S. AURELII AUGUSTINI HIPPONENSIS EPISCOPI CONTRA MENDACIUM AD CONSENTIUM LIBER UNUS .

 CAPUT PRIMUM.

 CAPUT II.

 3. Quae sententia sanctos martyres exhonorat, imo vero aufert sancta omnino martyria. Justius enim sapientiusque facerent, secundum istos, si persecut

 CAPUT III.

 5. Ecce constituamus ante oculos callidum exploratorem accedere ad eum quem Priscillianistam esse praesenserit et Dictinii episcopi , vel cogniti vit

 6. Remanet igitur, ut quod sentiunt Priscillianistae secundum haeresis suae nefariam falsitatem, de Deo, de anima, de corpore, et de caeteris rebus, n

 CAPUT IV.

 CAPUT V.

 9. Cum igitur blasphemare Deum doceamus nostros, ut eos Priscillianistae credant suos videamus quid mali dicant ipsi, quando propterea mentiuntur, ut

 CAPUT VI.

 11. Sed occultos lupos, inquies, indutos pellibus ovium et dominicum gregem latenter graviterque vastantes, aliter invenire non possumus. Unde ergo in

 12. Sed multo facilius, inquies, eorum latibula penetramus, si quod sunt nos esse mentiamur. Hoc si liceret aut expediret, potuit Christus praecipere

 13. An forte qui eo modo Priscillianistas invenire molitur, ideo non negat Christum, quia ore depromit quod corde non credit? Quasi vero (quod et paul

 14. Quapropter illud quod scriptum est, Qui loquitur veritatem in corde suo non sic accipiendum est, quasi retenta in corde veritate, loquendum sit i

 15. Et illud quod Apostolus ait, Deponentes mendacium, loquimini veritatem unusquisque cum proximo suo, quia sumus invicem membra (Ephes. IV, 25) abs

 16. Fuerunt enim etiam temporibus Apostolorum, qui veritatem non veritate , id est, non veraci animo praedicarent: quos dicit Apostolus Christum annun

 17. Quocirca multis quidem modis possunt latentes haeretici vestigari, nec catholica fide vituperata, nec haeretica impietate laudata.

 18. Interest quidem plurimum, qua causa, quo fine, qua intentione quid fiat: sed ea quae constat esse peccata, nullo bonae causae obtentu, nullo quasi

 CAPUT VIII.

 CAPUT IX.

 21. Si ergo peccare, ne gravius vel in nos vel in quoslibet alii peccent, procul dubio non debemus considerandum est in eo quod fecit Loth, utrum exe

 22. Et sancto quidem David justius dici potuit quod nec irasci debuit, quamvis ingrato et reddenti mala pro bonis sed etsi ut homini ira subrepsit, n

 CAPUT X.

 24. Jacob autem quod matre fecit auctore, ut patrem fallere videretur, si diligenter et fideliter attendatur, non est mendacium, sed mysterium. Quae s

 CAPUT XI.

 CAPUT XII.

 CAPUT XIII.

 28. Hinc est etiam illud quod commemorasti eos dicere, Dominum Jesum, posteaquam resurrexit, ambulasse in itinere cum duobus discipulis et propinquan

 CAPUT XIV.

 30. Cur autem isti imitandam sibi Thamar existimant mentientem, et imitandum Judam non existimant fornicantem (Gen. XXXVIII, 14-18)? Ibi enim utrumque

 CAPUT XV.

 32. Sed quod scriptum est bene Deum fecisse cum Hebraeis obstetricibus (Exod. I, 17-20), et cum Raab Jerichuntina meretrice (Josue II et VI, 25), non

 33. Restat itaque ut intelligamus illis mulieribus, vel in Aegypto, vel in Jericho, pro humanitate et misericordia redditam fuisse mercedem utique tem

 CAPUT XVII.

 35. Quae cum ita sint, quoniam nimis longum est omnia pertractare, quae in illa Libra Dictinii sunt posita velut imitanda exempla mentiendi: ad hanc r

 CAPUT XVIII.

 37. Huc accedit, ubi miserabilius ejulandum est, quod si concesserimus pro salute illius aegri de vita filii ejus fuisse mentiendum, ita paulatim minu

 CAPUT XIX.

 39. Sed perfectorum est, ait aliquis, solidus cibus 0546

 CAPUT XX.

 CAPUT XXI.

25. Nor have I undertaken that in the present discourse, as it more pertains to thee, who hast laid open the hiding-places of the Priscillianists, so far as relates to their false and perverse dogmas; that they may not seem to have been in such sort investigated as if they were meet to be taught, not to be argued against. Make it therefore more thy work that they be beaten down and laid low, as thou hast made it, that they should be betrayed and laid open; lest while we wish to get at the discovery of men practising falsehood, we allow the falsehoods themselves, as if insuperable, to stand their ground; when we ought rather even in the hearts of latent heretics to destroy falsehoods, than by sparing falsehoods to find out the deceivers who practise falsehood. Moreover, among those dogmas of theirs which are to be subverted, is this which they dogmatize, namely, that in order to hide religion religious people ought to lie, to that degree that not only concerning other matters, not pertaining to doctrine of religion, but concerning religion itself, it is meet to lie, that it may not become exposed to aliens; to wit, that one may deny Christ, in order that one may in the midst of His enemies be in secret a Christian. This impious and nefarious dogma do thou likewise, I beseech thee, overthrow; to bolster up which they in their argumentations do gather from the Scriptures testimonies to make it appear that lies are not only to be pardoned and tolerated, but even honored. To thee therefore it pertains, in refuting that detestable sect, to show that those testimonies of Scripture are so to be received, that either thou shalt teach those to be no lies which are accounted to be such, if they be understood in that manner in which they ought to be understood; or, that those are not to be imitated which be manifestly lies; or in any wise at last, that concerning those matters at least which pertain to doctrine of religion, it is in no wise meet to tell a lie. For thus are they truly from the very foundation overthrown, while that is overthrown wherein they lurk: that in that very matter they be judged least fit for us to follow, most fit to be shunned, in that they, for the hiding of their heresy, do profess themselves liars. This it is in them that must from the very first be assaulted, this which is, as it were, their fitting bulwark must with blows of Truth be battered and cast down. Nor must we afford them another lurking-place, which they had not, wherein they may take refuge, to wit, that being perhaps betrayed of them whom they have essayed to seduce but could not, they should say, “We only wanted to try them, because prudent Catholics have taught that to find out heretics it is right to do this.” But it is necessary with somewhat more earnest be-speaking of thy favor to say why this seems to me a tripartite method of disputing against those who want to apply the divine Scriptures as advocates of their lies; to wit, by showing that some which are there accounted to be lies, are not what they are accounted, if rightly understood; next, that if there be there any manifest lies, they are not meet to be imitated; thirdly, contrary to all opinions of all persons who think it pertains to the duty of a good man sometimes to lie, that it must in every way be held that in doctrine of religion there must in no wise a lie be told. For these are the three things to follow up which I shortly before recommended, and in some sort enjoined thee.

CAPUT XI.

25. Tripartita ratio disputandi adversus eos qui Scripturas divinas mendaciis suis adhibere patronas volunt. Neque id isto sermone suscepi, quod ad te magis pertinet, qui Priscillianistarum latebras aperuisti, quantum ad eorum attinet dogmata falsa atque perversa; ne ita investigata videantur quasi docenda fuerint, et non redarguenda. Magis ergo fac ut expugnata jaceant, quae fecisti ut prodita pateant: ne dum volumus ad indaginem hominum fallacium pervenire, ipsas falsitates sinamus tanquam insuperabiles permanere; cum potius debeamus et in latentium cordibus destruere falsitates, quam parcendo falsitatibus invenire fallaces. Porro inter illa dogmata eorum, quae subvertenda sunt, etiam hoc est utique quod dogmatizant, ad occultandam religionem religiosos debere mentiri, in tantum ut non solum de aliis rebus ad doctrinam religionis non pertinentibus, sed de ipsa quoque religione mentiendum sit, ne patescat alienis; ut videlicet negandus sit Christus, quo possit inter inimicos suos latere christianus. Etiam hoc, obsecro te, dogma impium nefariumque subverte, propter quod astruendum argumentantes de Scripturis colligunt testimonia, quibus videantur non solum ignoscenda vel toleranda, verum et honoranda mendacia. Ad te igitur pertinet, sectam detestabilem cum refellis, sic accipienda monstrare ista testimonia Scripturarum, ut vel doceas non esse quae putantur esse mendacia, si eo modo intelligantur, quo intelligenda sunt; vel imitanda non esse etiam quae manifestum est esse mendacia; vel certe ad extremum de his saltem rebus quae ad doctrinam religionis pertinent, nullo modo esse mentiendum. Sic enim vere funditus evertuntur, dum evertitur ubi delitescunt: ut eo ipso minime sectandi et maxime cavendi judicentur, quo se ad occultandam haeresim suam profitentur esse mendaces. Hoc in eis est primitus expugnandum, hoc eorum velut idoneum munimentum veritatis ictibus feriendum atque dejiciendum. Nec eis quam non habebant, alia latebra quo confugiant est praebenda: ut si forte ab his produntur, quos conati fuerint seducere, nec potuerint, dicant, Tentare illos voluimus, quoniam prudentes catholici docuerunt ad inveniendos haereticos id esse faciendum. Sed aliquanto commendatius oportet ut dicam, cur ista mihi videatur tripartita ratio disputandi adversus eos qui patronas mendaciis suis volunt adhibere divinas Scripturas: 0536 ut prius ostendamus nonnulla quae ibi putantur esse mendacia, non esse quod putantur, si recte intelligantur; deinde, si qua ibi mendacia manifesta sunt, imitanda non esse; tertio, contra omnes omnium opiniones, quibus videtur ad viri boni officium pertinere aliquando mentiri, omni modo tenendum, in doctrina religionis nullo modo esse mentiendum. Haec enim tria tibi exsequenda paulo ante commendavi, et quodam modo injunxi.