S. AURELII AUGUSTINI HIPPONENSIS EPISCOPI DE BONO CONJUGALI LIBER UNUS .

 CAPUT PRIMUM.

 CAPUT II.

 3. Illud nunc dicimus, secundum istam conditionem nascendi et moriendi, quam novimus, et in qua creati sumus, aliquid boni esse conjugium masculi et f

 CAPUT IV.

 CAPUT V.

 6. Jam in ipsa quoque immoderatiore exactione debiti carnalis, quam eis non secundum imperium praecipit, sed secundum veniam concedit Apostolus, ut et

 7. Miror autem si quemadmodum licet dimittere adulteram uxorem, ita liceat ea dimissa alteram ducere. Facit enim de hac re sancta Scriptura difficilem

 8. Honorabiles ergo nuptiae in omnibus, et thorus immaculatus turpe est etiam dicere scientiae destruetur, charitas nunquam cadet 0380

 CAPUT IX.

 CAPUT X.

 11. Nec ipsis tamen peccatum sunt nuptiae, quae si in comparatione fornicationis eligerentur, minus peccatum essent quam fornicatio, sed tamen peccatu

 CAPUT XI.

 13. Quod ergo ait, Quae innupta est, cogitat ea quae sunt Domini, ut sit sancta et corpore et spiritu, non sic accipiendum est, ut putemus non esse sa

 CAPUT XII.

 CAPUT XIII.

 CAPUT XIV.

 17. Posse sane fieri nuptias ex male conjunctis, honesto postea placito consequente, manifestum est.

 CAPUT XVI.

 CAPUT XVII.

 20. Ideoque non sicut uni viro etiam plures habere licebat uxores, ita uni feminae plures viros, nec prolis ipsius causa, si forte illa parere posset,

 CAPUT XVIII.

 22. Si ergo et illi qui propter solam generationem, propter quam sunt institutae nuptiae, conjunguntur, non comparantur patribus, multo aliter ipsos f

 CAPUT XX.

 24. Bonum, inquam, sunt nuptiae, et contra omnes calumnias possunt sana ratione defendi. Nuptiis tamen sanctorum patrum, non quas nuptias, sed quam 03

 CAPUT XXI.

 26. Verum ut apertius intelligatur quomodo sit virtus in habitu, etiamsi non sit in opere, loquor de exemplo de quo nullus dubitat catholicorum Christ

 CAPUT XXII.

 CAPUT XXIII.

 29. Huc accedit quia non recte comparantur homines hominibus ex uno aliquo bono. Fieri enim potest ut alius non habeat aliquid quod alius habet, sed a

 30. Recte plane quaeritur, non utrum omnimodis inobediens virgo conjugatae obedienti, sed minus obediens obedientiori comparanda sit quia et illa nup

 31. Ex hac obedientia pater ille qui sine uxore non fuit, esse sine unico filio et a se occiso paratus fuit . Unicum enim non immerito dixerim, de quo

 CAPUT XXIV.

 CAPUT XXV.

 CAPUT XXVI.

 35. Pueros quoque ac virgines integritatem ipsam Deo dicantes, multo maxime commonemus ut tanta norint humilitate tuendum esse quod in terra interim v

6. Further, in the very case of the more immoderate requirement of the due of the flesh, which the Apostle enjoins not on them by way of command, but allows to them by way of leave, that they have intercourse also beside the cause of begetting children; although evil habits impel them to such intercourse, yet marriage guards them from adultery or fornication. For neither is that committed because of marriage, but is pardoned because of marriage. Therefore married persons owe one another not only the faith of their sexual intercourse itself, for the begetting of children, which is the first fellowship of the human kind in this mortal state; but also, in a way, a mutual service of sustaining14    Excipiendæ one another’s weakness, in order to shun unlawful intercourse: so that, although perpetual continence be pleasing to one of them, he may not, save with consent of the other. For thus far also, “The wife hath not power of her own body, but the man: in like manner also the man hath not power of his own body, but the woman.”15    1 Cor. vii. 4 That that also, which, not for the begetting of children, but for weakness and incontinence, either he seeks of marriage, or she of her husband, they deny not the one or the other; lest by this they fall into damnable seductions, through temptation of Satan, by reason of incontinence either of both, or of whichever of them. For intercourse of marriage for the sake of begetting hath not fault; but for the satisfying of lust, but yet with husband or wife, by reason of the faith of the bed, it hath venial fault: but adultery or fornication hath deadly fault, and, through this, continence from all intercourse is indeed better even than the intercourse of marriage itself, which takes place for the sake of begetting. But because that Continence is of larger desert, but to pay the due of marriage is no crime, but to demand it beyond the necessity of begetting is a venial fault, but to commit fornication or adultery is a crime to be punished; charity of the married ought to beware, lest whilst it seek for itself occasion of larger honor, it do that for its partner which cause condemnation. “For whosoever putteth away his wife, except for the cause of fornication, maketh her to commit adultery.”16    Matt. v. 32 To such a degree is that marriage compact entered upon a matter of a certain sacrament, that it is not made void even by separation itself, since, so long as her husband lives, even by whom she hath been left, she commits adultery, in case she be married to another: and he who hath left her, is the cause of this evil.

6. Jam in ipsa quoque immoderatiore exactione debiti carnalis, quam eis non secundum imperium praecipit, sed secundum veniam concedit Apostolus, ut etiam praeter causam procreandi sibi misceantur; etsi eos pravi mores ad talem concubitum impellunt, nuptiae tamen ab adulterio seu fornicatione defendunt. Neque enim illud propter nuptias admittitur, sed propter nuptias ignoscitur. Debent ergo sibi conjugati non solum ipsius sexus sui commiscendi fidem, liberorum procreandorum causa, quae prima est humani generis in ista mortalitate societas; verum etiam infirmitatis invicem excipiendae, ad illicitos concubitus evitandos, mutuam quodam modo servitutem; ut etsi alteri eorum perpetua continentia placeat, nisi ex alterius consensu non possit. Et ad hoc enim uxor non habet potestatem corporis sui, sed vir; similiter et vir non habet potestatem corporis sui, sed mulier (I Cor. VII, 4-6): ut et quod non filiorum procreandorum, sed infirmitatis et incontinentiae causa expetit, vel ille de matrimonio, vel illa de marito, non sibi alterutrum negent; ne per hoc incidant in damnabiles corruptelas, tentante satana, propter incontinentiam, vel amborum, vel cujusquam eorum. Conjugalis enim concubitus generandi gratia, non habet culpam; concupiscentiae 0378 vero satiandae, sed tamen cum conjuge, propter thori fidem, venialem habet culpam: adulterium vero sive fornicatio lethalem habet culpam. Ac per hoc melior est quidem ab omni concubitu continentia, quam vel ipse matrimonialis concubitus, qui fit causa gignendi.

CAPUT VII.

Foedus nuptiale separatione conjugum non fit irritum. An dimissa adultera liceat alteram ducere. Uxorem superducere vetitum more Romano. Divortio lex foederis nuptialis non aboletur inter Christianos. Sed quia illa continentia meriti amplioris est, reddere vero debitum conjugale, nullius est criminis, exigere autem ultra generandi necessitatem, culpae venialis, fornicari vero vel moechari, puniendi criminis; cavere debet charitas conjugalis, ne dum sibi quaerit unde amplius honoretur, conjugi faciat unde damnetur. Qui enim dimittit uxorem suam, excepta causa fornicationis, facit eam moechari (Matth. V, 32). Usque adeo foedus illud initum nuptiale cujusdam sacramenti res est, ut nec ipsa separatione irritum fiat: quandoquidem vivente viro, et a quo relicta est, moechatur, si alteri nupserit; et ille hujus mali causa est qui reliquit.