45. [XXI.]—Pelagius’ Acquittal Becomes Suspected.

If these are the proceedings by which Pelagius’ friends rejoice that he was exculpated, we, on our part,—since he certainly took much pains to prove that we were well affected towards him, by going so far as to produce even our private letters to him, and reading them at the trial,—undoubtedly wish and desire his salvation in Christ; but as regards his exculpation, which is rather believed than clearly shown, we ought not to be in a hurry to exult. When I say this, indeed, I do not charge the judges either with negligence or connivance, or with consciously holding unsound doctrine—which they most certainly would be the very last to entertain. But although by their sentence Pelagius is held by those who are on terms of fullest and closest intimacy with him to have been deservedly acquitted, with the approval and commendation of his judges, he certainly does not appear to me to have been cleared of the charges brought against him. They conducted his trial as of one whom they knew nothing of, especially in the absence of those who had prepared the indictment against him, and were quite unable to examine him with diligence and care; but, in spite of this inability, they completely destroyed the heresy itself, as even the defenders of his perverseness must allow, if they only follow the judgment through its particulars. As for those persons, however, who well know what Pelagius has been in the habit of teaching, or who have had to oppose his contentious efforts, or those who, to their joy, have escaped from his erroneous doctrine, how can they possibly help suspecting him, when they read the affected confession, wherein he acknowledges past errors, but so expresses himself as if he had never entertained any other opinion than those which he stated in his replies to the satisfaction of the judges?

CAPUT XXI.

45. Si ista sint gesta , quibus amici Pelagii gaudent eum esse purgatum: nos, quoniam erga se nostram quoque amicitiam, prolatis etiam familiaribus epistolis nostris, atque in hoc judicio recitatis, quas insertas continent gesta, satis probare curavit, salutem quidem ejus in Christo cupimus et optamus; de ista vero ejus purgatione, quae magis creditur, quam liquido demonstratur, gaudere temere non debemus. Neque hoc dicens, judicum arguo vel negligentiam, vel conniventiam, vel, quod ab eis longe abhorrere certissimum est, impiorum dogmatum conscientiam: sed eorum judicio pro merito approbato atque laudato, Pelagius tamen apud eos quibus amplius certiusque notus est , non mihi videtur esse purgatus. Illi enim tanquam de ignoto judicantes, his praesertim absentibus qui contra eum libellum dederant, hominem quidem diligentius examinare minime potuerunt: haeresim tamen ipsam, si eorum sequantur judicium qui pro ejus perversitate certabant, penitus peremerunt. Illi autem qui bene sciunt quae Pelagius docere consuevit, sive qui ejus disputationibus restiterunt, sive qui ex ipso errore se liberatos esse gratulantur, quomodo possunt eum non habere suspectum, quando ejus non simplicem confessionem praeterita errata damnantem, sed talem confessionem legunt, quasi nunquam aliter senserit, quam isto judicio in ejus est responsionibus approbatum?