De Baptismate [in ancient mss.]

 [English Introduction]

 ANONYMI LIBER DE REBAPTISMATE. NON DEBERE DENUO BAPTIZARI QUI SEMEL IN NOMINE DOMINI JESU CHRISTI SINT TINCTI.

 1183C I. Animadverto quaesitum apud fratres quid potius observari oportet in personam eorum qui in haeresi quidem, sed in nomine Dei nostri Jesu Chris

 II. Igitur aggredientibus tractatum salutaris et novi, hoc est spiritalis et evangelici Baptismatis, in primis occurrit notissima omnibus praedicatio

 III. Ad quae forte tu, qui novum quid inducis, continuo impatienter respondeas, ut soles, dixisse in Evangelio Dominum: Nisi quis denuo natus fuerit e

 IV. Cum ita invenitur, quid tibi, frater, videtur? Si quis non ab episcopo baptizatus, ita ut si in continenti etiam manus ei imponatur, priusquam tam

 1189A V. Quod si ita est, et potest aliquid horum eveniens salutem homini credenti non praeripere, tu quoque ipse annuis quoniam modo dimidiatum et no

 VI. Quod etiam e contrario latere tractatus hujus sunt consecuti ipsi illi discipuli Domini nostri, super quos jampridem baptizatos postremo die Pente

 VII. Nec aestimes huic tractatui contrarium esse quod dixit Dominus: Ite, docete Gentes, tinguite eos in nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti. (M

 VIII. Sed ad haec, ut soles, contradices, opponendo nobis tunc cum baptizarentur integre ac recte discipulos ac non ut hos haereticos esse baptizatos:

 IX. Quibus rebus et hujusmodi compluribus factis ad claritatem ejus pertinentibus consequens esse videbatur ut quemadmodum Judaei de Christo 1193A sen

 X. Praeterea quid dicturus es de his qui plerumque 1194C ab episcopis pessimae conversationis baptizantur: qui tamen tandem, cum Deus voluerit, in sce

 XI. Quid autem statues in personam ejus verbum audientis qui forte apprehensus in nomine Christi statim confessus, ac priusquam baptizari aqua permitt

 XII. Quapropter totus discernendus est tractatus hic, ut possit manifestior fieri. Namque invocatio nominis Jesu ideo tantum patrocinari potest, si ri

 XIII. Quodcumque enim in homine ultimum in hac specie deprehensum fuerit, in illo quis nostrum judicari necesse habebit, abolitis et obliteratis 1197D

 XIV. Et usque adeo omne illud haereticorum baptisma intercedente aliquo intervallo temporis corrigi potest, si quis supervixerit et fidem correxerit,

 XV. Et quoniam videmur omne Baptisma spiritale trifariam divisisse, veniamus etiam ad probationem 1199D narrationis propositae, ne videamur proprio 12

 XVI. Quoniam autem prima pars disputationis hujus videtur explicata, etiam sequentem ejus propter haereticos debemus attingere: quia perquam necessari

 XVII. Item si hujusmodi homo rursus ad te redeat, utique haesitabis utrum habeat Baptisma necne 1202B et tamen oportebit te huic quoque poenitentiam

 XVIII. Et hominibus quidem Spiritus perseverat hodie invisibilis, sicut Dominus dicit: Spiritus ubi vult spirat, et nescis unde veniat vel quo vadat (

 XIX. Puto nos plene exsecutos praedicationem Baptistae Joannis, unde sermonem sumus exorsi, qui dixit ad Judaeos: Ego quidem vos baptizo aqua in poeni

9. By which things, and by many deeds of this kind tending to His glory, it appeared to follow as a consequence, that in whatever manner the Jews think about Christ, and although they do not believe concerning Jesus Christ our Lord, that even they themselves thought that such and so great a one would without any death endure to eternity, and would possess the kingdom of Israel, and of the whole world for ever; and that it should not be destroyed. Whence, moreover, the Jews dared to seize Him by force, and anoint Him for the kingdom, which indeed He was compelled to evade; and therefore His disciples thought that in no other way would He bestow upon them eternal life, except He Himself had first continued this temporal life into that eternal one in His own experience. In fine, when they were passing through Galilee, Jesus said to them, “The Son of man is to be delivered into the hands of men, and they will kill Him; and after three days He shall rise again.”24    Mark ix. 30. and they were greatly grieved, because, as we have said, they had formed a very different notion previously in their minds and hearts. And again, this also was the speech of the Jews, in contradiction against Him, when He taught them of Himself, and announced future things to them, and they said, “We have heard out of the law that Christ abideth for ever:  and how sayest thou that the Son of man must be lifted up?”25    John xii. 34. And so there was this same presumption concerning Christ in the mind of the disciples, even as Peter himself, the leader and chief of the apostles, broke forth into that expression of his own incredulity. For when he, together with the others, had been asked by the Lord what he thought about Him, that is, whom he thought Him to be, and had first of all confessed the truth, saying that He was the Christ the Son of the living God, and therefore was judged blessed by Him because he had arrived at this truth, not after the flesh, but by the revelation of the heavenly Father; yet this same Peter, when Jesus began to show His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders, and priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after the third day rise again from the dead; nevertheless that true confessor of Christ, after a few days, taking Him aside, began to rebuke Him, saying, “Be propitious to Thyself: this shall not be;”26    Matt. xvi. 22. so that on that account he deserved to hear from the Lord, “Get thee behind me, Satan;27    [Isa. xiv. 12. The sin of Lucifer had, very possibly, been this of rebelling against the Incarnation and the introduction thereby of an order of beings higher than himself.  Hence our Lord recognised in Peter’s words the voice of the old adversary, and called him “Satan.” A premonition of his lapse.] thou art an offence unto me, because he savoured not the things which are of God, but those things which are of men.” Which rebuke against Peter became more and more apparent when the Lord was apprehended, and, frightened by the damsel, he said, “I know not what thou sayest, neither know I thee;”28    Matt. xxvi. 70. and again when, using an oath, he said this same thing; and for the third time, cursing and swearing, he affirmed that he knew not the man, and not once, but frequently, denied Him.29    [It has been profoundly felt, that, as the Church of Rome in her early rectitude (Rom. i. 8) reflected Peter’s confession, so in her lapse (Rom. xi. 20, 21) she reflects this terrible rebuke. If she was once identified with Peter’s Rock, so now, alas! with Peter’s Satan.] And this disposition, because it was to continue to him even to the Lord’s passion, was long before made manifest by the Lord, that we also might not be ignorant of it. Again, after the Lord’s resurrection, one of His disciples, Cleopas, when he was, according to the error of all his fellow-disciples, sorrowfully telling what had happened to the Lord Himself, as if to some unknown person, spoke thus, saying of Jesus the Nazarene, “who was a prophet mighty in deed and in word before God and all the people; how the chief priests and our rulers delivered Him to be condemned to death, and fastened Him to the cross. But we trusted that it had been He which should have redeemed Israel.”30    Luke xxiv. 20, 21. And in addition to these things, all the disciples also judged the declaration of the women who had seen the Lord after the resurrection to be idle tales; and some of themselves, when they had seen Him, believed not, but doubted; and they who were not then present believed not at all until they had been subsequently by the Lord Himself in all ways rebuked and reproached; because His death had so offended them that they thought that He had not risen again, who they had believed ought not to have died, because contrary to their belief He had died once. And thus, as far as concerns the disciples themselves, they are found to have had a faith neither sound nor perfect in such matters as we have referred to; and what is much more serious, they moreover baptized others, as it is written in the Gospel according to John.

IX. Quibus rebus et hujusmodi compluribus factis ad claritatem ejus pertinentibus consequens esse videbatur ut quemadmodum Judaei de Christo 1193A sentiunt, quod tamen de Jesu Christo Domino nostro non credunt, ut etiam ipsi existimarent, ut talis et tantus nulla obita morte in aeternum perseveret, et regnum Israel et totius orbis in perpetuum quod non corriperetur possideret. Unde etiam Judaei ausi fuerunt eum rapere et in regnum unguere: quod quidem necesse habuit ille superfugere: ac propterea discipuli ejus arbitrabantur quod nulla alia ratione vitam aeternam his praestaturus esset, nisi primum ipse vitam hanc temporalem cum illa aeterna in se ipso continuasset. Denique cum conversarentur in Galilaea, dixit eis Jesus: Incipit Filius hominis tradi in manus hominum, et interficient eum, et post triduum resurget (Marc. IX, 30). Et contristati sunt nimis, quia, sicuti 1193B diximus, longe diversum prius animis ac mente conceperant. Denique hic fuit etiam Judaeorum sermo contradictionis adversus eum, cum se ipse quidem doceret eos et futura annuntiaret; illi autem dicerent: Nos audivimus a lege quia Christus manet in aeternum: et quomodo tu dicis quia exaltari oportet filium hominis (Joan. XII, 34)? Itaque fuit discipulorum eadem haec praesumptio de Christo, prorumpente in istum sermonem incredulitatis suae Petro ipso duce ac principe Apostolorum. Cum enim a Domino simul cum caeteris fuisset interrogatus quidnam sentiret de ipso, id est quem esse eum existimaret; et primo veritatem confessus fuisset, dicens esse eum Christum Filium Dei vivi (Matth. XVI, 16 et seq.); et propterea beatus ab illo judicatus esset quod hoc non 1193C carnaliter, sed per Patris coelestis revelationem assecutus esset: idem tamen, ubit coepit Jesus ostendere discipulis suis quia oporteret eum Hierosolymam ire, et multa pati a senioribus et sacerdotibus et scribis, et interfici et post diem tertium resurgere; nihilominus ille verus Christi confessor post pauculos dies assumpto eo coepit illum corripere dicens: Propitius sis tibi, non erit istud (Ibid. 22, 23); ita ut propterea audire a Domino commeruerit, Vade post me, Satanas, scandalum mihi es; ob hoc quod non saperet ea quae sunt Dei, sed ea quae sunt hominum. Quae increpatio adversus Petrum magis magisque eluxit apprehenso Domino, cum a muliercula conterritus diceret: (Matth. XXVI, 70 et seq.) Nescio quid dicas, neque novi te. Et iterum cum hoc idem 1193D diceret addhibito jurejurando, et tertio devotans et jurans affirmaret, quoniam non nosset hominem, 1194A et non semel, sed saepius eum negasset: quod consilium ei quoniam usque ad passionem Domini perseveraturum erat, multo prius a Domino palam factum est, ut nos quoque id non ignoremus. Denique post resurrectionem Domini unus e discipulis ejus Cleopas, cum esset moestus secundum errorem omnium condiscipulorum suorum, ipsi Domino tamquam alicui ignoto referens quod contigerat, sic locutus est dicens de Jesu Nazareno, qui fuit propheta potens in factis et dictis in conspectu Dei et universi populi, quomodo hunc tradiderunt sacerdotes et principes nostri in damnationem mortis et cruci eum fixerunt: nos autem sperabamus quod ipse erat redempturus Israel (Luc. XXIV). Juxta quae, omnes quoque discipuli asseverationem quoque mulierum 1194B quae post resurrectionem viderant Dominum, judicaverunt deliramenta; et quidam ipsorum viso eo non crediderunt, sed dubitaverunt; quique tunc non interfuerunt omnino non crediderunt, nisi postmodum ab ipso Domino omnibus modis fuissent objurgati atque increpati: quoniam mors eos ita offenderat, ut putarent eum non resurrexisse, quem crediderant mori non debuisse; quia contra opinionem ipsorum semel mortuus fuisset. Itaque quod ad ipsos discipulos pertinet, neque integram neque perfectam fidem habuisse his modis quibus retulimus inveniuntur; et quod multo gravius est, sicut in Evangelio cata Joannem scriptum est, etiam alios baptizabant (Joan., III, 22).