Chapter 26.—The Manicheans Do Not Receive All the Books of the Old Testament, and of the New Only Those that They Choose.
But wherefore is “the case of infants not allowed,” as you write, “to be alleged as an example for their elders,” by men who do not hesitate to affirm against the Pelagians that there is original sin, which entered by one man into the world, and that from one all have gone into condemnation?54 See the Letter of Hilary in Augustin’s Letters, 226, ch. 8. This, the Manicheans, too, do not receive, who not only reject all the Scriptures of the Old Testament as of authority, but even receive those which belong to the New Testament in such a manner as that each man, by his own prerogative as it were, or rather by his own sacrilege, takes what he likes, and rejects what he does not like,—in opposition to whom I treated in my writings on Free Will, whence they think that they have a ground of objection against me. I have been unwilling to deal plainly with the very laborious questions that occurred, lest my work should become too long, in a case which, as opposed to such perverse men, I could not have the assistance of the authority of the sacred Scriptures. And I was able,—as I actually did, whether anything of the divine testimonies might be true or not, seeing that I did not definitely introduce them into the argument,—nevertheless, by certain reasoning, to conclude that God in all things is to be praised, without any necessity of believing, as they would have us, that there are two co-eternal, confounded substances of good and evil.
26. Cur autem «causam parvulorum ad exemplum majorum,» sicut scribitis, «non patiuntur afferri» (Supra, in Epist. Hilarii, n. 8) homines, qui contra Pelagianos non dubitant esse peccatum originale, quod per unum hominem intravit in mundum, et ex uno omnes isse in condemnationem (Rom. V, 12, 16)? Quod et Manichaei non accipiunt, qui non solum omnes Veteris Instrumenti scripturas in ulla auctoritate non habent; verum etiam eas quae ad Novum pertinent Testamentum sic accipiunt, ut suo quodam privilegio, imo sacrilegio, quod volunt sumant, quod nolunt rejiciant: contra quos agebam in libris de Libero Arbitrio, unde isti nobis praescribendum putant. Ideo quaestiones operosissimas incidentes enucleate solvere nolui, ne nimium longum opus esset, ubi me adversus tam perversos testimoniorum divinorum non adjuvabat auctoritas. Et poteram, sicut feci, quodlibet horum verum esset, quae non definite interponebam, certa tamen ratione concludere, in omnibus Deum esse laudandum, sine ulla necessitate credendi duas, sicut illi volunt, coaeternas boni et mali permixtas esse substantias.