Council of Constance

 SESSION 1 - 16 November 1414

 SESSION 2 - 2 March 1415

 SESSION 3 - 26 March 1415

 SESSION 4 - 30 March 1415

 SESSION 5 - 6 April 1415

 SESSION 6 - 17 April 1415

 SESSION 7 - 2 May 1415

 SESSION 8 - 4 May 1415

 SESSION 9 - 13 May 1415

 SESSION 10 - 14 May 1415

 SESSION 11 - 25 May 1415

 SESSION 12 - 29 May 1415

 SESSION 13 - 15 June 1415

 SESSION 14 - 4 July 1415

 SESSION 15 - 6 July 1415

 SESSION 16 - 11 July 1415

 SESSION 17 - 15 July 1415

 SESSION 18 - 17 August 1415

 SESSION 19 - 23 September 1415

 SESSION 20 - 21 November 1415

 SESSION 21 - 30 May 1416

 SESSION 22 - 15 October 1416

 SESSION 23 - 5 November 1416

 SESSION 24 - 28 November 1416

 SESSION 25 - 14 December 1416

 SESSION 26 - 24 December 1416

 SESSION 27 - 20 February 1417

 SESSION 28 - 3 March 1417

 SESSION 29 - 8 March 1417

 SESSION 30 - 10 March 1417

 SESSION 31 - 31 March 1417

 SESSION 32 - 1 April 1417

 SESSION 33 - 12 May 1417

 SESSION 34 - 5 June 1417

 SESSION 35 - 18 June 1417

 SESSION 36 - 22 July 1417

 SESSION 37 - 26 July 1417

 SESSION 38 - 28 July 1417

 SESSION 39 - 9 October 1417

SESSION 21 - 30 May 1416

[Sentence condemning Jerome of Prague]

In the name of the Lord, Amen. Christ our God and saviour, the true vine whose Father is the vine-dresser, said when teaching his disciples and other followers in these matters: If anyone does not abide in me, he shall be cast forth as a branch and shall wither. This holy synod of Constance is following the teaching and carrying out the commands of this sovereign teacher and master in this case of inquiry into heresy which was started by the same holy synod. It notes the public talk and loud outcry against the said master Jerome of Prague , master of arts, layman. From the acts and proceedings of the case it is evident that the said Jerome has held, asserted and taught various heretical and erroneous articles, which were long ago condemned by holy fathers, some of which are blasphemous, others scandalous and others offensive to the ears of the devout as well as rash and seditious. They were long ago asserted, preached and taught by John Wyclif and John Hus, of cursed memory, and were included in various of their books and pamphlets. These articles, doctrines and books of the aforesaid John Wyclif and John Hus, as well as the memory of Wyclif, and finally the person of Hus, were condemned and damned by this same holy synod and its sentence of heresy. The said Jerome later, during the course of this inquiry, in this holy synod, approved and consented to this sentence of condemnation and acknowledged and professed the true, catholic and apostolic faith. He anathematised all heresy, especially that for which he had been defamed-and he confessed himself defamed--and which John Wyclif and John Hus had taught and held in the past in their works, sermons and pamphlets, and on account of which the said Wyclif and Hus, together with their dogmas and errors, had been condemned as heretical by this same holy synod, and their teaching likewise condemned. He professed acceptance of every condemnation of the aforesaid things and swore that he would remain in the truth of the faith, and that if he ever dared to think or preach anything to the contrary then he wished to submit to the severity of canon law and to be bound to eternal punishment. He offered and gave this profession of his, written in his own hand to this holy synod. Many days after his profession and abjuration, however, like a dog returning to its vomit, he asked for a public hearing to be granted to him in this same holy synod, in order that he might vomit forth in public the deadly poison which lay hidden within his breast. The hearing was granted to him and he asserted, said and professed in effect, at a public assembly of the same synod, that he had wrongly consented to the aforesaid sentence condemning the said Wyclif and John Hus and that he had lied in approving the sentence. He did not fear to state that he had lied. Indeed, he revoked now and for eternity his confession, approval and profession regarding the condemnation of the two men. He asserted that he had never read any heresy or error in the books of the said Wyclif and John Hus, even though it was clearly proved, before his profession to the sentence on the two men, that he had carefully studied, read and taught their books and it is clear that many errors and heresies are contained in them. The said Jerome professed, however, that he held and believed what the church holds and believes regarding the sacrament of the altar and the transubstantiation of the bread into the body of Christ, saying that he believed in Augustine and the other doctors of the church more than in Wyclif and Hus. It is evident from the above that the said Jerome adhered to the condemned Wyclif and Hus and their errors, and that he was and is a supporter of them. This holy synod has therefore decreed and now declares that the said Jerome is to be cast away as a branch that is rotten, withered and separated from the vine; and it pronounces, declares and condemns him as a heretic who has relapsed into heresy and as an excommunicated and anathematised person.