De Baptismate [in ancient mss.]

 [English Introduction]

 ANONYMI LIBER DE REBAPTISMATE. NON DEBERE DENUO BAPTIZARI QUI SEMEL IN NOMINE DOMINI JESU CHRISTI SINT TINCTI.

 1183C I. Animadverto quaesitum apud fratres quid potius observari oportet in personam eorum qui in haeresi quidem, sed in nomine Dei nostri Jesu Chris

 II. Igitur aggredientibus tractatum salutaris et novi, hoc est spiritalis et evangelici Baptismatis, in primis occurrit notissima omnibus praedicatio

 III. Ad quae forte tu, qui novum quid inducis, continuo impatienter respondeas, ut soles, dixisse in Evangelio Dominum: Nisi quis denuo natus fuerit e

 IV. Cum ita invenitur, quid tibi, frater, videtur? Si quis non ab episcopo baptizatus, ita ut si in continenti etiam manus ei imponatur, priusquam tam

 1189A V. Quod si ita est, et potest aliquid horum eveniens salutem homini credenti non praeripere, tu quoque ipse annuis quoniam modo dimidiatum et no

 VI. Quod etiam e contrario latere tractatus hujus sunt consecuti ipsi illi discipuli Domini nostri, super quos jampridem baptizatos postremo die Pente

 VII. Nec aestimes huic tractatui contrarium esse quod dixit Dominus: Ite, docete Gentes, tinguite eos in nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti. (M

 VIII. Sed ad haec, ut soles, contradices, opponendo nobis tunc cum baptizarentur integre ac recte discipulos ac non ut hos haereticos esse baptizatos:

 IX. Quibus rebus et hujusmodi compluribus factis ad claritatem ejus pertinentibus consequens esse videbatur ut quemadmodum Judaei de Christo 1193A sen

 X. Praeterea quid dicturus es de his qui plerumque 1194C ab episcopis pessimae conversationis baptizantur: qui tamen tandem, cum Deus voluerit, in sce

 XI. Quid autem statues in personam ejus verbum audientis qui forte apprehensus in nomine Christi statim confessus, ac priusquam baptizari aqua permitt

 XII. Quapropter totus discernendus est tractatus hic, ut possit manifestior fieri. Namque invocatio nominis Jesu ideo tantum patrocinari potest, si ri

 XIII. Quodcumque enim in homine ultimum in hac specie deprehensum fuerit, in illo quis nostrum judicari necesse habebit, abolitis et obliteratis 1197D

 XIV. Et usque adeo omne illud haereticorum baptisma intercedente aliquo intervallo temporis corrigi potest, si quis supervixerit et fidem correxerit,

 XV. Et quoniam videmur omne Baptisma spiritale trifariam divisisse, veniamus etiam ad probationem 1199D narrationis propositae, ne videamur proprio 12

 XVI. Quoniam autem prima pars disputationis hujus videtur explicata, etiam sequentem ejus propter haereticos debemus attingere: quia perquam necessari

 XVII. Item si hujusmodi homo rursus ad te redeat, utique haesitabis utrum habeat Baptisma necne 1202B et tamen oportebit te huic quoque poenitentiam

 XVIII. Et hominibus quidem Spiritus perseverat hodie invisibilis, sicut Dominus dicit: Spiritus ubi vult spirat, et nescis unde veniat vel quo vadat (

 XIX. Puto nos plene exsecutos praedicationem Baptistae Joannis, unde sermonem sumus exorsi, qui dixit ad Judaeos: Ego quidem vos baptizo aqua in poeni

14. And even to this point the whole of that heretical baptism may be amended, after the intervention of some space of time, if a man should survive and amend his faith, as our God, in the Gospel according to Luke, spoke to His disciples, saying, “But I have another baptism to be baptized with.”46    Luke xii. 50. Also according to Mark He said, with the same purpose, to the sons of Zebedee: “Are ye able to drink of the cup which I drink of, or to be baptized with the baptism wherewith I am baptized?”47    Mark x. 38.  Because He knew that those men had to be baptized not only with water, but also in their own blood; so that, as well baptized in this baptism only, they might attain the sound faith and the simple love of the laver, and, baptized in both ways, they might in like manner to the same extent attain the baptism of salvation and glory. For what was said by the Lord, “I have another baptism to be baptized with,” signifies in this place not a second baptism, as if there were two baptisms, but demonstrates that there is moreover a baptism of another kind given to us, concurring to the same salvation. And it was fitting that both these kinds should first of all be initiated and sanctified by our Lord Himself, so that either one of the two or both kinds might afford to us this one twofold saving and glorifying baptism; and certain ways of the one baptism might so be laid open to us, that at times some one of them might be wanting without mischief, even as in the case of martyrs that hear the word, the baptism of water is wanting without evil; and yet we are certain that these, if they had any indulgence, would also be used to be baptized with water. And also to those who are made lawful believers, the baptism of their own blood is wanting without mischief, because, being baptized in the name of Christ, they have been redeemed with the most precious blood of the Lord; since both of these rivers of the baptism of the Lord proceed out of one and the same fountain, that every one who thirsts may come and drink, as says the Scripture, “From his belly flowed rivers of living water;”48    John vii. 38. which rivers were manifested first of all in the Lord’s passion, when from His side, pierced by the soldier’s spear, flowed blood and water, so that the one side of the same person emitted two rivers of a different kind, that whosoever should believe and drink of both rivers might be filled with the Holy Spirit. For, speaking of these rivers, the Lord set this forth, signifying the Holy Spirit whom they should receive who should believe on Him: “But the Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.”49    John vii. 39. And when He thus said how baptism might be produced, which the apostle declares to be one, it is assuredly manifest on that principle that there are different kinds of one and the same baptism that flow from one wound into water and blood; since there are there two baptisms of water of which we have spoken, that is, of one and the same kind,50    Unius atque ejusdem species. although the baptism of each kind ought to be one, as we have more fully spoken.

XIV. Et usque adeo omne illud haereticorum baptisma intercedente aliquo intervallo temporis corrigi potest, si quis supervixerit et fidem correxerit, ut Deus noster in Evangelio secundum Lucam ad discipulos suos locutus est dicens: Habeo autem aliud baptisma baptizari (Luc. XII, 50). Item secundum Marcum ad filios Zebedaei eadem ratione dixerat: 1198D Potestis bibere calicem quem ego bibo; aut baptismate quo ego baptizor, baptizari (Marc. X, 38)? quod sciret homines non sulum aqua, verum, etiam sanguine suo proprio habere baptizari: ita ut et solo hoc Baptismate baptizati fidem integram et dignationem sinceram lavacri possint adipisci et utroque 1199A modo baptizari, aeque tamen unum baptisma salutis et honoris pariter et aequaliter consequi. Quod enim dictum est a Domino, Habeo aliud Baptisma baptizari, hoc in loco non ut secundum Baptisma, ac si sint duo Baptismata, significat, sed alterius quoque speciei Baptisma ad eamdem salutem concurrens donatum nobis esse demonstrat. Quas utrasque species ab ipso Domino nostro primum initiari et sanctificari oportebat, ut nobis quoque alterutra sive utraque species unum hoc duplex salutiferum atque honorificum Baptisma praestaret; et viae quaedam unius Baptismatis sic nobis patefierent, ut aliquando impune aliqua illarum deesset, sicut in verbum audientibus martyribus impune aquae Baptisma deest, quos tamen certi sumus, 1199B si quid laxamenti habeant, etiam aqua solitos baptizari: itemque illis qui legitimi sunt fideles effecti, impune deest Baptisma sanguinis proprii; quia baptizati in nomine Christi, redempti sunt protiosissimo sanguine Domini, cum utraque haec ex uno atque eodem fonte procedant flumina Baptismatis dominici, ut omnis qui sitit veniat et bibat, sicut Scriptura dicit: Flumina de ventre ejus currebant aquae vivae (Joan. VII, 38). Quae flumina primum apparuerunt in Domini passione, cujus de latere perforato lancea militari sanguis et aqua manavit, ut emitteret duo flumina diversae speciei, sed tamen ejusdem ac singulare latus, ita ut impleatur Spiritu sancto quicumque credens biberit ex utroque flumine. Haec enim de fluminibus his loquens 1199C ostendebat Dominus significans Spiritum sanctum quem accepturi essent qui credituri erant in illum. Nondum autem erat Spiritus, quia Jesus nondum erat clarificatus (Ibid., 39). Igitur dicens quemadmodum generari potest Baptismi quod Apostolus unum esse praedicat, utique manifestum est illa ratione, quia diversae sunt species unius atque ejusdem Baptismatis ex uno vulnere profluentis in aquam et sanguinem; cum illic duo sint de quibus locuti sumus Baptismata aquae, id est unius atque ejusdem species, cum unum esse debeat Baptisma uniuscujusque species, sicut plenius sumus locuti.