0875

 EPISTOLA PRIOR, INTER AUGUSTINIANAS CCXIV.

 EPISTOLA POSTERIOR, INTER AUGUSTINIANAS CCXV.

 S. AURELII AUGUSTINI HIPPONENSIS EPISCOPI DE GRATIA ET LIBERO ARBITRIO AD VALENTINUM ET CUM ILLO MONACHOS Liber unus .

 CAPUT PRIMUM.

 CAPUT II.

 3. Sed sunt homines qui etiam de ipso Deo se excusare conantur, quibus dicit apostolus Jacobus: Nemo cum tentatur, dicat, Quoniam a Deo tentor . Deus

 4. Quid illud, quod tam multis locis omnia mandata sua custodiri et fieri jubet Deus? quomodo jubet, si non est liberum arbitrium? Quid beatus ille, d

 CAPUT III.

 CAPUT IV.

 7. Proinde, charissimi, sicut superioribus testimoniis sanctarum Scripturarum probavimus, ad bene vivendum et recte agendum esse in homine liberum vol

 8. De ipsa quoque pudicitia conjugali nempe Apostolus ait, Quod vult faciat, non peccat si nubat (I Cor. VII, 37, 36): et tamen etiam hoc Dei donum es

 9. Propter quod dicit et coelestis Magister, Vigilate, et orate, ne intretis in tentationem (Matth. XXVI, 41). Ergo unusquisque contra suam concupisce

 CAPUT V.

 11. Item quod scriptum est in libro secundo Paralipomenon, Dominus vobiscum, cum vos estis cum eo, et si quaesieritis eum, invenietis si autem reliqu

 12. Meritum enim fuit quidem in apostolo Paulo, sed malum, quando persequebatur Ecclesiam: unde dicit, Non sum idoneus vocari Apostolus, quia persecut

 CAPUT VI.

 14. Ergo redeamus ad apostolum Paulum, quem certe invenimus sine ullis meritis bonis, imo cum multis meritis malis, Dei gratiam consecutum reddentis b

 15. Sed cum dicunt Pelagiani hanc esse solam non secundum merita nostra gratiam, qua homini peccata dimittuntur illam vero quae datur in fine, id est

 CAPUT VII.

 17. Postremo dixit, Fidem servavi sed ille hoc dixit, qui alibi ait, Misericordiam consecutus sum, ut fidelis essem ut fidelis essem: Gratia salvi fa

 18. Homines autem non intelligentes, quod ait ipse Apostolus, Arbitramur justificari hominem per fidem sine operibus legis (Rom. III, 28) putaverunt

 CAPUT VIII.

 20. Ista ergo quaestio nullo modo mihi videtur posse dissolvi, nisi intelligamus et ipsa bona opera nostra quibus aeterna redditur vita, ad Dei gratia

 CAPUT IX.

 CAPUT X.

 CAPUT XI.

 CAPUT XII.

 CAPUT XIII.

 26. Dicunt etiam gratiam Dei, quae data est per fidem Jesu Christi, quae neque lex est neque natura, 0897 ad hoc tantum valere, ut peccata praeterita

 CAPUT XIV.

 28. Jam quidem de fide, hoc est, de voluntate credentis superius disputavi (Supra, nn. 16-18), usque adeo eam demonstrans ad gratiam pertinere, ut Apo

 29. Nam si fides liberi est tantummodo arbitrii, nec datur a Deo, propter quid pro eis qui nolunt credere, oramus ut credant? Quod prorsus faceremus i

 30. Nam et alio loco per eumdem prophetam Deus manifestissime ostendit, non propter eorum aliqua bona merita, sed propter nomen suum ista facere, ubi

 CAPUT XV.

 CAPUT XVI.

 CAPUT XVII.

 0902 34. Istam charitatem, id est divino amore ardentissimam voluntatem commendans Apostolus, dicit: Quis nos separabit a charitate Christi? tribulati

 35. Et apostolus Petrus: Ante omnia, inquit, mutuam inter vos charitatem perpetuam habentes, quia charitas cooperit multitudinem peccatorum Si tamen l

 36. Dicit etiam ipse Dominus Jesus, in duobus praeceptis dilectionis Dei et dilectionis proximi totam Legem Prophetasque pendere (Matth. XXII, 40). De

 CAPUT XVIII.

 38. Nemo ergo vos fallat, fratres mei: quia nos non diligeremus Deum, nisi nos prior ipse diligeret. Idem Joannes apertissime hoc ostendit, et dicit,

 39. Et ad Timotheum dicit: Non enim dedit nobis Deus spiritum timoris, sed virtutis et charitatis et continentiae (II Tim. I, 7). In quo sane Apostoli

 CAPUT XIX.

 CAPUT XX.

 CAPUT XXI.

 43. His et talibus testimoniis divinorum eloquiorum, quae omnia commemorare nimis longum est, satis, quantum existimo, manifestatur, operari Deum in c

 CAPUT XXII.

 CAPUT XXIII.

 CAPUT XXIV.

Chapter 12.—He Proves Out of St. Paul that Grace is Not Given According to Men’s Merits.

Now there was, no doubt, a decided merit in the Apostle Paul, but it was an evil one, while he persecuted the Church, and he says of it: “I am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the Church of God.”106    1 Cor. xv. 9. And it was while he had this evil merit that a good one was rendered to him instead of the evil; and, therefore, he went on at once to say, “But by the grace of God I am what I am.”107    1 Cor. xv. 10. Then, in order to exhibit also his free will, he added in the next clause, “And His grace within me was not in vain, but I have laboured more abundantly than they all.” This free will of man he appeals to in the case of others also, as when he says to them, “We beseech you that ye receive not the grace of God in vain.”108    2 Cor. vi. 1. Now, how could he so enjoin them, if they received God’s grace in such a manner as to lose their own will? Nevertheless, lest the will itself should be deemed capable of doing any good thing without the grace of God, after saying, “His grace within me was not in vain, but I have laboured more abundantly than they all,” he immediately added the qualifying clause, “Yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me.”109    1 Cor. xv. 10. In other words, Not I alone, but the grace of God with me. And thus, neither was it the grace of God alone, nor was it he himself alone, but it was the grace of God with him. For his call, however, from heaven and his conversion by that great and most effectual call, God’s grace was alone, because his merits, though great, were yet evil. Then, to quote one passage more, he says to Timothy: “But be thou a co-labourer with the gospel, according to the power of God, who saveth us and calleth us with His holy calling,—not according to our works but according to His own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus.”110    2 Tim. i. 8, 9. Then, elsewhere, he enumerates his merits, and gives us this description of their evil character: “For we ourselves also were formerly foolish, unbelieving, deceived, serving divers lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful, and hating one another.”111    Titus iii. 3. Nothing, to be sure, but punishment was due to such a course of evil desert! God, however, who returns good for evil by His grace, which is not given according to our merits, enabled the apostle to conclude his statement and say: “But when the kindness and love of our Saviour God shone upon us,—not of works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, by the laver of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Ghost, whom He shed upon us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour; that, being justified by His grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.”112    Titus iii. 4–7.

12. Meritum enim fuit quidem in apostolo Paulo, sed malum, quando persequebatur Ecclesiam: unde dicit, Non sum idoneus vocari Apostolus, quia persecutus sum Ecclesiam Dei. Cum ergo haberet hoc meritum malum, redditum est ei bonum pro malo: ideoque secutus adjunxit, Sed gratia Dei sum id quod sum. Atque ut ostenderet et liberum arbitrium, mox addidit, et gratia ejus in me vacua non fuit, sed plus omnibus illis laboravi. Hoc enim liberum arbitrium hominis exhortatur et in aliis, quibus dicit, Rogamus 0889 ne in vacuum gratiam Dei suscipiatis (II Cor. VI, 1). Utquid enim eos rogat, si gratiam sic susceperunt, ut propriam perderent voluntatem? Tamen ne ipsa voluntas sine gratia Dei putetur boni aliquid posse, continuo cum dixisset, Gratia ejus in me vacua non fuit, sed plus omnibus illis laboravi; subjunxit atque ait, Non ego autem, sed gratia Dei mecum (I Cor. XV, 9, 10): id est, non solus, sed gratia Dei mecum: ac per hoc nec gratia Dei sola, nec ipse solus, sed gratia Dei cum illo. Ut autem de coelo vocaretur, et tam magna efficacissima vocatione converteretur (Act. IX), gratia Dei erat sola; quia merita ejus erant magna, sed mala. Denique et alibi dicit ad Timotheum: Collabora Evangelio secundum virtutem Dei salvos nos facientis, et vocantis vocatione sua sancta; non secundum opera nostra, sed secundum suum propositum et gratiam, quae data est nobis in Christo Jesu (II Tim. I, 8, 9). Item merita sua, sed mala commemorans dicit: Fuimus enim stulti et nos aliquando et increduli, errantes, servientes desideriis et voluptatibus variis, in malitia et invidia agentes, abominabiles, invicem odio habentes. Quid istis tam malis meritis nisi poena utique debebatur? Sed Deo reddente bona pro malis, per gratiam quae non secundum merita nostra datur, factum est quod deinde subjungit et dicit: «Cum autem benignitas et humanitas illuxit Salvatoris nostri Dei, non ex operibus justitiae quae fecimus nos; sed secundum suam misericordiam salvos nos fecit, per lavacrum regenerationis et renovationis Spiritus sancti, quem ditissime effudit super nos, per Jesum Christum Salvatorem nostrum, ut justificati ipsius gratia, haeredes efficiamur secundum spem vitae aeternae (Tit. III, 3-7).