advance our study on the subject of the Word of God. Now I conceive heaven to have been shut against the ungodly, and those who bear the image of the earthly, and to have been opened to the righteous and those adorned with the image of the heavenly. For to the former, being below and still dwelling in the flesh, the better things are closed, since they cannot understand them and have neither power nor will to see their beauty, looking down as they do and not striving to look up. But to the excellent, or those who have their commonwealth in heaven,216 Philipp. iii. 20. he opens, with the key of David, the things in heavenly places and discloses them to their view, and makes all clear to them by riding on his horse. These words also have their meaning; the horse is white because it is the nature of higher knowledge (γνῶσις) to be clear and white and full of light. And on the white horse sits He who is called Faithful, seated more firmly, and so to speak more royally, on words which cannot be set aside, words which run sharply and more swiftly than any horse, and overhear in their rushing course every so-called word that simulates the Word, and every so-called truth that simulates the Truth. He who sits on the white horse is called Faithful, not because of the faith He cherishes, but of that which He inspires, because He is worthy of faith. Now the Lord Jehovah, according to Moses,217 Deut. xxxii. 4. is Faithful and True. He is true also in respect of His relation to shadow, type, and image; for such is the Word who is in the opened heaven, for He is not on earth as He is in heaven; on earth He is made flesh and speaks through shadow, type, and image. The multitude, therefore, of those who are reputed to believe are disciples of the shadow of the Word, not of the true Word of God which is in the opened heaven. Hence Jeremiah says,218 Lam. iv. 20. “The Spirit of our face is Christ the Lord, of whom we said, In His shadow shall we live among the nations.” Thus the Word of God who is called Faithful is also called True, and in righteousness He judges and makes war; since He has received from God the faculty of judging in very righteousness and very judgment, and of apportioning its due to every existing creature. For none of those who have some portion of righteousness and of the faculty of judgment can receive on his soul such copies and impressions of righteousness and judgment as to come short in no point of absolute righteousness and absolute justice, just as no painter of a picture can communicate to the representation all the qualities of the original. This, I conceive, is the reason why David says,219 Ps. cxliii. 2. “Before Thee shall no living being be justified.” He does not say, no man, or no angel, but no living being, since even if any being partakes of life and has altogether put off mortality, not even then can it be justified in comparison of Thee, who art, as it were, Life itself. Nor is it possible that one who partakes of life and is therefore called living, should become life itself, or that one who partakes of righteousness and, therefore, is called righteous should become equal to righteousness itself. Now it is the function of the Word of God, not only to judge in righteousness, but also to make war in righteousness, that by making war on His enemies by reason and righteousness, so that what is irrational and wicked is destroyed,220 Omitting λεγεσθαι, with Jacobi. He may dwell in the soul of him who, for his salvation, so to speak, has become captive to Christ, and may justify that soul and cast out from her all adversaries. We shall, however, obtain a better view of this war which the Word carries on if we remember that He is an ambassador for the truth, while there is another who pretends to be the Word and is not, and one who calls herself the truth and is not, but a lie. Then the Word, arming Himself against the lie, slays it with the breath of His mouth and brings it to naught by the manifestation of His coming.221 2 Thess. ii. 8. And consider whether these words of the Apostle to the Thessalonians may be understood in an intellectual sense. For what is that which is destroyed by the breath of the mouth of Christ, Christ being the Word and Truth and Wisdom, but the lie? And what is that which is brought to naught by the manifestation of Christ’s coming, Christ being conceived as wisdom and reason, what but that which announces itself as wisdom, when in reality it is one of those things with which God deals as the Apostle describes,222 1 Cor. iii. 19. “He taketh the wise, those who are not wise with the true wisdom, in their own craftiness”? To what he says of the rider on the white horse, John adds the wonderful statement: “His eyes are like a flame of fire.” For as the flame of fire is bright and illuminating, but at the same time fiery and destructive of material things, so, if I may so say, are the eyes of the Logos with which He sees, and every one who has part in Him; they have not only the inherent quality of laying hold of the things of the mind, but also that of consuming and putting away those conceptions which are more material and gross, since whatever is in any way false flees from the directness and lightness of truth. It is in a very natural order that after speaking of Him who judges in righteousness and makes war in accordance with His righteous judgments, and then after His warring of His giving light, the writer goes on to say, “On His head are many diadems.” For had the lie been one, and of one form only, against which the True and Faithful Word contended, and for conquering which, He was crowned, then one crown alone would naturally have been given Him for the victory. As it is, however, as the lies are many which profess the truth and for warring against which the Word is crowned, the diadems are many which surround the head of the conqueror of them all. As He has overcome every revolting power many diadems mark His victory. Then after the diadems He is said to have a name written which no one knows but He Himself. For there are some things which are known to the Word alone; for the beings which come into existence after Him have a poorer nature than His, and none of them is able to behold all that He apprehends. And perhaps it is the case that only those who have part in that Word know the things which are kept from the knowledge of those who do not partake of Him. Now, in John’s vision, the Word of God as He rides on the white horse is not naked: He is clothed with a garment sprinkled with blood, for the Word who was made flesh and therefore died is surrounded with marks of the fact that His blood was poured out upon the earth, when the soldier pierced His side. For of that passion, even should it be our lot some day to come to that highest and supreme contemplation of the Logos, we shall not lose all memory, nor shall we forget the truth that our admission was brought about by His sojourning in our body. This Word of God is followed by the heavenly armies one and all; they follow the Word as their leader, and imitate Him in all things, and chiefly in having mounted, they also, white horses. To him that understands, this secret is open. And as sorrow and grief and wailing fled away at the end of things, so also, I suppose, did obscurity and doubt, all the mysteries of God’s wisdom being precisely and clearly opened. Look also at the white horses of the followers of the Word and at the white and pure linen with which they were clothed. As linen comes out of the earth, may not those linen garments stand for the dialects on the earth in which those voices are clothed which make clear announcements of things? We have dealt at some length with the statements found in the Apocalypse about the Word of God; it is important for us to know clearly about Him.