S. AURELII AUGUSTINI HIPPONENSIS EPISCOPI DE NATURA ET GRATIA AD TIMASIUM ET JACOBUM CONTRA PELAGIUM LIBER UNUS .

 CAPUT PRIMUM.

 CAPUT II.

 CAPUT III.

 CAPUT IV.

 CAPUT V.

 CAPUT VI.

 CAPUT VII.

 8. Nam prius distinguit, aliud esse quaerere, an possit aliquid esse, quod ad solam possibilitatem pertinet: aliud, utrumne sit. Hanc distinctionem ve

 CAPUT VIII.

 CAPUT IX.

 CAPUT X.

 CAPUT XI.

 CAPUT XII.

 CAPUT XIII.

 CAPUT XIV.

 CAPUT XV.

 CAPUT XVI.

 CAPUT XVII.

 19. Tractat etiam iste de peccatis ignorantiae, et dicit, «hominem praevigilare debere ne ignoret ideoque esse culpandam ignorantiam, quia id homo ne

 CAPUT XVIII.

 CAPUT XIX.

 CAPUT XX.

 CAPUT XXI.

 CAPUT XXII.

 CAPUT XXIII.

 CAPUT XXIV.

 27. Dicit nullum malum boni alicujus esse causam. Avertisti faciem tuam a me, et factus sum conturbatus? Non movebor in aeternum: Domine, in voluntate

 CAPUT XXV.

 CAPUT XXVI.

 CAPUT XXVII.

 31. Sed Deus, inquiunt, potest omnia sanare. Virtus in infirmitate perficitur: Cum timore et tremore vestram ipsorum salutem operamini: Deus enim est

 CAPUT XXVIII.

 CAPUT XXIX.

 CAPUT XXX.

 CAPUT XXXI.

 CAPUT XXXII.

 CAPUT XXXIII .

 CAPUT XXXIV.

 39. Porro autem quod Dei causam sibi agere videtur, defendendo naturam non attendit quod eamdem naturam sanam esse dicendo, medici repellit misericor

 CAPUT XXXV.

 41. Sed acute videtur interrogare, «quomodo istos sanctos de hac vita abiisse credendum sit, cum peccato, an sine peccato.» Ut si responsum fuerit, Cu

 CAPUT XXXVI.

 CAPUT XXXVII.

 44. Sed hoc etiam forsitan ipse vidit, et ideo subjecit atque ait: «Sed esto, aliis temporibus turbae numerositate omnium dissimulaverit peccata conte

 CAPUT XXXVIII.

 CAPUT XXXIX.

 CAPUT XL.

 CAPUT XLI.

 CAPUT XLII.

 CAPUT XLIII.

 CAPUT XLIV.

 52. Iste vero objecta sibi quaestione, in qua revera intolerabilis videtur cordibus christianis, quid respondeat attendamus. Ait enim: «Sed hoc est qu

 CAPUT XLV.

 CAPUT XLVI.

 CAPUT XLVII.

 CAPUT XLVIII.

 CAPUT XLIX.

 CAPUT L.

 CAPUT LI.

 CAPUT LII.

 CAPUT LIII.

 62. Quando enim istis rectissime dicitur, Quare sine adjutorio gratiae Dei dicitis hominem posse esse sine peccato? non tunc de illa gratia quaestio e

 CAPUT LIV.

 CAPUT LV.

 66. Porro si ab istis vel hoc impetramus, ut nondum baptizati implorent auxilium gratiae Salvatoris, non est hoc quidem parum adversus illam falsam de

 CAPUT LVI.

 CAPUT LVII.

 CAPUT LVIII.

 CAPUT LIX.

 CAPUT LX.

 CAPUT LXI.

 CAPUT LXII.

 73. Nam et ipse Job de peccatis suis non tacet, et utique huic amico vestro merito placet, humilitatem nullo modo in falsitatis parte ponendam: unde i

 CAPUT LXIII.

 75. Commemorabo et ego de hoc ipso opere sancti Ambrosii aliquid, ex quo iste commemoravit quod commemorandum putavit. « Visum est, » inquit, « mihi.

 CAPUT LXIV.

 77. Quis item christianus ignorat, quod beatissimum Xystum Romanae Ecclesiae episcopum et Domini martyrem dixisse commemorat , Quia libertatem arbitri

 CAPUT LXV.

 CAPUT LXVI.

 CAPUT LXVII.

 81. Sed ut non tantum illi, verum etiam iis qui eosdem libros meos, quos iste legit, de Libero Arbitrio non legerunt, atque illis non lectis, hunc for

 CAPUT LXVIII.

 CAPUT LXIX.

 CAPUT LXX.

Chapter 25 [XXIII.]—God Forsakes Only Those Who Deserve to Be Forsaken. We are Sufficient of Ourselves to Commit Sin; But Not to Return to the Way of Righteousness. Death is the Punishment, Not the Cause of Sin.

Perhaps he may answer that God does not compel men to do these things, but only forsakes those who deserve to be forsaken. If he does say this, he says what is most true. For, as I have already remarked, those who are forsaken by the light of righteousness, and are therefore groping in darkness, produce nothing else than those works of darkness which I have enumerated, until such time as it is said to them, and they obey the command: “Awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light.”69    Eph. v. 14. The truth designates them as dead; whence the passage: “Let the dead bury their dead.” The truth, then, designates as dead those whom this man declares to have been unable to be damaged or corrupted by sin, on the ground, forsooth, that he has discovered sin to be no substance! Nobody tells him that “man was so formed as to be able to pass from righteousness to sin, and yet not able to return from sin to righteousness.” But that free will, whereby man corrupted his own self, was sufficient for his passing into sin; but to return to righteousness, he has need of a Physician, since he is out of health; he has need of a Vivifier, because he is dead. Now about such grace as this he says not a word, as if he were able to cure himself by his own will, since this alone was able to ruin him. We do not tell him that the death of the body is of efficacy for sinning, because it is only its punishment; for no one sins by undergoing the death of his body; but the death of the soul is conducive to sin, forsaken as it is by its life, that is, its God; and it must needs produce dead works, until it revives by the grace of Christ. God forbid that we should assert that hunger and thirst and other bodily sufferings necessarily produce sin. When exercised by such vexations, the life of the righteous only shines out with greater lustre, and procures a greater glory by overcoming them through patience; but then it is assisted by the grace, it is assisted by the Spirit, it is assisted by the mercy of God; not exalting itself in an arrogant will, but earning fortitude by a humble confession. For it had learnt to say unto God: “Thou art my hope; Thou art my trust.”70    Ps. lxxi. 5. Now, how it happens that concerning this grace, and help and mercy, without which we cannot live, this man has nothing to say, I am at a loss to know; but he goes further, and in the most open manner gainsays the grace of Christ whereby we are justified, by insisting on the sufficiency of nature to work righteousness, provided only the will be present. The reason, however, why, after sin has been released to the guilty one by grace, for the exercise of faith, there should still remain the death of the body, although it proceeds from sin, I have already explained, according to my ability, in those books which I wrote to Marcellinus of blessed memory.71    The tribune Marcellinus had been put to death in the September of 413, “having, though innocent, fallen a victim to the cruel hatred of the tyrant Heraclius,” as Jerome writes in his book iii. against the Pelagians. Honorius mentions him as a “man of conspicuous renown,” in a law enacted August 30, in the year 414, contained in the Cod Theod. xvi. 5 (de hæreticis), line 55. Compare the notes above, pp. 15 and 80.

CAPUT XXIII.

25. Non deserit Deus nisi dignos deseri. Ad peccandum nobis ipsi sufficimus; ad justitiam vero ut redeamus, non item. Mors poena est, non causa peccati. Fortasse respondeat, Deum ad ista non cogere, sed dignos deseri tantum deserere. Si hoc dicit, verissime dicit: deserti quippe, ut dixi, luce justitiae et per hoc contenebrati quid pariant aliud, quam haec omnia, quae commemoravi opera tenebrarum, donec dicatur eis, si dicto obaudiant, Surge, qui dormis, et exsurge a mortuis, et illuminabit te Christus (Ephes. V, 14)? Mortuos Veritas dicit, unde est et illud, Sine mortuos sepelire mortuos suos (Matth. VIII, 22): mortuos ergo Veritas dicit, quos iste dicit laedi et vitiari non potuisse peccato, quia videlicet didicit peccatum non esse substantiam. Nemo ei dicit, sic hominem factum, ut de justitia quidem posset in peccatum ire, et de peccato ad justitiam redire non posset: sed ut in peccatum iret, suffecit ei liberum arbitrium, quo se ipse vitiavit; ut autem redeat ad justitiam, opus habet medico, quoniam sanus non est; opus habet vivificatore, quia mortuus est. De qua gratia omnino nihil iste dicit, quasi sola sua voluntate se possit sanare, quia eum potuit sola vitiare. Non ei dicimus, mortem corporis ad peccatum valere, ubi sola vindicta est; nemo enim peccat corpore moriendo: sed ad peccatum valet mors amimae, quam deseruit vita sua, hoc est, Deus ejus, quae necesse est mortua opera faciat, donec Christi gratia reviviscat. Famem et sitim et caeteras molestias corporales, absit ut dicamus necessitatem habere peccandi, quibus molestiis exercitata vita justorum splendidius enituit, et eas per patientiam superando majorem gloriam comparavit; sed adjuta gratia Dei, adjuta spiritu Dei, adjuta misericordia Dei; non superba voluntate se extollens, sed humili confessione fortitudinem promerens. Noverat enim Deo dicere, Quoniam tu es patientia mea (Psal. LXX, 5). De qua gratia et adjutorio et misericordia, sine qua bene non possumus vivere, nescio quare iste omnino nihil dicit: imo etiam velut sibi ad justitiam sufficientem, si sola voluntas adsit , defendendo 0260 naturam, gratiae Christi, qua justificamur, apertissime contradicit. Cur autem soluto per gratiam peccati reatu ad exercitationem fidei mors corporis maneat, quamvis venerit de peccato, jam et hoc in illis ad sanctae memoriae Marcellinum libris, ut valui, disserui (De Peccatorum Meritis et Remissione, lib. 2, n. 49-56).