35. Ego, inquit, lux in saeculum veni, ut omnis qui crediderit in me, non maneat in tenebris
Chapter 34 [XX.]—(4) That No Man, with the Exception of Christ, Has Ever Lived, or Can Live Without Sin.378 See above, chs. 7, 8, 26.
[4th.] There now remains our fourth point, after the explanation of which, as God shall help us, this lengthened treatise of ours may at last be brought to an end. It is this: Whether the man who never has had sin or is to have it, not merely is now living as one of the sons of men, but even could ever have existed at any time, or will yet in time to come exist? Now it is altogether most certain that such a man neither does now live, nor has lived, nor ever will live, except the one only Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus. We have already said a good deal on this subject in our remarks on the baptism of infants; for if these have no sin, not only are there at present, but also there have been, and there will be, persons innumerable without sin. Now if the point which we treated of under the second head be truly substantiated, that there is in fact no man without sin,379 See above, chs. 8, 9. then of course not even infants are without sin. From which the conclusion arises, that even supposing a man could possibly exist in the present life so far advanced in virtue as to have reached the perfect fulness of holy living which is absolutely free from sin, he still must have been undoubtedly a sinner previously, and have been converted from the sinful state to this subsequent newness of life. Now when we were discussing the second head, a different question was before us from that which is before us under this fourth head. For then the point we had to consider was, Whether any man in this life could ever attain to such perfection as to be absolutely without sin by the grace of God, by the hearty desire of his own will? whereas the question now proposed in this fourth place is, Whether there be among the sons of men, or could possibly ever have been, or yet ever can be, a man who has not indeed emerged out of sin and attained to perfect righteousness, but has never, at any time whatever, been under the bondage of sin? If, therefore, the remarks are true which we have made at so great length concerning infants, there neither is, has been, nor will be, among the sons of men any such man, except the one Mediator, in whom there accrues to us propitiation and justification through which we have reconciliation with God, by the termination of the enmity produced by our sins. It will therefore be not unsuitable to retrace a few considerations, so far as the present subject seems to require, from the very commencement of the human race, in order that they may inform and strengthen the reader’s mind in answer to some objections which may possibly disturb him.
CAPUT XX.
34. Ad quartam quaestionem respondet, nullum, excepto Christo, fuisse, vel esse posse, qui nullum habeat peccatum. Quartum jam illud restat, quo explicito quantum adjuvat Dominus, sermo quoque iste tam prolixus tandem terminum sumat, utrum qui omnino nunquam ullum peccatum habuerit habiturusve sit, non solum quisquam natorum hominum sit, verum etiam potuerit aliquando esse, vel possit. Hunc prorsus nisi unum mediatorem Dei et hominum hominem Christum Jesum, nullum vel esse, vel fuisse, vel futurum esse, certissimum est. Unde jam multa diximus de Baptismo parvulorum, qui si nullum peccatum habent, non solum sunt homines innumerabiles sine peccato; verum etiam fuerunt, et erunt. Porro si veraciter illud constitit, unde secundo loco egimus, neminem esse sine peccato (Supra, nn. 8, 9); profecto nec parvuli sine peccato sunt. Ex quo conficitur, etsi quisquam in hac vita esse potuisset, qui virtute ita perficeretur, ut ad tantam plenitudinem justitiae perveniret, qua nullum haberet omnino peccatum, fuisse tamen eum antea peccatorem, unde in istam novitatem vitae converteretur, non esse dubitandum. Etenim in secundo illo loco aliud quaerebatur, aliud in hoc quarto propositum est. Nam in illo, utrum aliquis in hac vita ad perfectam, quae prorsus sine ullo peccato est, vitam perveniret per gratiam Dei, studio voluntatis, hoc requirebatur : in hoc autem quarto, utrum esset in filiis hominum, vel esse potuisset, aut posset , qui non ex peccato ad justitiam perfectissimam perveniret, sed nullo omnino unquam peccato esset obstrictus, hoc quaeritur. Ideo si illa vera sunt, quae tam multa de parvulis diximus, nec est in filiis hominum quisquam, nec fuit, nec erit, excepto uno Mediatore, in quo nobis propitiatio et justificatio posita est, per quam finitis inimicitiis peccatorum reconciliamur Deo. Non itaque ab re est, quantum praesenti causae sufficere videtur, ab ipso exordio generis humani pauca repetere, quibus adversus quaedam, quae movere possunt, legentis animus informetur.