Chapter XIV.

Having sufficiently established the charge of idolatry, which alone ought to be reason enough for our giving up the shows, let us now ex abundanti look at the subject in another way, for the sake of those especially who keep themselves comfortable in the thought that the abstinence we urge is not in so many words enjoined, as if in the condemnation of the lusts of the world there was not involved a sufficient declaration against all these amusements. For as there is a lust of money, or rank, or eating, or impure enjoyment, or glory, so there is also a lust of pleasure. But the show is just a sort of pleasure. I think, then, that under the general designation of lusts, pleasures are included; in like manner, under the general idea of pleasures, you have as a specific class the “shows.” But we have spoken already of how it is with the places of exhibition, that they are not polluting in themselves, but owing to the things that are done in them from which they imbibe impurity, and then spirt it again on others.

CAPUT XIV.

0647

Nunc interposito nomine idololatriae , quod solum subjectum sufficere deberet ad abdicationem spectaculorum, alia jam ratione tractemus ex abundanti: propter eos maxime qui sibi blandiuntur, 0647A quod non nominatim abstinentia ista praescripta sit, quasi parum etiam de spectaculis pronuntietur , cum concupiscentiae saeculi damnantur. Nam sicut pecuniae, vel dignitatis, vel gulae, vel libidinis, vel gloriae; ita et voluptatis concupiscentia est: species autem voluptatis etiam spectacula. Opinor, generaliter nominatae concupiscentiae continent in se et voluptates: aeque generaliter intellectae voluptates specialiter et in spectacula disseruntur. Caeterum retulimus supra de locorum conditione, quod non per semetipsa nos inquinent, sed per ea quae illic geruntur, per quae simul inquinamentum combiberint, tunc et in alteros respuunt .