Origen's Commentary on the Gospel of John.

 Book I.

 Origen’s Commentary on the Gospel of John.

 2. The 144,000 Sealed in the Apocalypse are Converts to Christ from the Gentile World.

 3. In the Spiritual Israel the High-Priests are Those Who Devote Themselves to the Study of Scripture.

 4. The Study of the Gospels is the First Fruits Offered by These Priests of Christianity.

 5. All Scripture is Gospel But the Gospels are Distinguished Above Other Scriptures.

 6. The Fourfold Gospel. John’s the First Fruits of the Four. Qualifications Necessary for Interpreting It.

 7. What Good Things are Announced in the Gospels.

 8. How the Gospels Cause the Other Books of Scripture Also to Be Gospel.

 9. The Somatic and the Spiritual Gospel.

 10. How Jesus Himself is the Gospel.

 11. Jesus is All Good Things Hence the Gospel is Manifold.

 12. The Gospel Contains the Ill Deeds Also Which Were Done to Jesus.

 13. The Angels Also are Evangelists.

 14. The Old Testament, Typified by John, is the Beginning of the Gospel.

 15. The Gospel is in the Old Testament, and Indeed in the Whole Universe. Prayer for Aid to Understand the Mystical Sense of the Work in Hand.

 16. Meaning of “Beginning.” (1) in Space.

 17. (2) in Time. The Beginning of Creation.

 18. (3) of Substance.

 19. (4) of Type and Copy.

 20. (5) of Elements and What is Formed from Them.

 21. (6) of Design and Execution.

 22. The Word Was in the Beginning, I.e., in Wisdom, Which Contained All Things in Idea, Before They Existed. Christ’s Character as Wisdom is Prior to

 23. The Title “Word” Is to Be Interpreted by the Same Method as the Other Titles of Christ. The Word of God is Not a Mere Attribute of God, But a Sepa

 24. Christ as Light How He, and How His Disciples are the Light of the World.

 25. Christ as the Resurrection.

 26. Christ as the Way.

 27. Christ as the Truth.

 28. Christ as Life.

 29. Christ as the Door and as the Shepherd.

 30. Christ as Anointed (Christ) and as King.

 31. Christ as Teacher and Master.

 32. Christ as Son.

 33. Christ the True Vine, and as Bread.

 34. Christ as the First and the Last He is Also What Lies Between These.

 35. Christ as the Living and the Dead.

 36. Christ as a Sword.

 37. Christ as a Servant, as the Lamb of God, and as the Man Whom John Did Not Know.

 38. Christ as Paraclete, as Propitiation, and as the Power of God.

 39. Christ as Wisdom and Sanctification and Redemption.

 40. Christ as Righteousness As the Demiurge, the Agent of the Good God, and as High-Priest.

 41. Christ as the Rod, the Flower, the Stone.

 42. Of the Various Ways in Which Christ is the Logos.

 Book II.

 Book II.

 2. In What Way the Logos is God. Errors to Be Avoided on This Question.

 3. Various Relations of the Logos to Men.

 4. That the Logos is One, Not Many. Of the Word, Faithful and True, and of His White Horse.

 5. He (This One) Was in the Beginning with God.

 6. How the Word is the Maker of All Things, and Even the Holy Spirit Was Made Through Him.

 7. Of Things Not Made Through the Logos.

 8. Heracleon’s View that the Logos is Not the Agent of Creation.

 9. That the Logos Present in Us is Not Responsible for Our Sins.

 10. “That Which Was Made Was Life in Him, and the Life Was the Light of Men.” This Involves the Paradox that What Does Not Derive Life from the Logos

 11. How No One is Righteous or Can Truly Be Said to Live in Comparison with God.

 12. Is the Saviour All that He Is, to All?

 13. How the Life in the Logos Comes After the Beginning.

 14. How the Natures of Men are Not So Fixed from the First, But that They May Pass from Darkness to Light.

 15. Heracleon’s View that the Lord Brought Life Only to the Spiritual. Refutation of This.

 16. The Life May Be the Light of Others Besides.

 17. The Higher Powers are Men And Christ is Their Light Also.

 18. How God Also is Light, But in a Different Way And How Life Came Before Light.

 19. The Life Here Spoken of is the Higher Life, that of Reason.

 20. Different Kinds of Light And of Darkness.

 21. Christ is Not, Like God, Quite Free from Darkness: Since He Bore Our Sins.

 22. How the Darkness Failed to Overtake the Light.

 23. There is a Divine Darkness Which is Not Evil, and Which Ultimately Becomes Light.

 24. John the Baptist Was Sent. From Where? His Soul Was Sent from a Higher Region.

 25. Argument from the Prayer of Joseph, to Show that the Baptist May Have Been an Angel Who Became a Man.

 26. John is Voice, Jesus is Speech. Relation of These Two to Each Other.

 27. Significance of the Names of John and of His Parents.

 28. The Prophets Bore Witness to Christ and Foretold Many Things Concerning Him.

 29. The Six Testimonies of the Baptist Enumerated. Jesus’ “Come and See.” Significance of the Tenth Hour.

 30. How John Was a Witness of Christ, and Specially of “The Light.”

 1. He who distinguishes in himself voice and meaning and things for which the meaning stands, will not be offended at rudeness of language if, on enqu

 From the Fifth Book.

 From the Fifth Book.

 2. How Scripture Warns Us Against Making Many Books.

 But he who was made fit to be a minister of the New Covenant, not of the letter, but of the spirit, Paul, who fulfilled the Gospel from Jerusalem roun

 4. I feel myself growing dizzy with all this, and wonder whether, in obeying you, I have not been obeying God, nor walking in the footsteps of the sai

 Book VI.

 Sixth Book.

 2. How the Prophets and Holy Men of the Old Testament Knew the Things of Christ.

 3. “Grace and Truth Came Through Jesus Christ.” These Words Belong to the Baptist, Not the Evangelist. What the Baptist Testifies by Them.

 4. John Denies that He is Elijah or “The” Prophet. Yet He Was “A” Prophet.

 5. There Were Two Embassies to John the Baptist The Different Characters of These.

 6. Messianic Discussion with John the Baptist.

 7. Of the Birth of John, and of His Alleged Identity with Elijah. Of the Doctrine of Transcorporation.

 8. John is a Prophet, But Not the Prophet.

 9. John I. 22.

 10. Of the Voice John the Baptist is.

 11. Of the Way of the Lord, How It is Narrow, and How Jesus is the Way.

 12. Heracleon’s View of the Voice, and of John the Baptist.

 13. John I. 24, 25. Of the Baptism of John, that of Elijah, and that of Christ.

 14. Comparison of the Statements of the Four Evangelists Respecting John the Baptist, the Prophecies Regarding Him, His Addresses to the Multitude and

 15. How the Baptist Answers the Question of the Pharisees and Exalts the Nature of Christ. Of the Shoe-Latchet Which He is Unable to Untie.

 16. Comparison of John’s Testimony to Jesus in the Different Gospels.

 17. Of the Testimony of John to Jesus in Matthew’s Gospel,

 18. Of the Testimony in Mark. What is Meant by the Saviour’s Shoes and by Untying His Shoe-Latchets.

 19. Luke and John Suggest that One May Loose the Shoe-Latchets of the Logos Without Stooping Down.

 20. The Difference Between Not Being “Sufficient” And Not Being “Worthy.”

 21. The Fourth Gospel Speaks of Only One Shoe, the Others of Both. The Significance of This.

 22. How the Word Stands in the Midst of Men Without Being Known of Them.

 23. Heracleon’s View of This Utterance of John the Baptist, and Interpretation of the Shoe of Jesus.

 24. The Name of the Place Where John Baptized is Not Bethany, as in Most Copies, But Bethabara. Proof of This. Similarly “Gergesa” Should Be Read for

 25. Jordan Means “Their Going Down.” Spiritual Meanings and Application of This.

 26. The Story of Israel Crossing Jordan Under Joshua is Typical of Christian Things, and is Written for Our Instruction.

 27. Of Elijah and Elisha Crossing the Jordan.

 28. Naaman the Syrian and the Jordan. No Other Stream Has the Same Healing Power.

 29. The River of Egypt and Its Dragon, Contrasted with the Jordan.

 30. Of What John Learned from Jesus When Mary Visited Elisabeth in the Hill Country.

 31. Of the Conversation Between John and Jesus at the Baptism, Recorded by Matthew Only.

 32. John Calls Jesus a “Lamb.” Why Does He Name This Animal Specially? Of the Typology of the Sacrifices, Generally.

 33. A Lamb Was Offered at the Morning and Evening Sacrifice. Significance of This.

 34. The Morning and Evening Sacrifices of the Saint in His Life of Thought.

 35. Jesus is a Lamb in Respect of His Human Nature.

 36. Of the Death of the Martyrs Considered as a Sacrifice, and in What Way It Operates to the Benefit of Others.

 37. Of the Effects of the Death of Christ, of His Triumph After It, and of the Removal by His Death of the Sins of Men.

 38. The World, of Which the Sin is Taken Away, is Said to Be the Church. Reasons for Not Agreeing with This Opinion.

 Book X.

 Tenth Book.

 2. The Discrepancy Between John and the First Three Gospels at This Part of the Narrative, Literally Read, the Narratives Cannot Be Harmonized: They M

 3. What We are to Think of the Discrepancies Between the Different Gospels.

 4. Scripture Contains Many Contradictions, and Many Statements Which are Not Literally True, But Must Be Read Spiritually and Mystically.

 5. Paul Also Makes Contradictory Statements About Himself, and Acts in Opposite Ways at Different Times.

 6. Different Accounts of the Call of Peter, and of the Imprisonment of the Baptist. The Meaning of “Capernaum.”

 7. Why His Brothers are Not Called to the Wedding And Why He Abides at Capernaum Not Many Days.

 8. How Christ Abides with Believers to the End of the Age, and Whether He Abides with Them After that Consummation.

 9. Heracleon Says that Jesus is Not Stated to Have Done Anything at Capernaum. But in the Other Gospels He Does Many Things There.

 10. Significance of Capernaum.

 11. Why the Passover is Said to Be that of the “Jews.” Its Institution: and the Distinction Between “Feasts of the Lord” And Feasts Not So Spoken of.

 12. Of the Heavenly Festivals, of Which Those on Earth are Typical.

 13. Spiritual Meaning of the Passover.

 14. In the First Three Gospels the Passover is Spoken of Only at the Close of the Ministry In John at the Beginning. Remarks on This. Heracleon on th

 15. Discrepancy of the Gospel Narratives Connected with the Cleansing of the Temple.

 16. The Story of the Purging of the Temple Spiritualized. Taken Literally, It Presents Some Very Difficult and Unlikely Features.

 17. Matthew’s Story of the Entry into Jerusalem. Difficulties Involved in It for Those Who Take It Literally.

 18. The Ass and the Colt are the Old and the New Testament. Spiritual Meaning of the Various Features of the Story. Differences Between John’s Narrati

 19. Various Views of Heracleon on Purging of the Temple.

 20. The Temple Which Christ Says He Will Raise Up is the Church. How the Dry Bones Will Be Made to Live Again.

 21. That the Son Was Raised Up by the Father. The Charge Brought Against Jesus at His Trial Was Based on the Incident Now Before Us.

 22. The Temple of Solomon Did Not Take Forty-Six Years to Build. With Regard to that of Ezra We Cannot Tell How Long It Took. Significance of the Numb

 23. The Temple Spoken of by Christ is the Church. Application to the Church of the Statements Regarding the Building of Solomon’s Temple, and the Numb

 24. The Account of the Building of Solomon’s Temple Contains Serious Difficulties and is to Be Interpreted Spiritually.

 25. Further Spiritualizing of Solomon’s Temple-Building.

 26. The Promises Addressed to Jerusalem in the Prophets Refer to the Church, and are Still to Be Fulfilled.

 27. Of the Belief the Disciples Afterwards Attained in the Words of Jesus.

 28. The Difference Between Believing in the Name of Jesus and Believing in Jesus Himself.

 29. About What Beings Jesus Needed Testimony.

 30. How Jesus Knew the Powers, Better or Worse, Which Reside in Man.

18. The Ass and the Colt are the Old and the New Testament. Spiritual Meaning of the Various Features of the Story. Differences Between John’s Narrative and that of the Other Evangelists.

Now to see into the real truth of these matters is the part of that true intelligence which is given to those who can say,612 1 Cor. ii. 16. “But we have the mind of Christ that we may see those things which are freely given to us of God;” and doubtless it is beyond our powers. For neither is the ruling principle in our soul free from agitation, nor are our eyes such as those of the fair bride of Christ should be, of which the bridegroom says,613 Song of Sol. i. 15. “Thy eyes are doves,” signifying, perhaps, in a riddle, the observant power which dwells in the spiritual, because the Holy Spirit came like a dove to our Lord and to the lord in every one. Such as we are, however, we will not delay, but will feel about the words of life which have been spoken to us and strive to lay hold of that power in them which flows to him who touches them in faith. Now Jesus is the word of God which goes into the soul that is called Jerusalem, riding on the ass freed by the disciples from its bonds. That is to say, on the simple language of the Old Testament, interpreted by the two disciples who loose it: in the first place him who applies what is written to the service of the soul and shows the allegorical sense of it with reference to her, and in the second place him who brings to light by the things which lie in shadow the good and true things of the future. But He also rides on the young colt, the New Testament; for in both alike we find the word of truth which purifies us and drives away all those thoughts in us which incline to selling and buying. But He does not come alone to Jerusalem, the soul, nor only with a few companions; for many things have to enter into us before the word of God which makes us perfect, and as many things have to come after Him, all, however, hymning and glorifying Him and placing under Him their ornaments and vestures, so that the beasts He rides on may not touch the ground, when He who descended out of heaven is seated on them. But that His bearers, the old and the new words of Scripture, may be raised yet higher above the ground, branches have to be cut down from the trees that they may tread on reasonable expositions. But the multitudes which go before and follow Him may also signify the angelic ministrations, some of which prepare the way for Him in our souls, and help in their adorning, while some come after His presence in us, of which we have often spoken, so that we need not now adduce testimonies about it. And perhaps it is not without reason that I have likened to an ass the surrounding voices which conduct the Word Himself to the soul; for it is a beast of burden, and many are the burdens, heavy the loads, which are brought into view from the text, especially of the Old Testament, as he can clearly see who observes what is done in this connection on the part of the Jews. But the foal is not a beast of burden in the same way as the ass. For though every lead of the latter be heavy to those who have not in themselves the upbearing and most lightening power of the Spirit, yet the new word is less heavy than the old. I know some who interpret the tied-up ass as being believers from the circumcision, who are freed from many bonds by those who are truly and spiritually instructed in the word; and the foal they take to be those from the Gentiles, who before they receive the word of Jesus are free from any control and subject to no yoke in their unbridled and pleasure-loving existence. The writers I am speaking of do not say who those are that go before and who those follow after; but there would be no absurdity in saying that those who went before were like Moses and the prophets, and those who followed after the holy Apostles. To what Jerusalem all these go in it is now our business to enquire, and what is the house which has many sellers and buyers to be driven out by the Son of God. And perhaps the Jerusalem above to which the Lord is to ascend driving like a charioteer those of the circumcision and the believers of the Gentiles, while prophets and Apostles go before Him and follow after Him (or is it the angels who minister to Him, for they too may be meant by those who go before and those who follow), perhaps it is that city which before He ascended to it contained the so-called614 Ephes. vi. 12. “spiritual hosts of wickedness in heavenly places,” or the Canaanites and Hittites and Amorites and the other enemies of the people of God, and in a word, the foreigners. For in that region, too, it was possible for the prophecy to be fulfilled which says,615 Isa. i. 7. “Your country is desolate, your cities are burned with fire, your land, strangers devour it in your presence.” For these are they who defile and turn into a den of robbers, that is, of themselves the heavenly house of the Father, the holy Jerusalem, the house of prayer; having spurious money, and giving pence and small change, cheap worthless coinage, to all who come to them. These are they who, contending with the souls, take from them what is most precious, robbing them of their better part to return to them what is worth nothing. But the disciples go and find the ass tied and loose it, for it cannot have Jesus on account of the covering that is laid upon it by the law.616 2 Cor. iii. 14. And the colt is found with it, both having been lost till Jesus came; I mean, namely, those of the circumcision and those of the Gentiles who afterwards believed. But how these are sent back again after Jesus has ascended to Jerusalem seated upon them, it is somewhat dangerous to say; for there is something mystical about it, in connection with the change of saints into angels. After that change they will be sent back, in the age succeeding this one, like the ministering spirits,617 Heb. i. 11. who are sent to do service for the sake of them who will thereby inherit salvation. But if the ass and the foal are the old and the new Scriptures, on which the Word of God rides, it is easy to see how, after the Word has appeared in them, they are sent back and do not wait after the Word has entered Jerusalem among those who have cast out all the thoughts of selling and buying. I consider, too, that it is not without significance that the place where the ass was found tied, and the foal, was a village, and a village without a name. For in comparison with the great world in heaven, the whole earth is a village where the ass is found tied and the colt, and it is simply called “the village” without any other designation being added to it. From Bethphage Matthew says the disciples are sent out who are to fetch the ass and the colt; and Bethphage is a priestly place, the name of which means “House of Jaw-bones.” So much we have said, as our power allowed, on the text of Matthew, reserving for a further opportunity, when we may be permitted to take up the Gospel of Matthew by itself, a more complete and accurate discussion of his statements. Mark and Luke say that the two disciples, acting on their Master’s instructions, found a foal tied, on which no one had ever sat, and that they loosed it and brought it to the Lord. Mark adds that they found the foal tied at the door, outside on the road. But who is outside? Those of the Gentiles who were strangers618 Ephes. ii. 12. from the covenants, and aliens to the promise of God; they are on the road, not resting under a roof or a house, bound by their own sins, and to be loosed by the twofold knowledge spoken of above, of the friends of Jesus. And the bonds with which the foal was tied, and the sins committed against the wholesome law and reproved by it,—for it is the gate of life,—in respect of it, I say, they were not inside but outside the door, for perhaps inside the door there cannot be any such bond of wickedness. But there were some persons standing beside the tied-up foal, as Mark says; those, I suppose, who had tied it; as Luke records, it was the masters of the foal who said to the disciples, Why loose ye the foal? For those lords who subjected and bound the sinner are illegal masters and cannot look the true master in the face when he frees the foal from its bonds. Thus when the disciples say, “The Lord hath need of him,” these wicked masters have nothing to say in reply. The disciples then bring the foal to Jesus naked, and put their own dress on it, so that the Lord may sit on the disciples’ garments which are on it, at His ease. What is said further will not, in the light of Matthew’s statements, present any difficulty; how619 Mark xi. 15. “They come to Jerusalem, and entering into the temple He began to cast out them that sold and bought in the temple,” or how620 Luke xix. 41. “When He drew nigh and beheld the city He wept over it; and entering into the temple He began to cast out them that sold.” For in some of those who have the temple in themselves He casts out all that sell and buy in the temple; but in others who do not quite obey the word of God, He only makes a beginning of casting out the sellers and buyers. There is a third class also besides these, in which He began to cast out the sellers only, and not also the buyers. With John, on the contrary, they are all cast out by the scourge woven of small cords, along with the sheep and the oxen. It should be carefully considered whether it is possible that the changes of the things described and the discrepancies found in them can be satisfactorily solved by the anagogic method. Each of the Evangelists ascribes to the Word different modes of action, which produce in souls of different tempers not the same effects but yet similar ones. The discrepancy we noticed in respect of Jesus’ journeys to Jerusalem, which the Gospel now in hand reports quite differently from the other three, as we have expounded their words, cannot be made good in any other way. John gives statements which are similar to those of the other three but not the same; instead of branches cut from the trees or stubble brought from the fields and strewed on the road he says they took branches of palm trees. He says that much people had come to the feast, and that these went out to meet Him, crying, “Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord,” and “Blessed is the King of Israel.” He also says that it was Jesus Himself who found the young ass on which Christ sat, and the phrase, young ass, doubtless conveys some additional meaning, as the small animal afforded a benefit not of men, nor through men, but through Jesus Christ. John moreover does not, any more than the others, reproduce the prophetic words exactly; instead of them he gives us “Fear not, O daughter of Zion; behold thy King cometh sitting” (instead of “mounted”) “on the foal of an ass” (for “on an ass and a young foal”). The words “Fear not, daughter of Zion,” are not in the prophet at all. But as the prophetic utterance has been applied by all in this way, let us see if there was not a necessity that the daughter of Zion should rejoice greatly and that the greater than she, the daughter of Jerusalem, should not only rejoice greatly but should also proclaim it when her king was coming to her, just and bringing salvation, and meek, having mounted an ass and a young colt. Whoever, then, receives Him will no longer be afraid of those who are armed with the specious discourses of the heterodox, those chariots of Ephraim said to be destroyed by the Lord,621 Zech. ix. 10. nor the horse, the vain thing for safety,622 Ps. xxxiii. 17. that is the mad desire which has accustomed itself to the things of sense and which is injurious to many of those who desire to dwell in Jerusalem and to attend to the sound word. It is also fitting to rejoice at the destruction by Him who rides on the ass and the young foal of every hostile dart, since the fiery darts of the enemy are no longer to prevail over him who has received Jesus to his own temple. And there will also be a multitude from the Gentiles with peace623 Zech. ix. 9, 10. at the Saviour’s coming to Jerusalem, when He rules over the waters that He may bruise the head of the dragon on the water,624 Ps. lxxiv. 13. and we shall tread upon the waves of the sea and to the mouths of all the rivers on the earth. Mark, however, writing about the foal,625 xi. 2. reports the Lord to have said, “On which never man sat;” and he seems to me to hint at the circumstance that those who afterwards believed had never submitted to the Word before Jesus’ coming to them. For of men, perhaps, no one had ever sate on the foal, but of hearts or of powers alien to the Word some had sate on it, since in the prophet Isaiah the wealth of opposing powers is said to be borne on asses and camels.626 Isa. xxx. 6. “In the distress and the affliction,” he writes, “the lion and the lion’s whelp, whence also the offspring of flying asps, who carried their riches on asses and camels.” The question occurs again, for those who have no mind but for the bare words, if according to their view the words, “on which never man sat,” are not quite meaningless. For who but a man ever sits on a foal? So much of our views.